`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`SPEED MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.:
`
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRIGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Speed Monitoring Technologies LLC (“SMT”), as and for its Complaint
`
`against Defendant Volvo Cars of North America, LLC (“Volvo”), hereby alleges as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et
`
`seq., for infringement by Volvo of claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,389,198.
`
`PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff SMT is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws
`
`of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of business at One Commerce Center –
`
`1201 Orange St., #600, Wilmington, Delaware 19899.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Volvo is a limited liability company
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of
`
`business at 1 Volvo Drive, Rockleigh, New Jersey 07647.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`4.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1338(a).
`
`
`
`1
`
`Petitioners Ex. 1007 Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00346-SLR Document 1 Filed 03/18/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
`
`5.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Volvo because, inter alia, Volvo is a
`
`Delaware limited liability company, Volvo has done and continues to do business in the State
`
`of Delaware, and upon information and belief, Volvo has committed and continues to commit
`
`acts of patent infringement in the State of Delaware.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1391(c) and
`
`1400(b) because, inter alia, both Plaintiff SMT and Defendant Volvo are Delaware limited
`
`liability companies, Plaintiff’s principal place of business is located in this judicial district, the
`
`Patent-in-Suit is assigned to Plaintiff, Defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in this
`
`district, and, upon information and belief, Defendant has committed and continues to commit
`
`acts of patent infringement in this district.
`
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`7.
`
`On June 17, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`lawfully issued U.S. Patent No. 7,389,198 (the “’198 Patent” or the “Patent-in-Suit”), entitled
`
`“Land Vehicle Speed Monitoring System,” based upon an application filed by the inventor,
`
`James C. Dimitriadis. A true and correct copy of the ’198 Patent is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit A.
`
`8.
`
`The ’198 Patent generally relates to a system for monitoring a land vehicle speed
`
`relative to a speed limit.
`
`9.
`
`SMT is the owner of the ’198 Patent and has the right to sue and recover damages
`
`for infringement thereof.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`10.
`
`As referred to in this Complaint, and consistent with 35 U.S.C. § 100 (c), the
`
`“United States” means “the United States of America, its territories and possessions.”
`
`
`
`2
`
`Petitioners Ex. 1007 Page 2
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00346-SLR Document 1 Filed 03/18/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3
`
`11.
`
`Upon information and belief, including based on the products identified on
`
`Volvo’s websites and described in Volvo’s manuals, Volvo makes, imports, and sells products
`
`made in accordance with the ’198 Patent, including, but not limited to Volvo vehicles
`
`comprising the Road Sign Information and Navigation systems.
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, including based on the products identified on
`
`Volvo’s websites and described in Volvo’s manuals, vehicles comprising the Road Sign
`
`Information and Navigation systems, as of the date of this Complaint, include the 2013 Volvo
`
`S60, S80, XC60, and XC70 models; the 2014 Volvo S60, S80, XC60, and XC70 models; and
`
`the 2015 Volvo V60 model.
`
`COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’198 PATENT BY VOLVO
`
`Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Volvo has infringed at least claims 1-2
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`and 7-11 of the ’198 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 (a) by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`and/or selling in the United States, and/or importing into the United States vehicles with Road
`
`Sign Information and Navigation systems. Upon information and belief, Volvo’s infringement
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 (a) is ongoing.
`
`15.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Volvo has committed the foregoing
`
`infringing activities without license from SMT.
`
`16.
`
`To the extent that facts learned in discovery show that Volvo’s infringement of
`
`the ’198 Patent is or has been willful, SMT reserves the right to request such a finding at a later
`
`time, including at the time of trial.
`
`17.
`
`As a result of Volvo’s infringement of the ’198 Patent, SMT has suffered
`
`monetary damages and is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to compensate
`
`
`
`3
`
`Petitioners Ex. 1007 Page 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00346-SLR Document 1 Filed 03/18/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4
`
`for Volvo’s infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest
`
`and costs.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, SMT prays for judgment in its favor against Volvo granting SMT the
`
`following relief:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Entry of judgment in favor of SMT against Volvo on all counts;
`
`Entry of judgment that Volvo has infringed the ’198 Patent;
`
`Award of compensatory damages adequate to compensate SMT for Volvo’s
`
`infringement of the ’198 Patent;
`
`D.
`
`SMT’s reasonable fees for expert witnesses and attorneys, as provided by 35
`
`U.S.C. § 285;
`
`E.
`
`F.
`
`G.
`
`SMT’s costs;
`
`Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on SMT’s award; and
`
`All such other and further relief as the Court deems just or equitable.
`
`
`
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Fed. R. Civ. P., SMT hereby demands trial by jury in
`
`this action of all claims so triable.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Petitioners Ex. 1007 Page 4
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00346-SLR Document 1 Filed 03/18/14 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Brian E. Farnan
`Brian E. Farnan (#4089)
`919 North Market St.
`12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel. (302) 777-0300
`Fax (302) 777-0301
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Speed Monitoring
`Technologies LLC.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Farnan LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 18, 2014
`
`
`
`
`Of Counsel for Plaintiff Speed Monitoring
`Technologies LLC:
`
`Dmitriy Kheyfits
`dkheyfits@kheyfitsmaloney.com
`Michael James Maloney
`mmaloney@kheyfitsmaloney.com
`Kheyfits & Maloney LLP
`1140 Avenue of the Americas
`9th Floor
`New York, New York 10036
`Tel. (212) 203-5399
`Fax. (212) 203-6445
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Petitioners Ex. 1007 Page 5
`
`