throbber
14:48
`
`14:48
`
`14:49
`
`14:49
`
`14:49
`
`14:49
`
` 3997
`
` LoCascio Cross of Robert Brune
`
`And you know, sir, that there are people -- you have heard
`Q
`testimony from some -- that at the time of the invention were
`skeptical of if you could put a system together that would
`actually be able to steer these streamers that are this long
`and this far apart, correct?
`A
`Yeah. I guess with the caution or additional comment there
`has been many proposals, as we looked at some of the prior arts
`you showed before, for a long time the skepticism has usually
`been about efficiency in cost and ease of doing it as opposed
`to thinking that it simply could or could not be done.
`Q
`The first one to actually do it after all of those years
`was WesternGeco, right?
`A
`In a commercial implementation that had some commercial
`success, yes.
`Q
`There was some skepticism -- you could debate if it was
`skepticism that you could commercialize it or skepticism that
`you could make it work. That's your point?
`A
`Yes.
`Q
`You know there is testimony about a long-felt need in the
`industry to have this technology, correct?
`A
`Yes. And I would offer up the notion that there is maybe a
`secondary issue there that is significant. For many years,
`through the 1990s, typical streamer spacings were on the order
`of 160 meters, and concerns about entanglement and the ability
`to go to many streamers, more than four or six, was really
`
`Mayra Malone, CSR, RMR, CRR
`mayramalone@comcast.net
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2036, pg. 1
`PGS v WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01475
`
`

`
`14:49
`
`14:50
`
`14:50
`
`14:50
`
`14:50
`
`14:50
`
` 3998
`
` LoCascio Cross of Robert Brune
`
`greatly enhanced when vessels of the Ramform style became
`common.
`
`So I would add the concept that it was roughly in
`the late '90s, early 2000s that the need ratcheted up to a much
`higher level in the industry and, no surprise, commensurate
`with when a lot of the commercial activity started.
`Q
`So there was a long-felt need for lateral steering, and
`that continued to perhaps get more significant as more and more
`streamers were put on the back of boats?
`A
`Yeah, and put closer to 100 meters, and even shorter is a
`typical separation now.
`Q
`You know there was a long-felt need to get those streamers
`closer together that was met by the inventions in this case,
`correct?
`A
`Yes. There is a bit of a chicken-and-egg issue there in
`terms of willingness to put streamers in the water close
`together.
`Q
`You have seen testimony about the failure of others,
`including some of the other WesternGeco people like Workman and
`folks like that, to actually get this to work, right?
`A
`Yeah. I have personal knowledge of some of those dating
`back in the late '80s.
`Q
`In your own personal experience, you saw people try to do
`this and fail?
`A
`Yes. Fail usually for commercial reasons as much as
`
`Mayra Malone, CSR, RMR, CRR
`mayramalone@comcast.net
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2036, pg. 2
`PGS v WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01475
`
`

`
`14:51
`
`14:51
`
`14:51
`
`14:51
`
`14:52
`
`14:52
`
` 3999
`
` LoCascio Cross of Robert Brune
`
`technical.
`Q
`And the next one is praise of the invention by the
`infringer or others in the field. You understand, sir, that
`there was praise for WesternGeco in the industry after Q-Fin
`lateral steering was introduced?
`A
`Yeah. And most significantly the phrase "from oil and gas
`companies that are willing to pay for it."
`Q
`And, sir, all of those are factors that point to these
`patents not being obvious, correct?
`A
`They point to it not being obvious but with the cautions I
`mentioned about commercial issues being important. Certainly
`to do it in a commercial widespread practical version, no
`question that it was the Q-Fin in the 2000 time frame and
`beyond that really established it as an accepted technology.
`Q
`And these commercial success, skepticism, et cetera, these
`considerations of non-obviousness are not something that you
`took into account in providing your opinions this morning to
`the jury, correct?
`A
`I did take them into account in doing my analysis, but I
`didn't talk about them in the testimony, obviously, today.
`MR. LoCASCIO: No further questions, Your Honor. Pass
`the witness.
`THE COURT: Redirect?
`MR. PIERCE: Unfortunately for Mr. Brune, Your Honor,
`I do have some redirect.
`
`Mayra Malone, CSR, RMR, CRR
`mayramalone@comcast.net
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2036, pg. 3
`PGS v WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01475

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket