throbber
Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Point
`Mutations Using Allele-Specific
`Oligonucleotides
`
`UNIT 9.4
`
`This approach can be used to screen one gene for many allelic mutations or to screen
`several loci for several allelic mutations each. In the basic protocol, pools of radiolabeled
`allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) probes are hybridized to dot blots containing
`polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified DNA products generated from one or more
`loci (Fig. 9.4.1). Because tetramethyl ammonium chloride (TMAC) is added to the
`hybridization solution, the melting temperature of each oligonucleotide is independent
`of G-C content and oligonucleotides of the same length can be hybridized simultaneously.
`The pooled probes will give a positive hybridization signal from any PCR-amplified DNA
`sample containing a sequence complementary to any of the ASOs in the pool of
`oligonucleotide sequences. If many PCR-amplified samples are spotted onto a single
`filter, multiple individuals can then be screened simultaneously for many mutant se-
`quences. This multiple ASO hybridization technique is appropriate only for circumstances
`when hybridization with any one of the pooled probes is expected to be uncommon. The
`support protocol describes the removal of radiolabeled probe DNA from the filter in order
`to reuse the filter for further screening. An example highlighted in the Commentary details
`the use of this protocol for studying the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance
`regulator (CFTR) gene.
`
`SCREENING PCR-AMPLIFIED DNA WITH MULTIPLE POOLED ASOs
`This approach is particularly powerful when used to screen for rare alleles, but is not
`appropriate for screening commonly occurring alleles. It works well for detecting point
`mutations and small deletions/insertions. PCR-amplified DNA samples that test positive
`are then rescreened individually using single allele-specific oligonucleotides (ASOs) to
`identify which mutation-specific ASO hybridizes. The mutant PCR-amplified DNA can
`also be screened using an ASO corresponding to the normal gene sequence to determine
`whether the individual is heterozygous or homozygous for the mutant allele.
`
`The following steps describe radiolabeling ASOs using T4 polynucleotide kinase, pre-
`paring dot blots of PCR-amplified DNA, and hybridizing pooled radiolabeled ASOs to
`dot blots.
`
`Materials
`For recipes, see Reagents and Solutions in this unit (or cross-referenced unit); for common stock
`solutions, see APPENDIX 2; for suppliers, see SUPPLIERS APPENDIX.
`10× T4 polynucleotide kinase buffer (see recipe)
`200 mM DTT
`10 µM allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO), prepared just before use by
`diluting 100 µM stock
`10 mCi/ml [γ-32P]dATP (∼3000 Ci/mmol)
`10 U/µl T4 polynucleotide kinase
`25 mM EDTA
`Denaturing solution (see recipe)
`25 ng/µl PCR-amplified products from genes of interest (see Critical Parameters)
`2× SSC (APPENDIX 2)
`TMAC hybridization solution (see recipe)
`TMAC wash solution (see recipe), room temperature and 52°C
`
`Contributed by Barbara Handelin and Anthony P. Shuber
`Current Protocols in Human Genetics (1995) 9.4.1-9.4.8
`Copyright © 2000 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`
`BASIC
`PROTOCOL
`
`Clinical
`Molecular
`Genetics
`
`9.4.1
`
`Supplement 6
`
`GeneDX 1021, pg. 1
`
`

`

`Dot-blot apparatus
`Nylon membrane: e.g., Biotrans+ (ICN Biomedicals) or Biodyne (Pall)
`Whatman 3MM filter paper
`80°C oven
`Sealable bags
`52°C shaking water bath
`X-Omat AR film (Eastman Kodak)
`Additional reagents and equipment for PCR (UNITS 7.1 & 9.3; CPMB UNIT 15.1) and
`preparing dot blots, (CPMB UNIT 2.9B)
`
`CAUTION: 32P and TMAC are hazardous; see APPENDIX 2A for guidelines on handling, storage, and
`disposal.
`
`Label the ASO with 32P
`1. For each ASO to be labeled, prepare the following labeling reaction:
`10 µl H2O
`2 µl 10× T4 polynucleotide kinase buffer
`1 µl 200 mM DTT
`3 µl 10 µM ASO
`3 µl 10 mCi/ml [γ-32P] ATP
`1 µl 10 U/µl polynucleotide kinase.
`Incubate 1 hr at 37°C.
`See Critical Parameters for important tips on design of probes to be used in the labeling
`reaction. The specific probes which are to be used would, of course, be determined by the
`genetic locus of interest.
`2. Stop the reaction with 80 µl of 25 mM EDTA.
`
`Prepare dot blot of PCR-amplified DNA samples
`3. Prepare the dot-blot apparatus according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
`If necessary, clean the dot-blot apparatus because the apparatus must be clean and dry to
`obtain adequate suction.
`4. Estimate the size of membrane that will be necessary to contain the number of samples
`to be analyzed and cut the membrane to the appropriate size to fit the dot-blot
`apparatus. Mark the dry membrane in asymmetric corners so that it can be reoriented
`after hybridization.
`The membrane may be marked with a pen (e.g., Sharpie extra-fine-point marker) or by
`cutting a corner.
`5. Wet the membrane by floating it on water (it should wet immediately), then submerge
`it briefly. Place the membrane on the dot-blot apparatus gasket and assemble the
`manifold—do not apply vacuum until just before loading the samples.
`6. For each sample to be dotted onto the membrane, add 50 µl denaturing solution to a
`1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube. Next, add 8 µl PCR-amplified DNA from the gene of
`interest and mix by vortexing.
`As many as eight PCR-amplified DNA fragments (products) can be combined in a single
`tube and co-dotted onto the membrane (see Critical Parameters). PCR-amplified DNA from
`a multiplex PCR (using 8 (cid:1)l containing 200 ng of each amplification product; see UNIT 9.3)
`can be used.
`
`For each ASO included in the hybridization cocktail (see below), include a PCR-amplified
`DNA from an individual who is a known homozygote or heterozygote for that mutation (as
`a positive control). Include PCR-amplified DNA from an individual who does not have the
`mutation and a “no-DNA” PCR sample as negative controls.
`
`Current Protocols in Human Genetics
`
`Simultaneous
`Detection of
`Multiple Point
`Mutations Using
`Allele-Specific
`Oligonucleotides
`
`9.4.2
`
`Supplement 6
`
`GeneDX 1021, pg. 2
`
`

`

`ASO position
`
`R117H 621+1
`
`508
`507
`
`G542X
`1717-1
`
`S549N
`R553X
`G551D
`
`R560T
`
`W1282X N1303K
`
`exon #
`
`4
`
`10
`
`11
`20
`carry out PCR amplification
`on CFTR gene
`
`21
`
`prepare four replicate dot-blots
`of amplified DNA
`
`hybridize with
` 508 probe
`
`hybridize with
`pool of 5
`mutations
`
`hybridize with
`pool of 6
`mutations
`
`hybridize with
`N( 508)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112
`
`←
`
`←
`
`ABCDE
`
`N( 508)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112
`
`←
`
`←
`
`ABCDE
`
`Pool 2
`
`perform independent hybridization
`for mutation specification
`
`A (+)
`
`B A
`
` (+)
`
`B A
`
` (+)
`
`B A
`
` (+)
`
`B A
`
` (+)
`B
`
`A (+)
`B
`
`Pool 2
`probes
`1 2 3 4 5
`
`6
`
`∆507
`
`R117H
`
`←←
`
`←←
`
`621+1
`
`S549N
`
`R560T
`
`1717-1
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112
`
`←
`
`←
`
`Pool 1
`probes
`1 2 3 4 5
`
`ABCDE
`
`Pool 1
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112
`
`←
`
`←
`
`←
`
`←
`
`ABCDE
`
`508
`
`A (+)
`
`B A
`
` (+)
`
`B A
`
` (+)
`
`B A
`
` (+)
`
`B A
`
` (+)
`B
`
`G542X
`
`G551D
`
`R553X
`
`←←
`
`W1282X
`
`N1303K
`
`Figure 9.4.1 Detection of mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene using
`allele-specific oligonucleotides.
`
`7. When all samples have been added to denaturing solution, apply the vacuum to the
`dot-blot apparatus. Add the entire volume of each sample to a well, avoiding bubbles
`on the filter. Prepare Whatman 3MM filter paper saturated with 2× SSC.
`A common mistake at this point is to place a sample in the wrong well. Use bromphenol
`blue in the denaturing solution to keep track of sample loading.
`
`Clinical
`Molecular
`Genetics
`
`9.4.3
`
`Current Protocols in Human Genetics
`
`GeneDX 1021, pg. 3
`
`

`

`8. With the vacuum still on, remove the upper block of the apparatus, quickly remove
`the membrane, and place it onto Whatman 3MM filter paper saturated with 2× SSC.
`Let sit for 2 min.
`9. Fix the DNA onto the membrane by placing it for 15 min in an 80°C oven. Rewet the
`membrane in water and transfer it to a sealable bag for hybridization.
`
`The filters may be temporarily stored by keeping in a dark place, at room temperature.
`
`Hybridize 32P-labeled ASOs to dot blots and autoradiograph
`10. Add an appropriate amount of hybridization solution containing the 32P-labeled ASO
`pooled probes to each bag. Incubate 2 hr to overnight, with shaking, in 52°C water
`bath.
`
`For example, for a standard 96-well format membrane, use 10 ml of hybridization solution.
`The optimal concentration of each ASO probe should be determined empirically, but should
`be in the range of 0.03 to 0.15 pmol/ml of hybridization solution. To reduce background
`hybridization, add ≥20-fold excess unlabeled ASO corresponding to the “normal” allele.
`
`This protocol has been optimized for 17-mer ASO probes.
`
`11. Remove the membrane from the bag and wash with vigorous agitation as follows: 20
`min in 200 ml TMAC wash solution, room temperature, followed by 20 min in 300
`ml TMAC wash solution, 52°C.
`12. Blot membranes on Whatman 3MM filter paper to dry and expose to X-Omat AR
`film 1 hr to overnight at −70°C.
`
`SUPPORT
`PROTOCOL
`
`STRIPPING OLD PROBES AND REHYBRIDIZATION
`Filters can be stripped of previously hybridized probe and rehybridized several times,
`depending on the amount of DNA (control and experimental) on the filters. If the
`signal-to-noise ratio allows reading of the appropriate hybridization signals from positive-
`and negative-control DNA, and the amount of experimental and control DNA on the filter
`is equivalent, then the experimental results can be interpreted.
`
`Additional Materials
`For recipes, see Reagents and Solutions in this unit (or cross-referenced unit); for common stock
`solutions, see APPENDIX 2; for suppliers, see SUPPLIERS APPENDIX.
`Hybridized membrane (first basic protocol)
`TMAC wash solution (see recipe), freshly prepared and prewarmed to 15°C
`above previous hybridization temperature
`Agitating water bath, 15°C above previous hybridization temperature
`
`CAUTION: Radiolabeled hybridized membranes and TMAC are hazardous; see APPENDIX 2A for
`guidelines on handling, storage, and disposal.
`
`1. Add previously hybridized membrane to 300 ml prewarmed TMAC wash solution in
`a washing dish. Wash 1 hr with vigorous agitation in a water bath at 15°C above
`previous hybridization temperature.
`
`2. Remove filter from the wash and blot dry on Whatman 3MM filter paper.
`
`3. Autoradiograph to confirm that the previously hybridized probe has been removed.
`
`4. Hybridize filters as described in steps 10 to 12 of the basic protocol, or store dry at
`room temperature (they can be stored indefinitely in resealable bags).
`
`Current Protocols in Human Genetics
`
`Simultaneous
`Detection of
`Multiple Point
`Mutations Using
`Allele-Specific
`Oligonucleotides
`
`9.4.4
`
`GeneDX 1021, pg. 4
`
`

`

`REAGENTS AND SOLUTIONS
`
`Use deionized, distilled water in all recipes and protocol steps. For common stock solutions, see
`APPENDIX 2; for suppliers, see SUPPLIERS APPENDIX.
`
`Denaturing solution
`500 mM NaOH
`2.0 M NaCl
`25 mM EDTA (prepare freshly)
`0.0001% (w/v) bromphenol blue (add just before use)
`Prepare fresh
`T4 polynucleotide kinase buffer, 10×
`700 mM Tris⋅Cl, pH 7.6
`100 mM MgCl2
`50 mM spermidine
`Store frozen
`Tetramethylammonium chloride (TMAC) solution
`Dissolve 657.6 g TMAC (mol. wt. = 109.6) in 1 liter H2O. Filter solution through
`Whatman no. 1 filter paper and determine the precise concentration by measuring
`the refractive index (n) of a three-fold diluted solution. The molarity (M) of the
`diluted solution = 53.6 (n − 1.331) and the molarity of the stock solution = 3 × M.
`Store TMAC at room temperature in brown bottles.
`CAUTION: TMAC is hazardous; see APPENDIX 2A for guidelines on handling, storage, and
`disposal.
`TMAC hybridization solution
`6 ml TMAC solution (see recipe; ∼3 M final)
`600 µl 10% (w/v) SDS (0.6% final)
`20 µl 0.5 M EDTA (1 mM) final
`1 ml 0.1 M Na3PO4, pH 6.8 (10 mM final)
`1 ml 50× Denhardt solution (APPENDIX 2; 5× final)
`40 µl 10 mg/nl yeast RNA (40 µg/ml final)
`1.34 ml H2O
`CAUTION: TMAC is hazardous; see APPENDIX 2A for safety guidelines.
`TMAC wash solution
`60 ml TMAC solution (see recipe; ∼3 M final)
`200 µl 0.5 M EDTA (1 mM final)
`10 ml 0.1 M Na3PO4, pH 6.8 (10 mM final)
`6 ml 10% (w/v) SDS (0.6% final)
`23.8 ml H2O
`CAUTION: TMAC is hazardous; see APPENDIX 2A for safety guidelines.
`
`COMMENTARY
`Background Information
`Review of current human molecular genetics
`literature reveals that the paradigm of sickle cell
`anemia, in which one mutation accounts for
`essentially 100% of the cases of sickle cell
`phenotype, is the exception rather than the rule.
`As associations between genes and disease phe-
`notypes are discovered and the mutations that
`confer the disease phenotype are determined, a
`
`new rule is rapidly being established: DNA
`diagnosis of genetic diseases typically requires
`analysis of many alternative mutations, each of
`which confers the disease phenotype.
`Mutation analysis using ASO probes is di-
`rect and is less subject to errors or misinterpre-
`tation than other techniques for detecting spe-
`cific sequences; i.e., if specific hybridization of
`the probe is observed, the complementary se-
`
`Current Protocols in Human Genetics
`
`Clinical
`Molecular
`Genetics
`
`9.4.5
`
`GeneDX 1021, pg. 5
`
`

`

`quence is present. However, in order to analyze
`multiple ASOs, it is usually necessary to per-
`form separate hybridizations and washes for
`each probe. This is because pooling of ASOs in
`the same hybridization would generally require
`that probes be designed with identical melting
`temperatures (Tm) so that the stringency of
`hybridization can be controlled to reduce non-
`specific binding. In a pool of three or four
`ASOs, satisfactory results can be obtained by
`designing probes of different lengths or by
`adjusting placement of the ASO at the target
`sequence. However, as the pool gets larger, this
`approach becomes progressively more com-
`plex.
`The use of the quaternary ammonium salt
`TMAC as an adjunct in hybridization reactions
`essentially eliminates the dependence of Tm on
`G-C content (see CPMB UNITS 2.9 & 6.4; and Mel-
`chior and von Hippel, 1973). TMAC acts
`through a nonspecific salt effect to reduce hy-
`drogen-bonding (H-bond) energies between G-
`C base pairs (Marky et al., 1988). At the same
`time, it binds specifically to A-T base pairs and
`increases the thermal stability of the H-bonds
`between A-T base pairs. At 3 M TMAC, these
`opposing influences effectively reduce the dif-
`ference in bonding energy between the triple-
`H-bond G-C base pair and the double-H-bond
`A-T base pair. The net result is that the Tm of a
`probe in 3 M TMAC is a function of probe
`length alone. Thus, if all probes in an ASO pool
`are the same length, their Tm will be virtually
`identical.
`A related consequence of eliminating the
`bonding energy differences between A-T and
`G-C base pairs is that the slope of the melting
`curve for each probe increases. Together the
`effects of TMAC in hybridization allow the
`stringency of hybridization to increase to the
`point that single-base differences can be re-
`solved and nonspecific hybridization minimized.
`Specificity of hybridization is especially im-
`portant when multiple ASO probes with the
`same, or closely overlapping, targets are pooled;
`as, for example, in analyzing mutations S549N,
`G551D, and R553X in the CFTR gene where
`these mutations have identical target locations
`and differ in sequence by only 1 bp (Fig. 9.4.1).
`Thus, ASOs for mutations occurring in close
`proximity on the same target sequence do not
`cross-hybridize under TMAC hybridization con-
`ditions, as they tend to do with the allele-spe-
`cific priming (ASP) technique (Ferrie et al.,
`1992). Equally important, TMAC hybridiza-
`tion works with a heterogeneous population of
`
`target DNA (i.e., multiple PCR-amplified DNAs
`co-dotted on a membrane) without generating
`nonspecific background hybridization (Shuber
`et al., 1992).
`The method is appropriate only when hy-
`bridization with any one of the ASOs in a pool
`is expected to be somewhat uncommon. For
`example, this method would not be useful to
`genotype the common human histocompatibil-
`ity leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles as almost
`every sample would have a positive signal when
`hybridized with ASO pools containing any of
`the most common HLA alleles. However, for
`rare disease-causing alleles at various genetic
`loci, this approach is appropriate.
`
`Critical Parameters
`This method should be robust for both speci-
`ficity and sensitivity. That is, it should be pos-
`sible to analyze a complex sample (i.e., one
`containing multiple PCR products from one or
`several loci) with multiple ASOs. One remark-
`able feature of the TMAC hybridization method
`is that it is possible to hybridize simultaneously
`several ASO probes that overlap significantly
`at their target sequence. ASO probes may differ
`by only a single base without reducing specific
`signal via competitive hybridization.
`A significant advantage in using this proce-
`dure is that designing ASO probes only in-
`volves the necessity to observe two parameters:
`(1) all ASO probes in a single pool should be
`the same length (the basic protocol is optimized
`for a 17-base ASO probe) and (2) the position
`of the discriminating single-base mismatch be-
`tween the oligonucleotide probe and target se-
`quence should not be located at the end of the
`ASO. The basic protocol is based on the single-
`base mismatch being located 5 to 7 bases from
`the 5′ end of the ASO probe.
`Hybridization using pools of ≤20 ASO
`probes yields acceptable results but the upper
`limit to the number of ASO probes that can be
`combined is probably >20. ASOs of the same
`length, but with differing G-C content, can be
`pooled because TMAC hybridization elimi-
`nates dependence of the Tm of the probe on the
`G-C content.
`Pools of PCR-amplified DNA from several
`genes of interest can be co-dotted onto a filter
`and screened simultaneously. The PCR-ampli-
`fied DNA samples can be pooled from separate
`PCR amplification reactions (UNIT 7.1; CPMB UNIT
`15.1) or prepared in a multiplex PCR-amplifica-
`tion reaction (UNIT 9.3).
`
`Current Protocols in Human Genetics
`
`Simultaneous
`Detection of
`Multiple Point
`Mutations Using
`Allele-Specific
`Oligonucleotides
`
`9.4.6
`
`GeneDX 1021, pg. 6
`
`

`

`Table 9.4.1 Troubleshooting Guide for Mutation Analysis Using Allele-Specific Oligonucleotides Probes
`
`Problem
`
`Possible cause
`
`Solution
`
`Hybridization signal from
`sample is low or absent
`
`Specific activity of labeled ASO probe
`is low
`Probe is partially hydrolyzed or
`degraded
`No denaturing solution added to
`PCR-amplified DNA sample
`
`Probe not added to the hybridization
`cocktail
`No DNA spotted onto membrane
`
`Background signal is high
`
`Hybridization and wash temperature are
`not high enough
`
`Labeled probe remains on membrane
`after the washes have been done
`Agitation of washes is too slow
`
`Inadequate volume of wash solution
`
`Repeat the labeling procedure with
`fresh ASO and label
`Prepare new probe
`
`Denature, spot, and hybridize a
`second aliquot from amplified
`sample
`Add probe to hybridization solution
`and proceed as usual
`Repeat denaturation, spotting, and
`hybridizations with new aliquot of
`amplified sample
`
`Do not allow membrane to
`completely dry out; return damp
`membrane to a new wash solution
`and repeat washes at given
`temperature; omit room temperature
`wash
`Perform an additional 5-10 min wash
`at the required wash temperature
`Repeat washes with increased
`agitation; check to be sure that
`membrane has not become stuck to
`side of wash container
`Add additional wash solution and
`repeat
`
`Troubleshooting
`The problems encountered are one of two
`types: the specific hybridization signal is too
`low or the background hybridization is too high.
`Approaches to troubleshooting these problems
`are summarized in Table 9.4.1.
`
`Anticipated Results
`DNA samples that contain any sequence
`complementary to one of the ASO probes in a
`pool will give a positive hybridization signal.
`Of course, it is not possible to determine which
`of the pooled probes is responsible for a positive
`signal. Positive DNA samples are reanalyzed
`singly with individual ASO probes to determine
`which of the pooled ASOs hybridized. A posi-
`tive result does not discriminate between ho-
`mozygosity and heterozygosity. Thus, a posi-
`tive sample must be rehybridized with the
`ASOs corresponding normal sequence to de-
`termine if the individual has one or two copies
`of the mutant sequence.
`
`Time Considerations
`PCR amplification of the gene of interest
`and the entire basic protocol can be performed
`in a single day if the hybridization conditions
`are optimized for the pool of ASO probes being
`used, allowing a 2-hr hybridization. The hy-
`bridization time can be as long as overnight to
`62 hr for scheduling convenience. The length
`of time allowed for posthybridization washes
`is minimal, as are the number of washes. Unlike
`the washes used for hybridizations using SSC,
`the number and duration of washes are mini-
`mal, but critically timed.
`
`Example: Detection of Mutations
`in the CFTR Genes Using ASOs
`Consider the detection of mutations in the
`cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance
`regulator (CFTR) gene in a clinical laboratory.
`Diagnosis of 12 CFTR mutations would pro-
`ceed as follows (and as outlined in Figure
`9.4.1): Samples are amplified in a multiplex
`
`Current Protocols in Human Genetics
`
`Clinical
`Molecular
`Genetics
`
`9.4.7
`
`GeneDX 1021, pg. 7
`
`

`

`reaction to generate PCR products from five
`exons in the CFTR gene (Shuber et al., 1992).
`The PCR-amplified DNA is then dotted onto a
`96-well dot-blot apparatus (80 experimental
`and 16 control samples are analyzed simulta-
`neously). Four replicate dot-blot membranes
`are generated; one for each ASO pool to be
`hybridized. Replicate membranes are then hy-
`bridized with a cocktail of radiolabeled ASO
`probes. The composition of each pool is deter-
`mined by the relative frequency of specific
`mutations in the population being analyzed.
`More common mutations are not pooled (∆508
`probe). ASOs that recognize rare mutant allele
`are similarly pooled (5- and 6-mutation pools).
`The fourth replicate is hybridized to a probe
`containing the normal sequence at the ∆508
`position.
`Autoradiograms of these four hybridizations
`are analyzed as follows: In the ∆F508 mem-
`brane, the ∆F508 homozygote is read in column
`6, rows D and E (duplicate spots; see arrows).
`In the Pool 1 membrane, the sample in column
`4, rows D and E is read as the Pool 1 positive
`(unknown heterozygote or homozygote; see
`arrows). An example of a compound heterozy-
`gote can be found in column 5, rows D and E,
`on the ∆F508 and Pool 2 membranes.
`DNA samples that give a positive signal are
`rescreened using individual ASO probes in the
`hybridizations to determine which ASO probe
`in the pool hybridized to the sample DNA. Note
`in Fig. 9.4.1 that the number of samples giving
`a positive hybridization signal is small, espe-
`cially for the ASO pool containing the rarest
`mutant alleles. In this figure, columns 1 to 5 and
`1 to 6 are generated by aligning filters. The rows
`labeled A(+) contain positive controls. The rows
`labeled B are experimental sample rows.
`Although not shown in Fig. 9.4.1, positive
`samples also are hybridized with an ASO that
`recognizes the sequence of the normal allele to
`discriminate between a heterozygous and ho-
`mozygous genotype (e.g., G551D/G551D or
`
`G551D/normal). This step may not always be
`necessary, (e.g., in a phenotypically normal
`individual who is suspected only of being a
`carrier/heterozygote).
`
`Literature Cited
`Ferrie, R.M., Schwarz, M.J., Robertson, N.H., Vau-
`din, S., Super, M., Malone, G., and Little, S.
`1992. Development, multiplexing, and applica-
`tion of ARMS tests for common mutations in the
`CFTR gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51:251-262.
`Marky, L.A., Blumenfeld, K.S., and Breslauer, K.J.
`1988. Differential effect of tetramethylam-
`monium chloride and sodium chloride on duplex
`melting temperature of deoxyoligonucleotides:
`Resolution of a salt effect into specific and non-
`specific components. Can. J. Chem. 66:836-838.
`Melchior, W.B. and von Hippel, P.H. 1973. Altera-
`tion of the relative stability of dA-dT and dG-dC
`base pairs in DNA. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
`70:298-302.
`Shuber, A.P., Skoletsky, J., Stern, R., and Handelin,
`B.L. 1992. Efficient 12-mutation testing in the
`CFTR gene: A general model for complex muta-
`tion analysis. Hum. Molec. Genet. 2:159-163.
`
`Key Reference
`Shuber et al., 1992. See above.
`Original description and validation of the method.
`
`Wood, W.I., Gitschier, J., Lasky, L.A., and Lawn,
`R.M. 1985. Base composition-independent hy-
`bridization in tetramethylammonium chloride: A
`method for oligonucleotide screening of highly
`complex gene libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`U.S.A. 82:1585-1588.
`Establishes the empirical conditions for use of
`TMAC in hybridizing degenerate oligonucleotide
`pools to cDNA library clones. This is an important
`application of TMAC conditions and is the closest
`to the application described here.
`
`Contributed by Barbara Handelin
` and Anthony P. Shuber
`Integrated Genetics
`Framingham, Massachusetts
`
`Simultaneous
`Detection of
`Multiple Point
`Mutations Using
`Allele-Specific
`Oligonucleotides
`
`9.4.8
`
`Current Protocols in Human Genetics
`
`GeneDX 1021, pg. 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket