throbber
EXHIBIT 2012
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2012EXHIBIT 2012
`
`

`
`Congressional Record
`
`M
`
`U
`
`U N
`
`EPLU
`RIB
`
`U S
`
`United States
`of America
`
`PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112th
`
` CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
`
`Vol. 157
`
`WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2011
`
`No. 34
`
`Senate
`
`The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was
`called to order by the Honorable JEFF
`MERKLEY, a Senator from the State of
`Oregon.
`
`PRAYER
`The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of-
`fered the following prayer:
`Let us pray.
`Almighty God, whose word has
`taught us to pray without ceasing,
`guide us to pray according to Your
`will. May our Senators pray not only
`in challenging times, or to ask for spe-
`cial blessings, but because they love
`You and desire to do Your will. Remind
`them that our Nation was born in the
`spirit of prayer and that the interces-
`sion of righteous people has helped
`America survive and prosper. Use their
`vibrant prayer life to make them kind
`but firm, compassionate but resolute,
`loyal but independent. May Your grace
`be sufficient for all their needs.
`We pray in Your loving Name. Amen.
`
`f
`
`PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
`The Honorable JEFF MERKLEY led the
`Pledge of Allegiance, as follows:
`I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the
`United States of America, and to the Repub-
`lic for which it stands, one nation under God,
`indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
`
`f
`
`APPOINTMENT OF ACTING
`PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
`clerk will please read a communication
`to the Senate from the President pro
`tempore (Mr. INOUYE).
`The assistant legislative clerk read
`as follows:
`
`U.S. SENATE,
`PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE,
`Washington, DC, March 8, 2011.
`To the Senate:
`Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3,
`of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby
`appoint the Honorable JEFF MERKLEY, a Sen-
`
`ator from the State of Oregon, to perform
`the duties of the Chair.
`DANIEL K. INOUYE,
`President pro tempore.
`Mr. MERKLEY thereupon assumed
`the chair as Acting President pro tem-
`pore.
`
`f
`RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME
`The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-
`pore. Under the previous order, the
`leadership time is reserved.
`
`f
`MORNING BUSINESS
`The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem-
`pore. Under the previous order, the
`Senate will be in a period of morning
`business for 2 hours, with Senators per-
`mitted to speak therein for up to 10
`minutes each, with the time divided or
`controlled between the two leaders or
`their designees, with the minority con-
`trolling the first hour and the majority
`controlling the next hour, with 30 min-
`utes under the control of the Senator
`from Massachusetts.
`The Senator from Wyoming is recog-
`nized.
`
`f
`GASOLINE PRICES
`Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I
`come to the floor of the Senate to dis-
`cuss an issue that is critically facing
`the American people: It is the price of
`gasoline at the pump. It is something
`that, in my opinion, will impact our
`economy, impact the economic recov-
`ery we are all hoping will continue in
`this country. But with every penny the
`cost of gasoline goes up, it has been es-
`timated it takes about a billion dollars
`away from the amount of money that
`can be spent on other things in this
`country and to growing the economy.
`We are at a point where the Amer-
`ican people, who have to balance their
`budgets every year—and States have to
`do it, of course. Washington doesn’t do
`that, but the American people do. They
`
`have to focus on their pocketbooks.
`When they are going to fill up with gas
`at the pump and are noticing that they
`are approaching a point where it is
`going to be $100 to get a fill-up, they
`worry about the impact on the quality
`of their life, their ability to put food on
`the table for their children, and cloth-
`ing on their children, and even have
`the money to get back and forth to
`work—those fortunate enough to have
`jobs.
`One can say: Well, is it really a prob-
`lem? I believe it is. I filled up yester-
`day morning in Casper. A young man
`in front of me at the filling station was
`filling up his pickup truck. He was
`watching the numbers go up and up. I
`filled up a week ago in Wyoming as
`well. We use a lot of gasoline in Wyo-
`ming. We travel long distances. I was
`filling up in the evening. I put my cred-
`it card in, and it stopped at $75 because
`apparently they have to reset these
`pumps. One would think that with $75
`one would have enough money to fill
`up. But not as these gas prices con-
`tinue to rise.
`My concern is that so much of this
`money is being sent overseas to people
`who are trying to blow us up. We have
`an opportunity to be much more secure
`in our energy resources by developing
`our energy resources at home. It just
`seems that this administration’s poli-
`cies are making it that much harder.
`One may say: How high can gasoline
`prices go? With the unrest in the Mid-
`dle East, a front-page story a few days
`ago in USA TODAY said: ‘‘If unrest
`spreads, gas may hit $5 a gallon’’—$5 a
`gallon by summer.
`We need to do some things in this
`country that this administration has
`continued to block. We need to find
`more of our own energy, be reliant
`more on ourselves and less on foreign
`sources of energy. That means doing
`three things: exploring offshore, ex-
`ploring on Federal land, and exploring
`in Alaska. We know there are huge re-
`serves of oil, of energy in those loca-
`tions. Yet day by day those efforts are
`
`∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor.
`
`S1335
`
`.
`
`VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:36 Mar 08, 2011 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A08MR6.000 S08MRPT1
`
`sroberts on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with SENATE
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`Petition for IPR Review of Patent No. 8,059,015
`Page 1
`
`

`
`S1348
`March 8, 2011
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE
`ture if Senators are willing to sit down
`month—but it must add closer to
`We need to be smart about where we
`are going here. The GDP of our country
`and forge it and make it real. The
`200,000 jobs per month before we can
`is measured by our total expenditures
`President’s fiscal commission made
`say the economy is truly expanding
`of consumption of the American peo-
`very clear that our budget cannot be
`again. Imposing additional government
`ple, it is measured by our investments,
`balanced by cutting spending alone.
`spending cuts before this has happened,
`it is measured by government spending
`The American people deserve a serious
`as House Republicans want, would be
`and investment, and by our exports
`dialogue and adult conversation within
`taking an unnecessary chance with the
`minus our imports. That is the GDP.
`the Congress about our fiscal situation,
`recovery.’’
`That is how you measure GDP. How
`Zandi estimates that the cuts in-
`discretionary spending, entitlements,
`can these folks sit here and say if you
`cluded in the Republican continuing
`and revenues. We need to work to-
`cut the government spending you are
`resolution would lead to 700,000 fewer
`gether in a bipartisan process to de-
`not going to cut the GDP, which is
`jobs by the end of 2012. Federal Reserve
`velop a long-term solution to reduce
`what every major economic analysis
`Chairman Ben Bernanke said last week
`both our current budget deficit and our
`has said?
`that the Republican continuing resolu-
`staggering debt. And, yes, we will need
`So yes, we have to cut waste; yes, we
`tion would reduce growth and cost our
`to reduce Federal spending and make
`have to cut some spending; yes, we
`economy about a couple hundred thou-
`appropriate changes to our entitlement
`have to be responsible. But let us be re-
`sand jobs.
`programs to meet the fiscal challenges
`sponsible in a responsible way, by look-
`Last month, a Goldman Sachs econo-
`facing our country. But everything ev-
`ing at the overall budget and the places
`mist warned that the Republican cuts
`erything—tax reform, spending and en-
`we can reduce, at a tempo that doesn’t
`could reduce economic growth in the
`titlements—needs to be on the table.
`do injury to our ability to invest in
`United States by 1.5 to 2 percentage
`Mr. President, this is one of the mo-
`America’s future, to create the jobs for
`points this year.
`ments the Senate was intended to live
`Additional spending cuts would also
`the future, but nevertheless send the
`up to to provide leadership. To find
`go against the thrust of our economic
`right message to the marketplace and
`common ground. To level with the
`policies. The Federal Reserve is hold-
`to the American people.
`American people and be honest with
`We have done that before. We saw the
`ing short-term interest rates close to
`each other. We will no doubt continue
`longest expansion in America’s history.
`zero and purchasing hundreds of bil-
`to be frustrated and angry from time
`Staring us in the face is the largest
`lions of dollars in long-term Treasury
`to time, but I believe that more often
`economic opportunity of a lifetime.
`bonds, in an effort to hold down long-
`than not, we can rise to the common
`The energy marketplace is a $6 trillion
`term interest rates. The tax cut agree-
`ground of great national purpose. A lot
`market with 6 billion potential users
`ment we made last year is also helping
`of us like to talk about American
`today, rising to about 9 billion over the
`to create jobs and boost our economy.
`exceptionalism. But now we need to get
`next 30 years. But we are not engaged
`It doesn’t raise taxes, includes a 2 per-
`beyond the permanent campaign and
`in that. Two years ago, China produced
`cent payroll tax holiday, extends emer-
`the ideological agenda—and instead do
`5 percent of the world’s solar panels.
`gency unemployment insurance bene-
`the exceptional things that will keep
`Today, they produce 60 percent, and
`fits and allows businesses to expense
`America exceptional for generations to
`the United States doesn’t have one
`their investments this year.
`come.
`The American people deserve better
`company in the top 10 companies of the
`I thank the Chair, and I yield the
`than the approach taken by the House
`world’s solar panel producers. What are
`floor.
`of Representatives that cuts critically
`we
`doing? The
`biggest
`trans-
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen-
`needed research funding, eliminates
`formational market staring the United
`ator from Vermont.
`jobs and reduce economic growth,
`States in the face is the energy mar-
`hurts our competitiveness and could
`ket, and we should be here putting an
`push our economy into a ‘‘double dip’’
`energy policy in place, an education
`recession.
`policy in place, an infrastructure in-
`There is a better way for us to re-
`vestment policy in place, and a re-
`solve our budget problems. Let’s go
`search policy for technology and med-
`back to what worked before and can
`ical that soars, that takes America
`work again if we are willing to bite the
`into the future, creates the jobs we
`bullet. In the early 1990s, our economy
`need for the next generations, and re-
`was faltering because deficits and debt
`duces the deficit in responsible ways,
`were freezing capital. We had to send a
`not in this unbelievable reckless, meat
`signal to the market that we were ca-
`axe, hatchet budget that is being pre-
`pable of being fiscally responsible. We
`sented to us by the House of Represent-
`did just that and as result we saw the
`atives. We need to
`find common
`longest economic expansion in history,
`ground.
`The minority continues to criticize
`created more than 22 million jobs, and
`President Obama about the lack of
`generated unprecedented wealth
`in
`progress in creating jobs. Last month,
`America, with every income bracket
`the economy added 192,000 jobs and the
`rising. But we did it by making tough
`unemployment rate declined from 9
`choices.
`Now is the moment for America to
`percent to 8.9 percent. This is one of
`reach for the brass energy ring—to go
`the best job reports since the recession
`for the Moon here on Earth by building
`began more than 3 years ago. It shows
`our new energy future—and, in doing
`that the economic recovery is begin-
`so, create millions of steady, higher
`ning to gain momentum. However the
`paying jobs at every level of the econ-
`unemployment rate is still too high
`omy. Make no mistake: Jobs that
`and we need both small and big busi-
`produce energy in America are jobs
`nesses to increase jobs if we are going
`that stay in America. The amount of
`to see a meaningful decrease in unem-
`work to be done here is just stunning.
`ployment. The House continuing reso-
`It is the work of many lifetimes. And it
`lution will make that more difficult.
`Republican economist Mark Zandi
`must begin now. This shouldn’t be a
`says that now is not the time to imple-
`partisan issue, but instead of coming
`ment the cuts included in the House
`together to meet the defining test of a
`continuing resolution. In a recent re-
`new energy economy and our future.
`There is a bipartisan consensus just
`port, Zandi said. ‘‘The economy is add-
`waiting to lift our country and our fu-
`ing between 100,000 and 150,000 per
`
`f
`PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2011
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under
`the previous order, the Senate will re-
`sume consideration of S. 23, which the
`clerk will report.
`The assistant legislative clerk read
`as follows:
`A bill (S. 23) to amend title 35, United
`States Code, to provide for patent reform.
`Pending:
`Reid/Ensign amendment No. 143, to include
`public institutions of higher education in
`EPSCOR jurisdictions in the definition of a
`micro entity.
`Reid amendment No. 152 (to Reid amend-
`ment No. 143), to provide an effective date.
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen-
`ator from Vermont.
`Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, American
`ingenuity and innovation have been a
`cornerstone of the American economy
`from the time Thomas Jefferson exam-
`ined the first patent to today. The
`Founders recognized the importance of
`promoting innovation. The Constitu-
`tion explicitly grants Congress the
`
`f
`CONCLUSION OF MORNING
`BUSINESS
`Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I ask
`unanimous consent that all remaining
`morning business time be yielded back.
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`objection, morning business is closed.
`
`VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:36 Mar 08, 2011 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G08MR6.017 S08MRPT1
`
`sroberts on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with SENATE
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`Petition for IPR Review of Patent No. 8,059,015
`Page 2
`
`

`
`S1349
`March 8, 2011
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE
`ent reform this week, Austan Goolsbee,
`power to ‘‘promote the progress of
`KLOBUCHAR, Senator GILLIBRAND, Sen-
`the chair of the President’s Council of
`science and useful arts by securing for
`ator COONS and the other Democratic
`Economic Advisers, illustrated this
`limited times to inventors the exclu-
`cosponsors of the bill when I thank the
`point by noting that when Alexander
`sive rights to their respective discov-
`four senior Republican members of the
`Graham Bell applied for a patent that
`eries.’’
`Judiciary Committee, Senator HATCH,
`The discoveries made by American
`led to the telephone, it was granted in
`Senator GRASSLEY, Senator KYL and
`inventors and research institutions,
`a month. The patent in 1974 that led to
`Senator SESSIONS for working with us.
`commercialized by American compa-
`the cell phone took less than three
`Innovation and economic development
`nies and protected and promoted by
`years. The average time this year for a
`are not uniquely Democrat or Repub-
`American patent laws, have made our
`patent to be processed is almost three
`lican objectives, so we worked together
`years and several thousand take far
`system the envy of the world.
`to find the proper balance for Amer-
`The Senate has before it the America
`longer.
`ica—for our economy, for our inven-
`I want to commend Austan Goolsbee,
`Invents Act. This will keep America in
`tors, for our consumers. It is both a
`the chairman of the Council of Eco-
`its longstanding position at the pin-
`process and a result that should make
`nomic Advisers. His white board pres-
`nacle of innovation. This bill will es-
`us all proud.
`entation this week on the importance
`tablish a more efficient and stream-
`The last time Congress significantly
`of patent reform shows we need to help
`lined patent system that will improve
`updated the patent system was more
`America win global competition and
`patent quality and limit unnecessary
`than a half century ago. In the inter-
`create jobs. The creation of more than
`and counterproductive litigation costs,
`vening decades, our economy has
`220,000 jobs in the private sector last
`while making sure no party’s access to
`changed dramatically. A patent system
`month, the creation of 1.5 million jobs
`court is denied.
`developed in our 1952 economy before
`over the last 12 months, and the unem-
`I was glad to see the overwhelming
`the Internet, before cell phones, before
`ployment rate finally being reduced to
`bipartisan vote in favor of ending de-
`computers, before photocopiers, even
`8.9 percent are all signs that the efforts
`bate and invoking cloture that was
`before the IBM Selectric typewriter,
`we have made over the last two years
`cast yesterday. Yesterday was one of
`needs to be reconsidered in light of 21st
`to stave off the worst recession since
`the rare instances ever in Vermont
`century realities, while staying true to
`the Great Depression are paying off
`where snow impeded us and made it im-
`the consistent constitutional impera-
`and the economic recovery is taking
`possible for us to get back. I am de-
`tive of encouraging innovation and in-
`hold. The almost full percent point
`lighted to be back here for what I hope
`vention.
`drop in the unemployment rate over
`will be the successful conclusion and
`Our patent laws that were the envy
`the last three months is the largest de-
`vote on our legislation.
`of the world in the 20th century des-
`cline in unemployment since 1983. De-
`This is, after all, the product of eight
`perately need to be updated if we are
`spite interruptions of economic activ-
`hearings over the last three Con-
`going to compete effectively and win
`ity in many parts of the country
`gresses, hundreds of meetings, and doz-
`the future. China and the European
`caused by winter weather over the last
`ens of briefings. I again thank Sec-
`Union are improving their patent laws.
`months and days, despite the extraor-
`retary Locke and PTO Director Kappos
`We can’t remain complacent. If we are
`dinary rise in oil prices, the Dow Jones
`for their involvement, their wise coun-
`going to win the global competition by
`industrial average has climbed back to
`sel and their support.
`out-innovating the rest of the world,
`Last Congress, I introduced the Pat-
`over 12,000 from a low point of 6,500.
`we need a patent system that works in
`ent Reform Act of 2009 as a precursor
`Passage of the America Invents Act
`the 21st century.
`to the America Invents Act today,
`should help bolster our economic re-
`The array of voices heard in this de-
`along with Senator HATCH and others,
`covery and keep us on the right path
`bate represent virtually all sectors of
`and our bill was the subject of consid-
`toward business development and job
`our economy, all interests in the pat-
`eration and amendments over several
`creation.
`ent system. They have not been uni-
`According to an article in the New
`thoughtful sessions of markups in the
`form, as expected, but they know the
`York Times just a couple of weeks ago,
`Senate Judiciary Committee in March
`legislative process is one of com-
`patent applications last year amounted
`and April of 2009. At that time, Senator
`promise and accommodation where
`to 2,000 a day. There are currently 1.2
`KYL asked that I convene a meeting
`possible, and it has been that way dur-
`million patent applications in the pipe-
`with the Director of the Patent and
`ing the 6 years we have been at work
`line. Among them could be the next
`Trademark Office to discuss whether
`on this bill. Three major areas of con-
`medical miracle, the next energy
`there were further changes the office
`cern emerge from this discussion. The
`breakthrough, the next leap in com-
`needed in the legislation to improve
`America Invents Act addresses each
`puting ability, or the next killer app.
`the office’s efficiency. We held those
`one of them.
`We should be doing all we can to help
`discussions, and we held countless
`First, there is significant concern
`the PTO Director. It makes no sense
`other meetings and briefings with in-
`about delays in the patent application
`that it takes 2 years for an inventor to
`terested parties in an effort to improve
`process. The Patent and Trademark Of-
`get an initial ruling on his or her pat-
`the legislation, again on a bipartisan
`fice, PTO, currently has a backlog of
`ent application and another year or
`basis. Bruce Cohen in my office, Aaron
`more than 700,000 unexamined patent
`more to receive a patent, this during a
`Cooper, Ed Pagano and others, had
`applications. There are several reasons
`time when technology changes some-
`meeting after meeting just as prede-
`for this, not the least of which is the
`times by the hour, to say nothing by
`cessors of theirs had. In short, we spent
`PTO is overwhelmed with patent appli-
`the year and the 2 year and 3 year. As
`a whole lot of time making sure this
`cations and doesn’t have the resources
`the New York Times reporter Edward
`was done right and we did it in a bipar-
`necessary to work through that back-
`Wyatt notes: ‘‘The delays and ineffi-
`tisan manner. Bolstering the American
`log.
`ciencies are more than a nuisance for
`economic recovery and strengthening
`The Director of the PTO often says
`inventors . . . . [P]atent delays cost
`our efforts
`in global competition
`the next great invention that may
`jobs, slow the economy and threaten
`should not be matters of partisanship
`drive our economic growth may be
`the ability of American companies to
`or political advantage.
`waiting on the shelf, waiting to be
`The process of discussions, debates
`compete with foreign businesses.’’
`granted. Some estimate that each
`Second, there is a concern about the
`and deliberation has resulted in legis-
`issued patent represents three to 10
`quality of patents that have issued.
`lation that is going to be a much-need-
`jobs. We can ill-afford to keep so many
`Just as high quality patents are the
`ed boon to our economy. It is also a
`job-creating patents backlogged at the
`key to innovation, low quality patents
`model for our legislative process. It
`PTO. The America Invents Act author-
`are a drag on the economy because
`shows what you can do when you set
`izes the PTO to set its fees and ensures
`they provide monopoly rents over prod-
`aside partisan rhetoric and instead ne-
`that the PTO will have access to those
`ucts or processes that were not inven-
`gotiate and collaborate together in
`fees. We want the PTO to work through
`tive.
`good faith.
`its backlog and be current. In his white
`Patent examiners are facing a dif-
`I know I speak for Senator KOHL,
`ficult task given the explosion in the
`board presentation on the need for pat-
`Senator
`WHITEHOUSE,
`Senator
`
`VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:36 Mar 08, 2011 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G08MR6.018 S08MRPT1
`
`sroberts on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with SENATE
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`Petition for IPR Review of Patent No. 8,059,015
`Page 3
`
`

`
`S1350
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE
`number of applications and the increas-
`Fortunately, the courts have made
`ing complexity of those applications.
`great strides in addressing this issue,
`When Congress last overhauled the pat-
`and there is general consensus that leg-
`ent system in 1952, the PTO received
`islation need not and, in fact, should
`approximately 60,000 patent applica-
`not affect the law of damages as a re-
`tions; in 2009, it received more than
`sult.
`480,000.
`The Senate has before it bipartisan
`The America Invents Act will im-
`legislation that can lead to long-need-
`prove the quality of patents issued by
`ed improvements in our patent laws
`the PTO in several ways. At the outset,
`and system. This is a measure that can
`our legislation makes the common-
`help facilitate invention, innovation
`sense change that third parties who see
`and job creation, and do so in the pri-
`a patent application and know that it
`vate sector. This can help everyone
`is not novel and nonobvious, can assist
`from startups and small businesses to
`the PTO examiners by providing rel-
`our largest, cutting edge companies.
`evant information and explaining its
`The America Invents Act promotes
`relevance.
`innovation, and will improve our econ-
`The bill will also create a new post-
`omy, by addressing the impediments to
`grant review process for patents that
`innovation. As the President chal-
`recently issued to improve the quality
`lenges Americans to win the future,
`of patents in the system, as rec-
`Congress cannot afford to sit idly by
`ommended by the National Academy of
`while innovation—the engine of our
`Sciences, and it will streamline the
`economy—is impeded by outdated laws.
`current ‘‘inter partes’’ system so that
`Our legislation leverages the ingenuity
`it will be a more efficient alternative
`of our businesses, our universities, and
`to litigation.
`our independent inventors, and creates
`The third concern is that as business
`a system in which that ingenuity can
`competition has gone global, and pat-
`improve our economy. It will create
`ent applicants are increasingly filing
`jobs, improve products and reduce
`applications in the United States and
`costs for American companies and
`other countries for protection of their
`American consumers.
`inventions, our system puts American
`I began working on patent reform
`inventors and businesses at a disadvan-
`years ago, along with Chairman SMITH
`tage. The filing system in the United
`in the House, because of my belief that
`States differs from that in other pat-
`we needed a more efficient and stream-
`ent-issuing jurisdictions, which have
`lined system. For many years, patent
`‘‘first-inventor-to-file’’ systems. The
`law interested only a niche audience,
`difference causes confusion and ineffi-
`and developments were reported only
`ciencies for American companies and
`in trade publications. Now they are dis-
`innovators. The inefficiencies exist
`cussed everywhere from the front page
`both in the application process and in
`of the Wall Street Journal to the New
`determining what counts as ‘‘prior art’’
`York Times, and all three branches of
`in litigation. I ask unanimous consent
`government have taken an active role.
`to have printed in the RECORD an edi-
`The America Invents Act is about
`torial from today’s New York Times,
`economic development. It is about
`which calls the transition to first-in-
`jobs; it is about innovation; it is about
`ventor-to-file ‘‘simpler and cheaper’’
`consumers. All benefit under a patent
`and says it ‘‘should benefit the little
`system that reduces unnecessary costs,
`guy.’’
`removes inefficiencies, and holds true
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`to the vision of our Founders that Con-
`objection, it is so ordered.
`gress should establish a national policy
`(See exhibit 1.)
`that promotes the progress of science
`Mr. LEAHY. The America Invents
`and the useful arts.
`Act transitions to a first-inventor-to-
`When Thomas Jefferson examined
`file process, as recommended by the ad-
`that first patent in 1790—a patent that
`ministration, while retaining the im-
`went to a Vermonter—no one could
`portant grace period that will protect
`have predicted how the American econ-
`universities and small inventors, in
`omy would develop and what changes
`particular. We debated this change at
`would be needed for the law to keep
`some length in connection with the
`pace, but the purpose then remains the
`Feinstein amendment. That amend-
`purpose today: promoting progress.
`ment was rejected by the Senate by a
`If we are to maintain our position at
`vote of 87 to 13. The Senate has come
`the forefront of the world’s economy, if
`down firmly and decisively in favor of
`we are to continue to lead the globe in
`modernizing and harmonizing
`the
`innovation and production, if we are to
`American patent system with the rest
`continue to enjoy the fruits of the
`of the world.
`most creative citizens, then we must
`When we began the patent reform de-
`have a patent system that produces
`bate 6 years ago, there was also a sig-
`high quality patents, that limits coun-
`nificant concern that the costs and un-
`terproductive litigation over those pat-
`certainty associated with patent litiga-
`ents, and that makes the entire system
`tion had been escalating, which was re-
`more streamlined and efficient.
`sulting in a drag on innovation. Dam-
`Now is the time to bolster our role as
`age awards had been inconsistent and
`the world leader in innovation. Now is
`not always related to the value of the
`the time to create jobs at home. Now is
`invention. This disconnect and uncer-
`the time for Congress to act on patent
`tainty was a problem that also led to
`reform. I urge all Senators to support
`unreasonable posturing during licens-
`ing negotiations.
`the American Invents Act.
`
`March 8, 2011
`EXHIBIT 1
`[From the New York Times, Mar. 7, 2011]
`PATENTS, REFORM AND THE LITTLE GUY
`In the last decade, Congress has missed
`several chances to reform a patent system
`that is slow, costly and puts the United
`States at odds with the rest of the industrial
`world. On Wednesday, the Senate has an-
`other opportunity to reform the nation’s
`patent law.
`The America Invents Act offers a step to-
`ward a more effective and transparent patent
`protection system. This should encourage in-
`vestment in inventions and faster diffusion
`of ideas. The bill, which has broad bipartisan
`support, would boost the patent office’s re-
`sources by letting it keep all the fees it col-
`lects. This would enable it to speed up the
`review of patent applications—which cur-
`rently takes almost three years to process—
`and work through an immense backlog of
`715,000 applications.
`The bill should reduce costly litigation by
`creating an in-house system to look into
`claims of patent infringement before they go
`to court.
`The bill would also replace the first-to-in-
`vent standard prevailing in the United
`States—which grants formal protection to
`the creator of an innovation—with the first-
`inventor-to-file system used in most nations.
`This change would make it cheaper for
`American patent holders to get patent pro-
`tection around the world. But it has been
`met with vocal opposition from some groups
`of small businesses and inventors who claim
`the change would benefit big corporations at
`their expense.
`We disagree. The new law would make the
`process simpler and cheaper. That should
`benefit the little guy.
`Small inventors who needed time and
`money to fully develop and test their ideas
`could request a provisional patent until they
`were ready for a full filing. It costs $110. And
`because it is easy to determine who filed a
`patent first, the new system would better
`protect small inventors from challenges by
`corporations with deep pockets, reducing the
`chance of costly litigation.
`Right now, proving who invented some-
`thing first is difficult and expensive. Accord-
`ing to the patent office, it costs $400,000 to
`$500,000 to challenge a patent on the grounds
`of a prior invention. Most small inventors
`don’t have that kind of money. Big corpora-
`tions do.
`In fact, the current system mostly protects
`whoever files first for a patent. Of the last
`three million applications filed, only 113
`were granted to entities who filed second but
`proved they had invented first. In 88 of these
`cases, the winners were large corporations.
`The patent system is too cumbersome, and
`it doesn’t protect the small inventor. The
`America Invents Act is a smart reform.
`Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I suggest
`the absence of a quorum.
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
`clerk will call the roll.
`The assistant legislative clerk pro-
`ceeded to call the roll.
`Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, I ask
`unanimous consent the order for the
`quorum call be rescinded.
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`objection, it is so ordered.
`THE BUDGET
`Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, I rise
`today to add my voice to the debate
`that has been going on in the Chamber
`about spending proposals and how we
`get through the balance of this current
`fiscal year and ensure that we do not
`
`VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:36 Mar 08, 2011 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G08MR6.019 S08MRPT1
`
`sroberts on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with SENATE
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit 2012
`Petition for IPR Review of Patent No. 8,059,015
`Page 4
`
`

`
`S1351
`Marc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket