`
`
`
`Paper No. 9
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., AND LG
`ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v .
`
`CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2014-01405
`Patent 6,493,770
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`Pursuant to the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide (OPTPG), 77 Fed. Reg.,
`
`48765 (Aug. 14, 2012), Patent Owner submits this initial listing of motions that
`
`Patent Owner now contemplates and for which Patent Owner intends to request
`
`authorization during the March 9, 2015, telephonic conference.
`
`1. Motion to Amend or Substitute Claims
`
`Patent Owner may move to amend or propose substitute claims pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.121. Any such claim amendments or substitutions will respond to
`
`one or more of the grounds of unpatentability involved in the trial and will not
`
`enlarge the scope of the claims (37 C.F.R. § 42.221(a)(2)(i)) or introduce new
`
`matter (37 C.F.R. § 42.221(a)(2)(ii)).
`
`2. Motion to Consolidate IPRs for Purposes of Depositions
`
`Patent Owner notes that three related inter partes review proceedings were
`
`instituted on February 9, 2015, between the Patent Owner and Petitioner, LG
`
`Electronics. See IPR2014-01386, IPR2014-01396 and IPR2014-01405. The parties
`
`have discussed the possibility of consolidating the cases for purposes of cross-
`
`examination such that each declarant would be subject to one deposition, rather
`
`than three separate depositions, in order to streamline and simplify proceedings in
`
`the separate IPR proceedings. The cross-examination consolidation would have no
`
`other effect on the separate IPR proceedings. If the parties reach agreement on this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`issue, Patent Owner requests leave to file a motion to consolidate for purposes of
`
`cross-examination depositions, if such a motion is deemed necessary by the Board.
`
`3. Motion for Additional Discovery
`
`Patent Owner requests leave to file a motion seeking the full production of
`
`all exhibits and papers cited in the declaration of Mr. Geert Knapen, as required by
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(1)(i). In particular, Patent Owner requests production of the
`
`complete versions of documents cited to and relied upon by Petitioner and
`
`declarant in the Petition to Institute Inter Partes Review. Specifically, Exhibit 1004
`
`(PCCextend 100 User’s Manual), Exhibit 1013 (Universal Serial Bus
`
`Specification, Revision 1.0 ), Exhibit 1017 (PCMCIA Primer), Exhibit 1018
`
`(PCMCIA PC Card Standard, Release 2.01), and Exhibit 1019 (PCMCIA Card
`
`Services Specification, Release 2.0), which each appear to be incomplete and
`
`constituting only part of the entire respective document. Patent Owner notes that is
`
`has objected to these exhibits pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), the parties have
`
`conferred regarding the objections, and Petitioner will respond to the objections
`
`next week.
`
`4. Motion to Exclude Evidence
`
`Patent Owner believes it already has authority to file a motion to exclude but
`
`notifies the Board that it has objected to, and the parties have conferred regarding,
`
`certain evidence relied upon by Petitioner and declarant, including the evidence
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`noted above, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1). Petitioner will respond to the
`
`objections next week at which time the parties will again confer. If the objections
`
`cannot be resolved, Patent Owner seeks leave to file a motion to exclude the
`
`objectionable evidence pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(c).
`
`
`
`Dated: March 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/Robert R. Laurenzi
`Robert R. Laurenzi
`Reg. No. 45,557
`
`Kaye Scholer LLP
`250 West 55th Street
`New York, NY 10019-9710
`T: 212-836-7235
`F: 212-836-6427
`Email: rlaurenzi@kayescholer.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.205(b), the undersigned certifies
`
`that on March 5, 2015, a complete and entire copy of this PATENT OWNER’S
`
`LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS was provided via email to the Petitioner by
`
`serving the correspondence email address of record as follows:
`
`
`Jason Shapriro
`Soumya Panda
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Email:
`
`jshapiro@rothwellfigg.com
`spanda@rothwellfigg.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/Robert R. Laurenzi
`Robert R. Laurenzi
`Kaye Scholer LLP
`250 West 55th Street
`New York, NY 10019-9710
`T: 212-836-7235
`
`
`
`