throbber
Rolf W. Gunther, MD • Dierk Vorwerk, MD • Klaus Bohndorf, MD • Klaus C. Klose, MD •
`Dieter Kistler, MD • Helmut Mann, MD • Heinz G. Sieberth, MD • Adam El-Din
`
`Venous Stenoses in Dialysis Shunts: Treatment
`with Self-expanding Metallic Stents1
`
`A flexible, self-expanding metallic
`endoprosthesis was employed for
`the treatment of venous outflow
`stenoses in four patients with a poly-
`tetrafluoroethylene shunt and two
`patients with a Brescia-Cimino
`shunt. The stenoses had led to shunt
`occlusion in five patients and to
`flow impairment in one. In the oc-
`cluded shunts, thrombectomy and
`subsequent balloon angioplasty
`were performed in four patients,
`and percutaneous recanalization
`with angioplasty was performed in
`one. One shunt with decreasing
`flow was percutaneously dilated.
`Since the underlying stenoses re-
`curred in four patients after 24
`hours and did not respond suffi-
`ciently to angioplasty in two pa-
`tients, up to four stents were placed
`in the venous segments. Thrombosis
`of the stents occurred in two pa-
`tients after 24 hours and in one after
`6 weeks and was successfully reca-
`nalized with thrombectomy in two.
`At 2-6 months follow-up, the stents
`and the shunts were patent in five
`patients. In three of these patients,
`intima hyperplasia, associated with
`narrowing of the stent lumen in
`two, was noted within 4 months af-
`ter stent placement.
`
`Index terms: Dialysis, shunts • Interventional
`procedures, 91.456 • Veins, grafts and prosthe-
`ses
`
`Radiology 1989; 170:401-405
`
`1 From the Departments of Diagnostic Radi-
`ology (R.W.G., D.V., K.B., K.C.K.), Plastic and
`Reconstructive Surgery (O.K.), and Internal
`Medicine (H.M., H.G.S.), Klinikum, University
`of Technology, Pauwelsstrasse 1, D-5100 Aa-
`chen, Federal Republic of Germany; and Me-
`din vent SA, Lausanne, Switzerland (A.E.). Re-
`ceived May 17, 1988; revision requested June
`29; revision received August 29; accepted Sep-
`tember 20. Address reprint requests to R.W.G.
`c RSNA, 1989
`
`V ASCULAR stents or endopros-
`
`theses are new clinical adjuncts
`to balloon angioplasty. As early as
`1969, Dotter (1) reported his first ex-
`perimental results with the stenting
`of vessels. Experimental studies were
`also performed with other devices
`(2-6), but the clinical application of
`venous stents is still rather limited
`and mostly restricted to arteries (7-
`9). To our knowledge, there are few
`reports on venous applications (10-
`12).
`Vascular endoprostheses seem to
`provide a framework that prevents
`vascular restenoses and maintains
`the patency of the vessel following
`balloon dilation. Stents have also
`been shown to be useful in reopen-
`ing vessels compressed by extrinsic
`tumors (12). Zollikofer et al (10) re-
`cently reported one case of a failing
`hemodialysis shunt treated with an
`intraluminal stent. We report our
`preliminary experience in six pa-
`tients with the same type of stent for
`the treatment of venous stenoses in
`hemodialysis shunts.
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`The endoprosthesis used (Wallstent;
`Medin vent SA, Lausanne, Switzerland) is
`a tube woven from stainless steel alloy fil-
`aments (0.08-0.10 mm) and is described
`in detail elsewhere (2,10). The stent is
`flexible, self-expanding, and available in
`lengths of 10-100 mm and diameters of
`2.5-14 mm. The standard stents we used
`measured 6-10 mm in diameter when
`fully expanded and were 35 and 65 mm
`long. If larger segments had to be stented,
`several stents were placed in an overlap-
`ping manner with an overlap of at least
`10 mm. With too short an overlap, the ex-
`panding stents may retract and discon-
`nect from each other.
`The delivery system consists of a 7-F in-
`vaginated balloon catheter on which the
`constrained stent is mounted. When the
`delivery balloon is inflated with contrast
`medium (iopamidol) up to 3.5 atm, the
`friction between the membranes of the
`inverted balloon is reduced so the stent
`
`can be deployed easily by withdrawing
`the outer membrane of the balloon. Thus,
`the woven metallic stent progressively
`expands and affixes to the vessel wall
`(Fig 1).
`If necessary, the procedure can be dis-
`continued by removing the hydraulic
`pressure from the balloon. The stent, still
`within the balloon, can then be recovered
`through a 7-F introducer sheath, which is
`premounted on the introducer catheter.
`Stent deployment is controlled continu-
`ously under fluoroscopic guidance. The
`stent itself is radiopaque; additional metal
`markers on the delivery catheter permit
`the exact placement of the endoprosthe-
`sis. Once the stent is completely open, it
`can no longer be removed percutaneous-
`ly.
`Four patients with synthetic hemodial-
`ysis grafts made of polytetrafluoroethyl-
`ene (PTFE) (Fig 2) and two patients with a
`Brescia-Cimino (BC) (Fig 3) forearm shunt
`were treated.
`Four of the six patients had already un-
`dergone several shunt operations on both
`arms and had finally received a secondary
`synthetic (PTFE) shunt. Two patients pre-
`sented with shunt problems for the first
`time. Two patients had developed recur-
`rent stenoses following previous angio-
`plasty. The shunt was completely occlud-
`ed in five patients (three with the PTFE
`shunt and two with the BC shunt), and in
`one patient shunt function had deterio-
`rated.
`In all PTFE shunts, the graft was surgi-
`cally cleaned of thrombi and hyperplastic
`intima with a Fogarty balloon catheter.
`Thrombectomy was also performed in
`one of the BC shunts. The second occlud-
`ed BC shunt was only percutaneously di-
`lated and stented (Fig 3). Since images of
`the shunt revealed additional stenoses in
`the draining vein following operative re-
`vision, angioplasty was performed with a
`6- or 7-mm balloon with pressures of 10-
`12 atm. If the stenoses did not respond
`sufficiently to dilation or had recurred,
`they were stented with the Wallstent.
`The procedure was performed with lo-
`cal anesthesia. In the PTFE shunts, the
`draining vein was approached percutane-
`
`Abbreviations: BC = Brescia-Cimino, PTFE ..
`polytetrafluoroethylene.
`
`401
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-1
`
`

`

`ously via the synthetic graft (Fig 2). With
`the BC shunt, the nonoccluded proximal
`part of the draining vein was punctured
`in one patient (Fig 3); in the second pa-
`tient, the stenosis was catheterized via
`the surgically exposed vein near the
`shunt anastomosis.
`Using the Seldinger technique in five
`of six patients, we advanced a 5-F poly-
`ethylene catheter with a slight bend at
`the tip into the draining vein. Once the
`stenosis was overcome, a 0.9-mm guide
`wire was inserted, and the catheter was
`exchanged for an angioplasty balloon
`catheter (6-7-mm balloon). The stenosis
`was dilated several times with pressures
`of 10-12 atm. Since two patients experi-
`enced severe pain during dilation, the
`area around the stenosis was anesthetized
`by means of local infiltration with 1% li-
`docaine. The angioplasty catheter was
`then exchanged for the 7-F delivery cath-
`eter over a guide wire (0.9 mm in diame-
`ter, 2 mm long).
`The diameter of the stent was at least 1
`mm larger than that of the balloon cathe-
`ter used for dilation and varied from 7 to
`10 mm when fully expanded. The origi-
`nal diameter of the vessel was roughly es-
`timated on the basis of the pre- and post-
`stenotic size of the vessel. In only one pa-
`tient who had a small 4-mm outflow vein
`joining a larger vein, an oversize stent of
`6 mm in diameter was used to effect an
`adequate lumen. In this patient, the stent
`was dilated later with a 6-mm balloon,
`since it did not open satisfactorily after
`insertion.
`Prior to stent placement, patients re-
`ceived intravenous injection of 5,000 IU
`heparin, which was continued at 500 IU
`in one patient and at 1,000 IU in three for
`
`24-36 hours. Three patients were treated
`with peroral platelet inhibitors (500 mg/d
`aspirin) following the procedure.
`The patients were followed up between
`2 and 6 months with intravenous or intra-
`arterial fine-needle digital subtraction an-
`giography at intervals of 6-8 weeks or
`earlier if shunt flow decreased.
`
`RESULTS
`All patients but one underwent
`thrombectomy prior to angioplasty
`and stent insertion. In one patient
`with a BC shunt, the occluded ve-
`nous segment was recanalized exclu-
`sively by percutaneous means (Fig 3).
`The underlying cause of shunt occlu-
`sion in five patients and shunt dys-
`function in one patient was venous
`outflow stenosis. In addition, all pa-
`tients with PTFE shunts had pseu-
`dointimal proliferation within the
`graft as demonstrated during throm-
`bectomy.
`Venous outflow stenoses ranged
`from 3 to 13 em long. They recurred
`24 hours after balloon angioplasty in
`four patients and did not respond
`sufficiently to dilation in two, de-
`spite the high pressure applied (10-
`12 atm). Since the individual lengths
`of the stents were 3.5 and 6.5 em
`each, several had to be used in four
`patients to stent the stenosis ade-
`quately. One patient received four
`stents and three patients received
`two stents in an overlapping manner,
`and two patien~s received one stent.
`
`Thus, the stents covered venous seg-
`ments of 3.5 em (two patients), 4.5
`em, 5.5 em, 7 em, and 16 em in
`length. Improved shunt flow and
`improved patency of the stenoses
`were evident immediately after stent
`insertion . The stenoses were still visi-
`ble but less pronounced (Figs 2, 3).
`The constant pressure on the vessel
`wall caused the stents to fully open
`within 1-2 weeks after insertion.
`In one patient with a BC shunt, the
`vein was 4 mm in diameter after dila-
`tion with a 5-mm balloon. After the
`
`Images show self-expanding
`Figure 1.
`stent being deployed by gradual withdrawal
`of the invaginated balloon.
`
`c.
`e.
`a.
`b.
`f.
`d.
`Images of a 79-year-old patient show angioplasty and insertion of a self-expanding stent in an occluded hemodialysis shunt
`Figure 2.
`(PTFE) that resulted from stenosis of the draining vein. (a) After thrombectomy of the graft, severe stenosis was found in the draining vein.
`Arrows indicate cephalad direction of the shunt flow. Arrowheads indicate retrograde filling of a side branch. (b) Improved patency is ap-
`parent after balloon dilation ( 12 atm) of the stenosis. (c) After insertion of one stent (3.5 em long, 10 mm in diameter), the draining vein is
`fully patent. No extravasation occurred. (d) Two months later, the stenosis recurred distal to the stent. (e) Insertion of a second stent overlap-
`ping the first. Note patency of the covered side branch immediately after stent placement. (f) Good patency of the stents and the bridged
`side branches after 3 months. Shunt functioned well until patient died of heart failure 6 months after stent placement.
`
`402 • Radiology
`
`February 1989
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-2
`
`

`

`insertion of a 6-mm stent, however,
`the flow did not improve, since the
`stent did not open satisfactorily. For
`this reason, the stent was dilated
`with a 6-mm balloon, which resulted
`in an immediate improvement of
`flow . However, thrombosis devel-
`
`oped in the vein within 24 hours, de-
`spite the administration of 1,000 IU I
`h heparin. Thrombectomy was per-
`formed twice and resulted in tempo-
`rary patency for 24 hours. Although
`an image of the shunt did not show
`an obstacle either on the arterial or
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`Volume 170 • Number 2
`
`the venous side, the shunt occluded
`again and could not be salvaged.
`Of the three patients receiving two
`stents, two were treated in two ses-
`sions (ie, after intervals of 1 week
`and 2 months). In the first patient,
`the shunt occluded 24 hours after
`thrombectomy and percutaneous
`stent insertion. It was assumed that
`the shunt had to be abandoned, but
`after a second thrombectomy of the
`graft was performed 1 week later, an
`image of the shunt revealed a recol-
`lapsing venous stenosis distal to the
`stent as the cause of the early shunt
`occlusion. The second overlapping
`stent placed in the stenotic vein
`yielded the desired patency. In the
`second patient, only the tightest part
`of the stenosis was stented initially,
`since the rest of the stenosis respond-
`ed well to angioplasty. Two months
`later, however, the stenosis distal to
`the stent recurred and was then suc-
`cessfully stented with a second endo-
`prosthesis (Fig 2).
`Thrombosis of the stent developed
`in three patients. Early thrombosis of
`the stent occurred in two patients af-
`ter 24 hours, despite anticoagulation
`treatment with 1,000 IU /h heparin,
`and was successfully recanalized
`with thrombectomy in one patient.
`Thrombosis in a BC shunt following
`insertion of an oversize stent has
`been previously mentioned. In one
`patient who slept overnight on the
`arm containing the shunt, thrombo-
`sis developed 6 weeks after stent in-
`sertion and was successfully man-
`aged with thrombectomy.
`In three patients with restored
`shunt function (two with PTFE
`shunts and one with aBC shunt), he-
`modialysis was resumed within 24
`hours via the treated shunt. The re-
`maining three patients, two of them
`with early shunt thrombosis, under-
`went hemodialysis via a Sheldon
`catheter.
`The stents and shunts were patent
`in five patients at 2-6 months follow-
`
`Images of a 53-yt.>ar-old man
`Figure 3.
`show percutaneous rt.'canalization of an oc-
`cluded BC shunt and insertion of two over-
`lapping stents. (a) Brachial arteriogram
`shows occlusion of the BC shunt (arrow) at
`the venous anastomosis of the radial artt.>rv.
`(b) Puncture of the palpable draining vei~
`and catheterization of occludt.>d venous seg-
`ment with a 5-F catheter with a slight bend
`at tip. (c) lnsufficienl shunt function after
`balloon dilation (6-mm balloon) of the oc-
`cluded segment. (d) Insertion of two over-
`lapping stents (3.5 em long. 7 mm in diame-
`ter). (e) Good patency of the shunt (arrow) is
`apparent after stent placement. Follow-up is
`currently at 2 months.
`
`Radiology • 403
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-3
`
`

`

`up. There was no stent migration. In
`two patients, intima hyperplasia with
`narrowing of the stent lumen was
`noted within 4 months after stent
`placement (Fig 4). Discrete intima
`hyperplasia without stenosis was ob-
`served in one patient. One 79-year-
`old patient without shunt problems
`after stent placement died 6 months
`later of heart failure (cause of death
`unrelated to the procedure). A speci-
`men of the stented vein was not ob-
`tained.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Nonoperative techniques for the
`management of complications in he-
`modialysis shunts are of increasing
`importance. Shunt occlusion and
`graft thrombosis are the complica-
`tions most frequently encountered
`and usually result from venous out-
`flow stenoses or, less often, from in-
`adequate inflow due to arterial le-
`sions (13-16). In the patients in our
`study, venous outflow obstruction
`was the basic problem.
`To salvage shunts, surgical correc-
`tion of such venous stenoses has
`been preferred for a long time
`(14,15). Stenoses can also be treated
`percutaneously with balloon angio-
`plasty, and thrombosis can either be
`lysed with selective infusion of uro-
`kinase or mechanically fragmented
`(I 7 -19). Balloon angioplasty may also
`be combined with thrombectomy
`and removal of the neointima within
`the graft to restore shunt patency
`(I 8). Long-term results in the repair
`of stenosed hemodialysis shunts with
`angioplasty are not perfect, as the
`shunts have a 1-year patency rate of
`45% ( 19). The self-expanding, flexible
`metallic stent used in this small se-
`ries may help improve long-term
`shunt function.
`Venous stenoses in hemodialysis
`shunts are due to fibrosis and intima
`hyperplasia and are often found in
`secondary shunts such as PTFE
`shunts (13-16). These stenoses may
`be extremely tight and resist com-
`plete dilation even at high pressures.
`The purpose of the treatment de-
`scribed is to achieve and maintain
`the patency of the stenosis with the
`insertion of a self-expanding metallic
`stent.
`Several types of stents have been
`described in the literature (1-10). The
`stent used in this series is flexible,
`self-expanding, and woven from fine
`stainless steel wires and covers only
`20% of the vessel surface (2). Most
`important for the treatment of tight
`stenoses is the fact that the stent ex-
`
`404 • Radiology
`
`c.
`a.
`b.
`Images of a 29-year-old man show angioplasty and stent placement in a failing
`Figure 4.
`hemodialysis shunt (PTFE). Intima hyperplasia developed within the stent after 4 months.
`(a) Image of shunt after dilation of a recurrent venous stenosis (after successful balloon an-
`gioplasty 5 months previously). (b) Good patency after angioplasty with a 7-mm balloon and
`after insertion of two overlapping stents (3.5 em long, 8 mm in diameter). (c) Four months
`after insertion, the stents are expanded, but hyperplastic intima narrows the lumen. Shunt is
`still functioning.
`
`erts constant pressure on the wall un-
`til the stenosis is opened to the pre-
`determined diameter of the stent.
`Vascular stents appear promising,
`but their biocompatibility must be
`thoroughly investigated. From ani-
`mal experiments (2,3,10), it is known
`that the stents, although thrombo-
`genic, are well tolerated and are cov-
`ered with endothelium within a few
`weeks. Although Rousseau et al (2)
`and Zollikofer et al (10) did not ob-
`serve intima hyperplasia or observed
`only minimal proliferation in normal
`veins in their experimental series, in-
`tima hyperplasia may develop within
`stented veins in humans (Fig 4). Zol-
`likofer et al (10) recently described
`two cases in which intima hyperpla-
`sia had developed in a stented vein
`within 6 weeks after stent placement.
`This may also occasionally occur in
`femoral arteries in humans, accord-
`ing to our limited experience in 50
`patients with arterial stents.
`The mechanism of intima hyper-
`plasia may be partly explained by the
`studies of Duprat et al (3). In canine
`arteries, they showed that a stent/ar-
`
`tery ratio of more than I :2 is associat-
`ed with increased intima prolifera-
`tion and thrombosis. Thus, it seems
`to be important to avoid oversize
`stents and overstretching of the ves-
`sel.
`The early complications of stents
`that result in thrombosis may be
`managed with thrombectomy or local
`thrombolysis (10). In our small series,
`despite thrombectomy and subse-
`quent administration of 1,000 IU /h
`heparin, one occluded shunt could
`not be kept patent, although there
`was no evidence of a vascular obsta-
`cle on angiograms. Whether the
`oversize stent resulted in over-
`stretching of the vein is a matter for
`consideration. In this patient, the
`shunt could not be salvaged. Late
`thrombosis in one patient may be at-
`tributed to the fact that the patient
`slept on the arm containing the
`shunt.
`Long-term results will certainly
`depend on the degree of intima pro-
`liferation narrowing the venous lu-
`men and on the characteristics of the
`venous wall adjacent to the stent.
`
`February 1989
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-4
`
`

`

`Significant intima hyperplasia with-
`in the stent was noted in two of five
`patients (Fig 4) and had not jeopar-
`dized shunt function. Should the hy-
`perplasia progress, angioplasty will
`be scheduled. In one of our patients,
`progression of the stenosis distal to
`the stent was observed and then
`treated with a second stent (Fig 2).
`Interestingly, side branches of the
`stented veins may remain open (Fig
`2e, 2f), a phenomenon also observed
`in arteries (2).
`Intravascular stenting of venous
`outflow stenoses is suited for PTFE
`grafts, as the stent does not affect the
`puncture site for hemodialysis. In BC
`shunts, however, a venous segment
`long enough for puncture should be
`retained (Fig 3) because the stent can-
`not be punctured. The stent can be
`palpated and avoided during punc-
`ture. If the venous segment to be
`punctured is too short, stenting of
`the stenosis is useless.
`Regarding the early use of the he-
`modialysis shunt following stent
`placement, we would not consider it
`necessary to spare the shunt with
`fully restored function for a certain
`period of time.
`Although long-term results are
`currently lacking and the rate of
`long-term patency has yet to be es-
`tablished, we consider this technique
`to be a useful adjunct to balloon an-
`gioplasty in the nonoperative man-
`agement of a failing hemodialysis
`shunt. In postangioplasty dialysis
`shunt stenoses, Glanz et al (19) re-
`ported a 1-year patency rate of 45%
`and a 2-year patency rate of 24%. The
`results with long stenoses of more
`than 4 em were even poorer. Thus,
`
`angioplasty alone does not solve the
`problem of recurrent venous outflow
`obstruction, but we E:Xpect to im-
`prove the long-term results with the
`intravascular stent-particularly in
`the stenoses of long segments-and
`to prolong shunt patency. Since pa-
`tients undergoing hemodialysis have
`to also undergo multiple surgical cor-
`rections of their vascular accesses,
`prolongation of shunt patency of
`even 6-9 months may be regarded as
`a benefit.
`•
`
`References
`1. Dotter C. Transluminally-placed coil-
`spring endoarterial tube grafts: long-term
`patency in canine popliteal artery. Invest
`Radioll969; 57:5-10.
`2. Rousseau H, Puel J, Jaffrey F, et al. Self-
`expanding endovascular prosthesis: an ex-
`perimental study. Radiology 1987;
`164:709-714.
`3. Duprat G Jr, Wright KC, Charnsangavej C,
`Wallace S, Gianturco C. Self-expanding
`metallic stents for small vessels: an experi-
`mental evaluation. Radiology 1987;
`162:469-472.
`4. Lawrence DO Jr, Charnsangavej C, Wright
`KC, Gianturco C, Wallace S. Percutane-
`ous endovascular graft: experimental eval-
`uation. Radiology 1987; 163:357-360.
`5. Maass D, Zollikofer CL, Largiader F, Sen-
`ning A. Radiological follow-up of trans-
`luminally inserted vascular endoprosthe-
`ses: an experimental study using expand-
`ing spirals. Radiology 1984; 152:659-663.
`6. Palmaz JC, Sibbitt RR, Reuter SR, Tio FO,
`Rice WJ. Expandable intraluminal graft:
`a preliminary study. Radiology 1985;
`156:73-77.
`7. Palmaz JC. Balloon-expandable intravas-
`cular stent. AJR 1988; 150:1263-1269.
`8. Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovirtch V, Joffre F,
`Kappenberger L. Intravascular stents to
`prevent occlusion and restenosis after
`transluminal angioplasty. N Eng! J Med
`1987; 316:701-706.
`9. Strecker EP, Romaniuk R, Schneider B, et
`al. Perkutan implantierbare, durch bal-
`lon aufdehnbare gefassprothese. Dtsch
`Med Wochenschr 1988; 113:538-542.
`
`10. Zollikofer CL, Largiader l, Briihlman WF,
`Uhlschmid GK, Marty AH. Endovascular
`stenting of veins and grafts: preliminary
`clinical experience. Radiology 1988;
`167:707-712.
`11. Charsangavej C, Carrasco CH, Wallace S,
`et al. Stenosis of the vena cava: prelimi-
`nary assessment of treatment with ex-
`pandable metallic stents. Radiology 1986;
`161:295-298.
`12. Putnam JS, Uchida BT, Antonovic R,
`ROsch J. Superior vena cava syndrome as-
`sociated with massive thrombosis: treat-
`ment with expandable wire stents. Radiol-
`ogy 1988; 167:727-728.
`13. Connolly JE, Brownell DA, Levine EF,
`McCart M. Complications of renal dialy-
`sis access procedures. Arch Surg 1984;
`119:1325-1328.
`14. Raju S. PTFE grafts for hemodialysis ac-
`cess: techniques for insertion and man-
`agement of complications. Ann Surg 1987;
`206:666-673.
`15. Palder SB, Kirkman RL, Whittemore AD,
`Hakim RH, Lazarus M, Tilney NL. Vas-
`cular access for hemodialysis: patency
`rates and results of revision. Ann Surg
`1985; 202:235-239.
`16. Kherlakein GM, Roedersheimer LR, Ar-
`baugh JJ, Newmark KJ, King LR. Com-
`parison of autologous fistula versus ex-
`panded polytetrafluoroethylene graft fis-
`tula for angioaccess in hemodialysis. Am J
`Surg 1986; 152:238-243.
`17. Davis GB, Dowd CF, Bookstein JJ, Ma-
`roney TP, Lang EV, Halasz N. Throm-
`bosed dialysis grafts: efficacy of intra-
`thrombotic deposition of concentrated
`urokinase, clot maceration, and angio-
`plasty. AJR 1987; 149:177-181.
`18. Smith TP, Hunter OW, Darcy MD, Casta-
`neda-Zuniga WR, Amplatz K. Throm-
`bosed synthetic hemodialysis access fistu-
`las: the success of combined thrombec-
`tomy and angioplasty (technical note).
`AJR 1986; 147:161-163.
`19. Glanz S, Gordon DH, Butt KMH, Hong J,
`Lipkowitz GS. The role of percutaneous
`angioplasty in the management of chronic
`hemodialysis fistulas. Ann Surg 1987;
`206:777-781.
`
`Volume 170 • Number 2
`
`Radiology • 405
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket