`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`Quantum Corp.Quantum Corp.
`
`Oracle Corp.*Oracle Corp.*
`
`Dot Hill Systems Corp.*Dot Hill Systems Corp.*
`
`
`IPR2014-01226 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,035)IPR2014-01226 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,035)
`
`IPR2014-01463 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,041)IPR2014-01463 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,041)
`
`IPR2014-01544 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,147)IPR2014-01544 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,147)
`
`
`Andrew EhmkeAndrew Ehmke
`
`David McCombsDavid McCombs
`
`Scott JarrattScott Jarratt
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLPHaynes and Boone, LLP
`
`October 30, 2015October 30, 2015
`
`
`
`*Party by Joinder*Party by Joinder
`
`1
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`ArgumentArgument
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Patent Owner Has Improperly Narrowed the “Map”
`and “Access Control” Limitations
`
`Under Any Interpretation, the CRD-5500 Manual
`and HP Journal Render Obvious the ‘035, ‘041, and
`‘147 Patents
`
`2
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`The ’035, ’041, & ’147 Patents
`
`3
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`The ’035, ’041, & ’147 PatentsThe ’035, ’041, & ’147 Patents
`
`‘035 Patent, FIG. 3
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 5)
`
`4
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`’035 Patent, Claim 1’035 Patent, Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1226),
`’035 Patent, claim 1
`
`5
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`’041 Patent, Claim 1’041 Patent, Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1463),
`’041 Patent, claim 1
`
`6
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`’147 Patent, Claim 1’147 Patent, Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1544),
`‘147 Patent, claim 1
`
`7
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`The Cited Prior Art
`
`8
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The CRD-5500 Manual DisclosesThe CRD-5500 Manual Discloses
`
`“Mapping” and “Access Control”“Mapping” and “Access Control”
`
`Mapping:
`
`Access Controls:
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-2
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 31)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-1
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 32)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 4-5
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 32)
`
`9
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Combination DisclosesThe Combination Discloses
`
`“Mapping” and “Access Control”“Mapping” and “Access Control”
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 164:17-165:2
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 18)
`
`10
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The CRD-5500 Manual Discloses a Storage ControllerThe CRD-5500 Manual Discloses a Storage Controller
`
`that Allocates Storage to Hoststhat Allocates Storage to Hosts
`
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 17)
`
`11
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The CRD-5500 Manual DisclosesThe CRD-5500 Manual Discloses
`
`Storage Devices and Subsets of StorageStorage Devices and Subsets of Storage
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-11
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 18)
`
`12
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`The “Map” Limitation
`
`13
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`’035 Patent
`
`’147 Patent
`
`’041 Patent
`
`
`
`The Claim Language is BroadThe Claim Language is Broad
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1226),
`’035 Patent, claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1544),
`’147 Patent, claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1463),
`’041 Patent, claim 1
`
`14
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Specification Describes “Map” BroadlyThe Specification Describes “Map” Broadly
`
`as Allocating Storage Using Non-Specific Techniquesas Allocating Storage Using Non-Specific Techniques
`
`Specification:
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`‘035 Patent, 4:13-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 3)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 93:12-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 3)
`
`15
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Board’s Construction Does Not Require A SpecificThe Board’s Construction Does Not Require A Specific
`
`Mapping TechniqueMapping Technique
`
`Board’s Construction:
`
`Paper 19 (‘1226), Decision on Institution, p.6
`
`16
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Reinterpretation RequiresPatent Owner’s Reinterpretation Requires
`
`a Specific Mapping Techniquea Specific Mapping Technique
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 8
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 10
`
`17
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Reinterpretation AlsoPatent Owner’s Reinterpretation Also
`
`Requires the “Map” to Include the “Concept” of a HostRequires the “Map” to Include the “Concept” of a Host
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 38
`
`18
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`But the Claimed “Map” Does Not IncludeBut the Claimed “Map” Does Not Include
`
`the “Concept” of a Hostthe “Concept” of a Host
`
`Dr. Levy Redirect Testimony:
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 200:10-17
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 7)
`
`19
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Specification Represents Hosts in the Map withThe Specification Represents Hosts in the Map with
`
`Intermediary Identifiers such as AddressesIntermediary Identifiers such as Addresses
`
`‘035 Patent, 7:5-13
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 3)
`
`20
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Levy Confirmed the Specification UsesDr. Levy Confirmed the Specification Uses
`
`Addresses in the MapAddresses in the Map
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 63:9-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 5)
`
`21
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Addresses in the SpecificationThe Addresses in the Specification
`
`May Be Associated with Different HostsMay Be Associated with Different Hosts
`
`Specification:
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`‘035 Patent, 7:64-65
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 5)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 112:21-25
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 4)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 113:10-12
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 4)
`
`22
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`The Board’s Construction Is UndisputedThe Board’s Construction Is Undisputed
`
`Specification:
`
`Board’s Construction:
`
`‘035 Patent, 4:13-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 3)
`
`Paper 19 (‘1226), Decision on Institution, p.6
`
`23
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The CRD-5500 Manual Discloses the “Map” LimitationThe CRD-5500 Manual Discloses the “Map” Limitation
`
`Because It Teaches Allocating Storage to HostsBecause It Teaches Allocating Storage to Hosts
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-2
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 31)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-1
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1463), Petition, p. 37)
`
`24
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The CRD Manual Represents Hosts in the Same Way asThe CRD Manual Represents Hosts in the Same Way as
`
`the Patent – with an Intermediary Identifierthe Patent – with an Intermediary Identifier
`
`Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 12
`
`25
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The CRD Manual Represents Hosts in the Same Way asThe CRD Manual Represents Hosts in the Same Way as
`
`the Patent – with an Intermediary Identifierthe Patent – with an Intermediary Identifier
`
`CQ-1003, Hospodor Declaration, p. 48
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1463), Petition, p. 25)
`
`26
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`The “Access Control” Limitation
`
`27
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Requires the “Access Control” Limitation toPatent Owner Requires the “Access Control” Limitation to
`
`Provide Different Storage Access for Different HostsProvide Different Storage Access for Different Hosts
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 8
`
`28
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Claims Do Not RequireThe Claims Do Not Require
`
`Different Storage Access for Different HostsDifferent Storage Access for Different Hosts
`
`’035 Patent
`
`’041 Patent
`
`’147 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1226),
`’035 Patent, claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1463),
`’041 Patent, claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1544),
`’147 Patent, claim 1
`
`29
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The District Court’s Construction Does Not RequireThe District Court’s Construction Does Not Require
`
`Different Storage Access for Different HostsDifferent Storage Access for Different Hosts
`
`CQ-1026 (‘1226), Markman Order in Crossroads Sys. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., et al. , p.40
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 10)
`
`30
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The “Access Control” Limitation EncompassesThe “Access Control” Limitation Encompasses
`
`Controlling Access of a Single DeviceControlling Access of a Single Device
`
`‘147 Patent, Claim 28
`(cited in Paper 33 (‘1544), Pet. Reply, p. 9)
`
`31
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Also Requires the Access Controls toPatent Owner Also Requires the Access Controls to
`
`Survive ReconfigurationSurvive Reconfiguration
`
`Patent Owner’s Additional Requirements:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 18
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 19
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, pp. 19-20
`
`32
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`But the Specification Does Not Require the AccessBut the Specification Does Not Require the Access
`
`Controls to Survive ReconfigurationControls to Survive Reconfiguration
`
`CQ-1024
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 7)
`
`’035 Patent, 6:19-23
`
`33
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`But the Specification Does Not Require the AccessBut the Specification Does Not Require the Access
`
`Controls to Survive ReconfigurationControls to Survive Reconfiguration
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 151:2-10
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 10)
`
`34
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`“Access Control” Should be at Least as Broad the“Access Control” Should be at Least as Broad the
`
`District Court ConstructionDistrict Court Construction
`
`District Court’s Construction:
`
`CQ-1026 (‘1226), Markman Order in Crossroads Sys. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., et al. , p.40
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 10)
`
`35
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The CRD Manual DisclosesThe CRD Manual Discloses
`
`the “Access Control” Limitationthe “Access Control” Limitation
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-1
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 32)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 4-5
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 32)
`
`36
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Combination DisclosesThe Combination Discloses
`
`the “Access Control” Limitationthe “Access Control” Limitation
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 164:17-165:2
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 18)
`
`37
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`Even Under Patent Owner’s Narrowed Construction,Even Under Patent Owner’s Narrowed Construction,
`
`the Patents are Rendered Obviousthe Patents are Rendered Obvious
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 119:17-25
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 16)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 220:10-14
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 16)
`
`38
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`Other Issues
`
`39
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The CRD “Allow[s] Access” AccordingThe CRD “Allow[s] Access” According
`
`to Dr. Levy’s Understandingto Dr. Levy’s Understanding
`
`Dr. Levy’s Markman Testimony:
`
`CQ-2029, Markman Hearing, co-pending litigation, 91:25-92:6
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 20)
`
`CRD-5500 Manual:
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-4
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 21)
`
`40
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`The CRD “Allow[s] Access” Using NLLBPThe CRD “Allow[s] Access” Using NLLBP
`
`Dr. Levy’s Markman Testimony:
`
`CRD-5500 Manual:
`
`CQ-2029, Markman Hearing, co-pending litigation, 91:16-24
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 20)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 2-4
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 21)
`
`41
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`3
`
`CRD Manual and HP Journal are
`Properly Combinable
`
`4 Patent Owner Has No Objective
`Evidence of Nonobviousness
`
`42
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`HP Journal Improves a SCSI-Based SystemHP Journal Improves a SCSI-Based System
`
`CQ-1006, HP Journal, p. 96
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 35)
`
`CQ-1006, HP Journal, p. 94
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 21)
`
`CQ-1006, HP Journal, p. 94
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 23)
`
`43
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The System of the CRD Manual Was Designed ToThe System of the CRD Manual Was Designed To
`
`Support Fibre ChannelSupport Fibre Channel
`
`CQ-1005, CRD-5500 Data Sheet, p. 1
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 21)
`
`Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 20
`
`CQ-1006, HP Journal, Fig. 14
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 29)
`
`44
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`No Market Share Data to SupportNo Market Share Data to Support
`
`Commercial SuccessCommercial Success
`
`Mr. Bianchi Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1105, Bianchi Deposition Transcript, 44:11-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 23)
`
`45
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`No Nexus of Commercial SuccessNo Nexus of Commercial Success
`
`to Claimed Elementto Claimed Element
`
`Mr. Bianchi Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1105, Bianchi Deposition Transcript, 89:10-17
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 23)
`
`46
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`No Evidence that the PatentsNo Evidence that the Patents
`
`Motivated the LicensesMotivated the Licenses
`
`Ms. Crane Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1104, Crane Deposition Transcript, 136:22-137:5
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 24)
`
`47
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`No Evidence that the LicensesNo Evidence that the Licenses
`
`Include the PatentsInclude the Patents
`
`Ms. Crane Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1104, Crane Deposition Transcript, 83:4-10
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 24)
`
`48
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`Dependent Claims
`
`49
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner MisinterpretsPatent Owner Misinterprets
`
`Dependent Claims 2, 8, and 12 (‘035 Patent)Dependent Claims 2, 8, and 12 (‘035 Patent)
`
`Claim Language:
`
`Patent Owner Interpretation:
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1226), ’035 Patent, claim 2
`
`Paper 22(‘1226), PO Resp., p. 41
`
`50
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Combination Discloses DependentThe Combination Discloses Dependent
`
`Claims 2, 8, 12 (‘035 Patent) When Properly ConstruedClaims 2, 8, 12 (‘035 Patent) When Properly Construed
`
`Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 21
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 164:17-165:2
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 18)
`
`51
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Reasons to Combine theThe Reasons to Combine the
`
`QLogic Data Sheet were ProperQLogic Data Sheet were Proper
`
`Patent Owner Argument:
`
`Dr. Hospodor’s Actual Evidence Supporting Reasons to Combine:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 48
`
`CQ-1003, Dr. Hospodor Declaration, ¶ 68
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 55)
`
`52
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Combination DisclosesThe Combination Discloses
`
`Dependent Claims 13, 32, 49 of the ’041 PatentDependent Claims 13, 32, 49 of the ’041 Patent
`
`Patent Owner Argument:
`
`A POSITA Knew That Fibre Channel Distinguished Between Hosts:
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 19 (‘1463), PO Resp., p. 43
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 119:17-25
`(cited in Paper 32 (‘1463), Pet. Reply, p. 21)
`
`53
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`The Prior Art Discloses the Unique Identifiers ofThe Prior Art Discloses the Unique Identifiers of
`
`Dependent Claims 14, 15, 33, 34, 50, & 51 (’041 Patent)Dependent Claims 14, 15, 33, 34, 50, & 51 (’041 Patent)
`Claims 14 and 15:
`
`’041 Patent, Claims 14 and 15
`
`Unique Identifiers in the Cited Prior Art:
`1) Channel Number
`CQ-1004 (‘1463), pp. 1-2, 3-2, 4-5 (cited in Paper 3 (‘1463), Petition, pp. 15, 24-25)
`2) Worldwide Name (WWN)
`CQ-1007 (‘1463), pp. 46, 148 (cited in Paper 3 (‘1463), Petition, p. 59)
`3) AL_PA
`CQ-1025, 91:9-14 (cited in Paper 32 (‘1463), Pet. Reply, pp. 5, 22)
`
`KSR:
`
`KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 421 (2007)(cited in Paper 32 (‘1463), Pet. Reply, p. 22)
`
`54
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`
`ConclusionConclusion
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Patent Owner Has Improperly Narrowed the “Map”
`and “Access Control” Limitations
`• Patent Owner’s interpretations contradict the patent
`specification
`
`Under Any Interpretation, the CRD-5500 Manual
`and HP Journal Render Obvious the ‘035, ‘041, and
`‘147 Patents
`• Mapping: The CRD-5500 Manual explicitly teaches assigning
`storage “to a particular host.” CQ-1004, p. 1-2.
`• Access Control: The CRD-5500 Manual explicitly teaches
`making storage “visible to one host but not to another.” CQ-
`1004, p. 1-1
`
`55
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544
`
`
`
`
`Consolidated PetitionersConsolidated Petitioners
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`Quantum Corp.Quantum Corp.
`
`Oracle Corp.*Oracle Corp.*
`
`Dot Hill Systems Corp.*Dot Hill Systems Corp.*
`
`
`IPR2014-01226 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,035)IPR2014-01226 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,035)
`
`IPR2014-01463 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,041)IPR2014-01463 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,041)
`
`IPR2014-01544 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,147)IPR2014-01544 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,147)
`
`
`Andrew EhmkeAndrew Ehmke
`
`David McCombsDavid McCombs
`
`Scott JarrattScott Jarratt
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLPHaynes and Boone, LLP
`
`October 30, 2015October 30, 2015
`
`
`
`*Party by Joinder*Party by Joinder
`
`56
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01544