throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 22
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Entered: November 20, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`TRW AUTOMOTIVE US LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2014-01497 (Patent 8,531,278 B2)
`Case IPR2014-01499 (Patent 8,531,279 B2)1
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, BARRY L. GROSSMAN, and
`BART A. GERSTENBLITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 We use this caption to indicate that this Order applies to, and is entered in,
`both cases. The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`
`

`
`Case IPR2014-01497 (Patent 8,531,278 B2)
`Case IPR2014-01499 (Patent 8,531,279 B2)
`
`
`A trial hearing for presentation of oral argument is scheduled for
`December 9, 2015, if requested by the parties. Paper 17.2 Both parties have
`requested oral argument. Papers 20, 21.
`A consolidated hearing will be held for IPR2014-01497 and IPR2014-
`01499. Any representation made by counsel at the consolidated hearing is
`applicable to and useable in both cases where there is a proper underlying basis for
`the representation.
`The hearing will commence at 9:00 AM Eastern Time, on Wednesday,
`December 9, 2015, at Madison Building East, Ninth Floor, 600 Dulany Street,
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Each party will have 60 minutes of total oral
`argument time for the consolidated oral argument. The Board will provide a court
`reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official
`record of the hearing. The hearing transcript will be entered in the record of
`IPR2014-01497 and IPR2014-01499.
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s patent
`claims at issue are unpatentable. Therefore, at the hearing, Petitioner will proceed
`first to present its case with respect to the challenged patent claims and grounds
`with respect to which the Board instituted trial in IPR2014-01497 and IPR2014-
`01499. Petitioner may reserve some of its argument time for use in further
`presentation after Patent Owner has responded to Petitioner’s initial presentation.
`Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s initial presentation, having available to it
`the entirety of its allotted argument time. Thereafter, Petitioner may make use of
`the time it has reserved, to rebut Patent Owner’s presentation. No live testimony
`from any witness will be taken at the hearing. There are no outstanding motions to
`
`
`2 Both cases have the same Paper Number, unless indicated otherwise.
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2014-01497 (Patent 8,531,278 B2)
`Case IPR2014-01499 (Patent 8,531,279 B2)
`
`be argued. If either party believes there are outstanding motions, they should so
`notify the Board at least three business days prior to the hearing.
`The oral argument will be open to the public. Attendance will be
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served five
`business days before the hearing. They shall be filed with the Board three business
`days prior to the hearing and the parties must initiate a conference call with the
`Board at least two business days prior to the hearing to resolve any dispute over the
`propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits. For guidance on what constitutes
`an appropriate demonstrative exhibit, the parties are directed to Paper 118 in CBS
`Interactive Inc. v. Wireless Sciences LLC, IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013).
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at the hearing,
`although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole or in part.
`If lead counsel for either party will not be in attendance at the hearing, the Board
`should be notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than two business
`days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be made 5 days in advance of the
`hearing date. The request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not
`received timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2014-01497 (Patent 8,531,278 B2)
`Case IPR2014-01499 (Patent 8,531,279 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Jon Trembath
`A. Justin Poplin
`Timothy K. Sendek
`Hissan Anis
`Allan Sternstein
`Douglas W. Link
`LATHROP & GAGE, LLP
`patent@lathropgage.com
`jtrembath@lathropgage.com
`jpoplin@lathropgage.com
`tsendek@lathropgage.com
`HAnis@lathropgage.com
`asternstein@lathropgage.com
`DLink@lathropgage.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Timothy A. Flory
`Terence J. Linn
`GARDNER, LINN, BURKHART & FLORY, LLP
`flory@glbf.com
`linn@glbf.com
`
`David K.S. Cornwell
`Mark W. Rygiel
`Daniel Yonan
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`davidc-PTAB@skgf.com
`mrygiel-PTAB@skgf.com
`dyonan-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket