throbber
BSI-140
`
`' '
`
`•
`
`•
`
`PATENT
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`:Art Unit: 3308
`:Examiner: M. Milano
`
`/.
`1· 1
`RESPONSE UNDER 37 C.P.R. l.liRECE~V/ED
`JUN 2 5 1997
`GROUP3309
`
`Assistant Commissioner for Patents
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`
`SIR:
`
`l
`I.
`(~·
`
`Responsive to the Office Action mailed January 21, 1997, please
`amend this application as follows and reconsider the application in light of
`those amendments and the subsequent remarks.
`
`IN THE CLAIMS:
`
`~ ~
`Please cancel claims 56 and 66-87 without prejudice.
`
`~
`/
`'
`Please amend claims 55, 59, and 63 and add new claims 88, 89,
`and 90 as follows:
`
`]
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`55.
`(Twice Amended ) A method of treating an angeological
`disease at a bifurcation site where a blood vessel branches into a first
`branched vessel and a second branched vessel using a birfucation prosthesis
`[stent] having a bifurcation, a proximal portion, a first distal portion, and an
`extension portion extending distally relative to said bifurcation, and using a
`second prosthesis [stent], said method comprising the steps of:
`
`SLS _1:\BSI\140\AMENDOl.DOC
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-1
`
`

`
`BSI-140
`
`-2-
`
`•
`
`•
`
`(a) disposing said proximal portion of said bifurcated prosthesis
`[stent] in said blood vessel such that said first distal portion of said bifurcated
`prosthesis [stent] extends into said first branched vessel;
`
`~ to"~'
`
`7
`8
`9
`
`10
`11
`12
`
`13
`14
`IS
`
`16
`17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`s
`6
`7
`8
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`4
`s
`
`(b) directing blood flow from said blood vessel into said first
`branched vessel through said first distal portion of said bifurcated prosthesis
`[stent];
`
`(c) attaching said second prosthesis [stent] to said extension
`portion of said bifurcated prosthesis [stent] such that said second prosthesis
`[stent] extends into said second branched vessel; and
`
`(d) directing blood flow from said blood vessel into said second
`branched vessel through said second prosthesis [distal portion of said
`
`59. (Amended) A bifurcated prosthesis [stent] for use [in
`juxtaposition] with an angeological bifurcation of a blood vessel into two
`branched vessels comprising a bifurcated proximal [stent] portion adapted to
`be disposed within said blood vessel [in juxtaposition with said bifurcation], a
`distal [stent] portion adapted to extend across the bifurcation into one of the
`branched vessels, and a separate distal [stent] segment joined to said proximal
`portion and adapted to allow blood to flow from the proximal portion into the
`other branched vessel.
`
`(Amended) A method as claimed in claim 55 further
`63.
`comprising the step of:
`
`covering at least a portion of said proximal portion, said
`(d)
`first distal portion, and said second prosthesis [distal portion] with a graft
`layer.
`
`(Newly added) The bifurcated prosthesis of claim 59
`88.
`1
`2 wherein said proximal portion, distal portion, and distal segment each
`comprise a stent and graft combination.
`3
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-2
`
`

`
`1
`2
`
`3
`4
`
`s
`6
`
`1
`s
`
`9
`10
`11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`BSI-140
`
`- 3 -
`
`•
`
`•
`
`89.
`lumen comprising:
`
`(Newly added) An apparatus for reinforcing a bifurcated
`
`a first section, configured to be positioned within the lumen,
`
`comprising:
`
`an upper limb, configured to fit within the lumen upstream of
`the bifurcation;
`
`a first lower limb, configured to extend into a first leg of said
`bifurcation when said first section is positioned in the lumen, and
`
`a second lower limb, shorter than said first lower limb, and
`configured so that when said first section is positioned in the lumen, said
`second lower limb does not extend into a second leg of said bifurcation.
`
`(Newly added) The apparatus of claim 89, further
`90.
`comprising a second section configured to be positioned separately within the
`lumen and joined to said second lower limb of the first section, effectively
`extending said second lower limb into said second leg of said bifurcation.
`
`REMARKS
`
`Response to Restriction Requirement
`
`Applicant hereby confirms the election of Group I, claims 55,
`59, and 62-65, for further prosecution in this application. This election is
`made without traverse. Claims 55, 59, and 62-65 were pending in this
`application as of the issuance of the Office Action. By this amendment,
`Applicant has added claims 88, 89 and 90, all of which are directed to the
`same invention as the elected claims.
`
`SI3 _1:\BSI\140\AMENDOt.DOC
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-3
`
`

`
`BSI-140 •
`
`•
`
`-4-
`
`Response to Pending Rejection
`
`Claims 55, 59, and 62-65 stand rejected in the Official Action
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,575,817
`(Martin).
`
`Martin was filed on August 19, 1994. The present application is
`a divisional of application Serial No. 08/317,763, filed October 4, 1994,
`which is in tum a continuation-in-part of application Serial No. 08/312,881,
`filed September 27, 1994. Both of these applications have effective filing
`dates based on two EPO applications, one filed February 9, 1994 and one
`filed June 10, 1994. The priority claim to the EPO applications antedates the
`August 19, 1994 filing date of Martin, thus eliminating the patent as a
`reference against this application. Eliminating this patent as a reference
`' obviates the claim rejections over Martin. Withdrawal of the rejection of the
`claims based on this reference is therefore respectfully requested.
`
`Priority of the same EPO applications is made and
`acknowledged in the parent and grandparent applications, and certified copies
`of the EPO priority applications were filed in both of those cases. Applicant
`understands that no certified copy need be filed in the present case because of
`the prev:ious filings in the parent cases, but Applicant will do so if requested
`by the Examiner.
`
`Claims 55, 59, and 63 have been amended, and claim 88 has
`been added, to better define Applicant's invention. Newly added claims 89
`and 90, copies of claims 1 and 2 in the cited Martin patent, are also clearly
`patentable to Applicants for the same reasons stated with regard to the
`pending rejections (see further discussion below regarding Applicant's request
`for an interference to be declared between this application and the Martin
`patent).
`
`\
`\
`
`In light of the above amendments and remarks, it is respectfully
`submitted that the claims of the present application are in condition for
`allowance, which action is earnestly solicited.
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-4
`
`

`
`BSI-140 •
`
`-5-
`
`•
`
`-*'" Request for Declaration of Interference
`
`In view of the fact that the reference relied upon in the pending
`rejection is an issued patent, which issued within the past six months, and the
`recognition in the rejection statement that Applicant appears to be claiming the
`same invention as disclosed in the reference, Applicant respectfully suggests
`
`ll that an interference should be declared between this application and the cited
`\ reference. In furtherance of this suggestion, Applicant has added new claims
`ffl \ 89 and 90, which are copies of claims I and 2 of the cited patent.
`Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests that an interference be declared
`with at least one count corresponding to each of claims 89 and 90 hereof
`(claims 1 and 2 of Martin).
`
`As explained above, the effective filing date of the present
`application is believed to be February 9, 1994 by virtue of the priority claims
`in this application. Because this effective filing date antedates Martin's filing
`date, Applicant should be senior party in any interference that is declared.
`
`As a matter of information, Applicant has also proposed that the
`Interference between Applicant and the Martin patent encompass claim 66 of
`Applicant's U.S. application Serial Number 312,881, filed September 27,
`1994, and claims 63 and 65 of Applicant's U.S. application Serial Number
`~63,987, filed June 5, 1995.
`
`Upon declaration of the Interference, Applicant will place each
`of the interfering claims of its various applications into a single application,
`request that they be added to the Interference, and cancel them from the
`respective applications in which they now appear.
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-5
`
`

`
`BSI-140 •
`
`•
`
`-6-
`
`The Examiner in charge of this application is invited to call
`either of Applicant's undersigned attorneys if any further information is
`needed or if it will expedite the prosecution of the referenced applications in
`any way.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`•
`
`AMW:sls
`Dated: May 22, 1997
`Suite 301
`One Westlakes, Berwyn
`P.O. Box 980
`Valley ForgeJ.JA 19482-0980
`(610) 407-07uu
`
`The Assistant Commissioner for Patents is hereby
`authorized to charge payment to Deposit Account No.
`18-0350 of any fees associated with this
`communication.
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence is being deposited with the
`United States Postal Service as first class mail in an envelope, with
`suffiCient postage, addressed to: Assistant Commissioner for
`Patents, Washington, D.C. 20231 on:
`
`~r}J C}ii?l
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket