`EXHIBIT 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>
`Friday, June 26, 2015 9:41 AM
`McCormack, Brian C
`Fw: VC4 quality Proflux
`
`
`----- Forwarded Message -----
`From: Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com>
`To: Ying-Moh Liu <yml7245@yahoo.com>; Mahir Abrahim <MAbrahim@creativedis.com>; Michael Hoppe
`<MHoppe@creativedis.com>
`Sent: Friday, September 8, 2006 7:56 AM
`Subject: RE: VC4 quality Proflux
`
`I’ll email Ray and see what he knows. But my initial thoughts are to try it as is and then if we need to regroup and have to
`bond the PRoFlux to a thinker substrate we can do this – but we don’t have to make that decision yet.
`
`
`
`From: Ying-Moh Liu [mailto:yml7245@yahoo.com]
`Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 4:36 PM
`To: Jerry Carollo ; Mahir Abrahim ; Michael Hoppe
`Subject: VC4 quality Proflux
`
`I compared VC4 against VC2, which is 1 level better and may be their standard commercial grade, and found
`the differences as attached. I think they are mostly acceptable except two items. Please review and let me
`know your thoughts.
`
`
`1.6mm thick is definitely a lot better than 0.7mm as they informed me last time. Not sure if it is good enough
`for this round. If you think it is worth pursuing, I can continue to find the source with Jim in Moxtek for gluing
`it to a thicker substrate as a backup.
`
`I am also not sure if Moxtek will be able to provide surface figure to us in Zernike coefficients so I can analyze
`its impact in Zemax. I'll try a little more with Jim. I wonder if Jerry could talk to Raymond and see he can dig
`up that info.
`
`
`Ying-Moh
`
`Jerry Carollo <JCarollo@creativedis.com> wrote:
`I talked to Raymond Boyer, Marketing and Business Coordinator, and he said that they can make the large
`ProFlux on 1.6mm Schott Borofloat. Also if we can accept a low visual quality like VC4 the price is quite
`attractive and they may have parts available in 15 days. They will cut to shape and like square/rectangular
`versus round shapes.
`
`
`YM, please review the VC specs and see if we can accept the lower quality. Given we are not at an image plane
`and are using clean-up polarizers at the Z-Screen this should be acceptable.
`
`
`Also we need to get a drawing made so we can get a quote.
`
`
`Jerry
`
`
`
`1
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2014-1
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035
`
`
`
`Do you Yahoo!?
`Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.
`
`
`2
`
`REALD INC.
`Exhibit 2014-2
`MASTERIMAGE 3D, et al. v REALD INC.
`IPR2015-00035