throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`________________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. &
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`________________
`
`Case IPR2014-01367
`Patent 6,009,469
`
`________________
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`MICHAEL NEWMAN UNDER 37 C.F.R § 42.10
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01367
`Patent No. 6,009,469
`
`I.
`
`Relief Requested
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and the Board’s “Notice of Filing Date
`
`Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response,”
`
`entered September 9, 2014 (Paper No. 3), which authorized the parties to file
`
`motions for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Patent Owner
`
`requests that the Board admit Michael C. Newman pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel pro hac
`
`vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition
`
`that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the
`
`Board may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a registered
`
`practitioner may be granted upon showing that counsel is an experienced litigating
`
`attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`
`proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`The facts, supported by the attached Declaration of Michael C. Newman in
`
`Support of Patent Owner’s Motion for Admission P ro H ac V ice (“Newman Decl.”;
`
`Exhibit 2009), establish good cause to admit Mr. Newman pro hac vice in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`Lead counsel William A. Meunier is a registered practitioner and is
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01367
`Patent No. 6,009,469
`
`experienced in proceedings before the USPTO. Backup counsel Matthew D.
`
`Durell is also a registered practitioner and is experienced in proceedings before the
`
`USPTO.
`
`Mr. Newman is an experienced litigating attorney. He has been a patent
`
`litigation attorney for nine years, and is currently a Senior Associate at Mintz
`
`Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC. (Newman Decl. at ¶ 1.) Mr. Newman
`
`is a member in good standing of the Massachusetts State Bar, with no suspensions
`
`or disbarments from practice, nor any application for admission to practice denied,
`
`nor any sanctions or contempt citations, and is admitted to practice in the United
`
`States District Courts for the District of Massachusetts, the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (Id. at ¶¶ 2-5.) His mailing address is at One
`
`Financial Center, Boston MA, 02111. His email address is
`
`mcnewman@mintz.com, and his direct dial is 617-348-1626.
`
`Mr. Newman is particularly familiar with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding based on his work as trial counsel in a number of cases involving U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,009,469. He has been counsel to Patent Owner with respect to U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,009,469 in the following matters: C ertain P oint-to-P ointN etwork
`
`C ommu nication D evices and P rodu cts C ontainingSame, Inv. No. 337-TA-892
`
`(U.S.I.T.C., filed Aug. 1, 2013); StraightP athIP Grp.,Inc.v.L G Elecs.Inc,
`
`V IZIO ,Inc., ToshibaC orp(E.D. Va., consolidated case No. 1:13-cv-00934-AJT-
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01367
`Patent No. 6,009,469
`
`IDD); StraightP athIP Grp.,Inc.v.Samsu ngElectronics,B lackberry,ZTE,and
`
`H u aweiTechnologies (E.D. Tex., consolidated Case No. 13-cv-604) StraightP ath
`
`IP Grp.Inc.v.Straightand N etflix,Inc. (E.D. Tex. Case No. 14-cv-405);
`
`A mazon.com,Inc.,v.StraightP athIP Grp.,Inc.(N.D. Cal. Case No. 5:14-cv-
`
`4561-EJD). (Newman Decl. at 10.) Mr. Newman was the lead associate in each of
`
`these cases, and was involved in most all aspects of the litigations, including the
`
`issue of validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,009,469. (Id.)
`
`Mr. Newman has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board's Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R,
`
`and he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a). (Id. at ¶ 7.)
`
`For these reasons Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board admit
`
`Michael C. Newman pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Dated: April 16, 2015
`
`/William Meunier/
`William A. Meunier (Reg. No. 41,193)
`Matthew Durell (Reg. No. 55,136)
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
`and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`Telephone: (617) 348-1845
`Facsimile: (617) 542-2241
`StraightPathIPRs@mintz.com
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01367
`Patent No. 6,009,469
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that a copy of Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Michael Newman Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 and supporting Exhibits
`
`2009 and 2010 are being served by electronic mail and First Class Mail, prepaid,
`
`on the following counsel for the Petitioner:
`
`Brian Erickson (Reg. No. 48,895)
`brian.erickson@dlapiper.com
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Samsung-SP-IPR@dlapiper.com
`
`Jeff Cole (Reg. No. 56,052)
`jeff.cole@dlapiper.com
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Samsung-SP-IPR@dlapiper.com
`
`Dated: April 16, 2015
`
`/Matthew D. Durell/
`Matthew D. Durell (Reg. No. 55,136)
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
`and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`Telephone: (617) 348-1615
`Facsimile: (617) 542-2241
`StraightPathIPRs@mintz.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket