`By:
`Justin B. Kimble (jkimble@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01357
`U.S. Patent No. 6,755,547
`
`
`
`PRO HAC VICE MOTION TO ADMIT ATTORNEY JEFFREY R.
`BRAGALONE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`EXHIBIT 2001: DECLARATION OF JEFFREY R. BRAGALONE
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01357
`Patent 6,755,547
`I, Jeffrey R. Bragalone, make the following declaration based on my
`
`
`
`own personal knowledge and, if called to testify before the court, could and would
`
`testify as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a shareholder with the law firm of Bragalone Conroy, P.C.,
`
`located at 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4500-West, Dallas, TX 75201.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Texas State Bar.
`
`I have never been subject to any suspensions or disbarments from
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`practice before any court or administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`None of my applications for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body has ever been denied.
`
`5.
`
`I have never been sanctioned nor had contempt citations imposed by
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42
`
`of 37 C.F.R.
`
`7.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`8.
`
`During the past three years, I have applied to appear pro hac vice
`
`before the PTAB in sixteen other proceedings, three of which have
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01357
`Patent 6,755,547
`been granted and the rest remain pending. Five of the pro hac vice
`
`motions involve the same parties as this proceeding and also involve
`
`light emitting panel assemblies:
`
`i. IPR2014-01092 (pending);
`
`ii. IPR2014-01094 (pending);
`
`iii. IPR2014-01095 (pending);
`
`iv. IPR2014-00096 (pending); and
`
`v. IPR2014-01097 (pending).
`
`The remaining eleven pro hac vice motions involve eleven other
`
`IPRs all unrelated to this petition:
`
`vi. CBM2014-00166 (granted);
`
`vii. IPR2014-00785 (pending);
`
`viii. IPR2014-00810 (pending);
`
`ix. IPR2014-00824 (granted);
`
`x. IPR2014-00825 (granted);
`
`xi. IPR2014-01278 (pending);
`
`xii. IPR2014-01282 (pending);
`
`xiii. IPR2014-01283 (pending);
`
`xiv. IPR2015-00153 (pending);
`
`xv. IPR2015-00155 (pending); and
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01357
`Patent 6,755,547
`xvi. IPR2015-00156 (pending).
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other proceeding
`
`before the PTAB.
`
`9.
`
`I have familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I
`
`currently represent Patent Owner Innovative Display Technologies in
`
`its assertion of U.S. Patent No. 6,755,547 (the patent at issue-in this
`
`petition) and its related patents in numerous cases pending in the
`
`District of Delaware and the Eastern District of Texas. See, e.g.,
`
`Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Acer Inc. et al., No. 2:13-cv-
`
`00522 (E.D. Tex., filed June 28, 2013); see also Delaware Display
`
`Group LLC et al. v. Sony Corp et al., No. 1:13-cv-02111 (D. Del.,
`
`filed Dec. 31, 2013). As lead counsel in those actions, I have
`
`familiarized myself with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding,
`
`i.e., light emitting panel assemblies. During the course of those
`
`lawsuits, I have developed invalidity defenses for the patent-at-issue
`
`in this petition as well as its related patents, all of which concern light
`
`emitting panel assemblies. Also in those lawsuits, I have developed
`
`infringement allegations that assert the patent-at-issue in this petition
`
`against various light emitting panel assemblies, including those found
`
`in smart phones, tablets, laptop computers, and televisions to name a
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01357
`Patent 6,755,547
`few. In my role as the lead attorney in those litigations, I have spent
`
`significant time learning the technology involved in light emitting
`
`panel assemblies such as those found in the patent-at-issue in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`Executed this 28th day of November, 2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`