throbber
Bright ideas go unrewarded
`
`Published 24 May 2012 00:01, Updated 25 May 2012 14:49
`
`
`
`Counter culture: Ric Richardson says the lack of reward retards invention Photo: Naz Mulla
`
`Few inventors have made it onto the BRWRich 200, however useful or appealing their inventions.
`
`The Hill-Ling family invented and manufactured the Hills Hoist and have featured in the Rich 200 eight times. Their
`
`wealth peaked at $70 million and was sustained because the family diversified into producing television antennas,
`
`among other things.
`
`In the early 1970s, Ralph Sarich invented the orbital engine which had the potential to transform the automotive
`
`industry. It had modest commercial success but he sold out in 1992 to go into property development, which has
`
`proved far more lucrative.
`
`Mike O’Dwyer is one of the few other inventors to make the list. The former Wooloworths store manager envisaged a
`
`super rapid-fire gun in the 1960s but did not take out a patent until 1993. He raised seed capital in 1996 and floated
`
`Metal Storm in 1999 with backing from the Australian and Unites States defence departments. His shareholding was
`
`once worth $235 million but difficulties with commercialisation dramatically reduced his wealth. Metal Storm’s
`
`market capitalisation is now about $9 million.
`
`The record of the Rich 200 suggests that invention is not the way to get rich and Australia’s most prolific inventor, Ric
`
`Richardson, is not surprised. His inventing has been lucrative but even he has not made it onto the Rich 200.
`
`His inventions number in the hundreds and one led to a half-billion dollar settlement from technology giant Microsoft
`
`— a story that began in 1992 when the Byron Bay-based inventor took out a patent for the anti-piracy software he
`
`developed for his computer security company Uniloc.
`
`In 1999, he took Microsoft to court for infringing this patent. In April 2009, a US court ordered Microsoft to pay
`
`compensation of $US388 million (then worth $530 million) for using the technology without his knowledge or
`
`permission. It was one of the biggest damages awards in US patent history but the verdict was overturned five months
`
`later. Richardson successfully appealed and damages were due to be re-assessed. Then, earlier this year, the parties
`settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001 Page 1
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001 Page 1
`
`

`
`Richardson is not motivated by wealth and is believed to have donated large sums to charity. He once said that no one
`
`should keep a fortune any bigger than $10 million. He now spends his time mentoring inventors and consulting.
`
`“It’s rare to reap significant financial rewards for invention in Australia,” he says. “We don’t like to stick our necks out
`
`to try and make ourselves look special. Even the idea of having a patent in your name is countercultural.”
`
`Just how much the Australian culture stymies individuals seeking monetary reward for their inventions was obvious
`
`to Richardson when he returned to Australia after 12 years living in the US.
`
`“Here we get bored with celebrating a grand final win after a few days,” he says. “In the US they’ll wear a signet ring
`
`from winning a football game in college 20 years ago and still talk about it.
`
`“They celebrate people going out on a limb and a lot of investors are happy to lose money so long as they were part of
`
`an exciting project. You don’t need to be making money — you just need to prove that what you’re doing is popular or
`
`of interest to another company.”
`
`Unlike some Americans, Richardson says local inventors are driven more by a desire to solve practical problems than
`
`the chance to make a mountain of money. Even so, it is a source of frustration that so few are rewarded richly for their
`efforts.
`
`“Invention is not the issue here,” he says. “Making money is.”
`
`This became clear to him during a conversation he had with John O’Sullivan, who invented wireless internet at the
`
`CSIRO. Richardson asked if the CSIRO had looked after him financially. “He said not really but he’s had a very
`
`comfortable contracting situation since the sale,” he says. “Which is great but the fact of the matter is that getting no
`reward at all is a shame. It retards invention.”
`
`Few inventors can negotiate the long and precarious pathway from developing an idea, taking it to market and
`
`running a commercial entity. This is in part because the characteristics of a successful inventor are very different from
`
`those of an astute business operator.
`
`“I love being around inventors because they’re passionate and being around them is so invigorating,” Richardson says.
`
`“But at the same time most are so far from being a successful business person that they need to team up with a
`
`professional. I hate breaking that news to them but I can with authority because I’m in the exact same situation.”
`
`It’s why he spends his time finding business partners for inventors. “It’s funny to think that the key to success is to
`
`find someone else but it’s true,” he says. “It’s a waste of time and effort for an inventor to think that he or she can learn
`
`the commercial process and pull it off on their own.”
`
`Recommended for you
`
`From Around the Web
`
`
`
`(http : //www.brw.com.au/p/national/ato_has_hit_list_ofjfimm[MmsmhEst§HFeRMm fl)s-slings
`identity-after-state-bans.html/ ?
`utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campai
`The Cheatsheet
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gMJh7kB2ceYlfAM)
`
`tent Owner Ex. 2001 Page 2
`
`(http : //www.brw.com.au/p/first_stephen_hung_ordered
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001 Page 2
`
`

`
`(http: //www.offroadxtreme.com/engine-
`tech/knowledge-is-power-the-colorado-zr2-and-a11-
`its-secrets/)
`
`(http : //wvvw.brw.com.au/p/entrepreneurs/with_sephora_fifi6k1£6ldflbeauty_brand_nZkj1vzyKPGJJGMZWPYQ6Lj
`
`How a two-week-old beauty brand scored a tvvo-year deal with...
`(http://www.bnN.com.auIp/entrepreneurs/with_sephora_week_o|d
`_beauty_brand_nZkjIvzyKPGJJGMZWPYQ6L)
`
`(http://thestir.cafemom.com/breaking/180817/teacher_
`quick_picks= 1&utm_medium=sem2&utm_source=outb1
`I&utm_campaign= outbrain-I&utm_content=outbrain-I_
`(http://wvvw.brw.com.au/p/entrepreneurs/how_pie_face_},<g;s,1',-,,‘}1§,u1gvay_s7RHCT80RILeaLYydrkxSM)
`
`
`
`(http ://www.brw.com.au/p/national/secrets_to_virtual_vx(drfltiI1gLwmwefistieEiniiPIei3n71G3i§iizaI§¢NlHfl§iflén-
`...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
`
`
`
`utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=
`
`{rss}&utm_campaign=RSS-feed-desktop)
`LittleBudha.oom
`
` (http://feeds.eon1ine.com/~r/eon1ine/topstories/ ~3/V11
`
`is-how-demi-lovato-reacts-to-someone-calling-her-fat-at
`cmpid=par-121113-outbrain-paid-links)
`E! Online
`
`Recommended by
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001 Page 3
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2001 Page 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket