`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINL l
`Norfolk Division
`
`FILED
`
`OCT 2 6 2012
`
`CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT
`NORFOLK. VA
`
`INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATIONS
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`VIVOX, INC.,
`Defendant,
`
`and
`
`INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATIONS
`TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`STALKER SOFTWARE, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`CiviINo.2:12cv7
`
`Civil No. 2:12cv9
`
`OPINION AND ORDER
`
`These cases involve actions alleging infringement of five patents owned by plaintiff
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc. ("Innovative") which disclose an invention
`
`concerning internet telephony technology, also known as Voice Over Internet Protocol ("VoIP").
`
`The first patent is entitled "Point-to-Point Internet Protocol" and was issued on August 22,2000, as
`
`United States Patent No. 6,108,704 (the '"704 patent"). The second patent is entitled "Point-to-Point
`
`Computer Network Communication Utility Utilizing Dynamically Assigned Network Protocol
`
`Addresses" and was issued on October 10,2000, as United States Patent No. 6,131,121 (the '"121
`
`patent"). The third patent is entitled "Graphic User Interface for Internet Telephony Application"
`
`and was issued on December 28, 1999, as United States Patent No. 6,009,469 (the '"469 patent").
`
`The fourth patent is entitled "Point-to-Point Internet Protocol" and was issued on March 2,2004, as
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 2 of 25 PageID# 1890
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 3 of 25 PageID# 1891
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 3
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 4 of 25 PageID# 1892
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 4
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 5 of 25 PageID# 1893
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 5
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 6 of 25 PageID# 1894
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 6
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 7 of 25 PageID# 1895
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 8 of 25 PageID# 1896
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 8
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 9 of 25 PageID# 1897
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 9
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 10 of 25 PageID# 1898
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 10
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 11 of 25 PageID# 1899
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 11
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 12 of 25 PageID# 1900
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 12
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 13 of 25 PageID# 1901
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 13
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 14 of 25 PageID# 1902
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 14
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 15 of 25 PageID# 1903
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 15
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 16 of 25 PageID# 1904
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 16
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 17 of 25 PageID# 1905
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 17
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 18 of 25 PageID# 1906
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 18
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 19 of 25 PageID# 1907
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 19
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 20 of 25 PageID# 1908
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 20
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 21 of 25 PageID# 1909
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 21
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 22 of 25 PageID# 1910
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 22
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 23 of 25 PageID# 1911
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 23
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 24 of 25 PageID# 1912
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 24
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00009-RGD-TEM Document 48 Filed 10/26/12 Page 25 of 25 PageID# 1913
`
`Samsung v. Straight Path, IPR2014-01366
`Straight Path - Ex. 2005 - Page 25