throbber
Michael R. Griffinger
`Sheila F. McShane
`GIBBONS P.C.
`One Gateway Center
`Newark, New Jersey 07102-5310
`Telephone No.: (973) 596-4500
`Facsimile No.: (973) 596-0545
`
`Of Counsel:
`Edgar H. Haug
`Angus Chen
`Nicholas F. Giove
`Leann M. Clymer
`FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP
`745 Fifth Avenue
`New York, New York 10151
`Telephone No.: (212) 588-0800
`Facsimile No.: (212) 588-0500
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Cornerstone Therapeutics Inc.,
`Cornerstone BioPharma, Inc.,
`and EKR Therapeutics, LLC
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`CORNERSTONE THERAPEUTICS INC.,
`CORNERSTONE BIOPHARMA, INC., and
`EKR THERAPEUTICS, LLC,
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-05723-NLH-AMD
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`SANDOZ INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT’S INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 1
`
`

`
`
`
`D.
`
`Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness
`
`Evidence relating to objective indicia of nonobviousness must be considered before
`
`determining whether the claimed invention would have been obvious to one of skill in the art at
`
`the time of invention. Here, relevant objective indicia of nonobviousness include, without
`
`limitation: the commercial success of the claimed inventions, the long-felt but unmet medical
`
`need for the claimed inventions, the unexpected results created by the claimed inventions,
`
`skepticism of others, the failure of others to develop the claimed inventions, copying of the
`
`claimed invention by others (including copying by Defendant), and industry praise.
`
`Plaintiffs further state, and Defendant does not dispute, that a nexus exists between the
`
`elements of the asserted claims and the stated objective evidence of nonobviousness. Cardene®
`
`I.V. Premixed Injection is a commercially available embodiment of the asserted claims. See,
`
`e.g., Plaintiffs’ Disclosures Pursuant to L. Pat. R. 3.1(g) and 3.2(e). Accordingly, there is
`
`presumptively a nexus between the commercial success (and other secondary considerations) of
`
`Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection and the claimed inventions. Defendant has offered no
`
`evidence to rebut the presumption of a nexus.
`
`Plaintiffs reserve the right to supplement and/or amend its disclosure of objective
`
`evidence of nonobviousness as discovery progresses, including fact and expert discovery.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference its expert declarations, reports, and corresponding testimony.
`
`Plaintiffs also incorporate by reference the objective evidence of nonobviousness presented to
`
`the Patent Office during prosecution of the patents in suit, including that Cardene® I.V. Premixed
`
`Injection had surprising and unexpected results and fulfilled a long-felt but unmet medical need.
`
`(See, e.g., CRTXCAR0001357-64). Specifically, Plaintiffs assert that the claimed invention: (i)
`
`provides a ready to use formulation of nicardipine hydrochloride that is room temperature stable
`
`for more than one year; (ii) is a premixed injection that requires no dilution before administration
`347
`
`
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 2
`
`

`
`
`
`to a patient; (iii) improves the hospital’s response time in treating cardiovascular emergencies
`
`where immediate lowering of a patient’s blood pressure is required; (iv) decreases the probability
`
`of dosing errors by health care professionals; and (v) minimizes safety concerns and the
`
`possibility of microbial contamination from breaking the ampul neck and/or diluting the
`
`concentrated nicardipine hydrochloride injection. (See, e.g., ’102 patent, col.1, ll.39-57).
`
`1.
`
`Long-Felt but Unmet Need
`
`Before the launch of Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection there was a long-felt need for a
`
`nicardipine hydrochloride premixed injection product that did not require dilution and could be
`
`immediately administered to patients during an emergency. Premixed injection formulations are
`
`particularly valuable for calcium channel blockers indicated for short-term treatment of
`
`hypertension when oral therapy is not feasible, e.g., when a patient’s blood pressure requires
`
`immediate lowering in an emergency room setting. Acute hypertensive emergencies, especially
`
`stroke-related, require immediate attention. (See CRTXCAR0004504). For example, gaining
`
`early control of elevated blood pressure is beneficial for stroke patients that have experienced
`
`intracerebral hemorrhage and may reduce the incidence of hematoma growth, which most
`
`frequently occurs within one to six hours of the initial stroke, thus improving clinical outcomes.
`
`(See CRTXCAR0004984). Cardene® I.V. ampuls were shown to achieve the target blood
`
`pressure within the first hour of treatment in significantly more patients when compared to other
`
`injectable medications used for lowering blood pressure. (Id.).
`
`Every second counts when treating a patient that has experienced a stroke. “Every
`
`minute in which a large vessel ischemic stroke is untreated, the average patient loses 1.9 million
`
`neurons and 14 billion synapses.” (CRTXCAR0007961). The availability of ready to use
`
`formulations of antihypertensive intravenous solutions, such as Cardene® I.V. Premixed
`
`
`
`348
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 3
`
`

`
`
`
`Injection, saves valuable time when treating a stroke patient. (See, e.g., CRTXCAR0007758;
`
`CRTXCAR0005324; CRTXCAR0004716; CRTXCAR0005484; CRTXCAR0007089).
`
`Nicardipine hydrochloride infusion is safer and more effective for treatment of acute
`
`hypertension as compared to other drugs, including labetalol and nitroprusside. (See, e.g.,
`
`CRTXCAR0005116; CRTXCAR0005279; CRTXCAR0005309). Cardene® I.V. has fewer drug
`
`interactions, which is important when hypertensive patients arrive in the emergency room unable
`
`to communicate what drugs they have recently taken. (See, e.g., CRTXCAR0006120;
`
`CRTXCAR0008075). Cardene® I.V. also provides for smoother control of blood pressure. (See
`
`CRTXCAR0004716; CRTXCAR0004729). And Cardene® I.V. does not have a negative impact
`
`on blood flow to the brain, which is critical when treating a stroke patient.
`
`(CRTXCAR0005324). A patient that has had a stroke must receive a thrombolytic drug to
`
`dissolve the blood clot in the brain within 3 hours of stroke onset; after this time period, the
`
`physician cannot use a thrombolytic. (See CRTXCAR0006140). But thrombolytics may not be
`
`administered if the patient’s blood pressure must be lowered. (See CRTXCAR0006135;
`
`CRTXCAR0005324). Physicians prefer to use an infusion of nicardipine hydrochloride to lower
`
`the patient’s blood pressure in these situations because of its safety and efficacy. (See
`
`CRTXCAR0005324).
`
`Despite: (i) the known benefits of nicardipine hydrochloride over other anti-hypertensive
`
`drugs; and (ii) the known delay (and other disadvantages) associated with the administration of
`
`concentrated formulations, no ready to use formulation of nicardipine hydrochloride existed
`
`before the launch of Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection. (See CRTXCAR0000009). After
`
`Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection launched, it was shown to provide significant benefits over
`
`Cardene® I.V. ampuls. The ready to use Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection product is safer than
`
`
`
`349
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 4
`
`

`
`
`
`concentrated IV products that require dilution before administration, including Cardene® I.V.
`
`ampuls. (See CRTXCAR0005312; see also CRTXCAR0000009). Cardene® I.V. Premixed
`
`Injection, when compared to bolus injections of labetalol for management of acute hypertension
`
`in the emergency department, was shown to be 2.7 times more likely to achieve the target blood
`
`pressure range within 30 minutes of initiating treatment. (CRTXCAR0005490). Doctors noted a
`
`difference in time to drug delivery of “as long as 5 to 10 minutes” due to the preparation time
`
`required to mix and prepare Cardene® I.V. ampuls. (CRTXCAR0006138).
`
`Surveys of hospital pharmacists confirm that Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection filled a
`
`long-felt need for many hospital emergency and pharmacy departments by providing doctors and
`
`their patients with a ready to use formulation of nicardipine hydrochloride intravenous solution.
`
`(See CRTXCAR0004504; CRTXCAR0005197). One study comparing Cardene® I.V. ampul and
`
`Premixed Injection with labetalol showed that immediate bolus administration of labetalol,
`
`which is not available in a premixed bag and must be reconstituted by the pharmacy to be
`
`administered as an infusion, “may be more problematic than its use as a continuous infusion.”
`
`(CRTXCAR0008075). Finally, the need for a quick response time in hypertensive emergencies,
`
`especially in stroke patients, and the relative frequency of emergency room visits for
`
`cardiovascular complaints generally increases the need for effective and convenient treatments to
`
`quickly lower blood pressure. (See CRTXCAR000537-5328).
`
`There was a long felt need for a ready to use nicardipine hydrochloride injectable product
`
`that: (i) eliminates admixture errors; (ii) is immediately available for rapid intervention (iii) saves
`
`pharmacy time and labor; (iv) reduces waste (extended beyond-use dating, no ampul breakage,
`
`no compounding errors); (v) can be stored in automated dispensing cabinets at point of care; (vi)
`
`improves door-to-dose time; (vii) complies with USP <797>; (viii) requires fewer supplies and
`
`
`
`350
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 5
`
`

`
`
`
`equipment (e.g., diluents, filter-tip needles); (ix) promotes standardized dosing; and (x) offers a
`
`safe alternative to after-hours compounding. (See CRTXCAR0005197).
`
`There are numerous other disadvantages associated with the concentrated ampul
`
`formulation of Cardene® I.V. as compared to the Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection, including
`
`the lag time between the doctor prescribing Cardene® I.V. and the diluted drug product being
`
`administered to the patient (CRTXCAR0005315). Further, breaking the Cardene® I.V. ampul
`
`neck may result in exposing both patients and health care providers to broken glass and an
`
`increased risk of injury. Moreover, because Cardene® I.V. requires dilution before
`
`administration to the patient, there is an increased risk of dosing errors, resulting in either an
`
`overdose or an underdose, as well as potential adverse effects on the stability of the reconstituted
`
`solution if an inappropriate diluent is used. (See CRTXCAR0000009). And once diluted,
`
`solutions prepared from a Cardene® I.V. ampul must be discarded within 24 hours due to
`
`stability issues. (See SAN_NIC_0001635; see also CRTXCAR0000009).
`
`The health care industry has explicitly noted issues with the time required to prepare a
`
`nicardipine hydrochloride solution from a concentrated ampul, including when compared to
`
`labetalol which may be administered immediately upon patient admission to the emergency
`
`department as a bolus injection. (CRTXCAR0004716). One group of investigators noted that
`
`the longer time between patient admission and treatment with nicardipine as compared to
`
`labetalol “was due to the time taken to mix and set up an infusion system for nicardipine.”
`
`(CRTXCAR0004726). Other physicians noted that “slow pharmacy delivery” of Cardene® I.V.
`
`and other intravenous antihypertensive medications “was the major reason for the delay in
`
`achieving target MAP [mean arterial pressure]” and obtain control of blood pressure in patients
`
`following intracranial hemorrhage. (CRTXCAR0004726). The introduction of ready to use
`
`
`
`351
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 6
`
`

`
`
`
`Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection reduced this delay and improved treatment outcomes.
`
`(CRTXCAR0004726). In fact, the authors noted that many of the patients in another study (at
`
`CRTXCAR0005324) received the ready-to-use Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection and “achieved
`
`better BP control than did patients treated with labetalol.” (CRTXCAR0004726).
`
` A general “good rule” in any operating room is to have a vasodilator, such as
`
`nicardipine hydrochloride, ready for use as an intravenous infusion at any time.
`
`(CRTXCAR0007899). Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection also provides increased safety to
`
`patients by supporting dosage standardization, and eliminating dilution errors and the risk of
`
`microbiological contamination associated with the manipulations necessary to prepare
`
`intravenous infusions from concentrated Cardene® I.V. ampuls. (CRTXCAR0000009).
`
`Additionally, Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection provides cost and time savings to the hospital by
`
`improving efficiency, saving time and labor costs associated with dilution of Cardene® I.V.
`
`ampuls, including the costs of after-hours compounding, and also reduces medical waste.
`
`(CRTXCAR0004505-06). Thus, the development of Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection, a long
`
`term stable, ready to use nicardipine hydrochloride intravenous product satisfied a long-felt
`
`medical need.
`
`2.
`
`Commercial Success
`
`The commercial success of Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection evidences the
`
`nonobviousness of the asserted claims. First, the unit sales and dollar sales of Cardene® I.V.
`
`Premixed Injection are substantial considering the related competition from the Cardene® I.V.
`
`ampul and generic nicardipine hydrochloride for injection vial products that are currently
`
`marketed. Second, the commercial success of Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection cannot be
`
`explained by factors unrelated to the elements of the claimed inventions, such as aggressive
`
`marketing or pricing. The sales of Cardene® I.V. are largely attributable to the elements of the
`352
`
`
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 7
`
`

`
`
`
`claimed invention, e.g., a ready to use, room temperature stable, nicardipine hydrochloride
`
`premixed injection formulation.
`
`3.
`
`Unexpected Results and Skepticism of Others
`
`The claimed invention gave rise to surprising and unexpected results, including a ready to
`
`use, premixed nicardipine hydrochloride injectable product suitable for long term storage at
`
`room temperature. The biggest hurdle when developing a ready to use, premixed injectable
`
`formulation is obtaining a formulation that is long term stable, especially at room temperature.
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art would have had no expectation of success in formulating a stable
`
`form of a low concentration premixed injectable drug product as claimed by the patents in suit.
`
`Nicardipine hydrochloride is present in the Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection product at a
`
`lower concentration than the Cardene® I.V. ampul product. Degradation and sorption are of
`
`greater concern with a low concentration formulation like Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection
`
`because even a relatively small amount of sorption (or a small increase in total impurities) may
`
`result in a significant percentage loss of potency (or a significant percentage increase in total
`
`impurities).
`
`Nicardipine hydrochloride is subject to hydrolysis and is known to degrade in the
`
`presence of water. (CRTXCAR000621; CRTXCAR0006627; CRTXCAR0006658). Thus, a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art would have expected that the increased water to drug ratio in
`
`the ready to use Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection formulation would have caused increased
`
`degradation of the nicardipine hydrochloride drug substance. A person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`would not have expected the Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection formulation to be long term
`
`stable at room temperature.
`
`
`
`Further, a POSA would not have been motivated to adjust the pH of a ready to use
`
`nicardipine hydrochloride premixed injection solution to a range of pH 3.6 to 4.7. Nicardipine
`353
`
`
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 8
`
`

`
`
`
`hydrochloride is slightly basic with a pKa of about 7.0 and is only about 28% ionized at
`
`physiological pH 7.4. (CRTXCAR0006873; CRTXCAR0008083). Increasing the pH from 3.5
`
`in the concentrated Cardene® I.V. ampul to a pH from about 3.6 to about 4.7 in the ready to use
`
`Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection formulation would lead to lower ionization, lower polarity,
`
`and increased lipophilicity of nicardipine hydrochloride. (CRTXCAR0007030).
`
`In addition, increasing the pH level for a nicardipine hydrochloride aqueous solution
`
`would result in exponentially less aqueous solubility. (See, e.g., CRTXCAR0007011;
`
`CRTXCAR0007041; CRTXCAR0007247). The partition coefficient (log P), or diffusion
`
`coefficient (log K), for nicardipine free base is about 4.2. Nicardipine free base is about 10,000
`
`times more soluble in n-octanol than in water. (CRTXCAR0007144; see also
`
`CRTXCAR0006882). Increasing the pH level of a nicardipine hydrochloride aqueous solution
`
`also converts more of the nicardipine hydrochloride salt to the free base. And nicardipine free
`
`base is more lipophilic and less soluble in water than nicardipine hydrochloride. This can result
`
`in physical instability and precipitation of the drug substance. A POSA would not be motivated
`
`to increase the pH of a nicardipine hydrochloride aqueous solution because it could affect the
`
`stability of a ready to use, nicardipine hydrochloride premixed injection solution.
`
`
`
`A POSA at the time of the invention would not have been motivated to use non-polar
`
`polymer containers for a long term, room temperature stable, ready to use, nicardipine
`
`hydrochloride premixed injection solution at a pH from about 3.6 to about 4.7. Lipophilic drugs,
`
`such as nicardipine hydrochloride, are known to adsorb or absorb to non-polar polymers. (See
`
`CRTXCAR0007173). Figures 5A and 5B of the patents in suit demonstrate that nicardipine
`
`hydrochloride premixed injection solution had a minimal drop in drug potency in non-polar
`
`
`
`354
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 9
`
`

`
`
`
`polymer bags as compared to PVC bags. A POSA would expect a greater level of sorption of
`
`nicardipine to a non-polar polymer container.
`
`Nicardipine hydrochloride is susceptible to oxidation. (See, e.g., SAN_NIC_0001575;
`
`CRTXCAR0006793). A higher pH level of the premixed nicardipine hydrochloride aqueous
`
`solution claimed in the patents in suit would increase the potential for oxidative degradation of
`
`the drug substance. (See CRTXCAR0007056). Non-polar polymers, such as polyethylene and
`
`polypropylene, are permeable to oxygen. (See, e.g., CRTXCAR0006827; CRTXCAR0007056;
`
`CRTXCAR0007337). Thus, a POSA would not have been motivated to increase the pH level of
`
`the premixed nicardipine hydrochloride aqueous solution, and/or to use a polyethylene or other
`
`non-polar polymer container for a ready to use, nicardipine hydrochloride premixed injection
`
`solution.
`
`
`
`Further, nicardipine hydrochloride is a difficult molecule from a manufacturing
`
`perspective. Nicardipine hydrochloride is a dihydropyridine molecule, which is known to
`
`thermally degrade. (CRTXCAR0007156; CRTXCAR0007102). The photosensitivity of
`
`nicardipine hydrochloride is also well-known. These instabilities can lead to the formation of
`
`impurities in an aqueous nicardipine hydrochloride solution. (See CRTXCAR0006807;
`
`CRTXCAR0006888; CRTXCAR0006898; CRTXCAR0006901; CRTXCAR0006919;
`
`CRTXCAR0007459; CRTXCAR0007635). Drug processing, dilution, and manufacturing are
`
`unpredictable arts. Developing a long term, room temperature stable, ready to use nicardipine
`
`hydrochloride premixed injection formulation is especially difficult and unpredictable.
`
`An injectable drug product formulation must be sterile. Failure to maintain sterility
`
`during the drug product manufacturing process can result in purity and stability issues, including
`
`chemical degradation and pathogenic toxicity. The FDA suggests that terminal sterilization is
`
`
`
`355
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 10
`
`

`
`
`
`the preferred manufacturing method when making a sterile product. (See CRTXCAR0007396).
`
`“It is a well-accepted principle that sterile drugs should be manufactured using aseptic
`
`processing only when terminal sterilization is not feasible.” (CRTXCAR0007396). Thus, a
`
`POSA would be motivated to make a ready to use, nicardipine hydrochloride premixed injection
`
`product that was terminally sterilized.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`These unexpected results further evidence the nonobviousness of the claimed inventions.
`
`4.
`
`Failure of Others
`
`The nicardipine hydrochloride active pharmaceutical ingredient has been available in the
`
`United States since 1988, yet no one successfully developed a premixed aqueous solution that is
`
`ready to administer parenterally without further dilution until the inventors of the patents in suit.
`
`Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection is the first and only FDA-approved premixed, ready to
`
`administer nicardipine hydrochloride injectable drug product. This is especially notable given
`
`the success of Cornerstone’s concentrated nicardipine hydrochloride injection formulation,
`
`Cardene® I.V., which was approved on January 30, 1992. Finally, actual failed attempts by
`356
`
`
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 11
`
`

`
`
`
`pharmacists to make ready to use, nicardipine hydrochloride premixed injection formulations
`
`suitable for long term storage at room temperature confirm the nonobviousness of the claimed
`
`invention. (See, e.g. SAN_NIC_0001501; SAN_NIC_0001507; SAN_NIC_0001515).
`
`Other nicardipine hydrochloride products have been available worldwide since at least
`
`1985. In fact, Defendant Sandoz marketed a nicardipine hydrochloride injectable under the
`
`tradename Loxen in Europe, and marketed a generic version of the Cardene® I.V. ampul in the
`
`United States. (See e.g., CRTXCAR0006142). However, it was not until late 2012 that Sandoz
`
`submitted an ANDA for a generic version of Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection. (See, e.g.,
`
`SAN_NIC_000001; CRTXCAR0006102).
`
`In fact, the Baaske reference demonstrates the failure of others in making a ready to use,
`
`nicardipine hydrochloride premixed injection that is stable for at least one year at room
`
`temperature. (See SAN_NIC_0001575). A POSA at the time of the invention would not have
`
`been motivated to simply dilute the concentrated Cardene® I.V. ampul because it was known that
`
`diluted nicardipine hydrochloride is susceptible to instability, degradation, and sorption. (See,
`
`e.g., SAN_NIC_0004756; SAN_NIC_0004762). Baaske demonstrates that dilution of
`
`concentrated Cardene® I.V. ampuls causes more drug sorption and degradation upon long term
`
`storage at room temperature conditions. (See SAN_NIC_0001575). Diluting a concentrated
`
`drug into a ready to use solution is not a predictable process.
`
`5.
`
`Copying
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`357
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 12
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Failed attempts by others to attempt to copy Plaintiffs’ ready to use, long term stable,
`
`nicardipine hydrochloride premixed injection is further objective evidence of nonobviousness.
`
`Specifically, so-called compounding pharmacies, such as Ameridose and PharMEDium, among
`
`others, have attempted to copy—without success—Plaintiffs’ Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection.
`
`(See, e.g., SAN_NIC_0001472; SAN_NIC_0001497; SAN_NIC_0001501; SAN_NIC_0001507;
`
`SAN_NIC_0001515; see also CRTXCAR0006037; CRTXCAR0006039; CRTXCAR0006041;
`
`CRTXCAR0006045; CRTXCAR0006052; CRTXCAR0006057; CRTXCAR0006063;
`
`CRTXCAR0006065; CRTXCAR0006067; CRTXCAR0006071; CRTXCAR0006074). The
`
`products purportedly being manufactured by these pharmacies, including Ameridose and
`
`PharMEDium, are attempts to essentially copy Plaintiffs’ patented, FDA approved, Cardene®
`
`I.V. Premixed Injection, but without the stability, safety, and efficacy assurances provided by the
`
`
`
`358
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 13
`
`

`
`
`
`FDA’s review and approval process of an NDA or ANDA. (See, e.g., SAN_NIC_0001472;
`
`SAN_NIC_0001497; SAN_NIC_0001501; SAN_NIC_0001507; SAN_NIC_0001515; see also
`
`CRTXCAR0006037; CRTXCAR0006039; CRTXCAR0006041; CRTXCAR0006045;
`
`CRTXCAR0006052; CRTXCAR0006057; CRTXCAR0006063; CRTXCAR0006065;
`
`CRTXCAR0006067; CRTXCAR0006071; CRTXCAR0006074).
`
`Notably, New England Compounding Center (“NECC”), another compounding pharmacy
`
`owned by the same people as Ameridose, was investigated after injectable drug products it
`
`manufactured, which were contaminated with meningitis, infected and killed many people across
`
`the United States. (See, e.g., CRTXCAR0006039; CRTXCAR0006041; CRTXCAR0006045;
`
`CRTXCAR0006067; CRTXCAR0006071). In fact, Barry Cadden, the chief pharmacist at
`
`Ameridose and NECC, had his pharmacist license revoked. (See CRTXCAR0006042;
`
`CRTXCAR0006047). NECC was eventually shut down, has filed for bankruptcy, and federal
`
`authorities have opened a criminal investigation into NECC’s pharmacy compounding practices.
`
`(CRTXCAR0006071; CRTXCAR0006050; CRTXCAR0006047).
`
`Ameridose was discussed during Congressional hearings held on the meningitis outbreak
`
`associated with products manufactured by NECC. (CRTXCAR0006067; CRTXCAR0008032).
`
`Indeed, discussing the same 2008 FDA inspection report produced by Defendant in support of
`
`their invalidity contentions, Senators voiced concerns about FDA findings that Ameridose
`
`“products were shipped immediately without waiting for test results showing they were sterile.”
`
`(CRTXCAR0006068; see also SAN_NIC_0001507). And Ameridose did not perform potency
`
`tests to confirm the strength of products shipped to customers. (CRTXCAR0008058). FDA
`
`finally issued a Form 483 inspection observation report to Ameridose in November 2012.
`
`
`
`359
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 14
`
`

`
`
`
`(CRTXCAR0008073; CRTXCAR0008012). FDA summarized its findings of Ameridose’s
`
`practices as follows:
`
`[Ameridose] fails to test finished product for product for potency,
`failed to investigate complaints for ineffective products, failed to
`investigate violations of their own environmental sampling plan
`and fails to adequately maintain equipment and facilities used to
`manufacture sterile drug products.
`
`Ameridose recalled its injectable drug products after the FDA inspection because FDA “could
`
`not be assured of the sterility of those products.” (CRTXCAR0006075; see also
`
`CRTXCAR0006063; CRTXCAR0006065; CRTXCAR0006039). Ameridose has also shut
`
`down their facility. (CRTXCAR0006037; CRTXCAR0006063; CRTXCAR0008073).
`
`Similarly, the FDA recently issued Form 483 inspection observation reports after visiting
`
`two PharMEDium pharmacies. (See CRTXCAR0006052; CRTXCAR0006057). Some of the
`
`relevant observations include PharMEDium’s:
`
`
`
` “failure to perform endotoxin testing on all finished sterile injectable drug
`products.” (CRTXCAR0006052).
`
` “several of the firm’s finished drug products contain active drug ingredients that
`the manufacturer’s label declares to protect from light. These finished drug
`products processed by this firm are placed into clear plastic containers.”
`(CRTXCAR0006054).
`
` “stability test methods used to assign expiration dating of finished sterile
`injectable drug products are not stability indicating. The firm’s stability testing
`procedures do not include sterility, impurity, or degr[a]dant product testing.”
`(CRTXCAR0006055; CRTXCAR0006060).
`
` “failure to perform finished product potency/sterility testing on each lot of
`finished injectable drug product processed/distributed.” (CRTXCAR0006060).
`
`Compounding pharmacies such as Ameridose and PharMEDium have attempted to copy the
`
`inventions claimed in the patents in suit. Such attempted copying evidences the nonobviousness
`
`of the claimed inventions—even though none of the compounding pharmacies were able to
`
`duplicate the stability of the claimed formulations.
`
`
`
`360
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 15
`
`

`
`
`
`6.
`
`Industry Praise
`
`Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection has been widely praised by physicians and the
`
`pharmaceutical industry. (See, e.g., CRTXCAR0005484). A phase four, randomized,
`
`comparative effectiveness trial to determine the efficacy and safety of Cardene® I.V. Premixed
`
`Injection versus bolus labetalol for management of hypertension in the emergency department
`
`setting concluded that Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection is superior as a first-line intervention in
`
`clinically critical conditions, like intracranial hemorrhage, where rapid blood pressure reduction
`
`is considered optimal. (CRTXCAR0005484).
`
`Doctors, pharmacists, and other health care providers report that ready to use Cardene®
`
`I.V. Premixed Injection was an improvement over the Cardene® I.V. ampul. (See, e.g.,
`
`CRTXCAR0005331). When asked whether a premixed aqueous solution of Cardene® I.V.
`
`would be preferable, a pharmacist responded: “It takes about 5 minutes to admix Cardene IV, so
`
`we should save some time with [the] premixed bag. Ampules are a pain to work with.”
`
`(CRTXCAR0005358). And the ready to use Cardene® I.V. Premixed Injection has also been
`
`praised by the healthcare industry when compared to other antihypertensive medications used in
`
`emergency situations, including labetalol and nitroprusside. (See, e.g., CRTXCAR0005484;
`
`CRTXCAR0004716; CRTXCAR0006120).
`
`V.
`
`L. Pat. R. 3.4A(c)
`
`Attached as Exhibits A – D are Plaintiffs’ claim-by-claim responses to the charts
`
`provided by Defendant pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.3(c). In its response corresponding to
`
`each asserted claim, Plaintiffs incorporate by reference Sections I-IV, supra. In its response
`
`corresponding to each dependent claim, Plaintiffs incorporate by reference its responses to any
`
`claim(s) from which it depends. To the extent that Defendant’s contentions for an asserted claim
`
`reference another claim (e.g., “See discussion for claim __”), these contentions are vague and
`
`
`
`361
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 16
`
`

`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`CORNERSTONE THERAPEUTICS INC.,
`CORNERSTONE BIOPHARMA, INC., and
`EKR THERAPEUTICS, LLC,
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-05723-NLH-AMD
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`SANDOZ INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on this 28th day of April 2014, a true and correct copy of “Plaintiffs’
`
`Responses to Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions” was served on the following counsel by
`
` s/ Leann M. Clymer
` Leann M. Clymer
`
`
`
`electronic mail:
`
`Counsel for Sandoz Inc.
`
`Matthew M. D’Amore
`David J. Austin
`Sarah L. Prutzman
`Hui Liu
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`250 West 55th Street
`New York, New York 10019-9601
`Telephone: (212) 468-8168
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`01427553.DOCX
`
`EKR Therapeutics, LLC Exhibit 2014 Page 17

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket