throbber
Case 1:13-cv-00800-SS Document 48 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 4
`
`
` CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 2020
` Cisco Systems et al v Crossroads Systems, Inc.
` IPR2014-01544
`
`(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:23)
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00800-SS Document 48 Filed 05/07/14 Page 2 of 4
`
`•
`
`v.
`
`NETAPP, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`v.
`
`QUANTUM CORPORATION
`
`Defendant.
`


`§ C.A. NO. 1:14-cv-00149-SS


`


`§ C.A. NO. 1:14-cv-00150-SS


`
`AGREED ORDER GRANTING
`JOINT MOTION TO COORDINATE CASES FOR DISCOVERY
`
`The Court, having considered the parties' Joint Motion to Coordinate Cases for
`
`Discovery, finds that the motion is well-taken and should be, and is hereby GRANTED.
`
`It is therefore, ORDERED that discovery in the above numbered cases shall be
`
`coordinated . The discovery limits below shall apply to the above-captioned cases. These limits
`
`may be modified by agreement of the Parties or upon a showing of good cause. All parties retain
`
`their rights to seek additional discovery beyond the limits provided here.
`
`Interrogatories.
`
`Plaintiff may serve up to
`
`ten (10) common
`
`interrogatories on
`
`Defendants, which each Defendant Affiliate Group shall answer individually, and Plaintiff may
`
`serve an additional fifteen (15) individual or specific interrogatories on each Defendant Affiliate
`
`Group. 1 Defendants, jointly, may serve up to ten (10) common interrogatories on Plaintiff, and
`
`each Defendant Affiliate Group may serve an additional fifteen (15) individual or specific
`
`interrogatories on Plaintiff.
`
`1 Each of the following comprises a "Defendant Affiliate Group": (1) Dot Hill Systems Corp. ; (2)
`Oracle Corporation; (3) Dell Inc.; (4) Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Enterprise USA,
`Inc. , and Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. ; (5) Tandberg Data Corporation; (6) Cisco Systems,
`Inc.; (7) Netapp, Inc.; and (8) Quantum Corporation.
`
`2
`
`(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:23)
`
`

`

`--------- ------------------- - - - -···-----·-·····--··-
`Case 1:13-cv-00800-SS Document 48 Filed 05/07/14 Page 3 of 4
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Requests for Admission. Except for authentication purposes, Plaintiff may serve up to
`
`twenty-five (25) common requests for admission on Defendants, which each Defendant Affiliate
`
`Group shall answer individually, and an additional fifteen (15) individual or specific requests for
`
`admission on each Defendant Affiliate Group. Defendants, jointly, may serve up to twenty-five
`
`(25) common requests for admission on Plaintiff, and each Defendant Affiliate Group may serve
`
`an additional fifteen (15) individual or specific requests for admission on Plaintiff.
`
`There is no limit on the number of requests for admission the parties may serve to
`
`establish authenticity of documents.
`
`Overall Deposition Limits. For all depositions other than expert depositions, Plaintiff
`
`may take up to forty ( 40) hours of deposition testimony of each Defendant Affiliate Group
`
`(which
`
`includes both Rule 30(b)(6) depositions and Rule 30(b)(l) depositions of party
`
`employees).
`
`In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to take forty ( 40) hours of non party deposition
`
`testimony. Defendants may jointly take up to fifty (50) hours of deposition testimony of Plaintiff
`
`and individually take up to twenty (20) additional hours of deposition testimony of Plaintiff
`
`(which
`
`includes both Rule 30(b)(6) depositions and Rule 30(b)(l) depositions of party
`
`employees, but does not include the depositions of inventors), and jointly take up to fifty (50)
`
`hours of non party deposition testimony. Depositions, including depositions on written questions,
`
`of custodians of business records for third parties are also permitted but are not included in the
`
`limit on deposition hours per side set forth above.
`
`Duration of Depositions. Unless otherwise specified below, each deposition shall be
`
`limited to one day of seven (7) hours on the record. For inventor depositions, Defendants as a
`
`group will be limited to ten (10) deposition hours of each inventor in his individual capacity as
`
`an inventor (excluding deposition time as a 30(b)(6) witness). Each deposition of inventors or
`
`3
`
`(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:23)
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00800-SS Document 48 Filed 05/07/14 Page 4 of 4
`
`•
`
`30(b)(6) witnesses will be taken on consecutive days and shall not continue for more than seven
`
`(7) hours on the record each day. 2 Any deposition of an expert witness will be limited to seven
`
`(7) hours per witness per report.
`
`In addition to the seven (7) hours per report, if an expert
`
`witness issues a report or expresses an opinion addressing infringement or damages issues for
`
`multiple Defendants in this action, for that report, he/she may be deposed up to an additional two
`
`(2) hours for each Defendant beyond the first seven (7) hours. For each of the durational limits
`
`provided here, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30, additional time consistent with Rule 26(b)(2) will
`
`be allowed if needed to fairly examine the deponent.
`
`I+
`SIGNED this ~day of
`
`'Jn4VJ
`
`'2014.
`
`lJl~~
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`2 "For purposes of this durational limit, the deposition of each person designated under Rule
`30(b)(6) should be considered a separate deposition." 2000 Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30, ~ 3.
`
`4
`
`(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:23)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket