throbber
Consolidated PetitionersConsolidated Petitioners
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`Quantum Corp.Quantum Corp.
`
`Oracle Corp.*Oracle Corp.*
`
`Dot Hill Systems Corp.*Dot Hill Systems Corp.*
`
`
`IPR2014-01226 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,035)IPR2014-01226 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,035)
`
`IPR2014-01463 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,041)IPR2014-01463 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,041)
`
`IPR2014-01544 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,147)IPR2014-01544 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,147)
`
`
`Andrew EhmkeAndrew Ehmke
`
`David McCombsDavid McCombs
`
`Scott JarrattScott Jarratt
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLPHaynes and Boone, LLP
`
`October 30, 2015October 30, 2015
`
`
`
`*Party by Joinder*Party by Joinder
`
`1
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`ArgumentArgument
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Patent Owner Has Improperly Narrowed the “Map”
`and “Access Control” Limitations
`
`Under Any Interpretation, the CRD-5500 Manual
`and HP Journal Render Obvious the ‘035, ‘041, and
`‘147 Patents
`
`2
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`The ’035, ’041, & ’147 Patents
`
`3
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`The ’035, ’041, & ’147 PatentsThe ’035, ’041, & ’147 Patents
`
`‘035 Patent, FIG. 3
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 5)
`
`4
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`’035 Patent, Claim 1’035 Patent, Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1226),
`’035 Patent, claim 1
`
`5
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`’041 Patent, Claim 1’041 Patent, Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1463),
`’041 Patent, claim 1
`
`6
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`’147 Patent, Claim 1’147 Patent, Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1544),
`‘147 Patent, claim 1
`
`7
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`The Cited Prior Art
`
`8
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The CRD-5500 Manual DisclosesThe CRD-5500 Manual Discloses
`
`“Mapping” and “Access Control”“Mapping” and “Access Control”
`
`Mapping:
`
`Access Controls:
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-2
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 31)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-1
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 32)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 4-5
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 32)
`
`9
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Combination DisclosesThe Combination Discloses
`
`“Mapping” and “Access Control”“Mapping” and “Access Control”
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 164:17-165:2
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 18)
`
`10
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The CRD-5500 Manual Discloses a Storage ControllerThe CRD-5500 Manual Discloses a Storage Controller
`
`that Allocates Storage to Hoststhat Allocates Storage to Hosts
`
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 17)
`
`11
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The CRD-5500 Manual DisclosesThe CRD-5500 Manual Discloses
`
`Storage Devices and Subsets of StorageStorage Devices and Subsets of Storage
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-11
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 18)
`
`12
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`The “Map” Limitation
`
`13
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`’035 Patent
`
`’147 Patent
`
`’041 Patent
`
`
`
`The Claim Language is BroadThe Claim Language is Broad
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1226),
`’035 Patent, claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1544),
`’147 Patent, claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1463),
`’041 Patent, claim 1
`
`14
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Specification Describes “Map” BroadlyThe Specification Describes “Map” Broadly
`
`as Allocating Storage Using Non-Specific Techniquesas Allocating Storage Using Non-Specific Techniques
`
`Specification:
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`‘035 Patent, 4:13-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 3)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 93:12-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 3)
`
`15
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Board’s Construction Does Not Require A SpecificThe Board’s Construction Does Not Require A Specific
`
`Mapping TechniqueMapping Technique
`
`Board’s Construction:
`
`Paper 19 (‘1226), Decision on Institution, p.6
`
`16
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`Patent Owner’s Reinterpretation RequiresPatent Owner’s Reinterpretation Requires
`
`a Specific Mapping Techniquea Specific Mapping Technique
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 8
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 10
`
`17
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`Patent Owner’s Reinterpretation AlsoPatent Owner’s Reinterpretation Also
`
`Requires the “Map” to Include the “Concept” of a HostRequires the “Map” to Include the “Concept” of a Host
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 38
`
`18
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`But the Claimed “Map” Does Not IncludeBut the Claimed “Map” Does Not Include
`
`the “Concept” of a Hostthe “Concept” of a Host
`
`Dr. Levy Redirect Testimony:
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 200:10-17
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 7)
`
`19
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Specification Represents Hosts in the Map withThe Specification Represents Hosts in the Map with
`
`Intermediary Identifiers such as AddressesIntermediary Identifiers such as Addresses
`
`‘035 Patent, 7:5-13
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 3)
`
`20
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`Dr. Levy Confirmed the Specification UsesDr. Levy Confirmed the Specification Uses
`
`Addresses in the MapAddresses in the Map
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 63:9-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 5)
`
`21
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Addresses in the SpecificationThe Addresses in the Specification
`
`May Be Associated with Different HostsMay Be Associated with Different Hosts
`
`Specification:
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`‘035 Patent, 7:64-65
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 5)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 112:21-25
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 4)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 113:10-12
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 4)
`
`22
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`The Board’s Construction Is UndisputedThe Board’s Construction Is Undisputed
`
`Specification:
`
`Board’s Construction:
`
`‘035 Patent, 4:13-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 3)
`
`Paper 19 (‘1226), Decision on Institution, p.6
`
`23
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The CRD-5500 Manual Discloses the “Map” LimitationThe CRD-5500 Manual Discloses the “Map” Limitation
`
`Because It Teaches Allocating Storage to HostsBecause It Teaches Allocating Storage to Hosts
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-2
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 31)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-1
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1463), Petition, p. 37)
`
`24
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The CRD Manual Represents Hosts in the Same Way asThe CRD Manual Represents Hosts in the Same Way as
`
`the Patent – with an Intermediary Identifierthe Patent – with an Intermediary Identifier
`
`Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 12
`
`25
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The CRD Manual Represents Hosts in the Same Way asThe CRD Manual Represents Hosts in the Same Way as
`
`the Patent – with an Intermediary Identifierthe Patent – with an Intermediary Identifier
`
`CQ-1003, Hospodor Declaration, p. 48
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1463), Petition, p. 25)
`
`26
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`The “Access Control” Limitation
`
`27
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`Patent Owner Requires the “Access Control” Limitation toPatent Owner Requires the “Access Control” Limitation to
`
`Provide Different Storage Access for Different HostsProvide Different Storage Access for Different Hosts
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 8
`
`28
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Claims Do Not RequireThe Claims Do Not Require
`
`Different Storage Access for Different HostsDifferent Storage Access for Different Hosts
`
`’035 Patent
`
`’041 Patent
`
`’147 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1226),
`’035 Patent, claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1463),
`’041 Patent, claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1544),
`’147 Patent, claim 1
`
`29
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The District Court’s Construction Does Not RequireThe District Court’s Construction Does Not Require
`
`Different Storage Access for Different HostsDifferent Storage Access for Different Hosts
`
`CQ-1026 (‘1226), Markman Order in Crossroads Sys. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., et al. , p.40
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 10)
`
`30
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The “Access Control” Limitation EncompassesThe “Access Control” Limitation Encompasses
`
`Controlling Access of a Single DeviceControlling Access of a Single Device
`
`‘147 Patent, Claim 28
`(cited in Paper 33 (‘1544), Pet. Reply, p. 9)
`
`31
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`Patent Owner Also Requires the Access Controls toPatent Owner Also Requires the Access Controls to
`
`Survive ReconfigurationSurvive Reconfiguration
`
`Patent Owner’s Additional Requirements:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 18
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, p. 19
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Response, pp. 19-20
`
`32
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`But the Specification Does Not Require the AccessBut the Specification Does Not Require the Access
`
`Controls to Survive ReconfigurationControls to Survive Reconfiguration
`
`CQ-1024
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 7)
`
`’035 Patent, 6:19-23
`
`33
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`But the Specification Does Not Require the AccessBut the Specification Does Not Require the Access
`
`Controls to Survive ReconfigurationControls to Survive Reconfiguration
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 151:2-10
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 10)
`
`34
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`“Access Control” Should be at Least as Broad the“Access Control” Should be at Least as Broad the
`
`District Court ConstructionDistrict Court Construction
`
`District Court’s Construction:
`
`CQ-1026 (‘1226), Markman Order in Crossroads Sys. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., et al. , p.40
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 10)
`
`35
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The CRD Manual DisclosesThe CRD Manual Discloses
`
`the “Access Control” Limitationthe “Access Control” Limitation
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-1
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 32)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 4-5
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 32)
`
`36
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Combination DisclosesThe Combination Discloses
`
`the “Access Control” Limitationthe “Access Control” Limitation
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 164:17-165:2
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 18)
`
`37
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`Even Under Patent Owner’s Narrowed Construction,Even Under Patent Owner’s Narrowed Construction,
`
`the Patents are Rendered Obviousthe Patents are Rendered Obvious
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 119:17-25
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 16)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 220:10-14
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 16)
`
`38
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`Other Issues
`
`39
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The CRD “Allow[s] Access” AccordingThe CRD “Allow[s] Access” According
`
`to Dr. Levy’s Understandingto Dr. Levy’s Understanding
`
`Dr. Levy’s Markman Testimony:
`
`CQ-2029, Markman Hearing, co-pending litigation, 91:25-92:6
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 20)
`
`CRD-5500 Manual:
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 1-4
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 21)
`
`40
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`The CRD “Allow[s] Access” Using NLLBPThe CRD “Allow[s] Access” Using NLLBP
`
`Dr. Levy’s Markman Testimony:
`
`CRD-5500 Manual:
`
`CQ-2029, Markman Hearing, co-pending litigation, 91:16-24
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 20)
`
`CQ-1004, CRD-5500 Manual, p. 2-4
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 21)
`
`41
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`3
`
`CRD Manual and HP Journal are
`Properly Combinable
`
`4 Patent Owner Has No Objective
`Evidence of Nonobviousness
`
`42
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`HP Journal Improves a SCSI-Based SystemHP Journal Improves a SCSI-Based System
`
`CQ-1006, HP Journal, p. 96
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 35)
`
`CQ-1006, HP Journal, p. 94
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 21)
`
`CQ-1006, HP Journal, p. 94
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 23)
`
`43
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The System of the CRD Manual Was Designed ToThe System of the CRD Manual Was Designed To
`
`Support Fibre ChannelSupport Fibre Channel
`
`CQ-1005, CRD-5500 Data Sheet, p. 1
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 21)
`
`Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 20
`
`CQ-1006, HP Journal, Fig. 14
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 29)
`
`44
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`No Market Share Data to SupportNo Market Share Data to Support
`
`Commercial SuccessCommercial Success
`
`Mr. Bianchi Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1105, Bianchi Deposition Transcript, 44:11-16
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 23)
`
`45
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`No Nexus of Commercial SuccessNo Nexus of Commercial Success
`
`to Claimed Elementto Claimed Element
`
`Mr. Bianchi Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1105, Bianchi Deposition Transcript, 89:10-17
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 23)
`
`46
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`No Evidence that the PatentsNo Evidence that the Patents
`
`Motivated the LicensesMotivated the Licenses
`
`Ms. Crane Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1104, Crane Deposition Transcript, 136:22-137:5
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 24)
`
`47
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`No Evidence that the LicensesNo Evidence that the Licenses
`
`Include the PatentsInclude the Patents
`
`Ms. Crane Deposition Testimony:
`
`CQ-1104, Crane Deposition Transcript, 83:4-10
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 24)
`
`48
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`Dependent Claims
`
`49
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`Patent Owner MisinterpretsPatent Owner Misinterprets
`
`Dependent Claims 2, 8, and 12 (‘035 Patent)Dependent Claims 2, 8, and 12 (‘035 Patent)
`
`Claim Language:
`
`Patent Owner Interpretation:
`
`Ex. 1001 (‘1226), ’035 Patent, claim 2
`
`Paper 22(‘1226), PO Resp., p. 41
`
`50
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Combination Discloses DependentThe Combination Discloses Dependent
`
`Claims 2, 8, 12 (‘035 Patent) When Properly ConstruedClaims 2, 8, 12 (‘035 Patent) When Properly Construed
`
`Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 21
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 164:17-165:2
`(cited in Paper 36 (‘1226), Pet. Reply, p. 18)
`
`51
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Reasons to Combine theThe Reasons to Combine the
`
`QLogic Data Sheet were ProperQLogic Data Sheet were Proper
`
`Patent Owner Argument:
`
`Dr. Hospodor’s Actual Evidence Supporting Reasons to Combine:
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 48
`
`CQ-1003, Dr. Hospodor Declaration, ¶ 68
`(cited in Paper 3 (‘1226), Petition, p. 55)
`
`52
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Combination DisclosesThe Combination Discloses
`
`Dependent Claims 13, 32, 49 of the ’041 PatentDependent Claims 13, 32, 49 of the ’041 Patent
`
`Patent Owner Argument:
`
`A POSITA Knew That Fibre Channel Distinguished Between Hosts:
`
`Dr. Levy Deposition Testimony:
`
`Paper 19 (‘1463), PO Resp., p. 43
`
`Paper 22 (‘1226), PO Resp., p. 35
`(citing to Ex. 2027, Levy Declaration, p. 53)
`
`CQ-1025, Levy Deposition Transcript, 119:17-25
`(cited in Paper 32 (‘1463), Pet. Reply, p. 21)
`
`53
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`The Prior Art Discloses the Unique Identifiers ofThe Prior Art Discloses the Unique Identifiers of
`
`Dependent Claims 14, 15, 33, 34, 50, & 51 (’041 Patent)Dependent Claims 14, 15, 33, 34, 50, & 51 (’041 Patent)
`Claims 14 and 15:
`
`’041 Patent, Claims 14 and 15
`
`Unique Identifiers in the Cited Prior Art:
`1) Channel Number
`CQ-1004 (‘1463), pp. 1-2, 3-2, 4-5 (cited in Paper 3 (‘1463), Petition, pp. 15, 24-25)
`2) Worldwide Name (WWN)
`CQ-1007 (‘1463), pp. 46, 148 (cited in Paper 3 (‘1463), Petition, p. 59)
`3) AL_PA
`CQ-1025, 91:9-14 (cited in Paper 32 (‘1463), Pet. Reply, pp. 5, 22)
`
`KSR:
`
`KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 421 (2007)(cited in Paper 32 (‘1463), Pet. Reply, p. 22)
`
`54
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`
`ConclusionConclusion
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Patent Owner Has Improperly Narrowed the “Map”
`and “Access Control” Limitations
`• Patent Owner’s interpretations contradict the patent
`specification
`
`Under Any Interpretation, the CRD-5500 Manual
`and HP Journal Render Obvious the ‘035, ‘041, and
`‘147 Patents
`• Mapping: The CRD-5500 Manual explicitly teaches assigning
`storage “to a particular host.” CQ-1004, p. 1-2.
`• Access Control: The CRD-5500 Manual explicitly teaches
`making storage “visible to one host but not to another.” CQ-
`1004, p. 1-1
`
`55
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463
`
`

`
`
`Consolidated PetitionersConsolidated Petitioners
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`Quantum Corp.Quantum Corp.
`
`Oracle Corp.*Oracle Corp.*
`
`Dot Hill Systems Corp.*Dot Hill Systems Corp.*
`
`
`IPR2014-01226 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,035)IPR2014-01226 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,035)
`
`IPR2014-01463 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,041)IPR2014-01463 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,934,041)
`
`IPR2014-01544 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,147)IPR2014-01544 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,147)
`
`
`Andrew EhmkeAndrew Ehmke
`
`David McCombsDavid McCombs
`
`Scott JarrattScott Jarratt
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLPHaynes and Boone, LLP
`
`October 30, 2015October 30, 2015
`
`
`
`*Party by Joinder*Party by Joinder
`
`56
`
`CISCO et al. v. Crossroads
`CQ-1106 / IPR2014-01463

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket