throbber
1296-port MEMS Transparent Optical CrossConnect with
`2.07Petabit/s Switch Capacity
`
`R. Ryf, J. Kim, J. P. Hickey, A. Gnauck, D. Carr, F. Pardo, C. Bolle, R. Frahm , N.
`Basavanhally , C. Yoh, D. Ramsey, R. Boie , R. George, J. Kraus, C. Lichtenwalner, R.
`Papazian, J. Gates, H. R. Shea, A. Gasparyan, V. Muratov, J.E. Griffith, J.A. Prybyla, S.
`Goyal, CD. White, MX Lin , R. Ruel, C. Nijander, S. Arney, D. T. Neilson, D. J. Bishop,
`P. Kolodner, S. Pau, C. Nuzman, A. Weis, B. Kumar, D. Lieuwen, V. Aksyuk, D. S.
`Greywall, T.C. Lee, H.T. Soh, W.M. Mansfield, S. Jin, W.Y. Lai, H.A. Huggins, D.LBarr,
`R.A. Cirelli, G. R. Bogart, K. Teffeau, R. Vella, H. Mavoori, A. Ramirez, N.A.Ciampa,
`F.P. Klemens, M.D. Morris, T. Boone, J.Q. Liu, J.M.Rosamilia, C. R. Giles
`
`Lucent Technologies
`791 Holmdel-Keyport Rd
`Holmdel, NJ 07733
`Email: ryf@lucent.com
`
`Agere Systems
`600 Mountain Ave.
`Murray Hill, NJ07974-0636
`
`Abstract
`insertion loss
`A 1296-port MEMS transparent optical crossconnect with 5.1dB+/-1.1dB
`at 1550nm is reported. Measured worst-case optical crosstalk in a fabric was h38dB
`and nominal switching rise/fall times were 5msec. A 2.07Petabit/s switch capacity was
`verified upon cross-connecting a forty-channel by 40Gb/s DWDM data stream through a
`prototype fabric.
`
`Summary
`Major data communications optical networks are growing in capacity and sophistication
`to accommodate the demand for reconfigurable and reliable Internet data transport.
`Traditional SONET rings can no longer economically manage the data traffic and more
`flexible mesh architectures are looking attractive. Optical crossconnects would then
`manage WDM traffic at major network intersections, redirecting optical channels as
`dictated by provisioning, protection and restoration needs. Hundreds of optical fibers
`with potentially one hundred or more WDM channels may reach a central office,
`necessitating large, scalable optical crossconnects[1-3]. Here we report a 1296-port
`transparent, strictly nonblocking, Micro-ElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) optical
`crossconnect. The fabric had a mean insertion loss of 5.1dB (1530-1560nm), worst-case
`optical crosstalk of h38dBand nominal connection rise/fall times of 5msec. Single-port
`data capacity of 1.6 Tb/s using forty 40Gb/s DWDM channels was demonstrated in a
`prototype subsystem, which when fully implemented to populate all ports of a 1296-port
`fabric, corresponds to 1296x1.6Tb/s=2.07Petabit/s switch capacity.
`
`This new optical crossconnect was assembled using two integrated 1296-MEMS single-
`crystal silicon mirror arrays and matching lens-fiber arrays [1]. The MEMS-mirrors were
`built as electrostatically actuated gimbal structures capable of 2-axis tilt motion and the
`mirror arrays were sealed behind glass windows in ceramic packages. The MEMS
`mirrors were designed for sustained operation with a maximum electrode voltage of
`200V. Single-mode optical fiber input and output ports were arranged in lens-fiber
`assemblies, comprised of 36x36=1296 square-pitch fiber bundles, having matching
`collimating lenslet arrays. Both diffractive and refractive lenslet arrays were tested, the
`
`FNC 1031
`
`

`

`diffractive lenses were designed for restricted wavelength operation, the refractive-
`element design extended the fabrici's operating wavelength range to ~1300nm-1600nm.
`
`Figure 1 shows a schematic of switch fabrici's opto-mechanical layout. The figure also
`shows the placement of a retroreflector, enabling the use of one MEMS mirror array and
`lens/fiber array with half of the MEMS mirrors committed to input-ports and the
`remaining committed to output-ports. This folded configuration was used in the DWDM
`signal switching experiments. In operation, prescribed voltages are applied to the input-
`and output-mirror electrodes, steering input optical beams to impinge on the output-
`destination mirrors that are tilted to minimize coupling loss to the output-ports. The
`photographs in figure 2 show front-views of a 1296-port optical switch module and of a
`prototype crossconnect tested in the folded configuration. The prototype shows that the
`majority of the bay area is occupied by optical port connectors, and highlights the density
`of the drive and control electronics.
`
`Figure 1. Optical layout of the 1296-port switch fabric. A gold mirror retroreflector
`placed in the middle of the optical path enables the use of a single MEMS mirror
`array and lens/fiber array to implement a folded-geometry 648-port fabric.
`
`The loss spectrum of the prototype crossconnect was dictated by the optical properties
`of the diffractive lenses in the lens/fiber array, which were designed to match the C-band
`requirements of amplified optical line systems. Connections measured between 60 input
`ports and 60 output ports yielded a mean insertion loss of 5.1dB+/- 1.1 dB. Figure 3(a)
`shows the loss spectrum of a typical connection through the fabric. Optical crosstalk to
`output ports adjacent to an established connection was h58dB,and worst-case crosstalk
`originating during beam scanning was less than -38dB. The mechanical response of the
`MEMS mirror resulted in nominal 5 msec rise/fall times of connections, as shown by the
`output-port signal response in figure 3(b).
`In laboratory-environment tests, connection
`losses were stable to within 1dB over a 1hour period without any active mirror control.
`
`The data capacity and spectral bandwidth of the prototype optical crossconnect was
`verified by switching a forty channel by 40Gb/s DWDM data stream through the fabric
`(PRBS length:231 - 1). The experiment used forty multiplexed DFB lasers on a 100GHz
`channel spacing centered at 1545nm and externally modulated using a single common
`lithium niobate modulator. This DWDM source was connected to one input port of the
`prototype crossconnect and switched to the output ports. The total input optical power
`was 16dBm with OdBm average channel power. DWDM channels were demultiplexed
`after the switch fabric and detected by an optically preamplified receiver having
`-29.5dBm sensitivity at 10E-9 BER. Figure 4 shows the input and output DWDM optical
`spectra of the fabric together with measured bit-error-rate performance of three
`
`

`

`connections at four wavelengths. No noticeable signal degradation was observed and
`error-free transmission through the switch fabric was consistently obtained for all
`connections and channels. These results confirm the potential aggregate switch
`capacity for this transparent optical crossconnect of 1296x40x40Gb/s=2.07Petabit/s.
`This data transparency and the ability to switch DWDM data streams with low optical
`loss, are suitable for cost-effective management of the vast traffic patterns evolving with
`the growth of Internet data.
`
`free-space optical crossconnect with
`In summary, a 1296-port MEMS-based
`2.07petabit/s switch capacity has been described. The low insertion loss (5.1dB), low
`optical crosstalk (-38dB worst-case), and fast switch response (5msec optical rise/fall
`times) enable the practical implementation of a new generation of scalable switch fabrics
`capable of managing diverse optical signals found in complex optical networks.
`
`References
`[1] D. T. Neilson et al; OFCi'2000, March 2000, pd. 12
`[2] J.E. Fouquet et al;LEOSi'98, December 1998, vol.2, pp.169
`[3] A. A. M. Saleh; OFCi'2000, vol. 4, pp62-65
`
`Figure 2. (a)1296-port optical switch module
`and (b) 648-port folded-geometry optical
`crossconnect prototype.
`
`Figure 4. BER of 4 DWDM channels in 3
`connections (baselines=solid symbols). Insets
`show spectra before and after the fabric.
`
`Figure 3. (a) loss spectrum
`of prototype crossconnect
`with diffractive lenslet array
`and (b) output optical signal
`response upon setting up the
`connection.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket