throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 5
`
`
`
` Entered: October 10, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`AMERICAN VEHICULAR SCIENCES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01543
`Patent 6,738,697 B2
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, BARBARA A. PARVIS, and
`GREGG I. ANDERSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`Order
`Conduct of Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01543
`Patent 6,738,697
`
`
`On October 10, 2014, a conference call was held. The participants
`
`were respective counsel for the parties, Judges Lee, Parvis, and Anderson,
`
`and counsel for American Honda Motor Co., Inc. The subject matter of the
`
`call was a Motion for Joinder (Paper 3), filed by Petitioner, which seeks to
`
`join this proceeding with IPR2014-00634. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
`
`is involved in IPR2014-00634.
`
`During the conference call, counsel for Petitioner explained that the
`
`Petition is essentially literally the same as the Petition filed by American
`
`Honda Motor Co., Inc. in IPR2014-00634, except that a portion of that
`
`Petition relying on “Fry” as prior art reference has been removed. Counsel
`
`for Petitioner further explained that the declaration it has submitted in
`
`support of the Petition is by the same declarant relied on by American
`
`Honda Motor Co., Inc. in IPR2014-00634. Counsel for Petitioner
`
`additionally explained that the declaration testimony submitted in this
`
`proceeding is the same as that submitted by American Honda Motor Co.,
`
`Inc. in IPR2014-00634, except for the removal of all testimony in support of
`
`the ground of unpatentability relying on “Fry” as a prior art reference.
`
`Mr. Scott P. McBride indicated that he represents Patent Owner and a
`
`mandatory notice will be filed confirming his representation. In addition,
`
`Mr. McBride stated that Patent Owner likely would not oppose the Motion
`
`for Joinder. Mr. McBride further agreed to a due date of five business days
`
`for filing of Patent Owner’s preliminary response or waiver of filing a
`
`preliminary response in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED Patent Owner have until October 17, 2014, to file any
`
`opposition to the Motion to Joinder; and
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01543
`Patent 6,738,697
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the due date for Patent Owner’s
`
`preliminary response or waiver of filing a preliminary response is set to
`
`October 17, 2014.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01543
`Patent 6,738,697
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Edward Naidich
`Christopher Kurpinski
`ed.naidich@finnegan.com
`christopher.kurpinski@finnegancom
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brian Roffe, Esq.
`8170 McCormick Boulevard, Suite 223
`Skokie, IL 60076–2914
`
`Thomas J. Wimbiscus
`Scott P. McBride
`twimbiscus@mcandrews-ip.com
`smcbride@mcandrews-ip.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket