UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC & THE ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.,
`Patent Owners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01415
`Patent No. 8,214,097
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNERS PAICE LLC & THE ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF DANIEL A.
`TISHMAN UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC & THE ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.,
`Patent Owners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01415
`Patent No. 8,214,097
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNERS PAICE LLC & THE ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF DANIEL A.
`TISHMAN UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2014-01415
`Attorney Docket: 36351-0013IP2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Patent Owners (“PAICE LLC & THE
`
`ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.,” hereinafter “Paice & Abell”) respectfully request
`
`that the Board recognize Daniel A. Tishman as counsel pro hac vice in this
`
`proceeding. Patent Owner seeks the counsel of Daniel A. Tishman due to his
`
`experience in representing Paice & Abell in other patent-related matters and
`
`particularly due to his familiarity with the substantive and technical issues involved
`
`in this proceeding. This motion is authorized by the Notice of Filing Date
`
`Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response that
`
`was mailed on September 16, 2014.
`
`Petitioner does not oppose this motion for pro hac vice admission.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`Mr. Tishman is a patent litigation attorney whose practice focuses on patent
`
`litigation in Federal District Courts and Section 337 proceedings before the
`
`International Trade Commission. He has been involved in cases covering a broad
`
`range of technologies, including complex computer software, television tuners,
`
`micro-electromechanical systems, consumer mobile handsets, and hybrid-electric
`
`vehicles. Through his practice in such cases, Mr. Tishman has gained substantial
`
`experience in all aspects of patent litigation, including discovery procedures,
`
`motions practice, depositions, Markman hearings, and trials. Mr. Tishman began
`
`his legal career as a judicial clerk for the Honorable Judge Yvette P. Kane of the
`
`2
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2014-01415
`Attorney Docket: 36351-0013IP2
`District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania from 2011-2013. Mr.
`
`Tishman received his J.D., summa cum laude, from Tulane Law School in 2011,
`
`where he was a managing editor of the Tulane Law Review. He received a B.S. in
`
`Information Sciences and Technology from the Pennsylvania State University in
`
`2007. Paice & Abell provide Appendix A, as evidence, Daniel Tishman’s
`
`biography.
`
`Mr. Tishman also has particular experience and familiarity with the
`
`substantive and technical issues involved in this inter partes review proceeding:
`
`Mr. Tishman represents Paice & Abell in two related matters: Paice LLC, et. al. v.
`
`Hyundai Motor Co., et. al., No. CIV. WDQ-12-0499 (D. Md.) and Paice LLC,
`
`et. al. v. Ford Motor Company, No. CIV. WDQ-14-cv-00492 (D. Md.). Both cases
`
`are currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, and
`
`both involve U.S. Patent 8,214,097, as well as other patents in the same family.
`
`Paice & Abell have invested significant financial resources in each of these related
`
`matters in which Mr. Tishman is serving as counsel. Moreover, through his
`
`representation in the related matters, Paice & Abell have developed a particular
`
`relationship with Mr. Tishman such that Paice & Abell desire to continue the
`
`relationship with Mr. Tishman for the purpose of this proceeding.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2014-01415
`Attorney Docket: 36351-0013IP2
`1. Declaration of Individual Seeking to Appear
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by a Declaration
`
`of Daniel A. Tishman as required by the Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac
`
`Vice mailed December 16, 2014.
`
`Accordingly, Patent Owners, Paice LLC & The Abell Foundation, Inc.,
`
`submit that there is good cause under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) for the Board to
`
`recognize Daniel A. Tishman as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Timothy W. Riffe/
`Timothy W. Riffe
`Reg. No. 43,881
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: 8/26/15
`
`
`Customer Number 26171
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Telephone: (612) 337-2508
`Facsimile: (612) 288-9696
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2014-01415
`Attorney Docket: 36351-0013IP2
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(4), the undersigned certifies that on August
`26, 2015, a complete and entire copy of this Patent Owners Paice LLC & The
`Abell Foundation, Inc. Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission Of Daniel
`A. Tishman under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and its exhibit, were provided via email to
`the Petitioner by serving the correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`Sangeeta G. Shah
`Frank A. Angileri
`Michael D. Cushion
`Andrew B. Turner
`Brooks Kushman P.C.
`1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`
`Lissi Mojica
`Kevin Greenleaf
`Dentons US LLP
`233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 7800
`Chicago, IL 60606-6306
`
`Email: FPGP0110IPR2@brookskushman.com
`Email: lissi.mojica@dentons.com
`Email: kevingreenleaf@dentons.com
`Email: iptdocketchi@dentons.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Edward G. Faeth/
`
`Edward G. Faeth
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(202) 626-6420
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
