throbber
1:30pm - 2:OOpm (Invited)
`ThSl
`
`A Compact, Scalable Cross-Connect Switch Using Total Internal
`Reflection Due to Thermally-Generated Bubbles
`
`J.E. Fouquet, S. Venkatesh, M. Troll, D. Chen, H.F. Wong* and P.W. Barth
`
`Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 3500 Deer Creek Road 26M9, Palo Alto, CA 94304, (650) 857-31 38
`voice, (650) 81 3-3626 fax, fouquet@hpl.hwom
`* Hewlett-Packard Company, Lightwave Division, 1400 Fountaingrove Parkway 1 US, Santa Rosa, CA
`95403
`
`Cross-connect switches for connecting optical fibers are important for high speed communications,
`particularly where wavelength division multiplexing is employed. Commercial optomechanical switches
`offer low insertion losses but are bulky, expensive and difficult to scale to large numbers of fibers.
`Commercial thermo-optic switches are far more compact by comparison, but still use a relatively large
`amount of wafer area, have relatively high insertion losses (e.g. - 8 dB in a 4x4 switch) and polarization
`dependence (frequently - 1 dB PDL), and are generally difficult to scale. Free-space silicon
`micromachined switches are usually limited to small numbers of fibers due to insertion losses incurred
`from beam divergence. Friction-based wear and difficult optical alignment of all paths simultaneously are
`problems commonly encountered with free-space micromachined designs.
`
`Our novel, compact single mode fiber cross-connect switch diverts light from one waveguide to a crossing
`waveguide in a silica planar lightwave circuit (PLC) using total internal reflection (TIR) off the interface
`between a waveguide and a thermally-generated bubble. Trenches are etched at the waveguide
`intersections, with one sidewall passing through the point where the waveguide axes intersect. When the
`trenches are filled with a liquid whose refractive index matches that of the waveguide (the default
`condition), light is transmitted across a trench into the next colinear waveguide segment as shown in Fig.
`la. When the liquid is displaced by a bubble, the incident light undergoes TIR into the crossing
`P .
`
`wave uide as shown in Fig. 1 b. The concept of a PLC using TIR was demonstrated by Jackel, et al. in
`1990 using electrolytically-generated bubbles. The device switched light, albeit with rather poor
`performance. Our devices exhibit much better optical performance since thermal actuation permits use of
`a fluid with a much closer refractive index match to the waveguide. In addition, our actuators are formed
`on a separate substrate, allowing independent optimization of the PLC to minimize insertion loss, and
`improvements in etching technology have yielded much smoother trench sidewalls.
`
`The diamond-shaped feature of Fig. 2 is the PLC portion of a 4x4 device. It contains two 250pm-pitch
`waveguide arrays intersecting at an angle to support TIR. If no crosspoint along the path of one input
`fiber is activated to reflect, then the light passes straight through the switch along the original path as a
`“drop” output. These “drop” outputs, along with the corresponding “add” inputs, allow modular scaling
`architectures to construct larger switches, as shown in Fig. 3. In contrast, optomechanical and polymer
`thermo-optic NxN switches do not scale as readily. The switch design reported here is basically
`polarization-insensitive; only the crosstalk should depend on polarization.
`
`Flame hydrolysis-deposited planar lightwave matrices were fabricated to our specifications by an external
`vendor. Refractive indexes nominally match those of single mode fiber at 1.55 ym. The core layer is 8
`pm high and is centered 25 pm below the top of the upper cladding layer of the as-fabricated PLC.
`Losses within the waveguides are reported to be approximately 0.1 dB/cm by the vendor. The core layer
`has been patterned in order to create waveguides 8pm wide at the edge of the switch. In some
`structures, waveguides adiabatically expand to 16 pm width in order to reduce optical losses while
`traversing the trench. After the upper cladding deposition, verl:ical-sidewalled trenches have been etched
`to a depth of 50 pm. Waveguides approach the trenches at a 160” angle of incidence, which provides for
`TIR of all rays inside standard single mode fiber. The bubbles used to divert the light are generated using
`
`0-7803-4947-4/98/$10.00 0 1 998 IEEE
`
`169
`
`FNC 1025
`
`

`

`immersible heaters constructed using a process based on proven thermal inkjet technology. 70 pm -
`diameter vertical holes penetrate the silicon heater substrate to supply fluid to the trenches in the PLC.
`The PLC waveguide matrix is inverted top-to-bottom before being bonded to the actuator circuit.
`
`Initial optical tests were made on PLC structures without actuators. The refractive index of the matching
`liquid reduces beam divergence, and thus transmission insertion loss, to low levels for our trenches.
`BeamPROP version 2.1 h predicts a 0.2 dB insertion loss for transmission through a 25 pm-wide single
`trench with 8 pm x 16 pm waveguides. Indeed, fiber-to-fiber losses at 1.55 pm wavelength in test
`structures containing 32 trenches with these dimensions were measured to be 0.2 dB per trench,
`agreeing well with theory. Polarization-dependent loss is 5 0.02 dB for transmission through four
`trenches along the “drop” path.
`
`A 4x4 prototype switch was interconnected with single mode fibers in silicon V-groove arrays. Fiber-to-
`fiber insertion loss was 1.9 to 2.5 dB along the “drop” path, implying approximately 0.55 to 0.85 dB loss
`per fibeddevice interconnection. Insertion loss for reflection off the lowermost crosspoint was 5 dB. For
`ideal conditions, reflection insertion loss off of an empty trench should be 0.1 dB, so reflection loss was
`considerably higher than expected, possibly due to nonideal angle (2” from vertical) and placement of the
`etched trench sidewalls in this device. The same value of reflection insertion loss was measured for
`reflection at an empty trench as for reflection off a bubble having an end-to-end length approximately 2.5
`times the trench width located in the same trench. Extinction (on:off) ranged from 45 to 70 dB for the
`different reflected paths. Measurements were made without temperature control, so fluid refractive index
`match and thus extinction were less than ideal. Even so, these results far exceed the single crosspoint
`performance of interference-based switches.
`
`1. Janet L. Jackel, John J. Johnson and W.J. Tomlinson, “Bistable optical switching using
`electrochemically generated bubbles”, Optics Letters, v. 15, n. 24, 1990.
`
`index-
`matching fluid
`
`silica
`
`I
`
`gas
`
`silica
`
`Fig. 1 a transmission
`
`Fig. 1 b reflection
`
`TIR
`
`I
`
`V
`
`four 4x4 devices
`
`Fig. 2
`PLC array with empty trenches
`bonded to silicon heater chip
`
`170
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket