`EXHIBIT 2053
`
`
`
`
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Saturday, June 27, 2015 6:16 PM
`McCormack, Brian C
`Fw: Meeting summary
`
`
`----- Forwarded Message -----
`From: Mahir Abrahim <MAbrahim@creativedis.com>
`To: Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com>
`Cc: Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 2:39 PM
`Subject: Meeting summary
`
`Hi Jerry,
`
`
`Per your request here is a summary of what Ying-Moh and I went over when he stopped by.
`
`
`The various lens configurations were discussed. It was agreed upon that the smallest throw ratio (TR) would be
`accommodated without any Z adjustment. This corresponds to the shortest lens zoomed all the way out to its most
`recessed position, which is approximately 1.4 TR. I will find out the actual length of this lens when we get the two lenses
`tomorrow. For TR > 1.4 the assembly will make use of spacers or an equivalent method of Z adjustment.
`
`It is still preferred to machine the lens shroud. When the lens is zoomed in it won’t make much difference, but machining
`will allow us to get ~1.5” closer when the lens is zoomed out. According to Ying-Moh’s analysis, if we get as close as we
`can to the lens the 1.4 TR setup can be accommodated using the existing Proflux with ~2mm clearance on each side.
`
`I gave Ying-Moh a stp file of my current design, and he will send me an updated cad file of the optical analysis which
`incorporates the 1.4 TR. In the meantime I am thinking of concepts for being able to adjust in X Y & Z. Ying-Moh, let me
`know if I left anything out.
`
`-Mahir
`
`
`1
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2053-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
