throbber
a
`
`ROBERTO SAUCEDO
`Manager, Command and Control Systems
`International Business Machines, Inc.
`and
`University of California at Los Angeles
`
`EARL E. SCHIRING
`Staff Engineer
`Logicon, Inc.
`and
`University of California at Los Angeles
`
`INTRODUCTION
`TO CONTINUOUS
`AND DIGITAL
`CONTROL
`SYSTEMS
`
`R
`
`THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
`COLLIER· MACMILLAN LIMITED. London
`
`Micro Motion 1029
`
`1
`
`

`
`\
`
`ti
`
`© Copyright, The Macmillan Company, 1968
`All rights reserved. No part of this book may be repro(cid:173)
`duced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
`electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, re(cid:173)
`cording or by any· information storage and retrieval
`system, without permission in writing from the Publisher.
`
`PRINTING 3456789 YEAR
`
`3456789
`
`Library of Congress catalog card number: 68-12075
`
`THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, NEW YORK
`COLLIER-MACMILLAN CANADA, LTD., TORONTO, ONTARIO
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`2
`
`

`
`~pts [Ch.l
`
`or extended
`nd noncon(cid:173)
`. production
`tic controls.
`
`n is not in(cid:173)
`;ystem is an
`'er, with his
`arrive at the
`llUman pilot
`~ading at all
`i the actual
`
`nted by the
`sensed and
`
`ller uses an
`ystem being
`system, the
`lfe 1-2. The
`nervous and
`;raft control
`tis change of
`n open-loop
`) the ground
`e magnitude
`
`~
`
`path
`
`Ie end of each
`
`§1.2] Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Systems
`
`3
`
`Reference
`input
`
`: Comparator
`
`Disturbances
`
`Output
`
`Output
`< - - - - - - - -1 measuring 1+ - - - - - - - - - '
`device
`
`FIGURE 1-3. Block diagram of closed-loop system.
`
`and direction of the side winds, the accuracy of the compass instrument, the
`engine thrust magnitude, and the accuracy of the controller all contribute to
`errors between the desired flight path and the actual one.
`A closed-loop cont;rol system is one in which the output quantity is fed back
`for comparison with the input, and the difference, or error quantity, is then
`applied to the amplifier, as shown in Figure 1-3. In such a feedback system, if
`the output is not the desired one, an error is sensed by the comparator and the
`control system will act in a manner to reduce the error to zero, or to maintain
`the output equal to the desired input. Thus the feedback system has the ability
`to correct for load disturbances and inaccuracies in the controller. If in the
`aircraft navigation example the pilot can see the ground, and if he is familiar
`with many landmarks along his flight, then he has the capability of correcting
`his flight-path errors by this visual feedback, as shown in Figure 1-4.
`In general, open-loop control systems are characterized by moderate accuracy,
`high sensitivity to environmental conditions, and slow response. The advantages
`of open-loop control are simplicity and low cost. In contrast, closed-loop or
`feedback control systems are characterized by high accuracy, rapid response, and
`relative independence of environmental factors.
`
`Desired
`flight path
`
`Disturbances
`
`Actual
`: Aircraft 1-....--'-":.:..=.::.:...... ....
`flight path
`
`FIGURE 1-4. Closed-loop aircraft navigation system.
`
`1.3 NOMENCLATURE
`The functional block diagram of a closed-loop system in Figure 1-5 shows the
`nomenclature that is in common use. The command input is transformed by the
`reference input element, or reference selector, into a signal that is calibrated in
`terms of the output. This signal is called the reference input. The actuating signal
`is applied to the feedforward elements, which include the amplifier, controller,
`
`3
`
`

`
`§lA] ContI
`
`raise the tell
`preset value
`tinuous coni
`and control
`type system
`
`1.4 CON
`In this se(
`It is recogni
`and of the 1
`necessary d,
`nature of c(
`practical aJ:
`exerted inel
`rotational),
`Consider
`The inlet v~
`set at a con:
`of the inlet'
`the float ah
`to raise the
`similar to t
`Another
`output ofa
`electric po,
`pressurized
`inherentne
`reactor dec
`as a result (
`as the elect
`the reactor
`power leve
`for reactor
`
`4
`
`Control Systems Concepts
`
`[Cb. 1
`
`and plant of Figure 1-1. The output of these feedforward elements is the control
`system output. This output is sensed by the feedback element and is fed back to
`the comparator as the feedback signal, where it is compared with the reference
`input to form the actuating error signal. In addition, an output element may exist
`such as an output indicator.(2)
`Common terms for control systems that are widely used in the literature are
`servomechanism or servo, and regulator. A servomechanism is a control system
`in which the output is the position, velocity, or acceleration of a mechanical
`shaft, such as that corresponding to a motor. The term regulator usually applies
`to a control system wherein the output quantity is desired to be maintained
`constant despite unwanted disturbances to the system. An electric generator is
`an example of a regulator, in that it is desired to maintain constant the generator
`voltage regardless of the load fluctuations on the generator.
`If control systems are classified according to the nature of the signals at the
`various points of the feedback loop, then the three kinds of systems are con(cid:173)
`tinuous, sampled-data or pulsed-data systems,t and relay-type systems. A
`continuous control system is one in which all the signals in the control loop may
`be considered as continuous functions of time, and an example of a continuous
`system is the regulation of speed of a motor using tachometric feedback. In such
`a system, the tachometer feeds back a signal proportional to the motor shaft
`speed to be compared with the desired speed.
`A sampled- or pulsed-data system is one in which one or more signals in the
`loop are in the form of a pulse train or a numerical code, such as the output of
`a digital computer. An example of a sampled-data system is that of a radar
`tracking system. The signals sent and received are in pulse form, and are used
`to position an antenna to track some desired object.
`A system in which a relay type of element is present in an otherwise continuous
`type of system is called a relay, or on-off, system. The thermostat home-heating
`system is an example of an on-off system. When the temperature at the thermo(cid:173)
`stat is below a preset value, the full force of the furnace is suddenly applied to
`
`Command. 1 Relere~~ce
`input
`i selector
`
`Reference +
`input
`
`Actuatin
`error
`
`Output
`
`Feedback
`signal
`
`FIGURE 1-5. Functional block diagram 0/ closed-loop system.
`
`t The terms" sampled-data,"" digital," and" discrete" are used interchangeably in many
`instances throughout the text, although fine distinctions are made by many researchers.
`The term" sampled-data" is the most general term, and includes all systems which contain
`signals in pulsed form. The term "digital" implies that a digital component such as a
`digital sensor or a digital computer is used in the system.
`
`4
`
`

`
`§1.4] Control
`
`Numerous c
`occur naturall:
`system compo
`human body r
`more general 51
`The oculomot(
`discussed prev
`object, such as
`the retina fron
`muscles are COl
`in the center 0
`In ecology a
`of Canada. In
`territory under
`constitute the I
`the lynx popul
`population wiU
`rabbits. To co
`overpopulatior
`complete. (9)
`Another nat
`1-12. This pan
`(10), which is
`income is the Sl
`these quantitie:
`
`8
`
`Control Systems Concepts
`
`[Ch. 1
`
`8
`
`FIGURE 1-10. Sampled-data/ire-control system.
`
`or missile launcher is commanded for the gun control system. The error signal
`in pulsed form is converted to a continuous signal and applied to the gunmount
`drive motor, and the gun is positioned accordingly. The angle of the gun is
`sensed and convetted to digital form and fed back for the error comparison.
`While the diagram shows a simple single-axis representation, two separate
`channels of azimuth and elevation are positioned simultaneously in the actual
`equipment. In addition, if the fire-control system is on board a naval vessel,
`the ship is subjected to sea motion that must also be accounted for in the fire(cid:173)
`control computer. (6)
`Another example ofa sampled-data system is the control of an electro(cid:173)
`optical telescope to effect automatic tracking of a star. The telescope must be
`continuously repositioned if the star is to remain in the field of view of the tele(cid:173)
`scope, owing primarily to the rotation of the earth. This system is illustrated in
`Figure 1-11. A television camera is mounted on the telescope and an image is
`generated on the screen. The set is aligned such that the center of the raster is
`coincident with the optical axis of the telescope. Additional tracker electronics
`determine the displacement of the image with respect to the center of the raster
`and furnish a signal proportional to the pointing error of the telescope. Since
`television is by nature a repetitive scanning device, it is also by nature a sampled(cid:173)
`data component. The pointing error is amplified and shaped by stabilization
`electronics, and is then applied to the servomotor, which positions the telescope
`in a direction to decrease the pointing error. While a standard television applied
`to this problem has a sampling rate so high in comparison to earth rate that the
`system appears to operate as a continuous control system, the same system
`applied to automatic tracking of a high speed missile or aircraft could have
`system time constants of nearly the order of magnitude of the television sampling
`rate, so that a sampled-data analysis would be required.(7)
`
`Star
`Line of sight
`
`'--~r----'
`
`r - - - - - - , Optical
`axis
`
`FIGURE 1-11. Electro-optical telescope tracker.
`
`5
`
`

`
`CHAPTER 8
`
`ROOT lOCUS
`
`One must learn by doing the thing: for though you think you know it, you
`have no certainty until you try.
`SOPHOCLES
`
`INTRODUCTION
`8.1
`This chapter introduces the root locus method, a graphical means for deter(cid:173)
`mining the migration of a system's closed-loop poles as a function of the loop
`gain. Obviously, the closed-loop poles are the roots (or the zeros) of the charac(cid:173)
`teristic equation, and the loci of these roots in a complex plane as the loop gain
`parameter takes on different values constitute the migration mentioned. If
`continuous systems are involved, the complex plane is the s plane; if the system
`is discrete, it is the z plane. The theory and mechanics of the root locus method
`are not affected by the resident complex domain; only the interpretation of the
`effect on the system response is altered.
`The root locus method provides a correlation between the feedback system's
`open-loop poles and zeros and the system's stability characteristics, its frequency
`and transient respons~d its steady-state behavior. It complements the other
`classical techniques very m~ely and is extremely useful to the system analyst. As
`with any technique, its use will be dictated by the particulars of the situation and
`personal preference.
`
`8.2 ROOT LOCUS METHOD FOR CONTINUOUS SYSTEMS
`It has been mentioned that the root locus method provides a means for chart(cid:173)
`ing the migration of the closed-loop poles for a feedback control system as the
`loop gain varies. The starting point is the open-loop pole-zero configuration for
`a feedback control system as depicted in Figure 8-1, where attention is restricted
`
`R(s) +
`
`CIs)
`
`' - - -.. H(s) k - - - '
`
`FIGURE 8-1. Feedback control system.
`
`324
`
`§8.2:
`
`to s
`fune
`
`whe
`and
`fune
`
`Inse
`
`This
`feed
`man
`give
`
`or
`
`The:
`eval
`dete
`thro
`T
`(8.5:
`in tl
`
`To~
`
`Poil
`At 1
`s pi
`sho]
`B
`wh2
`trail
`
`6
`
`

`
`374
`
`Root Locus
`
`[Ch. 8
`
`8.6 ROOT LOCUS METHOD FOR NEGATIVE LOOP GAIN
`It will be recalled that for a feedback control system as depicted in Figure 8-1,
`the loop gain K was considered always positive. It is possible for the loop gain
`to be negative, in which case the system is depicted as in Figure 8-40. In this
`figure the feedback signal is positively fed back and the loop gain is once again
`assumed positive. Feedback systems of this type are called regenerative or
`positive feedback sy~tems and most often appear as inner loops in a multiloop
`system.
`
`R(s) +
`+
`
`CIs)
`
`FIGURE 8-40. Regenerative feedback control system.
`
`The closed-loop transfer function for the system portrayed in Figure 8-40 is
`
`KG(s}
`KG(s)H(s)
`
`(8.142)
`
`where G(s) and H(s) are rational algebraic functions. The characteristic equation
`is
`
`1 - KG(s)H(s) = 0
`
`(8.143)
`
`The root locus method, just as before, provides a graphical means for evaluating
`the roots of (8.143) as the loop gain varies from 0 to 00. The difference between
`(8.143) and the characteristic equation for negative feedback systems is in the
`sign. As a consequence, the root locus for positive feedback systems consists of
`points in the s plane which satisfy
`
`r
`r
`
`KIG(s)H(s)1
`
`1
`
`/G(s)H(s) = k· 360°
`
`k any integer
`
`(8.144)
`
`(8.145)
`
`As a matter of construction; points are found in the s plane which satisfy
`(8.145) and the resulting locus is then calibrated by use of (8.144).
`
`Construction Rules
`The construction of the root loci for positive feedback systems is similar to
`that for negative feedback systems. Hence only these construction rules which
`differ appreciably will be stated and these without proof. The proofs will be
`left to the reader. The construction rules involved are:
`
`5. The root loci are asymptotic to straight lines, for large values of s, with
`angles given by
`
`k = 0,1, ... , n - m
`
`1
`
`t I
`
`7
`
`

`
`400
`
`30
`
`I
`
`l5 20
`13
`-l2
`'""0
`
`10
`
`0
`
`0..
`.Q
`"10
`.;
`-0
`:>±:
`10
`c:
`ao
`'" :z; -20
`-30
`
`0
`
`-30
`
`-60
`
`-90
`
`120
`
`0>
`
`"10
`
`'"
`~ 0
`"'­
`-;;'0
`c:
`'"
`" , ­
`"'~
`'" 0
`'" 0..
`..c::. a..
`
`Frequency Response
`
`[eh. 9
`
`•
`
`I
`
`1 1 I I ~l~ ~: ci
`
`I
`~:o~
`T«~: O.IQ
`1~:'0.20
`~J.-:: ~~:O'YO
`~ : 0.40
`!
`[-I­ ~~-1 ~I: 0'1
`57
`I ~:1;~ ~ I I
`~
`
`~: 0.707/ i
`
`Asymptote
`
`,'"
`
`t =0.10
`~ =0.20
`
`- 30
`
`i ­ 20
`
`I- 10 ~
`o u
`.E
`e
`'" N
`
`.10
`I
`o
`11
`o
`I :
`o
`+'0
`
`+ 30
`
`+60
`
`+90
`
`+120
`
`5..­
`0 '"..­
`2.,
`
`N
`
`+150
`
`!
`.1 !
`
`'.' ., ..
`
`:
`
`",'(1
`
`, I>~, ~
`
`/",.
`
`§9.7]
`
`1 E
`14
`12
`lC
`E
`E
`4
`
`.0
`"0
`C
`0
`c:;
`~
`0
`0
`
`~ C
`0 a..
`-;:
`
`-4
`-6
`-E
`
`FJ
`
`For ~
`stitutir
`as
`
`A plot
`0.001 :
`occurs
`The
`
`For W
`when,
`functi(
`values
`pair oj
`widely
`factor.
`
`Exa,
`respon
`transfe
`angle c
`
`-150
`-180 L-.lJ-"-lUJ11Ull-l::l:t£i~~§~ + 180
`
`0.1
`
`1.0
`
`10
`
`FIGURE 9--16.
`
`(iW)2] ',H
`2~w
`Bode ploto! 1 + -:;;- + ';'n
`.•
`[
`
`magnitude correction curves shown in Figure 9-17. In both Figures 9-16 and
`9-17, the scale on the right is to be used when the quadratic factor represents a
`zero term.
`In many applications, particularly those involving transfer functions of
`aircraft and missiles, the natural damping ratio of the airframe is normally
`< 0.1. The peak value of the db magnitude for any value of damping ratio may
`be derived by differentiation of (9.75). Assuming that i = -1, or the factor is a
`pair of complex conjugate poles, the magnitude is
`1
`
`1
`
`(9.78)
`
`If this result is differentiated and set equal to zero, the ratio of w/wn where the
`peak magnitude occurs is found to be
`
`~ < 0.707
`
`(9.79)
`
`8
`
`8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket