`
`From:
`
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Vignone, Maria <Maria.Vignone@USPTO.GOV> on behalf of Trials
`<Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Tuesday, December 30, 2014 1:47 PM
`Andrew B. Turner; Trials
`riffe@fr.com; IPR36351-0013IP2@fr.com; greene@fr.com; Frank A. Angileri;
`FPGP0110IPR2@brookskushman.com; Mojica, Lissi (lissi.mojica@dentons.com);
`Greenleaf, Kevin R. (kevin.greenleaf@dentons.com)
`RE: Request for Conference Call re IPR2014-01415
`
`Counsel: No conference call is necessary. Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a reply to the argument raised on
`pages 5–9 of Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response is denied.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria Vignone
`Paralegal Operations Manager
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`571-272-4645
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Andrew B. Turner [mailto:aturner@brookskushman.com]
`Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 6:44 PM
`To: Trials
`Cc: riffe@fr.com; IPR36351-0013IP2@fr.com; greene@fr.com; Frank A. Angileri; FPGP0110IPR2@brookskushman.com;
`Mojica, Lissi (lissi.mojica@dentons.com); Greenleaf, Kevin R. (kevin.greenleaf@dentons.com)
`Subject: Request for Conference Call re IPR2014-01415
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Ford requests a conference call to seek the Board’s guidance on whether and how to address Paice’s assertion that Ford
`has not established that Takaoka qualifies as a prior art “printed publication.” (See e.g., Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response, Paper 9, pp. 5-9 of IPR2014-01415.) Accordingly, to the extent the Board considers it helpful, Ford would like
`to file a Reply on the issue.
`
`We have conferred with counsel for Paice, and the parties are available on Monday, January 5 before 3 pm and on
`Tuesday, January 6.
`
`Thank you for your consideration.
`
`Regards,
`Andrew Turner
`Counsel for Petitioner, Ford Motor Company
`
`
`1
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`FORD 1128
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
