`MOTIONS FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.68, I, Jamie B. Beaber, hereby attest to the following:
`1. I am a member in good standing of the District of Columbia Bar (2003) and
`
`the Michigan Bar (2001), as well as the following Federal Courts:
`
`a. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2003)
`
`b. District of Columbia Court of Appeals (2003)
`
`c. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2013)
`
`d. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (2013);
`
`2. I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body;
`
`3. I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied;
`
`4. I have never had sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`
`administrative body against me;
`
`5. I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`6. I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`
`7. I am currently applying to appear pro hace vice in IPR2014-01092, IPR2014-
`
`01094, IPR2014-01095, IPR2014-01096, IPR2014-01097, IPR2014-01357,
`
`1
`
`LGD_001713
`
`LG Display Ex. 1024
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01359, and IPR2014-01362. I have not applied to appear pro hac vice
`
`before the Board in connection with any other proceedings in the last three
`
`years.
`
`8. I am an experienced litigation attorney and have been involved in numerous
`
`patent infringement cases in the U.S. International Trade Commission and in
`
`federal District Courts across the country. I have experience in various aspects
`
`of patent infringement matters including trials, Markman hearings, and
`
`summary judgment hearings.
`
`9. I am lead counsel for the defendants, which include LG Display Co., Ltd., in a
`
`co-pending litigation (Delaware Display Group LLC and Innovative Display
`
`Technologies LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Display Co.,
`
`Ltd., and LG Display America, Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-02109 (D. Del.)) in which
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,755,547, 7,300,194, 7,384,177, 7,404,660, 7,434,974,
`
`7,537,370, 7,914,196, and 8,215,816 are asserted. I have reviewed and am
`
`familiar with the asserted patents, the prior art references, and invalidity claim
`
`charts in the co-pending litigation. Further, I have been involved and am
`
`familiar with the factual and legal arguments at issue in the co-pending
`
`litigation. Accordingly, I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in the inter
`
`partes reexamination proceedings for the asserted patents.
`
`10. I also entered an appearance as counsel for third parties Dell Inc. in Case No.
`
`2:13-cv-00523 (E.D. Tex.) on September 5, 2014, Hewlett-Packard Company in
`2
`
`LGD_001714
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:13-cv-00524 (E.D. Tex.) on October 8, 2014, and Hyundai Motor
`
`Company, Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama,
`
`LLC, Kia Motors Corporation, Kia Motors America, Inc., and Kia Motors
`
`Manufacturing Georgia, Inc. in Case No. 2:14-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex.) on July 9,
`
`2014. Each of these cases involve U.S. Patent Nos. 6,755,547, 7,300,194,
`
`7,384,177, 7,404,660, 7,434,974, and 8,215,816. Case Nos. 2:13-cv-00523 and
`
`2:13-cv-00524 additionally involve U.S. Patent No. 7,537,370. Although these
`
`cases do not involve LG Display Co., Ltd., my role in these cases further
`
`underscores my familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the IPR
`
`proceedings listed at Paragraph 7.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`Mayer Brown LLP
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`(202) 263-3153
`
`
`
`
`
`Date:December 3, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`LGD_001715