throbber
t
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Hedloy
`Group Art Unit
`2173
`
`'
`
`24/2"
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`
`
`091189.626
`Examiner
`Crescelle Dela Torre
`
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel):
`
`
`
`C Q Sm
`CRESCELLE N. DEM TORRE
`PRIMARY EXAMINER
`i0 / I ‘I /oo
`
`12
`Paper No
`ArendiS.A.R. L.- Ex. 2002
`
`Page 1 of 1
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Ex. 2004
`Page 1 of 1
`
`
`
`(1) Crescelie Dela Torre
`(2') Carlos VII/am ar
`Date of lntervtew
`
`
`
`(3)
`
`
`
`Type
`
`:‘Telephonic
`
`Eersonal' (copy is given to
`
`afipncant
`
`amimitt's representative)
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`[Zps
`@.
`ifyes, brief description:
`
`
`
`Agreement
`
`[fijvas reached.
`
`Eats not reached
`
`Ciairnts) discussed 8
`
`identification of prior art discussed:
`(U S, patent 5, 813, 107}
`qu (U S patent 6 085,207Lsorovov er a/
`
`
`Description of the general nature of what was agreed to it an agreement was reached, or any other comments:
`Applicant’s representative discussed the differences between the T50 and Borovoueferences and thepresent invention. For
`instance it was painted out that in the T50 reference, the user must select the text string to begrocesseg, whereas in the
`present inventiorL the user does not have to select the text striridlo be anafl/zed, Applicant's representative may submit an
`AttenFinal Amendment that amends the independent claim to include this difference.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments, if available, which the examiner agreed would render
`the claims allowable must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendents which would render the claims allowable
`is available a su'nrnary thereof must be attached.)
`
`1 X it is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of the intervtew
`
`Unless the paragraph above has been checked to indicate to the contrary, A FORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE LAST
`CFFICE ACTION IS NOT WAIVED AND MUST INCLUDE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE lNTERVIEW (See MPEP Section
`713 04),
`If a response to the last Office action has already been filed, APPLICANT lS GIVEN ONE MONTH FROM THIS
`iNTERVIEW DATE TO FILE A STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW.
`
`2,
`
`F3 Since the Examiner's interview summary above (including any attachments) reflects a complete response to
`each of the objections, rejections and reqUIrements that may be present in the last Office action, and since the
`claims are now allowable, this completed form is considered to fulfill the response requirements of the last
`Office action, Applicant is not relieved from providing a separate record of the interview unless box 1 above
`
`is also checked
`
`.
`Examiner Note You must sign and stamp this form unless it Is an attachment to a signed Office action.
`U ‘3 Patent and 'rademarx oflice
`PTO—413(Rev 10-95)
`
`interview Summary
`
`
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Ex. 2004
`Page 1 of 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket