`By:
`Justin B. Kimble (JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 7,384,177
`
`
`
`PRO HAC VICE MOTION TO ADMIT ATTORNEY T. WILLIAM
`KENNEDY PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01362
`Patent 7,384,177
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Innovative Display Technologies LLC (“IDT”) hereby files this
`
`motion pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) for T. William Kennedy to appear pro hac
`
`vice on its behalf before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in IPR2014-01362. This
`
`motion follows the guidelines set forth in IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, entered October
`
`15, 2013.
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Facts.
`
`IDT has already designated a registered practitioner, Justin B. Kimble (reg.
`
`no. 58,591) as lead counsel, and IDT intends to designate T. William Kennedy as
`
`one of its back-up counsel in the event this motion is granted. The following
`
`statement of facts shows that there is good cause for the Board to recognize T.
`
`William Kennedy pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`Mr. Kennedy is a patent litigator with over eight years’ experience, including
`
`significant experience in the area of patent validity. In the many patent litigations in
`
`which he has been counsel, he was worked extensively on issues relating to 35
`
`U.S.C. §§ 102, 103, and 112 challenges to patent validity including things such as
`
`working closely with experts on validity and invalidity reports, preparing invalidity
`
`arguments for trial, developing invalidity and validity arguments, and reviewing and
`
`analyzing numerous prosecution histories and prior art references. Mr. Kennedy has
`
`also spent significant time learning the procedure of inter partes review.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01362
`Patent 7,384,177
`
`Mr. Kennedy currently represents the Patent Owner in its assertion of the
`
`patent at issue in this proceeding and its related patents in numerous cases resolved
`
`in the Eastern District of Texas and pending in the District of Delaware. See, e.g.,
`
`Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., No. 1:13-cv-02109
`
`(D. Del., filed Dec. 31, 2013); see also Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Vizio
`
`Inc., et al., No. 1:13-cv-02112 (D. Del., filed Dec. 31, 2013). As counsel in those
`
`actions, Mr. Kennedy has become very familiar the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding, i.e., light emitting panel assemblies. Moreover, during the course of
`
`those lawsuits, Mr. Kennedy has analyzed the prior art involved in this petition as it
`
`relates to the patent-at-issue as well as its related patents, all of which concern light
`
`emitting panel assemblies. Furthermore, in those lawsuits Mr. Kennedy has
`
`developed infringement allegations that assert the patent-at-issue in this petition
`
`against various light emitting panel assemblies, including those found in smart
`
`phones, tablets, laptop computers, and televisions to name a few. In his role as
`
`counsel in those litigations, Mr. Kennedy has spent significant time learning the
`
`technology involved in light emitting panel assemblies such as those found in the
`
`patent-at-issue in this proceeding.
`
`As of this date, there are currently 11 total pending IPRs covering the patent-
`
`at-issue and its related patents. Mr. Kennedy has familiarized himself which each of
`
`those pending petitions. Given the number of pending IPRs related to this patent
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01362
`Patent 7,384,177
`
`family and Mr. Kennedy’s already extensive knowledge of the patents, prior art, and
`
`IPRs, Patent Owner asks the PTAB to grant this motion to afford Patent Owner the
`
`benefit of having an additional attorney authorized on this matter.
`
`II. Mr. Kennedy has Submitted Herewith a Declaration1 Attesting the
`
`Following Facts.
`
`1. Mr. Kennedy is a member in good standing of the Texas State Bar.
`
`2. Mr. Kennedy has never been subject to any suspensions or disbarments
`
`from practice before any court or administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`None of Mr. Kennedy’s applications for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body has ever been denied.
`
`4. Mr. Kennedy has never been sanctioned nor had contempt citations
`
`imposed by any court or administrative body.
`
`5. Mr. Kennedy has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in
`
`part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`6. Mr. Kennedy will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`1 See Declaration of T. William Kennedy, attached hereto as Exhibit 2017.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01362
`Patent 7,384,177
`
`7.
`
`During the past three years, Mr. Kennedy has applied to appear pro hac
`
`vice before the PTAB in five other proceedings, all pending. All five of
`
`the pro hac vice motions involve the same or related parties as this
`
`proceeding and also involve the same or similar subject matter:
`
`i. IPR2014-01096 (pending);
`
`ii. IPR2014-01097 (pending);
`
`iii. IPR2015-00487 (pending);
`
`iv. IPR2015-00506 (pending); and
`
`v. IPR2015-01717 (pending).
`
`Mr. Kennedy has not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other
`
`proceeding before the PTAB.
`
`8. Mr. Kennedy has familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`
`proceeding as set forth in Section I above.
`
`
`
`Dated: September 9, 2015 Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 58,591
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01362
`Patent 7,384,177
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that this document has been served via
`
`electronic mail on September 9, 2015, to Petitioner at the email addresses
`
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com, bpaul@mayerbrown.com, astreff@mayerbrown.com,
`
`alam@mayerbrown.com,
`
`jbeaber@mayerbrown.com,
`
`and
`
`DDGIPR@mayerbrown.com, pursuant to Petitioner’s consent in its revised
`
`mandatory notice.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 58,591
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`
`
`6