EXHIBIT 2039
`
`EXHIBIT 2039EXHIBIT 2039
`
`
`
`

`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Saturday, June 27, 2015 5:56 PM
`McCormack, Brian C
`Fw: My slides for your review
`Real_D_Final_DR.ppt
`
`
`----- Forwarded Message -----
`From: Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`To: Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com>
`Cc: Michael Hoppe <MHoppe@creativedis.com>; Mahir Abrahim <MAbrahim@creativedis.com>
`Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 11:49 AM
`Subject: My slides for your review
`
`Jerry:
`
`I agree that it would be good to be able to compare performance with and without the LP on the Z-
`screens. Would you follow up with RealD on which lens they decide to use? I added some slides
`based on 55' screen and TR 2.0. Not sure if this leads to an actual lens. Look forward to receiving
`your feedback on my slides.
`
`
`Seems we will try to use the 9x5" Z-screen from RealD. I will integrate them in my model. Any idea
`of what the thickness is including the end caps? If we know the lens spec to use for prototype before
`Wed., I might be able to update the slides for that particular lens.
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com> wrote:
`Guys:
`
`
`We probably would want the flexibility of removing the LP from the assembly because if the Moxtek polarizers
`are good enough we will not need them which will increase the overall efficiency.
`
`
`Lenny, an action from our first review was for RealD to send us a ZScreen we can take apart so we can
`understand the electrical routing and mounting.
`
`Jerry
`
`
`
`
`From: Matt Cowan [mailto:mcowan@reald.com]
`Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 7:56 AM
`To: Lenny Lipton; Jerry Carollo
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`I suggest taking the Z screen out of the case completely and using only the glass elements.. Note it has only
`one polarizer - on the input side. this is a high quality dyestuff polarizer with transmission of about 42%. The Z
`screen also has A/R coated glass end caps on it.
`
`If you can tell us what you want, we can probably have a sample assembled using the same pi cells, and
`polarizer and A/R coatings of choice.
`
`
`1
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`We can supply you a unit(s) that are in the housing.
`
`
`Matt.
`
`
`From: Lenny Lipton
`Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 10:49 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo ; Matt Cowan
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`
`
`
`From: Jerry Carollo [mailto:JCarollo@creativedis.com]
`Sent: Mon 9/18/2006 7:31 AM
`To: Mahir Abrahim
`Cc: Michael Hoppe ; Ying-Moh Liu ; Lenny Lipton
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`Correct. It will make the assembly larger for the prototype but enable us to test the prototype quicker.
`
`
` J
`
`
`
`
`From: Mahir Abrahim
`Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 7:25 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo
`Cc: Michael Hoppe ; Ying-Moh Liu
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`
`OK. Thanks, Jerry. So it looks like I¡¦ll be gutting the existing ZScreen. The current assembly includes a squirrel
`cage fan and two polarizer plates. Unless told otherwise, I will remove one of the polarizers and the fan to make
`the package smaller and easier to integrate. The fan should not be an issue since each ZScreen is seeing half
`the light normally would, and the remaining polarizer is only absorbing enough light to clean up anything the
`beam splitter missed.
`
`-Mahir
`
`
`From: Jerry Carollo
`Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 11:10 AM
`To: Mahir Abrahim ; yml7245@yahoo.com; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`
`Guys:
`
`It looks like we will have to jury-rig the existing ZScreens recognizing that we will have to do another design turn
`for production.
`
`
`Jerry
`
`
`From: Matt Cowan [mailto:mcowan@reald.com]
`Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 7:54 AM
`To: Lenny Lipton; Jerry Carollo
`
`2
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-2
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Cc: Mahir Abrahim ; Michael Hoppe ; yml7245@yahoo.com
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`Jerry:
`
`The pi cells in the Z screen require tooling - the major implication is timing (an optical part - 12 - 16 weeks). Can you make
`the larger part work?
`
`We recognize that this is a proof of concept.
`
`Another question is what kind of polarizer you want on the ZS. We have much more flexibility on the assembly of the pi
`cells in terms of AR treatment and polarizer and if it isn't exotic can probably get reasonable turn around. If our standard
`assembly works all the better.
`
`Matt.
`
` -----Original Message-----
`From: Lenny Lipton
`Sent: Sat Sep 16 07:55:49 2006
`To: Jerry Carollo
`Cc: Mahir Abrahim ; Michael Hoppe ; yml7245@yahoo.com; Matt Cowan
`Subject: RE: zscreen sizes
`
`Jerry et al,
`
`The only ZS fully engineered for the theater -- to give the best image -- is the one in production -- 9 by 5.
`
`We can make other sizes, but is that worth doing for the proto since we'd have to endure some NRE and possible delay and
`the form-factor may be different for production.
`
`Is it not possible to use the present device even if it is larger than you'd like as a means to get started?
`
`Also -- would we require different sizes for different lenses in production?
`
`________________________________
`
`From: Jerry Carollo [mailto:JCarollo@creativedis.com]
`Sent: Fri 9/15/2006 6:08 PM
`To: Lenny Lipton
`Cc: Mahir Abrahim ; Michael Hoppe ; yml7245@yahoo.com
`Subject: FW: zscreen sizes
`
`Jerry,
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Lenny:
`
`Can you help with this? Thanks
`
`Jerry
`
`________________________________
`
`From: Mahir Abrahim
`Sent: Fri 9/15/2006 7:52 AM
`To: Jerry Carollo
`Cc: Ying-Moh Liu ; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: zscreen sizes
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-3
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`
`
`Can you ask Lenny what stock Z-Screen sizes are readily available. What we measured and have models for is about 9"x5"
`clear aperture, but I'd like something closer to 7"x5". That way it's not much more than the 160x100mm clear aperture that is
`called for by Ying-Moh's optical analysis. Thanks.
`
`
`
`-Mahir
`
`***********************************************************************************************
`This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely
`for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may
`contain confidential and privileged information. No one else is authorized to
`distribute, forward, print, copy or act upon any information contained in this email.
`If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
`and destroy all copies of the original message.
`************************************************************************************************
`
`
`
`Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or
`less.
`
`
`4
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-4
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`September 22, 2006
`
`Final Design Review
`
`CDS
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-5
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`•Summary
`
`permitting
`
`•Company Overview (time
`
`•PBS Final Design Review
`
`Agenda
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-6
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`–Action item review
`
`•Summary
`•Issues
`
`–System, Optical, Mechanical
`
`•Technical Approach
`
`–Compliance matrix
`
`•Requirement Review
`
`–Schedule
`–Programmatics
`
`•Program Objectives
`
`PBS Final Design Review
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-7
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`–Testing and Acceptance; 14 weeks
`
`–Prototype Delivery; 12 weeks
`
`–Final Design Review; 7 weeks –9/22
`
`–Initial Design Review; 4 weeks -complete
`
`•Contract schedule (ARO; 8/21)
`
`in Attachment 1 of the SOW
`
`•Deliver 1 prototypesystem per the requirements
`
`apparatus using wire grid polarizer (WGP)
`
`•Perform final design of image combiner optical
`
`Programmatics
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-8
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Comply
`
`25,000
`
`25,000
`
`Light Output (Lumens)
`
`Comply
`
`400-700nm
`
`400-700nm
`
`Spectrum
`
`Comply
`
`30
`
`30
`
`(degrees)
`Max Projection Angle
`
`Comply
`
`50x75mm
`
`Light Patch
`
`Comments
`Comply/
`
`Value
`
`Expected
`
`SOW Value
`
`Requirement
`
`Requirement Review
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-9
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`enough
`
`may not be flat
`WGP/fold mirror
`
`projector effects
`Z-Screen and
`
`TBD
`
`25’ screen
`
`image structure on
`Resolvable DMD
`
`TBD
`
`75%
`
`Resolution
`
`Uniformity
`Illumination
`
`Z-Screen effects
`
`TBD
`
`.01x and .01y
`
`Color Uniformity
`
`degrees
`
`Max angle 30
`
`degrees
`
`30
`
`1.78:1
`2.39:1,1.85:1,
`
`Aspect Ratio
`
`Comments
`
`Comply/
`
`Value
`
`Expected
`
`SOW Value
`
`Requirement
`
`Requirement Review
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-10
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Specification
`
`WGP
`
`effects
`
`Z-Screen
`
`Design Goal
`
`Pi Cell; 5000:1
`
`Linear P entering
`
`is 500:1
`
`Polarization State
`
`TBD
`
`w/projector that
`
`Contrast
`
`ANSI; 400:1
`
`1 edge
`
`+/-0.5 center, +/-
`
`Pixel Alignment (pixels)
`
`ents
`
`Value
`
`Comply/Comm
`
`Expected
`
`SOW Value
`
`Requirement
`
`Requirement Review
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-11
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Modifications
`
`With
`
`Yes
`
`projectors
`To other
`
`Projector Adaptability
`
`Comply?
`
`Yes?
`
`1.8 –2.4 Lens
`
`Interface
`Prototype Lens
`
`Comply
`
`Yes
`
`2000
`
`Christie CP-
`
`Interface
`Prototype Projector
`
`Design Goal
`
`system
`
`> 1.7 X current
`
`Overall Efficiency
`
`Comments
`
`Comply/
`
`Value
`
`Expected
`
`SOW Value
`
`Requirement
`
`Requirement Review
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-12
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`–PBS; WGP
`
`•Approach outlined in study
`
`Technical Approach
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-13
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`–Proflux, turning mirror, HWP, input window
`
`•Component spec
`
`•55’ screen with throw ratio (TR) of 2.0
`
`•2048x1080 DMD, 13.68µm pixel pitch
`
`–Assumptions
`
`•The design model
`
`Optical
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-14
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`= 110 ft = 33.528m
`Throw distance
`
`= 27.5ft = 8.382m
`Half screen width
`
`= 13.95o
`½ HFOV
`
`optics
`Projection
`
`Optical Design Model
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-15
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`4. 598
`
`=
`
`01368
`
`2048
`
`.0 *
`16764
`
`=
`
`width
`width
`
`ager
`Im
`Screen
`
`=
`
`M ion
`
`Magnificat
`
`)
`
`TR
`
`* 2
`
`1
`
`(
`1
`−
`
`tan * 2
`
`=
`)
`
`ce
`tan
`width
`
`,
`
`Dis
`screen
`optics
`
`Throw
`Half
`projection
`
`(
`1
`−
`
`tan * 2
`
`=
`)
`
`HFOV
`
`(
`
`FOV
`
`Horizontal
`
`,
`
`ce
`
`Dis
`
`Throw
`
`of
`Width
`tan
`
`length
`Screen
`
`>>
`
`ce
`
`tan
`
`dis
`
`throw
`
`If
`
`=
`)
`
`TR
`
`(
`
`Ratio
`
`Throw
`
`Imager size=(2048x1080)*13.68µm=28.016x14.774mm
`
`Imager pixel count = 2048x1080
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•Nominal throw distance = 110 ft = 33.528m
`
`•Nominal screen width = 55 ft = 16.764m
`
`•Nominal throw ratio (TR) = 2.0
`
`Optical Parameters
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-16
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`160(H)x100(V)mm
`Z-screen for P-pol.
`
`140(H)x110(V)mm
`Moxtek Polarizer
`
`70(W)x50(H)mm.
`Lens front aperture
`
`PBS assembly
`Input window to
`
`straight-through
`P-pol. Path
`
`f=49.0mm
`Paraxial lens
`
`26.26x14.22mm
`DMD plane
`
`HWP
`
`160(H)x100(V)mm
`Z-screen for S-pol.
`
`= 0.252o
`Toe-in angle
`
`path
`S-pol.
`
`R=150m
`240x180mm
`Mirror M1
`
`Optical Model Layout
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-17
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Confirming correct setup for a simplified projection lens
`
`70x50mm Matching Actual
`Light Patch at Lens Front Surface
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-18
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`raytrace footprint as 110x90mm
`
`•Minimum clear aperture defined by
`
`Proflux PBF02 Flat PBS
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-19
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Pixel offset = 4mm = 0.5 pixel
`
`Pixel offset = 12mm = 1.5 pixel
`
`Middle of screen horizontal edge
`
`Screen corner
`
`Pixel offset = 12mm = 1.5 pixel
`
`Middle of screen vertical edge
`
`Pixel offset = 0
`
`Screen center
`
`with Mirror Radius 150m
`Pixel Offsets Between Two Paths
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-20
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`•(Will add a table to compare throughput
`
`between the two paths)
`
`Light Throughput Efficiency
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-21
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`–Control of needed 200m radius
`
`•45oturning mirror
`
`–1.5λof power and 1.5 λof astigmatism per 25.4mm
`
`•Proflux surface figure
`
`Key Optical Issues
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-22
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Mechanical
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-23
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Technical Challenges
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-24
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`

`
`Summary
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2039-25
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035