throbber
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll|||||||||llllll'lllllllllllllllll
`
`I
`| |
`
`USO05659891A
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`I
`
`5,659,891
`Aug. 19, 1997
`
`1/1981 Perkins .................................... .. 370/69
`4,244,047
`5,163,181 11/1992 Koontz . . . . . .
`. . . . .. 455/103
`5,343,499
`8/1994 Jasper et a1.
`...... .. 375/39
`5,392,452 2/1995"Davis ................................... .. 455/38.1
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`47 C.F.R. § 22.106 (1994).
`
`Primary Examiner—Reinhard J. Eisenzopf
`Assistant Examiner-Lee Nguyen
`Attorney, Agent, or F irm-Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett and Dunner
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`United States Patent [191
`Hays et a].
`
`[54] MULTICARRIER TECHNIQUES IN
`BANDLIMITED CHANNELS
`
`[75] Inventors; William D_ Hays; Dennis Cameronq
`both of Jackson, Miss; Walter Roehr,
`Reston, Va.
`
`[73] Assignee: Mobile Telecommunication
`Technologies, Jackson, Miss.
`
`[21] APPL Na; 480,718
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Jun. 7, 1995
`
`[51] Int. Cl.“ ..................................................... .. H04B 1/02
`Amcthod 9f multicam'er modulation using wlocated trans
`[52] US. Cl. .......................... .. 455/103; 455/45; 370/339;
`mitters to achieve higher transmission capacity for mobile
`370/343
`Pagi{1g and FWO-WaY digitél c°mmunicé?on in a manner
`[58] Field of Search ................................... .. 455/103, 104,
`consistent w1th FCC emiss1on mask limits. Co-1ocat1on of
`455/17, 46’ 59‘ 6O, 6L 62~ 491’ 45; 375/260;
`'70’
`40, 344 thC transmitters obviates the need for SlIiIlgCHt, symmetrical
`subchannel interference protection and provides for a wider
`range of operating parameters, including peak frequency
`deviation, bit rate, and carrier frequencies, to obtain optimal
`transmission performance.
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U-S- PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`1/1970 Chang .................................. .. 370/691
`3,488,445
`3,914,554 10/1975
`
`. . . .. 179/1555 R
`
`Seidel . . . . . . . .
`
`5 Claims, 11 Drawing Sheets
`
`14
`
`LINEAR
`
`RF AMPLIFIER
`
`SUMMATION
`
`1217
`
`MODULATOR
`
`DATA SOURCE
`
`O
`:
`
`13
`
`12a
`
`7 MODULATOR
`
`DATA SOURCE
`
`113
`
`1
`
`TMO1001
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 19, 1997
`
`Sheet 1 of 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`2.
`
`P mEDOE
`
`3
`
`5:515
`
`“E A
`
`
`
`1523 29:52am
`
`mmEwzU
`
`a:
`
`k A
`
`10.533005
`
`n:
`
`or
`
`mwr
`
`A
`
`mok?noos
`
`.
`
`<P<D
`
`mOEDOw
`
`m:
`
`2
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 19, 1997
`
`Sheet 2 0f 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`mu
`
`N wmDOE
`
`on
`
`gm
`
`mam
`
`mum
`
`A Erin?‘ "E A
`
`(.CQQ
`
`mOmDOm
`
`mPN
`
`29:22am
`
`:3
`
`nun
`
`k k
`
`
`
`A mmmjn=z< “E 4
`
`19513005
`
`arm
`
`3
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug.19, 1997
`
`Sheet 3 of 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`31
`
`FIGURE 3A
`
`30b
`
`30a
`
`dB
`
`4
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug.19, 1997
`
`Sheet 4 0f 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`f
`
`/ 32b
`
`32a
`
`\
`
`FIGURE 38
`
`dB
`
`5
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 19, 1997
`
`Sheet 5 of 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`15
`
`10
`.505irequency(Hon1cenlerHeqU9“CY)(kHz)
`
`
`(gp)uouenuaua
`
`FIGURE4
`
`6
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 19, 1997
`
`Sheet 6 0f 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`.uwwuumo um ommw
`
`3254 u 32E
`
`@253 u 62E
`
`$3.25" an
`
`4m HMDUHM
`
`
`
`
`
`.33 “Swan “6
`
`
`
`.qo?umfwwu N9: 00 wm
`
`@D
`
`7
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`9919191997
`
`sheet 7 of 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`m m or m; cm mm
`
`52 mzw
`
`A _ _ _ 002:
`
`mm mmDwHm
`
`1:05;
`
`190:;
`
`32138 10113 11.8
`
`‘00:2
`
`10C;
`
`8
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug.19, 1997
`
`Sheet 8 0f 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`owobmin u 092$
`
`253 n .uwnm
`
`35.2.. u an
`
`4m HMDUHm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hm?uumv um omHm .wumh "Inn man “Sim .qo?um??rmw KME com."
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug.19, 1997
`
`Sheet 9 of 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`., E2 zzw
`o 9 9 8 mm 8 mm 3
`
`1! q _ A _ _ _ o
`
`mm HMDUHh
`
`0::
`
`1 :93
`
`lbs:
`
`8198 10113 11.8
`
`‘wot:
`
`1195
`
`10
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 19, 1997
`
`Sheet 10 0f 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`molmmggé n 33E
`
`263 n .vwum
`
`wmwméw. u an
`
`nw?nnnmu um ombw.
`
`
`
`4:. HMDUHh
`
`$53 in 35 “21m
`
`11
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 19, 1997
`
`Sheet 11 0f 11
`
`5,659,891
`
`OW
`
`62 5a
`
`_ _ _ _ m 2 mp cm
`
`mb HMDUHm
`
`8.
`
`00::
`
`1.0::
`
`3.0:;
`
`8198 19113 11.8
`
`I 90:;
`
`12
`
`

`
`1
`MULTICARRIER TECHNIQUES IN
`BANDLINIITED CHANNELS
`
`5,659,891
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates generally to multicarrier
`modulation techniques, and more particularly, to a method
`for operating more than one carrier in a single mask-de?ned,
`bandlimited channel assigned to mobile paging use.
`
`DISCUSSION OF RELATED ART
`The rising popularity of mobile paging services has
`resulted in increased competition for air time on the limited
`number of radio-frequency channels allocated by the Federal
`Communications Commission (FCC) for mobile paging use.
`As demand begins to approach and even exceed the capacity
`of assigned channels to handle transmission tra?ic, delays in
`service and deterioration of transmission quality are becom
`ing a major concern to mobile paging users and providers.
`The ability of mobile paging providers to successfully
`address the problem of transmission saturation is limited by
`the ?nite range of air space dedicated to mobile paging use.
`Channels assigned by the FCC to radio paging providers
`typically have narrow bandwidths (eg 25 kHz) and are
`subject to stringent emission mask limitations.
`One method that can be used to allow greater access to a
`I particular channel is to increase the number of messages
`transmitted over the channel in a given period. This can be
`achieved. for example, by increasing the data rate of the
`transmission or by reducing the length of transmitted mes
`sages. U.S. Pat. No. 5,392,452 issued to Davis, for example,
`describes a high data rate transmission scheme for handling
`lengthy messages in a paging system Systems employing
`techniques to increase transmission rates, however, are
`prone to higher error rates. In addition, high data rates tend
`to generate greater transmission interference.
`Another approach to addressing the saturation problem is
`to increase the transmission capacity of the channel itself.
`Traditionally, mobile paging providers have operated only
`one transmission signal, or carrier, within an assigned chan
`nel. While this mode ensures simplicity of operation and
`compliance with FCC mask requirements, it does not pro
`vide the most e?icient use of the limited frequency band
`width available. Successful multicarrier modulation,
`however, is difficult to achieve without incurring unaccept
`able levels of interference.
`The problem of interference is compounded when a
`receiver is attempting to acquire a signal from a distant
`transmitter while in close proximity to a transmitter oper
`ating on an adjacent .channel. In this environment, the
`receiver may experience di?iculty in detecting the signal
`from the distant source due to interference from the signal
`transmitted on the adjacent channel from the closer source.
`This is known as the “near-far” problem. This problem can
`be avoided by co-locating the transmitters at essentially the
`same geographic location.
`The FCC requires signals to be con?ned within emission
`limit masks in order to prevent interference caused by
`signals straying or spilling into adjacent channels. FCC
`masks typically require the power spectral density of a
`signal to be attenuated at least 70 dB at the band edge.
`Despite these stringent constraints, some carrier overlap can
`be expected. even when the maximum carrier spacing con
`sistent with the FCC mask requirements is utilized. Such
`overlap can result in unacceptable interference of the
`carriers, making it difficult for the receivers to acquire the
`proper carrier.
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`Thus. a traditional multicarrier design would commonly
`require the same stringent protection levels between sub
`channels. Speci?cally, when more than one carrier is oper
`ating within a single channel, each carrier is traditionally
`con?ned to a submask de?ning a subchannel internal to the
`channel. The carriers are symmetrically located within the
`channel such that they are evenly spaced relative to each
`other and to the band edges of the primary mask de?ning the
`primary channel. Although such symmetry achieves maxi
`mum inter-carrier spacing and reduces the opportunity for
`interference among adjacent carriers, it often necessitates
`the need for sophisticated receiver and transmitter schemes.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`It is an object of this invention to achieve higher capacity
`over a bandlimited channel for paging without the need for
`stringent subchannel interference protection. Additional
`objects, advantages, and features of the invention will be set
`forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will
`be obvious from the description, or may be learned by
`practice of the invention. The advantages of the invention
`will be realized and attained by means of the instrumentali
`ties and combinations particularly pointed out in the written
`description and claims herein, as well as the appended
`drawings.
`To achieve these and other objects, advantages, and
`features in accordance with the purpose of the invention, as
`embodied and broadly described herein, the invention pro
`vides a method of operating a plurality of paging carriers in
`a single mask-de?ned, bandlimited channel comprising the
`step of transmitting the carriers from the same location at
`center frequencies within the channel such that the fre
`quency ditference between the center frequency of the outer
`most caniers and the band edge of the mask de?ning said
`channel is more than half the frequency difference between
`the center frequencies of each adjacent carrier.
`In another aspect, the invention provides a method of
`operating at least two paging carriers each in a correspond
`ing subchannel of a single mask-de?ned. bandlimited chan
`nel comprising the step of transmitting the carriers from the
`same location with each carrier centrally located in a cor
`responding subchannel wherein the frequency difference
`between the center frequency of the outer most subchannels
`and the band edge ofthe mask de?ning said channel is more
`than half the frequency di?erence between the center fre
`quencies of each adjacent carrier.
`in another aspect, the invention provides a method of
`operating a plurality of carriers in a single mask-de?ned,
`bandlimited channel to achieve higher transmission capacity
`over the channel in a mobile paging system having a
`plurality of transmitters generating a plurality of modulated
`carriers over a single bandlimited channel and a plurality of
`mobile, independent receiving units. capable of receiving
`one of said plurality of carriers. The method comprises the
`steps of co-locating the plurality of transmitters such that the
`plurality of carriers can be emanated from the same trans
`mission source, and transmitting the carriers over a plurality
`of subchannels spaced asymmetrically within the mask
`de?ning the channel.
`It is to be understood that both the foregoing general
`description and the following detailed description are exem
`plary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the
`invention, as claimed.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`The accompanying drawings. which are incorporated in
`and constitute a part of this speci?cation, illustrate several
`
`13
`
`

`
`5,659,891
`
`3
`embodiments of the invention and together with the
`description. serve to explain the principles of the invention.
`In the drawings,
`FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a co-located multicarrier
`transmitter system in a linear ampli?er con?guration for
`using the present invention;
`FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a co-located multicarrier
`transmitter system in a composite transmitter con?guration
`for using the present invention;
`FIG. 3A is a graph depicting two submasks de?ning two
`subchannels in a single. mask-de?ned bandlimited channel.
`FIG. 3B is a graph depicting the power spectra of two
`carriers asymmetrically located within a single mask
`de?ned. bandlimited channel.
`FIG. 4 is a graph depicting an exemplary FCC emissions
`mask that requires the power spectral density to be attenu
`ated at least 70 dB within 10 kHz from center ?'equency.
`FIG. 5A is a graph depicting the power spectra of a system
`with peak deviation of 2400 Hz and data rate of 6000 bits per
`second (bps);
`FIG. 5B is a graph depicting the performance of the
`system of FIG. 5A in terms of bit error rate versus the signal
`noise ratio (SNR);
`FIG. 6A is a graph depicting the power spectra of a system
`with peak deviation of 1800 Hz and a data rate of 6400 bps;
`FIG. 6B is a graph depicting the performance of the
`system of FIG. 6A in terms of bit error rate versus SNR;
`FIG. 7A is a graph depicting the power spectra of a system
`with peak deviation of 2100 Hz and a data rate of 6400 bps;
`and
`FIG. 7B is a graph depicting the performance of the
`system of FIG. 7A in terms of bit error rate versus SNR.
`
`10
`
`IS
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`4
`nal or carrier. The outputs of the ?rst and second modulators
`are fed into ?rst and second RF ampli?ers. 23a and 23b,
`respectively. The outputs of the RF ampli?ers are combined
`into a single output signal by summation circuit 24. the
`output of which is applied to antenna 25 for transmission in
`a bandlimited channel.
`Alternative embodiments of co-located transmitter sys
`tems are also possible. For example. the co-located trans
`mitter con?gurations discussed above can be expanded to
`support more than two data sources and transmit more than
`two carriers in the bandlimited channel.
`Because transmitter co-location does not give rise to the
`near-far problem to which the FCC mask requirements are
`directed. carrier spacings far closer than would ordinarily be
`allowed (e.g.. 5 to 10 kHz) are achievable. Moreover. the
`carriers need not be symmetrically or evenly spaced within
`the mask de?ning the channel. That is. the ?'equency spac
`ings between adjacent carriers. while symmetric to each
`other. can be smaller than the frequency spacings between
`the band edges of the mask and the nearest respective carrier.
`Indeed. carrier spacings may be irregular such that the
`carriers are asymmetrically located within the mask without
`incurring undue interference.
`Referring to FIG. 3A. two submasks de?ning two
`subchannels. 30a and 30b, are asymmetrically located
`within a single mask-de?ned. bandlimited channel 31,
`resulting in some subchannel overlap. FIG. 3B depicts two
`carriers, 32a and 32b, operating respectively over two
`asymmetrically-located subchannels, resulting in some car
`rier overlap. In accordance with this asymmetry. the fre
`quency diiference between the center frequency of each
`carrier and the nearest band edge of the mask is greater than
`half the frequency difference between the center frequencies
`of the two carriers.
`The practical implication of transmitter co-location is that
`a greater range of operating parameters. including the peak
`frequency. deviation bit rate. and carrier frequencies. are
`available so that multicarrier modulation in a standard
`bandlimited channel can be obtained without the need for
`stringent subchannel interference protection. In accordance
`with the present invention. these and other parameters can be
`adjusted so that the carriers generated and transmitted
`according to the present invention will remain within the
`FCC emission limits while providing optimal transmission
`performance.
`FIG. 4 shows a FCC emissions mask which requires the
`power spectral density to be attenuated at least 70 dB within
`10 kHz from center frequency. Co-location of the transmit
`ters allows for signals with a greater range of deviation and
`band rates to be carried in the bandlimited channel than has
`been otherwise thought possible in view of FCC 70 dB
`cuto?’ requirements. The present invention will be further
`clari?ed by the following examples. which are intended to
`be purely exemplary of the invention.
`FIG. 5A is a spectra graph of a two-carrier system in
`which the following parameter values were selected: a peak
`frequency deviation of 2400 Hz. a bit rate of 6000 bps.
`premodulation ?lter cutotf frequency of 3000 Hz. and carrier
`frequencies set to within 4590 Hz of the center frequency.
`Using this operative parameter combination. the carriers
`remained within the FCC mask while providing an accept
`able error-rate versus signal strength performance (FIG. 5B).
`Alternatively. FIG. 6A is a spectra graph of a two-carrier
`system using a peak frequency deviation of 1800 Hz. a bit
`rate of 6400 bps. a premodulation ?lter cutoff frequency of
`3200. and carrier frequencies set to within 5150 Hz of the
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`
`35
`
`40
`
`Reference will now be made in detail to the presently
`preferred embodiments of the invention. examples of which
`are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever
`possible. the same reference numbers will be used through
`out the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
`Referring to FIG. 1. a co-located multicarrier transmitter
`system in a linear ampli?er con?guration 10 comprises a
`?rst and second data source. 11a and 11b, a ?rst and second
`modulator. 12a and 12b, a summation circuit 13. a linear RF
`ampli?er 14. and an antenna 15. The ?rst and second data
`sources. 11a and 11b, generate a respective ?rst and second
`digital bit stream which are provided to respective ?rst and
`second modulators. 12a and 12b. Each modulator converts
`the incoming digital information into a representative modu
`lated signal or carrier. The outputs of each modulator are
`then combined into a single output signal by summation
`circuit 13. the output of which is fed into linear RF ampli?er
`14. The combined output signal is then applied to antenna 15
`for transmission in a bandlimited channel.
`Alternatively. referring to FIG. 2. a co-located multicar
`rier transmitter in a composite ampli?er con?guration 20
`comprises a ?rst and second data source. 210 and 21b, a ?rst
`60
`and second modulator. 22a and 22b, a ?rst and second RF
`ampli?er. 23a and 23b, a summation circuit 24, and an
`antenna 25. The ?rst and second digital bit streams gener
`ated respectively by the ?rst and second data sources. 21a
`and 21b, are provided to ?rst and second modulators. 22a
`and 22b, respectively. Each modulator converts the incom
`ing digital information into a representative modulated sig
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`14
`
`

`
`5
`center frequency. As depicted in FIG. 6B, this combination
`of operative parameters exhibited a higher bit error rate than
`the system of FIG. 5A.
`FIG. 7A is a spectra graph of a two-carrier system using
`a peak frequency deviation of 2100 Hz. a bit rate of 6400
`bps. a premodulation ?lter cutoff frequency of 3200, and
`carrier frequencies set to within 4750 Hz of the center
`frequency. As depicted in FIG. 7B, this combination gives
`signi?cantly better performance than the system of FIG. 6A
`but performs slightly worse than the system of FIG. 5A.
`Thus, according to the present invention, increased trans
`mission capacity is achieved by operating more than one
`carrier in a standard bandlimited channel assigned for
`mobile paging use, such as in the Narrowband Personal
`Communications Service or the Part 22 Service. In the
`modulation technique of the present invention, caniers oper
`ating at different frequencies are ?t within a single band
`width allocation in a manner consistent with FCC mask
`requirements. This is achieved through the use of co-located
`transmitters and the selection of an optimal combination of
`operating parameters, including peak ?equency deviation,
`bit rate, and carrier separation frequencies. Through the
`multicarrier modulation technique of the present invention,
`the normal transmission capacity of a standard channel can
`be increased without the need for stringent subchannel
`protection levels and complicated receiver and transmitter
`schemes.
`The modulation technique of the present invention has
`particular application in metropolitan areas where the vol
`ume and concentration of transmission tra?ic is high and
`where the need for increased transmission capacity is acute.
`In addition, the modulation technique of the present inven
`tion may also be suited for use in areas where the incidence
`of unacceptable interference is high, such as international
`border regions. In that type of environment. transmissions
`from the respective bordering countries can be assigned to
`one of the carriers operating within the channel to reduce the
`risk of interference.
`It will be apparent to those sln'lled in the art that various
`modi?cation and variations can be made to present invention
`without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
`Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to
`those skilled in the art from consideration of the speci?ca
`tion and practice of the invention disclosed herein. Thus, it
`is intended that the speci?cation and examples be considered
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`5,659,891
`
`15
`
`25
`
`6
`as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the
`invention being indicated by the following claims.
`What is claimed is:
`1. Amethod of operating a plurality of paging carriers in
`a single mask-de?ned, bandlimited channel comprising the
`step of transmitting said carriers from the same location with
`said carriers having center frequencies within said channel
`such that the frequency difference between the center fre
`quency of the outer most of said carriers and the band edge
`of the mask de?ning said channel is more than half the
`frequency difference between the center frequencies of each
`adjacent carrier.
`2. The method of claim 1 wherein adjacent carriers
`overlap with each other.
`3. A method of operating at least two paging carriers each
`in a corresponding subchannel of a single mask-de?ned,
`bandlimited channel comprising the step of transmitting said
`caniers from the same location with each carrier centrally
`located in said corresponding subchannel wherein the fre
`quency difference between the center frequency of the outer
`most of said corresponding subchannels and the band edge
`of the mask de?ning said channel is more than half the
`frequency difference between the center frequencies of each
`adjacent carrier.
`4. The method of claim 3 wherein adjacent subchannels
`overlap with each other.
`5. In a paging system having a plurality of transmitters
`transmitting a plurality of modulated carriers over a single
`mask-de?ned, bandlimited channel and a plurality of mobile
`receiving units independently receiving one of said plurality
`of caniers, a method of operating said plurality of carriers in
`said channel to achieve higher transmission capacity com
`prising the steps of:
`co-locating said plurality of transmitters such that said
`plurality of caniers can be emanated from the same
`transmission source; and
`transmitting said plurality of carriers over a plurality of
`subchannels spaced within the mask de?ning said chan
`nel wherein the frequency di?erence between the cen
`ter frequency of the outer most caniers and the band
`edge of said mask is greater than half the frequency
`difference between the center frequencies of each adj a
`cent carrier.
`
`15

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket