throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________
`
`
`W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`
`v.
`
`
`LIFEPORT SCIENCES LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Patent No. 6,117,167
`Filing Date: February 9, 1998
`Issue Date: September 12, 2000
`Title: ENDOLUMINAL PROSTHESIS AND SYSTEM FOR JOINING
`__________________
`
`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`__________________
`
`DECLARATION OF ENRIQUE CRIADO, M.D.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`I.
`
`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I have been retained by W.L. Gore & Associates (“Gore”) to provide a
`
`technical evaluation and report regarding my opinions on topics in this matter
`
`relating to the inventions claimed in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,117,167 (“’167 patent”).
`
`In particular, for the purposes of this report, I have been asked to provide an
`
`analysis of the scope and content of the ’167 patent relative to the state of the art at
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`1
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-1
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`the time of the earliest application underlying the ’167 patent. I have also been
`
`retained to provide analysis regarding what a person of ordinary skill in
`
`intraluminal (or endovascular) graft, stent, and stent graft arts would have
`
`understood at the time of the earliest application underlying the ’167 patent.
`
`2.
`
`This report summarizes the opinions that I have formed to date, and it is
`
`based on personal knowledge, skill, experience, and review of materials read and
`
`considered in connection with this opinion. I may modify my opinions if
`
`necessary, based on further review and analysis of information provided to me
`
`subsequent to the serving of this report. If called to testify at a U.S. Patent and
`
`Trademark Office (“PTO”) hearing regarding the contents of this report, I will do
`
`so.
`
`II. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
`
`3.
`
`I have over 20 years of academic and professional experience in vascular
`
`surgery and endovascular interventions. I have experience in both developing and
`
`making stent grafts, in the surgical placement of grafts, and in the endovascular
`
`placement of stent grafts and stents. My curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit
`
`1014, and accurately describes my experience, education, employment,
`
`publications, presentations, awards, honors, memberships, and consulting
`
`positions.
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`2
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-2
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`4.
`
`I received my B.S. from the Instituto Nacional de Enseñanza Media
`
`Cervantes, Madrid, Spain. I received my M.D. from the Universitas Complutensis,
`
`School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain.
`
`5. My postdoctoral training occurred at North Carolina Memorial Hospital,
`
`Department of Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and included a
`
`surgery internship from 1985-86, surgery residency from 1986-89, appointment as
`
`chief resident from 1989-90, and vascular surgery fellowship from 1990-91. In
`
`addition, I had a research fellowship at the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery,
`
`Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
`
`6.
`
`I have held several academic appointments. I am currently a Professor of
`
`Surgery and the Director of Endovascular Surgery at the University of Michigan,
`
`and have held that position since January 2006. From 2002 to 2005, I was an
`
`Associate Professor of Surgery at the State University of New York at Stony
`
`Brook, where I was also the Chief of the Division of Vascular Surgery, as well as
`
`the Program Director of the Vascular Surgery Training Program. From February
`
`2002 to September 2002, I was an Associate Clinical Professor of Surgery at the
`
`University of Maryland. From 1996 to 1998, I was an Associate Professor of
`
`Surgery (tenured) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an
`
`Adjunct, Clinical Professor of Surgery at Duke University Medical Center. In
`
`addition, from 1992 to 1998, I was an Assistant Professor of Surgery at the
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`3
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-3
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Beforehand, I was a Clinical
`
`Assistant Professor of Surgery, from 1991 to 1992, and Surgery Instructor, from
`
`1990 to 1991, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
`
`7.
`
`In addition, I have held several clinical hospital appointments. Since
`
`January 2006, I have been the Director of Endovascular Surgery at the University
`
`of Michigan. From 2002 to 2005, I was an Attending Surgeon at the Stony Brook
`
`University Hospital as well as an Attending Surgeon at the Northport Veterans
`
`Administration Medical Center, New York. From 2001 to 2002, I was an
`
`Attending Surgeon and Medical Director of the Non-invasive Vascular Laboratory
`
`at Mercy Medical Center, Maryland. From 1998 to 2001, I was the Director of
`
`Vascular Surgery Service at Fundación Hospital de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
`
`From 1995 to 1998, I was the Chief of the Endovascular Surgery Section of the
`
`Division of Vascular Surgery at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. I
`
`was also an Attending Surgeon at the University of North Carolina Hospital from
`
`1990 to 1998 and an Attending Surgeon at the Durham Veterans Administration
`
`Medical Center (affiliated with Duke University). Finally, I was an Attending
`
`Surgeon in General Surgery at the National Institute of Health, León, Spain from
`
`1983 to 1984 and at the Central Military Hospital, Madrid, Spain from 1982 to
`
`1983.
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`4
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-4
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`8. Moreover, I have served as a reviewer or on the Editorial Board for the
`
`Annals of Vascular Surgery, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Journal of
`
`Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vascular Surgery Outlook, and
`
`Archivos de Ciugía Vascular, and currently I am Associate Editor of the Annals of
`
`Vascular Surgery.
`
`9.
`
`As set forth in Exhibit 1014, I have given over 200 scientific presentations,
`
`including presentations related to using stents, grafts, and stent grafts to treat
`
`vascular disease. Representative presentations include, for example:
`
`• Criado E, Marston WA, “Treatment of aortic aneurysms with stented
`endovascular grafts,” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
`Department of Surgery Grand Rounds, August 17, 1994.
`
` •
`
` Criado E, “Endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms,” University of
`North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Symposium on Current Therapy in Vascular
`Surgery, September 10, 1994.
`
` •
`
` Criado E, “Developments in endovascular stents and grafts,” University of
`North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Surgery Grand Rounds, April
`12, 1995.
`
` •
`
` Criado E, “Endovascular treatment of peripheral aneurysms,
`pseudoaneurysms and arterio-venous fistulae,” Fifth Annual Symposium on
`Current Therapy in Vascular Surgery, The Friday Center, University of
`North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill North Carolina, November 10,
`1995.
`
` •
`
` Marston WA, Criado E, Risley JL, McHugh P, Keagy BA, “Mechanical
`characteristics of dilated PTFE used for covered stents and stent grafts,”
`XXI Annual meeting of The Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society,
`Swisshotel, Chicago, Illinois, June 7, 1996.
`
`
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`5
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-5
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`
`• Criado E, “Endovascular treatment of iliac artery pathology,” Annual
`Symposium on New Developments in Vascular Surgery, The Friday Center,
`University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
`November 8, 1996.
`
` •
`
` Criado E, Marston W, Ligush J, Burnham SJ, Keagy BA, “Endovascular
`treatment of lesions involving branches of the aortic arch,” XXI Annual
`Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Park City, Utah,
`January 12, 1996.
`
` •
`
` Criado E, “Endovascular treatment of peripheral aneurysms,” Advances in
`the diagnosis and treatment of vascular disease, postgraduate course,
`Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile, August
`10, 2002.
`
`
`10. As set forth in Exhibit 1014, I have authored or co-authored over 140
`
`publications, including publications related to using stents, grafts, and stent grafts
`
`to treat vascular disease. Representative publications include, for example:
`
`• Marston WA, Criado E, Mauro M, Keagy BA, “Transbrachial repair of an
`axillary artery pseudoaneurysm using a PTFE covered stent,” Journal of
`Endovascular Surgery, 1995; 2(2):172-176.
`
` •
`
` Criado E, Marston WA, Woosley JT, Ligush J, Chuter T, Baird C, Keagy
`BA, “An aortic aneurysm model for the evaluation of endovascular
`exclusion prostheses,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, 1995; 22:306-315.
`
` •
`
` Marston WA, Criado E, Baird C, Keagy BA, “Reduction of aneurysmal
`pressure and wall stress after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic
`aneurysms in canines,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, 1996; 10:166-173.
`
` •
`
` Criado E, Marston WA, Woosley JT, Reddick R, “Endothelial cell
`coverage of endovascular dacron grafts in canines,” Journal of Vascular
`Surgery, 1996; 23:736-737.
`
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`6
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-6
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`
`• Marston WA, Risley GL, Criado E, McHugh P, Reddick RL, Woosley JT,
`Keagy BA, “Mechanical characteristics of dilated PTFE used for covered
`stents and stent grafts,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, 1997; 11:68-73.
`
` •
`
` Criado E, Marston WA, Ligush J, Mauro MA, Keagy BA, “Endovascular
`Repair of Peripheral Aneurysms, Pseudoaneurysms and Arteriovenous
`Fistulas,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, 1997; 11:256-263.
`
` •
`
` Fontcuberta J, Criado E, Doblas M, Orgaz A, Lopez-Beret P, “Reparacion
`endovascular de una fistula femoral post-traumatica con un stent cubierto,”
`Archivos de Cirugia Vascular XI; 2002; 3:170-173.
`
`I find this experience helpful in allowing me to understand how one skilled
`
`11.
`
`in the art would interpret the limitations of the claims at issue and how they would
`
`be applied in determining validity.
`
`III. COMPENSATION
`
`12.
`
`I am being compensated at the rate of $400 per hour for my time spent on
`
`this matter. I am being reimbursed for authorized travel and related consultation
`
`expenses. This compensation and these reimbursements are not contingent on my
`
`performance, my opinions, the outcome of this matter, or any other issues involved
`
`in or related to this matter. I have no financial interest in W.L. Gore Associates,
`
`Inc. In addition, I have been informed that LifePort Sciences LLC purports to own
`
`the ’167 patent. I have no financial interest in LifePort Sciences LLC.
`
`IV. MATERIALS REVIEWED
`
`13. A list of the materials that I have reviewed in conjunction with this
`
`declaration is below:
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`7
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-7
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,716,365, Goicoechea et al.
`• U.S. Patent No. 6,051,020, Goicoechea et al.
`• U.S. Patent No. 6,117,167, Goicoechea et al.
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,716,365 file history
`• U.S. Patent No. 6,051,020 file history
`• U.S. Patent No. 6,117,167 file history
`• U.S. Patent No. 4,562,596, Kornberg
`• U.S. Patent No. 4,580,568, Gianturco
`• U.S. Patent No. 4,830,003, Wolff et al.
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,064,435, Porter
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,226,913, Pinchuk
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,236,446, Dumon
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,366,504, Andersen et al.
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,405,377, Cragg
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,575,817, Martin
`• U.S. Patent No. 5,871,536, Lazarus
`• U.S. Patent No. 8,206,427, Ryan et al.
`• FR 2 678 508, Chevillon
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`8
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-8
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`• FR 2 678 508, Chevillon (English translation)
`• Gunther, R., et al., Venous Stenoses in Dialysis Shunts: Treatment with Self-
`
`expanding Metallic Stents, Radiology, Vol. 170, No. 2, pp. 401-405, Feb.
`
`1989
`
`• Schaer, J. et al., Treatment of malignant esophageal obstruction with
`
`silicone-coated metallic self-expanding stents, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,
`
`Vol. 38, No. 1, 1992, pp. 7-11
`
`• Chuter, T., et al., Transfemoral endovascular aortic graft placement, J.
`
`Vasc. Surg., Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 185-198, Aug. 1993
`
`
`14.
`
`In connection with any testimony I am asked to give to the PTO, I may use
`
`as exhibits various documents that relate to matters set forth in this report.
`
`V.
`
`SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
`
`15. Based on my experience, consideration of the materials and information
`
`listed in Section IV above, and my understanding of the applicable law regarding
`
`patent validity, it is my opinion that:
`
`• Claims 1, 3, 13-20, 24-28, 30, 31, 33-40, 44-48, 50, 52-60, 64-68, 70, and 71
`
`are Obvious Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 Over Cragg in View of Schaer.
`
`• Claims 2, 4, and 51 are Obvious Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 Over Cragg in View
`
`of Schaer and Pinchuk.
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`9
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-9
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`• Claims 21-23, 32, 41-43, and 61-63 are Obvious Under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`Over Cragg in View of Schaer and Wolff.
`
`• Claims 5-12, 29, 49, 69, and 72-79 are Obvious Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 Over
`
`Cragg in View of Schaer and Lazarus.
`
`• Claims 80-82 are Obvious Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 Over Cragg in View of
`
`Schaer, Lazarus, and Wolff.
`
`• Claims 5-12, 29, 49, 69, and 72-79 are Obvious Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 Over
`
`Cragg in View of Schaer and Dumon
`
`• Claims 80-82 are Obvious Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 Over Cragg in View of
`
`Schaer, Dumon, and Wolff.
`
`16. The detailed reasons supporting my opinions regarding the above claims are
`
`provided below.
`
`VI. DETAILED STATEMENT OF OPINIONS
`
`A. Overview of the Relevant Technology
`
`1. Overview of the ’167 Patent
`
`17. The ’167 patent is at issue in this petition for inter partes review. George
`
`Goicoechea, John Hudson, Claude Mialhe, Andrew Cragg, and Michael Dake are
`
`the named inventors. The ’167 patent is a continuation of U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,716,365 and claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 08/312,881, filed
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`10
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-10
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`on September 27, 1994. I understand that Gore contends the ’365 patent is not
`
`entitled to claim priority to EP 94400284 (“EP ‘284”) or EP94401306 (“EP ‘306”)
`
`based on the outcome of an interference proceeding and subsequent district court
`
`and Federal Circuit litigation. The clinical purpose of this technology is to provide
`
`an intraluminal treatment option for treating diseased or damaged bodily conduits.
`
`18. The ’167 patent relates to “bifurcated endoluminal prosthesis for use in a
`
`bifurcated blood vessel such, for example, as the infrarenal portion of a
`
`mammalian aortic artery where it bifurcates to the common iliac arteries” and “a
`
`stent connecting means for connecting a stent . . . to another stent.” (Ex. 1001 at
`
`1:19-24.) The stated goal of the technology is to eliminate “the requirement for
`
`by-pass surgery associated with the use of the prior art prosthesis in juxtaposition
`
`with a bifurcation in an artery.” (Id. at 2:18-20.)
`
`19. The ’167 patent claims and describes stent joining means for and methods
`
`relating to joining a first endoluminal stent to a second endoluminal stent. In
`
`particular, the patent claims and describes using a radially compressible male
`
`engaging portion on the first stent that is capable of expanding to engage a female
`
`cooperating portion on the second stent. This achieves a continuous lumen through
`
`the two stents. (Id. at 2:28-29.)
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`11
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-11
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`
`a. Male Engaging Portion/Female Portion
`
`20. Using a catheter, the “second stent” is intraluminally delivered in a radially
`
`compressed state to the diseased or damaged portion of the blood vessel to be
`
`treated. Once located at the site of treatment, the stent is deployed such that it
`
`expands and engages the endoluminal surface of the blood vessel. (Ex. 1001 at
`
`2:67-3:657.) The second stent includes a “distal female cooperation portion.” (Id.
`
`at 2:41-43.)1 The “first stent” is then intraluminally delivered in a radially
`
`compressed state to the site of treatment. The first stent includes a “proximal male
`
`engaging portion.” (Id. at 2:42-43.) The first stent “is entered into the female
`
`cooperating portion of the second stent” and then deployed, “allowing the first
`
`stent to re-expand such that the male engaging portion engages in the female
`
`cooperating portion of the second stent.” (Id. at 2:66-3:3.)
`
`b. Prevent Longitudinal Separation
`
`21. The specification further describes that “the interengagement of the male
`
`engaging portion and the female cooperating portion serves to resist longitudinal
`
`separation of the two stents one from the other.” (Ex. 1001 at 2:37-40.) The
`
`specification teaches two ways to “resist such longitudinal separation”: “[b]arbs or
`
`
`1 The specification defines “proximal” as “nearest to the heart” and “distal” as
`
`“furthest from the heart.” (Id. at 2:23-25.)
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`12
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-12
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`hooks on the second stent 40 and/or a frustoconical proximal part 42.” (Id. at
`
`11:54-56.)
`
`22. Flared Stent/Tapered Stent Combination. The patent describes that “[t]he
`
`male engaging portion may be flared radially outwardly towards its extremity, and
`
`the female cooperating portion may be tapered radially inwardly towards its
`
`extremity.” (Id. at 2:43-46.) Referring to Figure 1 below, the patents describe that
`
`in use “the outer surface of the frustoconical proximal part 42 [highlighted below
`
`in blue] engages the interior surface of the second frustoconical part 18
`
`[highlighted below in red] of the bifurcated stent 10.” (Id. at 11:41-43.) “The
`
`tapered configurations of the second frustoconical part 18 of the bifurcated stent 10
`
`and of the proximal frustoconical part 42 of the second stent 40 are such that in the
`
`fitted position as described, the prosthesis are locked together to resist
`
`longitudinal separation in service.” (Id. at 11:49-55 (emphasis added).)
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`13
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-13
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`
`Proximal frustoconical
`part 42
`
`Second frustoconical
`part 18
`
`
`
`23. Barbs or Hooks. The specification further describes that “[t]he male
`
`engaging portion for the first stent may be provided with circumferentially spaced
`
`hooks or barbs on its external surface to engage the internal surface of said female
`
`cooperating means, thereby to reinforce the connecting means against
`
`longitudinal separation of the stents one from the other in the service.” (Id. at
`
`5:66-6:4 (emphasis added).)
`
`24. Barbs or hooks may be provided on both flared and substantially cylindrical
`
`male engaging portions. For example, referring to Figure 1, the specification
`
`describes that “[a]s with other stents described herein, the frustoconical proximal
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`14
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-14
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`part 42 may be formed with circumferentially spaced barbs or hooks 43, as shown
`
`in FIG. 1b [highlighted in green], which engage in the wire skeleton of the second
`
`frustoconical part 18 of the bifurcated stent 10. When barbs 43 are on proximal
`
`portion 12, they engage the inner wall of the artery.” (Id. at 11:43-48.)
`
`Spaced barbs or hooks 43
`
`
`
`25. As another example, referring to Figure 7, the specification describes that
`
`the second stent includes a “female engaging portion which is adapted to receive a
`
`generally cylindrical male engaging portion of a second elongate prosthesis (not
`
`shown).” (Id. at 12:51-55.) The specification further describes that the first stent
`
`includes a “male engaging portion [that] is equipped with circumferentially spaced
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`15
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-15
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`external barbs to engage in the female cooperating portion in service.” (Id. at
`
`12:55-57.)
`
`
`
`c. Shape Memory Stents
`
`26. The specification describes that the first and second stents are self-
`
`expanding nitinol stents. (See id. at 3:46-51; 8:64-66.) For example, it describes
`
`that “[t]ypically, each stent may be made from a shape memory nitinol (nickel-
`
`titanium) wire.” (Id. at 3: 46-51.) More specifically, the specification states that
`
`“[s]aid nitinol wire may be type “M” nitinol wire which is martensitic at
`
`temperatures below about l3°C, and is austenitic at temperatures above about
`
`25°C; it will be appreciated therefore that the type “M” wire will be austenitic at
`
`body temperature of 37°C.” (Id. at 3:55-59.) Referring to Figure 1, the
`
`specification teaches that “[e]ach of the four parts of the bifurcated stent 10 is
`
`made in substantially the same way by winding a shape memory nitinol wire,
`
`typically nitinol type M wire, onto a mandrel 46.” (Id. at 8:64-67.) As stated in
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`16
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-16
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`the specification, “[a]n advantage of using Nitinol wire to form the stent in
`
`accordance with the present invention is that the nitinol wire is ‘super elastic’ in its
`
`austenitic state; the radial outward force exerted by the stent on the wall of the
`
`blood vessel in use is therefore substantially constant irrespective of the diameter
`
`of the vessel and the expanded stent.” (Id. at 3:65-4:463.)
`
`d. Bifurcated Stent Embodiments
`
`27. The specification further describes embodiments that include a “second
`
`stent” with “two transversely spaced distal female cooperating portions; the second
`
`stent may therefore constitute a bifurcated stent for use in juxtaposition with a
`
`bifurcation in a blood vessel.” (Id. at 3:7-11.) In other words, the stent lumen is
`
`split (“bifurcates”) in two for use in blood vessels that split into two vessels at a
`
`vessel “bifurcation.” (Id. at 3:21-26.) More specifically, the specification
`
`describes that “[e]ach of the two transversely spaced distal female cooperating
`
`portions may be adapted for connection to a first male stent which, in use, extends
`
`across the bifurcation into a respective one of the branched blood vessels.” (Id. at
`
`3:12-15.) The specification also states that “the bifurcated stent can be connected
`
`in situ to the other stent.” (Id. at 3:32-33.)
`
`e. Stent Graft Embodiments
`
`28.
`
`In addition to bare metal stents, the specification describes attaching a graft
`
`or multiple grafts to the first and second stents. It states that “[t]ypically the graft
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`17
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-17
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`layer may be disposed externally of the stent” but “in some embodiments the graft
`
`layer may be disposed internally of the stent.” (Id. at 5:5-8.) The specification
`
`further describes an embodiment of a bifurcated “second stent” having a
`
`frustoconical female cooperating portion at its distal end and a graft on its exterior
`
`surface that is folded over to its interior surface at the distal end of the stent. In
`
`addition, the specification describes a “first stent” having a frustoconical male
`
`engaging portion at its proximal end and a graft on its exterior surface. When the
`
`male engaging portion of the first stent engages the female cooperating portion of
`
`the second stent, the graft layer on the exterior surface of the male engaging
`
`portion contacts the graft layer on the interior surface of the female cooperating
`
`portion to form a substantially blood-tight seal. (Id. at 12:27-44.)
`
`f. ’167 Patent
`
`i. ’167 Patent Claim Language Summary
`
`29. The ’167 patent includes 82 claims, including 13 independent (claims 1, 2,
`
`3, 4, 5, 13, 31, 32, 33, 51, 52, 71, and 72) and 69 dependent claims.
`
`Claims Relating to “Stent Joining Means”:
`
`30.
`
`Independent claims 1-4 relate to stent joining means and require a first stent
`
`and second stent made of a shape memory alloy. The first stent includes a male
`
`engaging portion that is entered into a female portion of the second stent and
`
`thereafter expanded to engage the female portion of the second stent so as to
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`18
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-18
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`prevent separation. The claims require that either the male engaging portion is
`
`flared radially outwardly (claims 1 and 3), the female portion is tapered radially
`
`inwardly (claims 2 and 4), or the second stent includes two transversely spaced
`
`female portions (claim 5).
`
`31. Claim 1 claims:
`
`
`A stent joining means for joining a first endoluminal stent to a second
`endoluminal stent to define a continuous lumen through the first and
`second endoluminal stents, said stent joining means comprising:
`
` a
`
` male engaging portion on said first endoluminal stent which has an
`outer surface and can be compressed radially inwardly, wherein said
`male engaging portion is flared radially outwardly towards a
`proximal end; and
`
` a
`
` female portion on said second endoluminal stent cooperating with
`said male engaging portion, said female portion having an inner
`surface;
`
`wherein said first endoluminal stent and said second endoluminal
`stent consist of a shape memory alloy and the male engaging portion
`can be entered into the female portion in a radially compressed state
`and thereafter expanded in the female portion and wherein said outer
`surface of the male engaging portion and said inner surface of the
`female portion are inter-engaged to resist longitudinal movement to
`prevent separation of the first and second endoluminal stents in
`service.
`
`
`(emphasis added.)
`
`32. Claim 2 claims:
`
`
`A stent joining means for joining a first endoluminal stent to a second
`endoluminal stent to define a continuous lumen through the first and
`second endoluminal stents, said stent joining means comprising:
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`19
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-19
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`
` male engaging portion on said first endoluminal stent which has an
`outer surface and can be compressed radially inwardly; and
`
` a
`
` a
`
` female portion on said second endoluminal stent cooperating with
`said male engaging portion, said female portion having an inner
`surface, wherein the female portion is tapered radially inwardly
`towards a distal end;
`
`wherein said first endoluminal stent and said second endoluminal
`stent consist of a shape memory alloy and the male engaging portion
`can be entered into the female portion in a radially compressed state
`and thereafter expanded in the female portion and wherein said outer
`surface of the male engaging portion and said inner surface of the
`female portion are inter-engaged to resist longitudinal movement to
`prevent separation of the first and second endoluminal stents in
`service.
`
`
`(emphasis added.)
`
`33. Claim 3 claims:
`
`
`A stent joining means for joining a first endoluminal stent to a second
`endoluminal stent to define a continuous lumen through the first and
`second endoluminal stents, said stent joining means comprising:
`
` a
`
` male engaging portion on said first endoluminal stent which has an
`outer surface and can be compressed radially inwardly, wherein the
`male engaging portion comprises a frustoconical wall flaring
`outwardly towards a longitudinal extremity; and
`
` a
`
` female portion on said second endoluminal stent cooperating with
`said male engaging portion, said female portion having an inner
`surface;
`
`wherein said first endoluminal stent and said second endoluminal
`stent consist of a shape memory alloy and the male engaging portion
`can be entered into the female portion in a radially compressed state
`and thereafter expanded in the female portion and wherein said outer
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`20
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-20
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`
`surface of the male engaging portion and said inner surface of the
`female portion are inter-engaged to resist longitudinal movement to
`prevent separation of the first and second endoluminal stents in
`service.
`
`
`(emphasis added.)
`
`34. Claim 4 claims:
`
`
` a
`
`A stent joining means for joining a first endoluminal stent to a second
`endoluminal stent to define a continuous lumen through the first and
`second endoluminal stents, said stent joining means comprising:
`
`male engaging portion on said first endoluminal stent which has an
`outer surface and can be compressed radially inwardly; and
`
` female portion on said second endoluminal stent cooperating with
`said male engaging portion, said female portion having an inner
`surface, wherein the female portion comprises a frustoconical wall
`tapering radially inwardly towards a longitudinal extremity;
`
`wherein said first endoluminal stent and said second endoluminal
`stent consist of a shape memory alloy and the male engaging portion
`can be entered into the female portion in a radially compressed state
`and thereafter expanded in the female portion and wherein said outer
`surface of the male engaging portion and said inner surface of the
`female portion are inter-engaged to resist longitudinal movement to
`prevent separation of the first and second endoluminal stents in
`service.
`
`
`(emphasis added.)
`
`35. Claim 5 claims:
`
`
`A stent joining means for adjoining a first endoluminal stent to a
`second endoluminal stent to define a continuous lumen through the
`first and second endoluminal stents, said stent joining means
`comprising:
`
`
`US.54701997.04
`
`21
`
`W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-21
`
`

`

`Inter Partes Review No. Unassigned
`Exhibit 1013: Declaration of Enrique Criado, M.D.
`August 18, 2014
`
`
`a male engaging portion on said first endoluminal stent which has an
`outer surface and can be compressed radially inwardly; and
`
`two transversely spaced female portions on said second
`endoluminal stent, at least one female portion on said second
`endoluminal stent cooperating with said male engaging portion, said
`female portion having an inner surface;
`
`wherein said first endoluminal stent and said second endoluminal
`stent consist of a shape memory alloy and the male engaging portion
`can be entered into the female portion in a radially compressed state
`and thereafter expanded in the female portion and wherein said outer
`surface of the male engaging portion and said inner surface of the
`female portion are inter-engaged to resist longitudinal movement to
`prevent separation of the first and second endoluminal stents in
`service.
`
`
`(emphasis added.)
`
`36.
`
`Independent claim 72 also relates to a stent joining means that requires a
`
`first stent with two transversely spaced female portions and a second stent with a
`
`male engaging portion that is entered into

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket