`
` Entered: September 10, 2015
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC & THE ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2014-01415 (Patent 8,214,097 B2)
`IPR2014-01416 (Patent 7,237,634 B2)1
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`On August 26, 2015, Patent Owner filed motions for pro hac vice admission
`of Daniel A. Tishman. The motions are unopposed. Patent Owner’s motions are
`granted.
`
`
`1 This decision addresses motions for pro hac vice admission submitted in each of
`the three cases. One decision will be entered in each case. The parties are not
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01415 (Patent 8,214,097 B2)
`IPR2014-01416 (Patent 7,237,634 B2)
`
`
`Upon consideration, Patent Owner has demonstrated that Mr. Tishman
`possesses sufficient legal and technical qualifications to represent Patent Owner in
`these proceedings, and the Board recognizes that there is a need for Patent Owner
`to have Mr. Tishman as back-up counsel. Accordingly, Patent Owner has
`established good cause for Mr. Tishman’s admission. Mr. Tishman will be
`permitted to appear pro hac vice in the proceedings as back-up counsel only. See
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`It is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of Mr.
`Daniel A. Tishman are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Tishman is authorized to represent Patent
`Owner as back-up counsel only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner represent Patent Owner as lead counsel for this proceeding; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Tishman is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth
`in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, and to be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`authorized to use this heading style without authorization from the Board.
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01415 (Patent 8,214,097 B2)
`IPR2014-01416 (Patent 7,237,634 B2)
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Frank A. Angileri
`John E. Nemazi
`John P. Rondini
`Erin K. Bowles
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`FPGP0104IPR3@brookskushman.com
`
`Lissi Mojica
`Kevin Greenleaf
`DENTONS US LLP
`lissi.mojica@dentons.com
`kevin.greenleaf@dentons.com
`iptdocketchi@dentons.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Timothy W. Riffe
`Kevin E. Greene
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`Linda L. Kordziel
`Brian J. Livedalen
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`riffe@fr.com
`IPR36351-0015IP2@fr.com
`IPR36351-0015IP@fr.com
`
`
`
`3