`Filed on behalf of: VirnetX Inc.
`By:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1996
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0496
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`Filed: September 19, 2014
`
`Naveen Modi
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1990
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0490
`E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`v.
`VIRNETX INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`VirnetX Inc., the Patent Owner, provides the following mandatory notices
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8.
`
`I.
`
`Real Party-in-Interest
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), the real party-in-interest is VirnetX Inc.,
`
`the assignee of record for U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180 (“the ’180 patent”).
`
`II. Related Matters
`Patent Owner identifies the following matters that may be deemed related
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2).
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`A.
`The ’180 patent, which is the subject of this proceeding, is also at issue in
`
`the following inter partes review and inter partes reexamination proceedings:
`
`Case IPR2014-004011
`
`Case IPR2014-004052
`
`
`1 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`2 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`Case IPR2014-004813
`
`Case IPR2014-004824
`
`Case IPR2014-01418
`
`Control No. 95/001,792
`
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving Related Patents
`B.
`Several patents stemming from the same applications that led to the ’180
`
`patent are or were at issue in the following inter partes review and inter partes
`
`reexamination proceedings:
`
`
`3 The Board instituted this proceeding on September 3, 2014.
`
`4 The Board instituted this proceeding on September 3, 2014.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`
`Case IPR2013-003485
`
`Case IPR2013-003496
`
`Case IPR2013-003757
`
`Case IPR2014-001718
`
`Case IPR2014-001729
`
`Case IPR2014-0055810
`
`Control No. 95/001,679
`
`Control No. 95/001,682
`
`
`5 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`6 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`7 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`8 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`9 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`10 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151
`
`Case IPR2013-0035411
`
`Case IPR2013-0037612
`
`Case IPR2014-0017313
`
`Case IPR2014-00610
`
`Control No. 95/001,697
`
`Control No. 95/001,714
`
`
`11 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`12 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`13 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504
`
`Case IPR2013-0037714
`
`Case IPR2013-0039315
`
`Case IPR2013-0039416
`
`Case IPR2014-0017617
`
`Case IPR2014-0017718
`
`Case IPR2014-00612
`
`Case IPR2014-00613
`
`Case IPR2014-00614
`
`Control No. 95/001,788
`
`Control No. 95/001,851
`
`
`14 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`15 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`16 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`17 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`18 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,839,759
`
`Control No. 95/001,746
`
`7
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
`
`Case IPR2013-0037819
`
`Case IPR2013-0039720
`
`Case IPR2013-0039821
`
`Case IPR2014-0017422
`
`Case IPR2014-0017523
`
`Case IPR2014-00615
`
`Case IPR2014-00616
`
`Case IPR2014-00618
`
`Control No. 95/001,856
`
`Control No. 95/001,789
`
`
`19 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`20 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`21 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`22 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`23 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,987,274
`
`Case IPR2014-0040324
`
`Case IPR2014-0040425
`
`Case IPR2014-0048326
`
`Case IPR2014-0048427
`
`Case IPR2014-0048528
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,051,181
`
`Case IPR2014-0048629
`
`Control No. 95/001,949
`
`
`24 The Board instituted this proceeding on July 31, 2014.
`
`25 The Board instituted this proceeding on July 31, 2014.
`
`26 The Board instituted this proceeding on September 15, 2014, and joined it
`
`with IPR2014-00403.
`
`27 The Board instituted this proceeding on September 15, 2014, and joined it
`
`with IPR2014-00404.
`
`28 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on September 16, 2014.
`
`29 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on September 16, 2014.
`
`9
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,504,697
`
`Case IPR2014-0023730
`
`Case IPR2014-0023831
`
`
`C. U.S. Patent Applications Related to the Patent-at-Issue
`The following applications, which stem from the same applications that led
`
`to the ’180 patent, are currently pending before the Office:
`
`11/839,937
`
`13/080,680
`
`13/181,041
`
`13/285,962
`
`13/475,637
`
`
`
`13/615,536
`
`13/615,557
`
`13/617,375
`
`13/617,446
`
`13/620,534
`
`13/890,206
`
`13/903,788
`
`13/911,792
`
`13/911,813
`
`13/950,877
`
`13/950,919
`
`13/615,528
`
`13/620,550
`
`13/950,897
`
`--
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30 The Board instituted this proceeding on May 14, 2014.
`
`31 The Board instituted this proceeding on May 14, 2014.
`
`10
`
`
`
`D. Litigations Involving the Patent-at-Issue and/or Related Patents
`The ’180 patent and/or other patents that stem from the same applications
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`
`that led to the ’180 patent are at issue in the following cases:
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Aastra USA, Inc.,
`
`Aastra Technologies Ltd., NEC Corp., and NEC Corp.
`
`of America, No. 6:10-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex.)32
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00855 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 6:11-cv-00563 (E.D.
`
`Tex.; consolidated with case No. 6:12-cv-00855)
`
`
`32 NEC and Aastra have entered into a license agreement with VirnetX and
`
`have been dismissed from this case. The Cisco portion of the case has concluded
`
`with a final judgment. The only remaining defendant in this case is Apple. The
`
`district court entered judgment in favor of VirnetX against Apple. On September
`
`16, 2014, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part,
`
`and remanded for further proceedings in the district court.
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`VirnetXInc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6: 13-cv-0021 1 (ED. Tex.)
`
`Microsoft Co;p., No. 6: l3-cv—00351 (ED. Tex.)
`
`VirnetXInc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`III. Lead and Back-Up Counsel and Service Information
`
`In accordance with 37 CPR. §42_8(b)(3) and (b)(4), Patent Owner
`
`identifies the following lead and back-up counsel and service information:
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`
`Joseph E. Palys (Reg. No. 46,508)
`
`Naveen Modi (Reg. No. 46,224)
`
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`875 15‘11 Street NW
`
`875 15‘h Street NW
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Telephone: (202) 551-1996
`
`Telephone: (202) 551-1990
`
`Facsimile: (202) 551—0496
`
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0490
`
`12
`
`
`
`——
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`E-mail: jason.stach@fmnegan_com
`
`Jason E. Stach (Reg. No. 54,464)
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`
`Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`
`303 Peachtree St., NE, Suite 3500
`
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`
`Telephone: (404) 653-6428
`
`Facsimile: (404) 653-6444
`
`Dated: September 19, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Joseph E. Palys/
`By:
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01421
`Patent 7,188,180
`
`Certificate of Service
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on the
`
`counsel for Petitioner a true and correct copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 by electronic means on September
`
`19, 2014 at the following address of record:
`
`Counsel for Microsoft Corporation:
`
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`
`3200 RBC Plaza
`
`60 South Sixth Street
`
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`T: 202-783-5070
`
`F: 202-783-2331
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Kevin E. Greene, Reg. No. 46,031
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`T: 202-626-6376
`F: 202-783-2331
`
`IPR38868-0002IP4@fr.com
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph E. Palys/
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Dated: September 19, 2014
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
