throbber

`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 01048-21IP210
`
`In re Patent of: Cameron et al.
`U.S. Patent No.: 5,915,210
`Issue Date:
` Jun. 22, 1999
`Appl. Serial No.: 08/899,476
`Filing Date:
` Jul. 24, 1997
`Title:
`METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING
`MULTICARRIER SIMULCAST
`TRANSMISSION
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. BEHNAAM AAZHANG
`
`1. My name is Dr. Behnaam Aazhang, of Houston, Texas. I understand
`
`that I am submitting a declaration offering technical opinions in connection with
`
`the above-referenced Inter Partes Review proceeding pending in the United States
`
`Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Patent No. 5,915,210 (“the ’210 patent”),
`
`and prior art references relating to its subject matter. My current curriculum vitae
`
`is attached and some highlights follow.
`
`2.
`
`I have over thirty (30) years of experience in electrical and computer
`
`engineering in wireless communications with a focus on the interplay of
`
`communication systems and networks, including network coding, user cooperation,
`
`spectrum sharing, and opportunistic access. I attended the University of Illinois at
`
`Urbana-Champaign from 1979 to 1986, where I earned a Bachelor of Science, a
`
`Master of Science, and a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering.
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`TMO1022
`
`

`

`
`
`3.
`
`In 1985 I joined the faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering at
`
`Rice University as an Assistant Professor. In 2001, I became the J. S. Abercrombie
`
`Professor, at Rice University. At Rice, I have been teaching undergraduate courses
`
`in communication theory and systems, and developed a hands-on education
`
`laboratory for digital communications. I also teach graduate courses in the area of
`
`communication engineering, including wireless communications, random
`
`processes, detection and estimation theory, information and coding theory, spread
`
`spectrum communication systems, and topics in multiple access communications.
`
`In addition, I have received several NSF and NASA research grants, as well as
`
`being awarded numerous contracts with Texas Instruments, IBM, the State of
`
`Texas, National Instruments, the United States Air Force, and Nokia.
`
`4.
`
`In 1997, I founded the Center on Multimedia Communications at Rice
`
`University, in Houston, Texas. From 1997 until 2005, I served as its Director
`
`where I supervised core faculty, graduate students, staff members, and managed a
`
`budget of more than $4 million in annual research expenditures.
`
`5.
`
`From 2004 to 2014, I served as the Chair of Electrical and Computer
`
`Engineering at Rice University where I supervised faculty, staff members, and
`
`graduate students, and managed a budget of more than $4.5 million annual for
`
`operating costs and $12 million annual external research funding.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`6.
`
`From 2006 to 2013, I served as an Academy of Finland Distinguished
`
`Visiting Professor (FiDiPro) at the University of Oulu, in the Center for Wireless
`
`Communication in Oulu, Finland, where I taught short courses on Cooperative
`
`Communications and on Understanding Wireless Networks.
`
`7.
`
`In 2014, I became the Director of the Center for Neuro-Engineering, a
`
`multi-university research cluster within the Gulf Coast Consortium, which fosters
`
`collaboration among researchers and clinicians from Rice University, Baylor
`
`College of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Sciences, and The University
`
`of Houston. The Center for Neuro-Engineering is focused on an emerging field
`
`intersecting neuroscience and engineering.
`
`8.
`
`Over the course of my career, I have authored and co-authored some
`
`three hundred (300) publications on various aspects of fixed and mobile
`
`communications, as noted in my curriculum vitae. My papers have been cited by
`
`other publications over 19,000 times and in 2003 I was recognized as a Thomson-
`
`ISI Highly Cited Researcher. In 2004, I received the IEEE Communication
`
`Society Stephen O. Rice Best Paper Award. I am a member of the Institute of
`
`Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and actively involved in the
`
`Communications Society and the Information Theory Society of IEEE. I have
`
`served as the secretary and the treasurer of IEEE Information Theory Society. I am
`
`also a Fellow of IEEE and a fellow of American Association for the Advancement
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`of Science (AASS). I was a commission member of the Mayor’s Commission on
`
`Cellular Towers from 1998 to 2004. I also served as a panelist for The National
`
`Science Foundation.
`
`9.
`
`I have served as an editor for the IEEE and other publications. In
`
`2007, I served as the editor of the KICS Journal of Communication and Network’s
`
`Special Issue on Cooperative Communications. I also served as editor for the
`
`IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication’s Special Issue on Cooperation
`
`and Relay in December 2006, and the IEEE Transactions on Communications from
`
`1993 to 1998. I have organized technical sessions in technical conferences, which
`
`included serving as the Publications Chair of the IEEE International Symposium
`
`on Information Theory, held in San Antonio, Texas in January 1993; the General
`
`Chair for the IEEE International Theory Symposium on Information Theory, held
`
`in Austin, Texas in June 2010; the IEEE Communication Theory Workshop, held
`
`in Dorado, Puerto Rico in May 2006, as well as the Third Annual Texas System
`
`Day Symposium, held in Texas in November 1989.
`
`10. From 1996 to 2009, I was granted 13 patents as inventor or co-
`
`inventor.
`
`11. From 1998 to the present, I have served as a consultant on a variety of
`
`cases all over the United States, including several patent infringement cases.
`
`These cases involved Samsung, MOSAID, Wi-LAN, Marvell, Qualcomm, LG
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`Inc., the City of Houston, Lockheed-Martin, WorldCom, Rockwell International,
`
`Research and Development Laboratory, IBM Federal System Company, and
`
`Startek International Corp. In addition, I have served as a consultant on
`
`international litigation, including cases involving Nokia, in Finland, and ETRI, in
`
`Korea.
`
`12.
`
`I have no financial interest in either party or in the outcome of this
`
`proceeding. I am being compensated for my work as an expert on an hourly basis.
`
`My compensation is not dependent on the outcome of these proceedings or the
`
`content of my opinions.
`
`I.
`
`Scope of Assignment
`
`13.
`
`I have been asked to provide my findings as to whether certain subject
`
`matter of the ’210 patent is disclosed in certain references, including: (1) an
`
`English-language translation of German Patent Publication No. DE4102408 to
`
`Saalfrank (“Saalfrank”); (2) Yasuhisa Nakamura et al., 256 QAM Modem for
`
`Multicarrier 400 Mbit/s Digital Radio, 5 IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in
`
`Communications 329 (Apr. 1987) (“Nakamura”); (3) U.S. Patent No. 5,365,569 to
`
`Witsaman et al. (“Witsaman”); (4) John A. C. Bingham, Multicarrier Modulation
`
`for Data Transmission: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, 28 IEEE Communications
`
`Magazine 5 (May 1990) (“Bingham”); and (5) Bernard Le Floch et al., Digital
`
`Sound Broadcasting to Mobile Receivers, 35 IEEE Transactions on Consumer
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`Electronics 493 (Aug. 1989) (“Le Floch”), from the perspective of a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the art of the ’210 patent.
`
`14.
`
`I have reviewed and am familiar with the content of the ’210 patent.
`
`Among the background materials I have reviewed, I considered the materials
`
`referenced in this declaration, including the references listed above. I also
`
`reviewed the Declaration of Dr. Apostolos Kakaes (“Dr. Kakaes’ Declaration”)
`
`that I understand was submitted with another inter partes review action for the
`
`’210 patent filed by Apple, and which I understand T-Mobile is submitting as an
`
`exhibit to its petition along with my declaration. I have also reviewed portions of
`
`the prosecution history of the ’210 patent and the claim construction orders from
`
`Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc., Civil Action No.
`
`2:13-cv-258-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.) and Mobile Telecommunications Technologies,
`
`LLC v. Clearwire Corp., Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-308-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.).
`
`15. Counsel has informed me that I must review the ’210 patent and
`
`relevant prior art materials through the lens of one of ordinary skill in the art on
`
`November 12, 1992, the priority date of the ’210 patent. I believe that one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art would have had attained at least a B.S. degree in electrical
`
`engineering, computer engineering, or some equivalent, and at least two years of
`
`experience in the design and configuration of cellular systems, wireless paging
`
`systems, or other two-way wireless communications systems and be familiar with
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`the operation and functionality of multicarrier transmissions. I base this definition
`
`both on my technical expertise and on my personal experience as a teacher,
`
`advisor, and colleague of others who were within the art on the relevant date. I
`
`also reviewed the definition of one ordinary skill in the art by Dr. Kakaes in Dr.
`
`Kakaes’ Declaration. The knowledge of a person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`according to my own definition is not materially different from the knowledge of a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art under Dr. Kakaes’ definition.
`
`16. Counsel has advised me that, during inter partes review, claims of an
`
`expired patent (like the ’210 patent) are generally given their ordinary and
`
`customary meaning as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art in
`
`question at the effective filing date of the patent. Counsel has also informed me
`
`that this may yield interpretations that are different from the interpretations applied
`
`during co-pending District Court proceedings.
`
`17. My findings, as explained below, are based on my study, experience,
`
`and background in the fields discussed above, informed by my education in applied
`
`mathematics and electrical engineering, and my experience in the design and
`
`analysis of fixed and mobile communications systems.
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`II.
`
`Findings
`
`18. Having studied the above-referenced materials, I find that certain
`
`subject matter of the ’210 patent is disclosed in certain references, from the
`
`perspective of one of ordinary skill in the art of the ’210 patent.
`
`19. As part of my analysis, I conducted a detailed review of Dr. Kakaes’
`
`Declaration. Dr. Kakaes’ Declaration cites four of the same references that I
`
`reviewed myself: an English translation of Werner Saalfrank’s German Patent
`
`Publication No. DE4102408, Yasuhisa Nakamura’s 1987 paper entitled 256 QAM
`
`Modem for Multicarrier 400 Mbit/s Digital Radio, Mark Witsaman’s U.S. Patent
`
`No. 5,365,569, and John Bingham’s 1990 paper entitled Multicarrier Modulation
`
`for Data Transmission: An Idea Whose Time Has Come.
`
`20.
`
`I note that Dr. Kakaes’ Declaration performs essentially the same
`
`analysis and comes to the same conclusions that I come to myself. Therefore
`
`rather than preparing paragraphs of my own declaration that would contain
`
`essentially the same analysis as in Dr. Kakaes’ Declaration, I hereby adopt certain
`
`portions of the Dr. Kakaes’ Declaration as if they were my own, and incorporate
`
`them by reference into my declaration; specifically, ¶¶ 15-54 of Dr. Kakaes’
`
`Declaration, which include a brief overview of the ’210 patent and an analysis of
`
`certain subject matter in the four references.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`21.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements were made with the
`
`knowledge that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine
`
`or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States
`
`Code.
`
`Date: October 3, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Behnaam Aazhang
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket