Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 1 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, (TEXAS), INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`FILED
`OCT 11 2001
`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`B~ESTERN )1J/ICT OF TEXAS
`
`DEPU fY CLERK
`
`-vs-
`
`Case No. A-OO-CA-217-SS
`
`CHAPARRAL NETWORK STORAGE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`BE IT REMEMBERED on the 4th day of September 2001, the Court called the above-
`
`captioned matter, and all parties appeared through their appropriate representatives and counsel of
`
`record and announced ready for trial, and a jury composed of seven legally qualified jurors having
`
`been empaneled and this case proceeded to trial on September 4, 2001, and on September 6, 2001,
`
`the plaintiff rested its case and the defendant filed a motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 50 of the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court overruled said motion with the exception of the issue
`
`of "contributory inducement," and the trial proceeded until September 11, 2001, when the defendant
`
`rested, and thereafter the plaintiff filed its motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule
`
`50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the defendant renewed its Rule 50 motion and the
`
`Court ove1TUled all motions and the case proceeded with all parties closing on September 11, 200 l,
`
`and all parties renewing their motions, and the Cou11 ove1TUling all Rule 50 motions, and after the
`
`Court had instructed the jury and all counsel had made their final arguments, the case was submitted
`
` CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 2003
`Cisco Systems et al v Crossroads Systems, Inc.
` IPR2014-01463
`
`(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, (TEXAS), INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`FILED
`OCT 11 2001
`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`B~ESTERN )1J/ICT OF TEXAS
`
`DEPU fY CLERK
`
`-vs-
`
`Case No. A-OO-CA-217-SS
`
`CHAPARRAL NETWORK STORAGE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`BE IT REMEMBERED on the 4th day of September 2001, the Court called the above-
`
`captioned matter, and all parties appeared through their appropriate representatives and counsel of
`
`record and announced ready for trial, and a jury composed of seven legally qualified jurors having
`
`been empaneled and this case proceeded to trial on September 4, 2001, and on September 6, 2001,
`
`the plaintiff rested its case and the defendant filed a motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 50 of the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court overruled said motion with the exception of the issue
`
`of "contributory inducement," and the trial proceeded until September 11, 2001, when the defendant
`
`rested, and thereafter the plaintiff filed its motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule
`
`50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the defendant renewed its Rule 50 motion and the
`
`Court ove1TUled all motions and the case proceeded with all parties closing on September 11, 200 l,
`
`and all parties renewing their motions, and the Cou11 ove1TUling all Rule 50 motions, and after the
`
`Court had instructed the jury and all counsel had made their final arguments, the case was submitted
`
` CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 2003
`Cisco Systems et al v Crossroads Systems, Inc.
` IPR2014-01463
`
`(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 2 of 5
`
`to the jury on the 12th day of September 2001, and on that said day, the jury returned its verdict
`
`answering the questions as follows:
`
`Question No. 1:
`
`Yes
`
`1-14
`
`Question 2:
`
`Not answered
`
`Question 3:
`
`Yes
`
`July 14
`
`Question 4:
`
`Yes
`
`Question 5:
`
`Question 6:
`
`Question 7:
`
`Question 8:
`
`Question 9:
`
`July 14
`
`Router
`167,247
`5%
`8365.00
`
`Yes
`
`1-14
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`RAID
`1,371,693
`3%
`41,150.79
`
`49,515.79
`
`Said verdict was signed by the presiding juror who advised in open court it was a unanimous
`
`verdict and the verdict was accepted by the Court and filed by the Cleric Thereafter, the parties filed
`
`motions and on this date the Court has entered its orders disposing of all motions pending and, based
`
`upon the pleadings, trial record, and the law, enters this final judgment:
`
`ITIS ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the plaintiff Crossroads Systems
`
`(Texas), Inc., do have and recover judgment of and against the defendant Chapam1l Network
`
`-2-
`
`(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 3 of 5
`
`Storage, Inc., for the total sum of$148,547.37 with interest as ofJuly 11, 2001, in the amount
`
`of 2.40 percent per annum until paid, plus all costs of suit.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:
`
`l.
`
`ChapatTal Network Storage, Inc., has infringed claims 1-14 of the '972 patent
`
`in making, using, offering to sell, and selling certain routers and RAID controllers, including but not
`
`limited to the models listed in Exhibit l attached hereto and incorporated by reference and including
`
`any other products that provide access controls in a way that is substantially similar to any product
`
`listed in Exhibit l.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1-14 of the '972 patent are valid.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 154, Crossroads Systems (Texas), Inc., has the
`
`exclusive right in the United States to make, have made, use, sell, offer for sell, and imp011 products
`
`covered by, or coming within the scope of any of claims 1-14 of the '972 patent.
`
`4.
`
`ChapatTal has infringed Crossroads' 1ights in making, offering to sell, and
`
`selling router and RAID controller products that use, embody, or perform the inventions of claims
`
`1-14 of the '972 patent.
`
`5.
`
`Chapatnl has contributorily infringed and induced the infringement of claims
`
`7-14 of the '972 patent by providing third parties with the means of infringing claims 7-14 of the
`
`'972 patent and by instructing third parties to infringe claims 7-14 of the '972 patent.
`
`6.
`
`By reason of the infringement of the '972 patent, Chaparral Network Storage,
`
`Inc., its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons acting in concert
`
`or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise,
`
`are enjoined as of this date from infringing any of claims 1-14 of Crossroads Systems (Texas), Inc.'s
`
`-3-
`
`(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 4 of 5
`
`'972 patent, including but not limited to the router and RAID controller models identified on Exhibit
`
`1 and including any other router or RAID controllers that are substantially similar to any product
`
`listed in Exhibit 1.
`
`7.
`
`ChapatTa! Network Storage, Inc., its officers, directors, agents, servants,
`
`employees. attorneys, and all persons acting in concert or participation with them who receive actual
`
`notice of this order by personal service or otherwise are enjoined as of this date from contributorily
`
`infringing or inducing the infringement of any of claims 7-14 of Crossroads Systems (Texas), Inc.'s
`
`'972 patent.
`
`8.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Chaparral Network Storage, Inc., will, no
`
`later than 30 business days from the date of the entry of this injunction obtain from any dealers,
`
`distributors, or sales agents within the United States and take into Chaparral's possession all products
`
`which are owned by Chapairnl but which are now or will be in the possession or under control of
`
`such dealers, distributors, or sales agents and which infringe any of the claims 1-14 of the '972 patent
`
`(including but not limited to the products identified in Exhibit l and any other router or RAID
`
`controllers that are substantially similar to any product listed in Exhibit 1).
`
`9.
`
`The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin
`
`Division, retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this injunction.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED this the 11th day of October 2001.
`
`-4-
`
`(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 5 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, (TEXAS), INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-vs-
`
`Case No. A-OO-CA-217-SS
`
`CHAPARRAL NETWORK STORAGE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`EXHIBIT I TO PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`ChapatTa! Router Products that Infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,941,972
`
`FS 1220
`FS 2620
`
`Chapatnl RAID Controller Products that Infringe U.S. Patent No. 5.941.972
`
`G7313
`G7324
`G8324
`K7313
`K7413
`A8526
`
`(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
