throbber
Paper ____
`
`Filed on behalf of: LG Electronics, Inc.,
`
`
`
` LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and
`
`
`
` LG Electronics Mobilecomm, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`By:
`Jason M. Shapiro, Lead Counsel
`
`Soumya P. Panda, Back-up Counsel
`
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`
`Email: jshapiro@rothwellfigg.com
` spanda@rothwellfigg.com
`
`
`
` Filed: March 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., and
`LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2014-01386
`Patent 6,012,103
`_______________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`
`
`

`

`LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics
`
`Case IPR2014-01386
`Patent 6,012,103
`
`
`
`Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. (“Petitioner”) respectfully identify the following
`
`motions that Petitioner currently anticipates it might file, pursuant to Office Trial
`
`Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 at 48765-66:
`
` Motion to Submit Supplemental Information (37 C.F.R. § 42.123)
`
`Petitioner understands that it need not file any motion to serve and file
`
`supplemental evidence pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2) in response to the
`
`Patent Owner’s evidentiary objections. To the extent any authorization by the
`
`Board were deemed necessary or appropriate for Petitioner to file the supplemental
`
`evidence, Petitioner reserves the right to seek such authorization.
`
`
`
`Petitioner has not listed motions already authorized by the Board, such as
`
`those set forth in the Scheduling Order (Paper 9), and reserves the right to file such
`
`motions and to seek authorization to file any other motions that may become
`
`necessary or appropriate in response to any motions filed or action taken by Patent
`
`Owner, or in view of any further events or submissions in these proceedings.
`
`
`Date: March 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jason M. Shapiro/
`Jason M. Shapiro, Reg. No. 35,354
`
`Soumya P. Panda, Reg. No. 60,447
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`
` 
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` 
`
`Case IPR2014-01386
`Patent 6,012,103
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`LG Electronics, Inc.,
`LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and
`LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`Case IPR2014-01386
`Patent 6,012,103
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 5th day of March, 2015, a true and correct copy
`
`of the foregoing PETITIONER’S LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS was
`
`served, via electronic mail upon the following counsel for Patent Owner Cypress
`
`Semiconductor Corp.:
`
`
`
` 
`
`Robert R. Laurenzi, Esq.
`Kaye Scholer LLP
`425 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`Phone: (212) 836-8000
`Email: robert.laurenzi@kayescholer.com
` 
`Robert S. Magee, Esq.
`Kaye Scholer LLP
`Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 400
`3000 El Camino Real
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Phone: (650) 319-4500
`Email: robert.magee@kayescholer.com
` 
` 
` 
`
` /Erik van Leeuwen/
`Erik van Leeuwen
`Litigation Operations Coordinator
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket