UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436
`
`Before the Honorable Robert K. Rogers, Jr.
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN WIRELESS DEVICES
`WITH 3G AND/OR 4G CAPABILITIES
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-868
`
`HUAWEI RESPONDENTS’ CORRECTED
`IDENTIFICATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES
`
`Pursuant to the Ground Rule 6 and Order No. 34, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,
`
`Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Huawei Device USA, Inc. (collectively, “Huawei”), by the
`
`undersigned attorneys, hereby identify the following individuals as experts that Huawei currently
`
`believes may testify on behalf of Huawei in this investigation. Huawei also incorporates by
`
`reference the identification of any other expert witnesses identified by any other Respondent in
`
`this Investigation.
`
`This identification of experts and expected areas of testimony is preliminary and is based
`
`on Huawei’s current understanding of the evidence and defenses produced during discovery.
`
`Discovery is ongoing and Huawei reserves the right to supplement this identification.
`
`1.
`
`Mr. Laurent Aynes
`
`Mr. Aynes is an expert on French contract law. A copy of Mr. Aynes’s curriculum vitae
`
`is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Mr. Aynes may be called on to testify regarding the
`
`enforceability, effect, and construction of ETSI FRAND undertakings under French law. Mr.
`
`Aynes may also be called to rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should
`
`any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`SV: 74072-2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 1
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`2.
`
`Mr. Jonathan Barney
`
`Mr. Barney is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property. A
`
`copy of Mr. Barney’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit B. Mr. Barney may be called on to
`
`testify regarding matters relating to, at least, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory license
`
`terms and conditions, including royalty rates and levels. Mr. Barney may also be called to rebut
`
`the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the
`
`same.
`
`3.
`
`Mr. Richard Buttrick
`
`Mr. Buttrick is an expert on the ETSI IPR policy and the history of its adoption. A copy
`
`of Mr. Buttrick’s curriculum vitae is attached hereto as Exhibit C. Mr. Buttrick may be called on
`
`to testify regarding matters relating to, at least, Standard Setting Organization obligations,
`
`commitments, and procedures. Mr. Buttrick may also be called to rebut the testimony of
`
`InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`4.
`
`Dr. Alan Cox
`
`Dr. Cox is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property. A
`
`copy of Dr. Cox’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit D. Dr. Cox may be called on to testify
`
`regarding matters relating to, at least, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory license terms and
`
`conditions, including royalty rates and levels. Dr. Cox may also be called to rebut the testimony
`
`of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`5.
`
`Professor Jacques deLisle
`
`Professor deLisle is an expert in Chinese law. A copy of Professor deLisle’s curriculum
`
`vitae is attached as Exhibit X. Professor deLisle may be called on to testify regarding matters
`
`relating to, at least, Chinese law, procedures in Chinese courts, due process protections in China,
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 2
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`litigations between Chinese and foreign corporations, judicial decision-making in China, and
`
`other issues relating to the resolution of disputes in Chinese courts. Professor deLisle may also
`
`be called to rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be
`
`presented, regarding the same.
`
`6.
`
`Dr. Christian Dippon
`
`Dr. Dippon is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property. A
`
`copy of Dr. Dippon’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit E. Dr. Dippon may be called on to
`
`testify regarding matters relating to, at least, the impact any exclusion order would have upon the
`
`public interest; and fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory license terms and conditions,
`
`including royalty rates and levels. Dr. Dippon may also be called to rebut the testimony of
`
`InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`7.
`
`Dr. Charles Eldering
`
`Dr. Eldering is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property.
`
`A copy of Dr. Eldering’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit F. Dr. Eldering may be called
`
`on to testify regarding matters relating to, at least, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory
`
`license terms and conditions, including royalty rates and levels. Dr. Eldering may also be called
`
`to rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented,
`
`regarding the same.
`
`8.
`
`Dr. Richard Gilbert
`
`Dr. Gilbert is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property. A
`
`copy of Dr. Gilbert’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit G. Dr. Gilbert may be called on to
`
`testify regarding matters relating to, at least, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory license
`
`terms and conditions, including royalty rates and levels. Dr. Gilbert may also be called to rebut
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 3
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the
`
`same.
`
`9.
`
`Mr. John Jarosz
`
`Mr. Jarosz is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property. A
`
`copy of Mr. Jarosz’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit H. Mr. Jarosz may be called on to
`
`testify regarding matters relating to, at least, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory license
`
`terms and conditions, including royalty rates and levels. Mr. Jarosz may also be called to rebut
`
`the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the
`
`same.
`
`10.
`
`Dr. Apostolos Kakaes
`
`Dr. Kakaes is an expert in the field of wireless communications. A copy of Dr. Kakaes’s
`
`curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit I. Dr. Kakaes may be called on to testify regarding
`
`matters relating to, at least, the technical background of InterDigital’s patents; the interpretation
`
`of the claims in those patents; the design, structure, function, and operation of the accused
`
`products and any article asserted to be protected by the patents; the knowledge of a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the art; the scope of the prior art; other issues in connection with infringement,
`
`validity, enforceability, and/or the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement; the
`
`degree of importance, if any, of the InterDigital patents with respect to any industry standard
`
`and/or any accused product, as it may relate to the FRAND royalty rate for any such patent; and
`
`any other technical issue that may arise. Dr. Kakaes may also be called to rebut the testimony of
`
`InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`11. Mr. David Kennedy
`
`Mr. Kennedy is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 4
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`A copy of Mr. Kennedy’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit J. He may be called on to
`
`testify regarding matters relating to, at least, domestic industry; licensing; the appropriateness
`
`and/or scope of a remedy for this Investigation; and the appropriate amount of any bond to be set
`
`in any remedial orders for importation during the Presidential review period. Mr. Kennedy may
`
`also be called to rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be
`
`presented, regarding the same.
`
`12.
`
`Dr. Alon Konchitsky
`
`Dr. Konchitsky is an expert in the field of wireless communications. A copy of Dr.
`
`Konchitsky’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit K. Dr. Konchitsky may be called on to
`
`testify regarding matters relating to, at least, the technical background of InterDigital’s patents;
`
`the interpretation of the claims in those patents; the design, structure, function, and operation of
`
`the accused products and any article asserted to be protected by the patents; the knowledge of a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art; the scope of the prior art; other issues in connection with
`
`infringement, validity, enforceability, and/or the technical prong of the domestic industry
`
`requirement; the degree of importance, if any, of the InterDigital patents with respect to any
`
`industry standard and/or any accused product, as it may relate to the FRAND royalty rate for any
`
`such patent; and any other technical issue that may arise. Dr. Konchitsky may also be called to
`
`rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding
`
`the same.
`
`13. Mr. Mark Lanning
`
`Mr. Lanning is an expert in the field of wireless communications. A copy of Mr.
`
`Lanning’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit L. Mr. Lanning may be called on to testify
`
`regarding matters relating to, at least, the technical background of InterDigital’s patents; the
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 5
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`interpretation of the claims in those patents; the design, structure, function, and operation of the
`
`accused products and any article asserted to be protected by the patents; the knowledge of a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art; the scope of the prior art; other issues in connection with
`
`infringement, validity, enforceability, and/or the technical prong of the domestic industry
`
`requirement; the degree of importance, if any, of the InterDigital patents with respect to any
`
`industry standard and/or any accused product, as it may relate to the FRAND royalty rate for any
`
`such patent; and any other technical issue that may arise. Mr. Lanning may also be called to
`
`rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding
`
`the same.
`
`14. Mr. Michael Lasinski
`
`Mr. Lasinski is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property.
`
`A copy of Mr. Lasinski’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit M. Mr. Lasinski may be called
`
`on to testify regarding matters relating to, at least, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory
`
`license terms and conditions, including royalty rates and levels. Mr. Lasinski may also be called
`
`to rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented,
`
`regarding the same.
`
`15.
`
`Dr. Vijay Madisetti
`
`Dr. Madisetti is an expert in the field of wireless communications. A copy of Dr.
`
`Madisetti’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit N. Dr. Madisetti may be called on to testify
`
`regarding matters relating to, at least, the technical background of InterDigital’s patents; the
`
`interpretation of the claims in those patents; the design, structure, function, and operation of the
`
`accused products and any article asserted to be protected by the patents; the knowledge of a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art; the scope of the prior art; other issues in connection with
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 6
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`infringement, validity, enforceability, and/or the technical prong of the domestic industry
`
`requirement; the degree of importance, if any, of the InterDigital patents with respect to any
`
`industry standard and/or any accused product, as it may relate to the FRAND royalty rate for any
`
`such patent; and any other technical issue that may arise. Dr. Madisetti may also be called to
`
`rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding
`
`the same.
`
`16.
`
`Dr. Steven McLaughlin
`
`Dr. McLaughlin is an expert in the field of wireless communications. A copy of Dr.
`
`McLaughlin’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit O. Dr. McLaughlin may be called on to
`
`testify regarding matters relating to, at least, the technical background of InterDigital’s patents;
`
`the interpretation of the claims in those patents; the design, structure, function, and operation of
`
`the accused products and any article asserted to be protected by the patents; the knowledge of a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art; the scope of the prior art; other issues in connection with
`
`infringement, validity, enforceability, and/or the technical prong of the domestic industry
`
`requirement; the degree of importance, if any, of the InterDigital patents with respect to any
`
`industry standard and/or any accused product, as it may relate to the FRAND royalty rate for any
`
`such patent; and any other technical issue that may arise. Dr. McLaughlin may also be called to
`
`rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding
`
`the same.
`
`17. Mr. Paul Meyer
`
`Mr. Meyer is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual property. A
`
`copy of Mr. Meyer’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit P. He may be called on to testify
`
`regarding matters relating to, at least, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory license terms and
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 7
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`conditions, including royalty rates and levels. Mr. Meyer may also be called to rebut the
`
`testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`18.
`
`Dr. Paul Min
`
`Dr. Min is an expert in the field of wireless communications. A copy of Dr. Min’s
`
`curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit Q. Dr. Min may be called on to testify regarding matters
`
`relating to, at least, the technical background of InterDigital’s patents; the interpretation of the
`
`claims in those patents; the design, structure, function, and operation of the accused products and
`
`any article asserted to be protected by the patents; the knowledge of a person of ordinary skill in
`
`the art; the scope of the prior art; other issues in connection with infringement, validity,
`
`enforceability, and/or the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement; the degree of
`
`importance, if any, of the InterDigital patents with respect to any industry standard and/or any
`
`accused product, as it may relate to the FRAND royalty rate for any such patent; and any other
`
`technical issue that may arise. Dr. Min may also be called to rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s
`
`expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`19.
`
`Dr. James Olivier
`
`Dr. Olivier is an expert in the field of wireless communications. A copy of Dr. Olivier’s
`
`curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit R. Dr. Olivier may be called on to testify regarding
`
`matters relating to, at least, the technical background of InterDigital’s patents; the interpretation
`
`of the claims in those patents; the design, structure, function, and operation of the accused
`
`products and any article asserted to be protected by the patents; the knowledge of a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the art; the scope of the prior art; other issues in connection with infringement,
`
`validity, enforceability, and/or the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement; the
`
`degree of importance, if any, of the InterDigital patents with respect to any industry standard
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 8
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`and/or any accused product, as it may relate to the FRAND royalty rate for any such patent; and
`
`any other technical issue that may arise. Dr. Olivier may also be called to rebut the testimony of
`
`InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`20.
`
`Dr. Michael Samuels
`
`Dr. Samuels is an expert in the field of international trade and public affairs. A copy of
`
`Dr. Samuels’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit S. Dr. Samuels may be called on to testify
`
`regarding matters relating to, at least, international trade practice and policy and any impact or
`
`relation an ITC remedy has on the same; and the impact of InterDigital’s conduct to international
`
`trade, and the impact on the public interest factors. Dr. Samuels may also be called to rebut the
`
`testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`21. Mr. Robert Stoll
`
`Mr. Stoll is an expert in the field of intellectual property and legislation and policy of
`
`patents. A copy of Mr. Stoll’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit T. Mr. Stoll may be called
`
`on to testify regarding matters relating to, at least, InterDigital’s patent prosecution practices; the
`
`practices and policies of the intellectual property system; the USPTO; and the impact of
`
`InterDigital’s conduct to the patent system. Mr. Stoll may also be called to rebut the testimony
`
`of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`22.
`
`Dr. Thomas Vander Veen
`
`Dr. Vander Veen is an expert in the licensing and economic aspects of intellectual
`
`property. A copy of Dr. Vander Veen’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit U. He may be
`
`called on to testify regarding matters relating to, at least, domestic industry; licensing; the
`
`appropriateness and/or scope of a remedy for this Investigation; and the appropriate amount of
`
`any bond to be set in any remedial orders for importation during the Presidential review period.
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 9
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`Dr. Vander Veen may also be called to rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact
`
`witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`23.
`
`Dr. Michael Walker
`
`Dr. Walker is an expert in the field of standard setting organizations and ETSI. A copy
`
`of Dr. Walker’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit V. He may be called on to testify
`
`regarding matters relating to, at least, standard setting organization obligations, commitments
`
`and procedures. Dr. Walker may also be called to rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or
`
`fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same.
`
`24.
`
`Dr. Tim Williams
`
`Dr. Williams is an expert in the field of wireless communications. A copy of Dr.
`
`Williams’s curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit W. Dr. Williams may be called on to testify
`
`regarding matters relating to, at least, the technical background of InterDigital’s patents; the
`
`interpretation of the claims in those patents; the design, structure, function, and operation of the
`
`accused products and any article asserted to be protected by the patents; the knowledge of a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art; the scope of the prior art; other issues in connection with
`
`infringement, validity, enforceability, and/or the technical prong of the domestic industry
`
`requirement; the degree of importance, if any, of the InterDigital patents with respect to any
`
`industry standard and/or any accused product, as it may relate to the FRAND royalty rate for any
`
`such patent; and any other technical issue that may arise. Dr. Williams may also be called to
`
`rebut the testimony of InterDigital’s expert or fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding
`
`the same.
`
`25.
`
`Opinion Testimony from Other Witnesses
`
`In addition to the expert witnesses identified above, Huawei reserves the right to offer
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 10
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`opinion testimony from lay witnesses called at the hearing in this Investigation as to matters
`
`within the perception of the lay witness. Huawei further reserves the right to elicit testimony that
`
`may be deemed expert testimony from lay witnesses who have the requisite scientific, technical,
`
`or other specialized knowledge to provide that testimony and hereby designates those lay
`
`witnesses as expert with regard to such testimony. These reservations include, but are not limited
`
`to, opinion or expert testimony regarding the design, operation, functionality, implementation,
`
`manufacture, marketing, sale, or importation of any relevant device, product, or technology.
`
`Dated: June 27, 2013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Wallace J. Lee
`Sturgis M. Sobin
`Ashley E. Miller
`Virginia M. Bruner
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20004-2401
`Tel: 202.662.6000 | Fax: 202.662.6291
`
`David W. Haller
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10018
`Tel: 212.841.1057
`Fax: 646.441.9057
`
`Stanley Young
`Robert T. Haslam
`Wallace J. Lee
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418
`Tel: 650.632.4701 | Fax: 650.632.4801
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 11
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`Winslow B. Taub
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One Front Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111-5356
`Tel: 415.6591.6000 | Fax: 415.6591.6091
`
`Counsel for Respondents Huawei Technologies,
`Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., and Futurewei
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 12
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 13
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`Laurent Aynés
`28 rue Racine — 75006 Paris (France)
`Té1_+ 33(0)1.45.00.85.99 — Fax : +33(0)1.45.00.19.40
`Email : laurent.a
`es ilwanadoofr
`
`born November 18”‘, 1952
`married — father of four children
`
`Current professional position
`0 Professor of law at University of Paris I (Pantheon-Sorbonne) since 1991, after twelve
`years of full-time practise as a Professor at several other universities (University of
`Tours, University of Paris X)
`0 Co director of the Sorbonne Law School (Université Panthéon—Sorbonne, Paris 1)
`
`0 Co scientific director of Lamy “Droit des Sfiretés” (since 2002)
`0 Scientific director of the review “Droit et Patrimoine” (since 2003)
`0 Member of the scientific committee of the review “Revue des contrats" (since 2003) and
`
`“Repertoire du Defrénois” (since 2007)
`Scientific director of the review “Revue des contrats" (2013)
`Member of “Commission Darrois”
`
`Member of the Law Commission for the reform of securities
`
`Member of the working group for the reform of contract law (groupe Terré)
`Legal consultant since 1978, especially in business matters ; legal expert in French law
`before UK and US Courts, together with arbitral tribunals in various cases
`0 Arbitrator since 1990: international trade, joint ventures and industrial co—operation, agency
`and distribution, construction, finance and banking matters (law of contract. . .)
`
`Academic degrees / Qualifications
`0
`“Licence és—lettres modemes" (University of Reims, 1973)
`0 Admitted at the Paris Bar (1977)
`
`0
`O
`
`"Doctorat en Droit" (University of Paris 11, Pantheon-Assas, 1981)
`“Agrégation de Droit Privé" (1982) 2 a national competition for the nomination of
`professors of university
`
`Professional experience
`
`0 Director of the “Ecole Doctorale de droit privé”
`of University of Paris - Pantheon-Sorbonne (2002-2007)
`
`0 Director of DEA (i.e. Ph.D) of “Droit du patrimoine privé”
`at University of Paris I — Pantheon-Sorbonne (1993-2002)
`
`0 Member of the jury of the National competition for the nomination of professors of
`law, in 1993 and 1991 (Agrégation)
`0 Visiting fellow at the University of Oxford, Centre for the Advanced Study of European
`and Comparative Law (Oct. — Nov. 1996, Jan. - Feb. 1998, Nov. 1999)
`
`0 Guest professor to several foreign Universities (Turkey, Latvia, Tunisia, Japan, Canada)
`
`Publications
`Author of a number of text-books on civil law:
`
`0 The Assignment of contracts (La cession de contrats), Economica, 1983
`0 Suretyship (Le cautionnement), Dalloz, 2"d ed., 1997
`
`C o—autlior with Professor Philippe Malaurie, Cujas:
`0 The law of Torts and Contracts (Obligations), 11”‘ ed., 2001/2002
`iv
`1 — Responsabilité dé/ictuelle
`>
`2 — Contrats et quasi—c0ntrats
`>
`3 — Régime géneral
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 141
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`|PR2014-01507
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 14
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`0 Special contracts (Contrats spéciaux), 14”‘ ed., 2001/2002
`with Professor Gautier
`
`0 Marital law (Les régimes matrimoniawc), 4”‘ ed., 1999
`0 The law of property (Les biens), 5”" ed., 2002
`
`Co-author with Professor Philippe Malaurie, Defiénois
`0 The law of Torts and Contracts (Les obligations) with Professor Ph. Stoffel—Munck, 5"‘ ed. 2011
`0 The law of property (Les biens), 5”‘ ed. 2013
`I The securities, the land registry (Les sfiretés, la publicitéfonciere),
`with Professor P. Crocq, 6"‘ ed. 2012
`o The special contracts (Les contrats spéciaux), with Professor P.-Y. Gautier, 6”‘ ed. 2012
`- Marital law (Les régimes matrimoniaux), 3rd ed. 2010
`
`(Dalloz), Law of
`Legal commentator on case law, especially in Law of contract
`warranties (Dalloz, Defrénois), Law of arbitration (Revue de Parbitrage), compensation in
`civil liability (iurisclasseur civil)
`
`Member of:
`
`- Centre francais de droit compare
`- Comité francais de l’arbitrage
`- Association Capitant
`- Société de legislation comparée
`- Association Francaise d’Arbitrage
`- International Arbitration Institute (IAI)
`
`Member of the board of the Association Capitant
`
`ARBITRATION EXPERIENCE:
`
`International institutional arbitration:
`
`— CCI:
`
`7 times chairman of tribunal
`°
`- 49 times co-arbitrator
`° Once Sole arbitrator
`
`- Other:
`
`3 times chairman of tribunal
`°
`° 11 times co-arbitrator
`
`International ad hoc and domestic arbitration:
`
`° 14 times chairman of tribunal
`' 41 times co-arbitrator
`
`Sole arbitrator - domestic arbitration: once
`- International ad hoc: once
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 15
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`|PR2014-01507
`
`2
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 15
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 16
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`Jonathan is the founder and CEO of PatentRatings, LLC and an
`equity partner in Ocean Tomo, LLC, where he developed and
`patented statistical algorithms for quantitative patent analysis,
`strategic patent capital investment and other initiatives broadly
`aimed at creating and enhancing the value of intellectual capital.
`Jonathan is also the founder and CEO of MQ Gaming, LLC, co-
`founder and CEO of Creative Kingdoms Technologies, LLC,
`and co-founder and former CEO of Creative Kingdoms, LLC
`(now owned and operated by Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.). Prior to
`that Jonathan was a partner at Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear,
`LLP, where he specialized in patent prosecution, patent
`licensing and strategic patent management.
`
`
`As an engineer, inventor, lawyer and entrepreneur, Jonathan has led the development,
`patenting, commercialization and licensing of new technologies for automated patent
`rating, valuation and analysis, and motion-sensitive controllers and related toys for
`gaming, among others. Jonathan is a prolific inventor and has been awarded over four
`dozen U.S. patents and has been named as an inventor on more than two dozen pending
`patents. Jonathan continues to develop and manage a worldwide portfolio of over 50
`issued and pending patents and related licensing and enforcement initiatives.
`
`Jonathan is a frequent speaker on IP-related topics. He has spoken at Notre Dame's
`Mendoza College of Business, the Chicago-Kent College of Law, Rutgers University and
`before various professional organizations, such as the Licensing Executives Society
`(LES), Licensing Executives Society International (LESI), and the Organisation for
`Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Jonathan has been recognized by
`Intellectual Asset Management magazine as one of the world’s top 250 IP Strategists.
`
`Jonathan is a registered patent lawyer and a graduate of Virginia Tech University
`(B.S.M.E. 1987, cum laude) and The University of Michigan Law School (J.D. 1993,
`cum laude).
`
`Publications:
`J.Barney & J.Malackowski, "What is Patent Quality? -- A Merchant Banc's Perspective,"
`Les Nouvelles (June 2008)
`J. Barney, "The Quality Conundrum," Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)
`(October/November 2006)
`J. Barney, "A Study of Patent Mortality Rates: Using Statistical Analysis to Rate and
`Value Patent Assets," AIPLA Quarterly Journal (2002)
`J. Barney, "Comparative Quality Analysis – A Statistical Approach for Rating and
`Valuing Patent Assets," NACVA Valuation Examiner (2001)
`
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 17
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 18
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`Richard Buttrick
`
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`Summary of Career
`
`2002 – 2009 Senior Vice President, IP& Standards, Philips Electronics
`
`1996 – 2002 Deputy Head of Patents Division, BTG International Ltd
`
`1988 – 1996 IPR Adviser, British Telecommunications plc
`
`1982 – 1988 Patent Attorney, Batchellor, Kirk & Eyles,
`Chartered Patent Attorneys
`
`1979 – 1982 Trainee Patent Attorney, Frank B, Dehn & Co,
`Chartered Patent Attorneys
`
`Skill set and Accomplishments
`
`Richard’s leadership skills have been recognized through senior management
`roles in Philips and BTG, seats on the Board of several private companies, and
`two Board Chairmanships, where he has used his natural diplomatic and
`facilitation skills to lead, guide, and where necessary drive, diverse stakeholders
`to shared goals.
`
`Throughout his business career, with BT, BTG and Philips, Richard has worked
`with, and in, teams enabling and empowering people to work together. With
`more senior roles and the evolving world of Intellectual Property, Richard has
`created and grown increasingly diverse teams of Business, Accounting and
`Technical people, as well Legal and IP Specialists, to create and win business.
`
`As a skilled professional, Richard, brings the rich experience of 30 years in the
`field of Intellectual Property, with early work as a Patent Attorney being
`augmented by skills in IP Management and IP Licensing, where he has led,
`managed and/or controlled many hundreds of licensing projects ranging from
`technology licensing to patent litigation, to generate large, sustained licensing
`incomes. He has a particular specialism in the field of IP issues on standards,
`including licensing through patent pools. He has participated in the creation of
`this business sector since the early 1990s, and has worked with others to create
`and manage over a dozen patent pools.
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 19
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`Career Review
`
`Philips Electronics, March 2002 – April 2009
`
`4 successive, major roles, leading teams and managing projects to bring in large,
`sustained IP licensing revenues and manage complex IP issues. Joined Philips
`in April 2002 as Vice President, promoted to Senior Vice President in July 2005
`
`January 2008 – April 2009
`
`BG Executive in Philips Intellectual Property & Standards organization
`responsible for all IP matters for Philips’ Consumer Lifestyle Sector
`(CLS)
`
`Scope of duties included leading 10 man Management Team responsible
`for day to day management of
`IP matters in CLS, e.g. IP (inc Patent and
`Trademark) Creation and Management, IP Value Extraction (inc
`Licensing),
`IP Acquisitions, and IP Counseling, e.g. IP aspects of
`Purchasing and Supply Contracts, IP aspects of Research and
`Development Contracts. The professional team working on CLS IP issues
`was over 100, the Patent Portfolio ~ 2500 patent families; licensing
`revenues > $500M, Purchasing and Supply contract value >> $1B
`
`December 2006 – January 2008
`
`Value Extraction (Licensing) Executive responsible for all IP Value
`Extraction activities in Philips.
`
`Scope of duties included leading team of 6 Value Extraction (Licensing)
`managers responsible for getting value from Philips entire IP portfolio
`including through technology, trademark and patent licensing. Also direct
`involvement in major licensing projects.
`
`Scale of responsibilities: Licensing revenues > $500M
`
`January 2005 – November 2006
`
`Licensing Director responsible for General Patent Licensing and
`Technology Licensing in Philips
`
`BLACKBERRY EX. 1014, pg. 20
`Blackberry v. Zipit
`IPR2014-01507
`
`

`
`Scope of duties included leading team of 5 managers responsible for
`patent licensing and technology licensing. Scale of responsibilities:
`Licensing revenues > $200M
`
`April 2002 – December 2004
`
`Licensing Manager responsible for General Patent Licensing in
`Philips
`
`Scope of duties included managing licensing projects relating to Philips
`patent portfolio, and leading major projects. Scale of responsibilities:
`Licensing revenues > $100M
`
`Other Responsibilities
`
`Various Board Positions in IP related companies in which Philips owned
`minority i