throbber
0090-9556/ 83/ 1105-0446$00.00/ 0
`DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITIO N
`Copyright© 1983 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`
`Vol.ll , No.5
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`OXYMORPHONE METABOLISM AND URINARY EXCRETION IN HUMAN, RAT, GUINEA
`PIG, RABBIT, AND DOG
`
`EDWARD J. CONE, WILLIAM D. DARWIN, WILLIAM F. BUCHWALD, AND CHARLES W. GORODETZKY
`
`National Institute on Drug Abuse, Addiction Research Center, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,
`Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration
`
`(Received April 1, 1983; accepted May 23, 1983)
`
`ABSTRACT:
`
`Oxymorphone was extensively metabolized by human, rat, dog, and
`guinea pig and to a lesser extent by rabbit. The most abundant
`metabolite in urine for all species was conjugated oxymorphone
`(12. 7-81.7% administered dose) followed by 6/1- and 6a-carbinols
`produced by 6-keto reduction of oxymorphone. 6{1-0xymorphol
`(0.2-3.1 %) was found in the urine of all species, whereas 6a-oxy(cid:173)
`morphol (0.1-2.8%) was found only in human, rabbit, and guinea
`pig. Small amounts of free oxymorphone (~10%) were excreted by
`all species except rabbit, which excreted 31. 7%. Overall recoveries
`
`of oxymorphone and metabolites from urine ranged from 15-96%,
`of which >80% was excreted in the first 24 hr by all species except
`dog. Only 35% was excreted by dog during the first day. Stereose(cid:173)
`lectivity of 6-keto- reduction was observed for all species with the
`6{3-carbinol metabolite being most abundant in the urine of all but
`guinea pig. Considerable individual variability occurred in the excre(cid:173)
`tion of free and conjugated oxymorphone by six human subjects
`following oral dosing. Species trends in the metabolism of 6-keto(cid:173)
`opioids are discussed.
`
`OM 1 is a semisynthetic narcotic analgesic derived from the(cid:173)
`baine. The hydrochloride salt (Numorphan, Endo Pharmaceuti(cid:173)
`cals, Inc.) is available for parenteral administration and is approx(cid:173)
`imately 10 times more potent than morphine (1-4). The oral to
`parenteral potency ratio of OM in humans is about I: 10 which
`makes oral OM approximately equianalgesic to im administered
`morphine (1).
`Although OM has been used clinically for the relief of pain for
`many years, no reports of its metabolism and urinary excretion
`have appeared. This study of OM in humans and laboratory
`animal species was undertaken as part of an ongoing study of the
`metabolism of6-keto-opioids, i.e. narcotic agonists and antagonists
`with a morphinan-6-one skeletal structure. Thus far, the metabo(cid:173)
`lism of naltrexone (5, 6), naloxone (6), hydromorphone (7), and
`hydrocodone (8) in humans, dogs, rats, guinea pigs, and rabbits
`has been reported. This article describes the metabolic proftle and
`urinary excretion of OM in humans and laboratory animals
`following a single dose of OM.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Chemicals. Drugs and chemicals were obtained from the following
`sources: chloroform (preserved with 1% ethanol) and isopropanol, Burdick
`and Jackson Laboratories, Inc., Muskegon, MI; Tri-Sil Z, Pierce Chemical
`Co., Rockford, IL; OM, Endo Laboratories, Inc., Garden City, NY; 6{3-
`hydrocodol (IS), Drug Addiction Laboratory, University of Virginia.
`6aOM and 6{30M were synthesized by the selective reduction of OM as
`reported (9) (structure 1). The structure and purity of all drugs were
`checked by thin layer chromatography and GC/MS.
`
`Abbreviations used are: OM , oxymorphone (4,5a-epoxy-3, 14-dihydroxy-17-
`methylmorphinan-6-one): 6aOM, 6a-oxymorphol ; 6,80M, 6,8-oxymorphol; GC /
`MS, gas chromatography / mass spectrometry; Cl, chemical ionization; MF, mass
`fragmentography; TMS, trimethylsilyl; IS, internal standard.
`
`Send reprint requests to: Edward J. Cone, Ph.D., National Institute on Drug
`Abuse, Addiction Research Center, P.O. Box 12390, Lexington, KY 40583.
`
`STRUCTURE I
`
`Prior to use, chloroform was treated with calcium hydroxide (USP-FCC
`food grade, J . T. Baker Chemical Co., Phillipsburg, NJ) to eliminate
`phosgene-related impurities (10).
`Animals and Human Subjects. The animals used in this study consisted
`of one. male (9.6 kg) and one female (7.5 kg) mongrel beagle dogs
`(approximately 3 years old), six male Wistar albino rats (198 ± 5 g, 6-9
`months old), six male Hartley albino guinea pigs (322 ± 30 g, 6-9 months
`old), and four male New Zealand albino rabbits (2.5 ± 0.1 kg, 10-12
`months old). The six humans in this study were healthy, adult male federal
`prison volunteers from whom informed consent was obtained under NIH
`Guidelines; all were former narcotic addicts who were drug-free at the
`time of the study and had been so for at least I week. The age (years) and
`weight (kg), respectively, of each subject were as follows: subject I, 34,
`77.1; subject 2, 33, ll8.8; subject 3, 29, 74.8; subject 4, 43, 76.2; subject 5,
`38, 86.2; subject 6, 41 , 74.8.
`
`446
`
`

`

`OXYMORPHONE METABOLISM AND URINARY EXCRETION
`
`447
`
`Drug Administration and Urine Collection. Animals were housed in
`metal cages with stainless steel urine collection pans. Control urine was
`collected for 24 hr prior to drug administration. A single dose of OM.
`HCl (2.5 mg base/kg) was administered sc and urine was collected in 24-
`hr aliquots for 2 days. After each collection, the pans were rinsed with
`water, which was added to the urine. Feces were discarded.
`Control urine from the six human subjects was collected for 24 hr prior
`to drug administration. OM-HCl (10 mg) was administered orally in
`solution and urine collections were made at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and
`120 hr following drug administration. During the intervals, subjects' urine
`specimens were combined for each interval.
`Urine specimens were pooled for each laboratory animal species but
`not for the six human subjects. Following collection, the samples were
`frozen until time of analysis.
`Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Mass spectra were obtained
`on a Finnigan model 3300 quadrupole GC/ MS operating in the methane
`Cl mode. The system was interfaced to a Finnigan model 6000 interactive
`data system. Electron energy was 80 eV. The GC consisted of a 2 mm X
`1.52 m glass column packed with 3% OV-225 on Gas-Chrom Q (100/ 120
`mesh) coupled by a glass capillary tube to the mass spectrometer. Methane
`served as reagent and carrier gas at a flow rate of20 ml/min. Temperatures
`of the injector, column, and ion source were as follows: 250, 200, and
`100°C, respectively.
`Quantitative measurements were made by MF; ions specific for each
`compound at its respective retention time were as follows: OM, m/z 502,
`5.9 min; 6,BOM, m/ z 504, 4.7 min; 6aOM, m/z 504, 5.2 min; IS, m/ z 374,
`7.2 min. Plots Qf peak height ratios of compound/ IS vs. concentration (0-
`2.0 11g/ ml for OM; 0-1.0 !lg/ ml for metabolites) were linear throughout
`the concentration range. The lower limit of detection for each compound
`was approximately 20 ng/ ml. Daily standard curves were constructed from
`five standard urine samples which were processed in the same manner as
`drug specimens. Least squares regression of these data provided slopes and
`intercepts for calculation of drug content of samples.
`Urine Hydrolysis and Extraction. Urine aliquots (10 ml) were treated
`with IS (20 11g, 6,8-hydrocodol) and extracted with and without acid
`hydrolysis. For hydrolysis, samples were mixed with concentrated HCI in
`a 10: I ratio and heated in an autoclave at 1!5°C and 1.27 kg/ cm2 pressure
`for 20 m in a manner similar to that reported for the acid hydrolysis of
`morphine (I I). Following hydrolysis and adjustment to pH 10 with sodium
`hydroxide, the hydrolyzed samples were processed in the same manner as
`those without hydrolysis.
`The extraction procedure was identical to that used for the extraction
`of naltrexone (5) with the exception that the pH of the aqueous phases
`was adjusted to 10.0 ± 0.1 rather than 9.5 and the solvent, chloroform/
`isopropanol (9: I, v / v), was substituted for chloroform. Extracts were
`evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen and transferred with
`methanol to acylation tubes (Regis Chemical Co., Morton Grove, IL). The
`methanol was evaporated and the residue was treated with Tri-Sil Z (100
`!!1). The sample tube was sealed and heated for 3 hr at 90°C. Samples
`were maintained at 90°C until just prior to analysis by GC/ MS.
`Extraction Efficiency. Preliminary studies were performed to determine
`the optimum conditions for extraction of OM, 6,BOM, and 6aOM from
`urine with chloroform/isopropanol. Extraction efficiencies were highest in
`the pH range 9.5-10.5 with chloroform/isopropanol in a 9:1 (v/v) ratio.
`Recoveries ± SE at pH 10.0 for the entire extraction procedure were as
`follows: OM, 73.4 ± 1.2%; 6,BOM, 67.9 ± 0.4%; 6aOM, 72.6 ± 0.4%.
`
`Results
`
`Identification of OM and Metabolites in Urine. OM, conjugated
`OM, and 6-keto reduction metabolites (6f30M and conjugated
`6,80M) appeared immediately in human urine (0-2-hr collection)
`following the administration of a single 10-mg oral dose of OM·
`HCL These substances also appeared in the 0-24-hr urines of rat,
`dog, guinea pig, and rabbit following a single sc dose of OM·
`HCl (2.8 mg/kg). Small amounts of free and conjugated 6aOM
`
`were found in human, guinea pig, and rabbit urine. The identities
`of OM and the metabolites were established by comparison of GC
`retention times and methane GC/MS-CI spectra of the silyl
`derivatives obtained from drug urine extracts with equivalent
`extracts of authentic standards (fig. 1). Conjugated metabolites
`were cleaved by an acid hydrolysis procedure (II) prior to anal(cid:173)
`yses. Initial studies on the stability of OM, 6f30M, and 6aOM
`during acid hydrolysis ruled out the possibility of artifact forma(cid:173)
`tion or loss from hydrolysis. No other metabolites were detected
`by these methods.
`Assay Development. A reliable quantitative assay was devel(cid:173)
`oped for OM, 6f30M, and 6aOM in urine. The method consisted
`of extraction of untreated or acid-hydrolyzed urine by an estab(cid:173)
`lished procedure (5) followed by measurement with methane CI(cid:173)
`MF. Various GC liquid phases (OV-225, OV-17, Silar-5CP, SE-
`30) were tested for separation of drug components. GC columns
`packed with OV-225 provided the best resolution of all phases
`tested. The (M - 15t ions at m/z 502 and 504 for OM and 6-
`hydroxy metabolites were selected for monitoring by MF on the
`basis of their relative abundance (fig. 1). Confirmatory molecular
`ions at m/ z 517 and 519 were monitored on an occasional basis to
`ensure identification. Typical MF scans are shown in fig. 2 for
`extracts of standards, and drug urine of human and animals.
`Quantitative Studies. The amount of unchanged OM excreted
`in urine varied from about 2% (administered dose) for human and
`rat to 31.7% for rabbit (table 1). Dog and guinea pig excreted 5.3
`and 10%, respectively. Conjugated OM was present in substantial
`quantities for all species. Rabbit (11.7%) and rat (12.7%) excreted
`almost equivalent amounts, whereas human (44.1%), dog (56.4%),
`and guinea pig (81.7%) excreted considerably larger amounts.
`Metabolic reduction of the 6-keto group of OM occurred to a
`small extent in all species. Guinea pig and rabbit produced the
`largest amount of reduced metabolites (about 4% total free and
`conjugated 6aOM and 6/30M) followed by human (3.0%), dog
`(1.6%), and rat (0.2%). Stereoselectivity of reduction was found
`for all species with 6f30M being the favored isomer by all animals
`except guinea pig.
`Total drug and metabolite present in the 0- 120-hr samples for
`humans and the 0-48-hr samples for laboratory animals ranged
`from a low of 14.9% for rat to a high of 95.8% for guinea pig.
`Intermediate recoveries were found for rabbit (47.3%), human
`(49.0%), and dog (63.3%). Of these totals, greater than 80% was
`excreted in the first 24-hr period following drug administration
`for all species except dog which showed a greater excretion of OM
`and metabolites during the second day.
`Considerable intersubject variability was present for the six
`human subjects in their excretion pattern of OM and metabolites
`(table 2). Free OM excretion over a 5-day period ranged from 0.3
`to 2.5%. Excretion of conjugated OM ranged from 27.2 to 61.3%.
`Free 6f30M ranged from 0.1 to 0.7%. Excretion of conjugated
`6f30M was less variable with a range of2.1 to 3.0%. Small amounts
`of conjugated 6aOM were detected in three subjects.
`OM, conjugated OM, and conjugated 6f30M were detectable
`through 5 days and reached cumulative mean excretions of 1.9,
`44.1, and 2.6%, respectively (fig. 3). Free 6f30M was detectable
`only through 48 hr at a mean cumulative excretion of 0.3%. The
`half-life (h;2) of free OM was estimated from urinary excretion
`data of three subjects. With the Sigma-Minus method for calcu(cid:173)
`lation of t112, (12) the h;2 ± SE was 8.9 ± 0.4 hr. The mean t1;2
`± SE from urinary excretion rate plots for the same three subjects
`was 7.6 ± 2.0 hr.
`
`

`

`448
`
`CONE ET AL.
`
`TH3
`
`200
`
`250
`
`300
`
`350
`M/Z
`
`400
`
`100
`
`A.
`
`50
`
`169
`
`0
`150
`
`100
`
`B.
`
`50
`
`169
`
`_1
`
`0
`150
`
`>-
`!::=
`(f)
`z
`w
`f-
`~
`w
`>
`i=
`~
`_J
`w
`a::
`
`N ®
`~TMS
`
`0
`
`TMSO
`
`0
`
`OXYMO::H.o~1~- ITMSJ3
`2["
`
`!M-1~1+
`
`302
`
`M•
`011
`
`MH+
`
`500
`(W·I~)+
`504
`
`...
`
`(M+291+
`
`~
`550
`
`IM-891•
`
`T
`
`...
`
`450
`
`TH3
`N
`

`
`OTMS
`0
`TMSO
`6,8-0XYMORPHOL- ITMSJ3
`MW•519
`
`200
`
`250
`
`300
`
`IM-891+
`430
`
`I
`
`4i;
`
`408
`
`w•
`019
`
`MH+
`
`Ill
`
`IM+291+
`
`100
`
`C.
`
`50
`
`169
`
`TH3
`
`©fib
`
`OTMS
`TMSOc=) 0
`6a- OX YMORPHOL- I TMS 1
`3
`MW•519
`
`350
`M/Z
`
`400
`
`450
`
`(M -89)+
`414 430
`
`•••
`550
`
`I
`500
`IM-Ia)•
`504
`
`w•
`019
`
`0
`150
`
`200
`
`250
`
`300
`
`350
`M/Z
`FIG. 1. Methane chemical ionization spectra of the silyl derivatives of oxymorphone, 6{3-oxymorphol, and 6a-oxymorphol.
`
`400
`
`450
`
`500
`
`550
`
`TABLE I
`Recovery of drug and metabolites from urine following a single dose of oxymorphone hydrochloride
`These data represent the means of triplicate determinations and are expressed as percentage of administered dose. Conjugated (Conj) drug and
`metabolites were determined by subtraction of free from total concentration after acid hydrolysis.
`OM
`6,BOM
`
`Species (N)
`
`Dose/ Route
`
`Time
`
`Free
`
`Conj
`
`Free
`
`Conj
`
`Free
`
`Conj
`
`6aOM
`
`Total
`
`Total First 24 hr
`
`Human (6)
`Rat (6)
`Dog (2)
`Guinea pig (6)
`Rabbit (6)
`
`10 mg (oral)
`2.5 mg/kg (sc)
`2.5 mg/kg (sc)
`2.5 mg/kg (sc)
`2.5 mg/kg (sc)
`
`hr
`0-120
`0-48
`0-48
`0-48
`0-48
`
`1.9
`2.0
`5.3
`10.0
`31.7
`
`44.1
`12.7
`56.4
`81.7
`11.7
`
`%
`
`0.3
`0.1
`0.4
`0.3
`2.0
`
`2.6
`0.1
`1.2
`1.0
`1.1
`
`0
`0
`0
`0.5
`0.6
`
`0.1
`0
`0
`2.3
`0.2
`
`%
`49.0
`14.9
`63.3
`95 .8
`47.3
`
`%
`82
`97
`35
`94
`99
`
`Discussion
`
`The metabolite profile of OM in humans and laboratory animals
`is similar in a number of respects to that observed for other 6-
`keto-opioids. The high degree of conjugation of OM for all species
`except rabbit is found with only minor exception for naltrexone
`(6), naloxone (6), and hydromorphone (7). The free phenolic
`group common to each of these substances is highly accessible for
`conjugation (presumably as the glucuronide) by liver microsomal
`enzymes similar to that found for morphine (13). The low ratio of
`conjugated material to intact OM in the rabbit appears to be an
`exceptional case since more conjugate than free parent was found
`in urine following naltrexone (6), naloxone (6), hydromorphone
`(7), and hydrocodone (8) administration. Saturation of enzyme
`systems does not appear to be the reason for the low conjugate/
`
`parent excretion ratios of OM in rabbit since the dosage (2.5 mg/
`kg) was intermediate in the dosage range of the other 6-keto(cid:173)
`opioids, all with high conjugate/parent ratios. The dosage in the
`other studies varied from approximately 1-5 mg/kg (6- 8). It seems
`more likely that differences in liver glucuronyltransferase activity
`toward OM vs. the other 6-keto-opioids account for the observed
`differences in glucuronidation. Separate enzymes have been iso(cid:173)
`lated from rabbit liver microsomes for the glucuronidation of
`morphine and p-nitrophenol ( 13) indicating narrow substrate spec(cid:173)
`ificities within this family of conjugating enzymes.
`The presence of the free phenolic group of OM also appears to
`preclude significant N-dealkylation, similar to that found for
`naltrexone (6), naloxone (6), and hydromorphone (7). Methylation
`of the phenolic group substantially increases N-demethylation as
`evidenced by the N-demethylation of hydrocodone (8) and oxy-
`
`

`

`OXYMORPHONE METABOLISM AND URINARY EXCRETION
`
`449
`
`A. STANDARDS
`
`B. HUMAN(8-12HR)
`
`OM
`
`6/IOM
`\
`
`C. DOG (0-24HR)
`OM
`
`6/IOM
`I
`
`504X4
`
`502
`"-Is
`
`502
`
`IS
`
`374
`
`374
`
`374XIO
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300
`
`D. RAT (0-24HR)
`
`E. GUINEA PIG(0-24HR) f RABBIT(0-24HR)
`OM
`
`OM
`
`OM
`
`~
`
`6aOM
`6/IOM, \
`
`502X4
`...J----'1 ' - (cid:173)
`'-IS
`
`374
`\.__
`
`502
`
`-
`
`IS
`
`374 X2
`
`502
`
`t
`
`w
`en
`:z:
`0 a..
`en
`w
`a::
`
`a::
`0
`1-
`u w
`1-
`w
`0
`
`t
`
`w
`en
`:z:
`0 a..
`en
`w
`a::
`a::
`0
`1-u
`w
`1-
`w
`0
`
`200
`100
`SCAN NUMBER
`FIG. 2. Mass fragmentography recordings of extracts of standards and human and animal urine following oxymorphone administration.
`
`300
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300
`
`100
`
`I
`200
`
`300
`
`TABLE 2
`Urinary excretion of oxymorphone and metabolites in six human subjects
`These data are expressed as percentage of dose and represent the cumulative means of triplicate determinations of samples collected over a 120-hr
`period following a single 10-mg oral dose of oxymorphone hydrochloride.
`OM
`
`Subject
`
`Free
`
`Conj
`
`Free
`
`Conj
`
`Free
`
`Conj
`
`6,BOM
`
`6crOM
`
`Total
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`Mean± SE
`
`2.5
`5.0
`0.6
`0.7
`0.3
`2.4
`1.9 ± 0.7
`
`28.5
`27.2
`63.1
`48.8
`42.0
`54.9
`44.1 ± 5.9
`
`%
`
`0.6
`0.2
`0.1
`0.2
`0.7
`0.2
`0.3 ± 0.1
`
`2.8
`2.5
`2.1
`2.4
`2.8
`3.0
`2.6 ± 0.1
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0.1
`0.2
`0
`0.3
`0
`0
`0.1 ± 0.1
`
`%
`
`34.5
`35.1
`65.9
`52.4
`45.8
`60.5
`49.0 ± 5.3
`
`codone (14), the 0-methyl ether of OM. Whether these effects of
`the phenolic group on N-dealkylation are a result of differences in
`enzyme specificities or differences in substrate accessibility due to
`the higher lipid solubilities of the ethers vs. free phenols remains
`unclear.
`
`Reduction of the ketone group of OM to 6a- and 6/3-carbinols
`also occurred for naltrexone (6), naloxone (6), and hydromor(cid:173)
`phone (7) for all species. Reduction of hydrocodone also was
`evident for all species except dog (8). The degree of reduction of
`OM, naltrexone, and naloxone varied from species to species, but
`
`

`

`450
`
`50
`
`CONE ET AL.
`
`--·-------·-------·
`
`• - - • CONJUGATED OM
`•----• OM
`o -o CONJUGATED 6,80M
`o-----os,eoM
`
`Emerging species trends from these and previous studies on the
`metabolism of 6-keto-opioids indicate that of the five mammalian
`species: a) conjugation (glucuronidation) activity is greatest in the
`dog, but is high in human, guinea pig, and rabbit; b) 6-ketore(cid:173)
`ductase activity is high in human and guinea pig followed by
`rabbit and is almost nonexistent in rat and dog; c) 6-keto reduction
`of opioids with a free phenolic group is stereoselective; reduction
`generally favors formation of the 6-,8-hydroxymetabolite for all
`species except guinea pig; d) N-dealkylation of 6-keto-opioids with
`a free phenolic group is not a significant metabolic pathway but
`becomes important with 0-methyl ethers such as hydrocodone for
`human and dog. Perhaps further metabolic studies of the opioids
`will add to these generalizations of species trends in metabolism.
`
`References
`
`l. W. T. Beaver, S. L. Wallenstein, R . W. Houde, and A. Rogers,
`Comparison of the analgesic effects of oral and intramuscular
`oxymorphone and of intramuscular oxymorphone and morphine in
`patients with cancer. J. Clin. Pharmacal. 17, 186-198 (1977).
`2. N. B. Eddy and L. E. Lee, The analgesic equivalence to morphine and
`relative side action liability of oxymorphone (14-hydroxydihydro(cid:173)
`morphinone). J. Pharmacal. Exp. Ther. 125, 116-121 (1959).
`3. T. J. De Kornfeld, A clinical and laboratory study of hydroxydihy(cid:173)
`dromorphinone (Numorphan HCl). Fed. Proc. 20, 309 (1961).
`4. A. S. Keats and J. Telford, Studies of analgesic drugs. V. The
`comparative subjective effects of oxymorphone and morphine. Clin.
`Pharmacal. Ther. I, 703-707 (1960).
`5. E. J. Cone, C. W. Gorodetzky, and S. Y. Yeh: The urinary excretion
`profile of naltrexone and metabolites in man. Drug Metab. Dispos.
`2, 506-512 (1974).
`6. E. J. Cone, in "Critical Concerns in the Field of Drug Abuse" (A.
`Schecter, H. Alksne, and E. Kaufman, eds.), p. 1228. Marcel Dekker,
`New York, 1978.
`7. E. J. Cone, B. A. Phelps, and C. W. Gorodetzky, Urinary excretion of
`hydromorphone and metabolites in humans, rats, dogs, guinea pigs
`and rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci. 66, 1709-1713 (1977).
`8. E. J. Cone, W. D. Darwin, C. W. Gorodetzky, and T. Tan, Compar(cid:173)
`ative metabolism of hydrocodone in man, rat, guinea pig, rabbit,
`and dog. Drug Metab. Dispos. 6, 488-493 (1978).
`9. E. J. Cone, General procedure for the isolation and identification of
`6o:- and 6{3-hydroxy metabolites of narcotic agonists-and antagonists
`with a hydromorphone structure. J. Chromatogr. 129, 355-361
`(1976).
`10. E. J. Cone, W. F. Buchwald, and W. D. Darwin, Analytical controls
`in drug metabolic studies. II. Artifact formation during chloroform
`extraction of drugs and metabolites with amine substituents. Drug
`Metab. Dispos. 10,561-567 (1982).
`II. S. Y. Yeh and L. A. Woods, Determination of radioactive-labeled
`codeine, morphine, dihydromorphine, and their metabolites in bio(cid:173)
`logical materials. J. Pharm. Sci. 59,380-384 (1970).
`12. M. Gilbaldi and D. Perrier, in "Pharmacokinetics" (J. Swarbrick, ed.),
`vol. I, p. 287. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1975.
`13. E. D. Villar, E. Sanchez, and T. R. Tephly, Morphine metabolism. V.
`Isolation of separate glucuronyltransferase activities for morphine
`and p-nitrophenol from rabbit liver microsomes. Drug Metab. Dis(cid:173)
`pos. 5, 273-278 (1977).
`14. S. H. Weinstein and J. C. Gaylord, Determination of oxycodone in
`plasma and identification of a major metabolite. J. Pharm. Sci. 68,
`527-528 (1979).
`
`--c-------o-------c-------o
`-·-------·---------------
`
`- - -
`
`0"
`r:l
`·---
`1 ......... ..
`-o·c··--o----- ---o
`72
`48
`24
`Tl ME I HOURS
`FIG. 3. Mean cululative urinary excretion of free and conjugated
`oxymorphone and 6{3-oxymorphol for six human subjects following a 10-
`mg oral dose of oxymorphone hydrochloride.
`
`--0--
`
`,o
`
`.
`
`96
`
`120
`
`was consistently low (<10% of administered dose) for rat, dog,
`and rabbit. A highly variable rate of reduction has been found for
`humans and guinea pigs with up to 40% of the dose of naltrexone
`being excreted by humans as reduced metabolites (5). The selec(cid:173)
`tivity of reduction (6o:- vs. 6,8-epimer formation) also was variable
`with the 6,8-carbinol being highly favored by most species except
`guinea pig.
`Overall urinary recoveries of OM and metabolites were quite
`comparable with those found for other 6-keto-opioids. Recoveries
`for the 6-keto-opioids for rat range from 3-17% (6, 8), whereas
`recoveries for the remaining species generally range from 30-60%
`(6-8) of administered dose. It is likely that the remainder of the
`dose was present as polar unidentified metabolites as well as being
`partially eliminated in feces. The moderate recovery of OM
`(-50%) and other 6-keto-opioids from human urine following oral
`dosing indicates that these compounds are well absorbed from the
`gastrointestinal tract. Excretion of free OM in urine was low for
`all species (2-10%) in this study except rabbit. This also appears
`to be an exception for this species since the rabbit generally has
`excreted significantly more conjugated metabolite than free parent
`drug in the 6-keto-opioid series (6-8).
`Individual variation in human excretion of OM and metabolites
`was quite similar to that found for hydromorphone (7), the
`chemical derivative of OM without a 14-hydroxy group. Like
`hydromorphone, excretion of free OM varied over a 10-fold range
`within six subjects, whereas conjugated OM varied only over an
`approximate 2-fold range. Also, mean keto reduction for these
`two compounds was less than 3%.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket