throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 9
`Entered: December 8, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CHEN-JEAN CHOU,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-01268
`Patent 7,612,843 B2
`
`
`Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, BRYAN F. MOORE, and
`PATRICK R. SCANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Termination of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01268
`Patent 7,612,843 B2
`
`
`
`On November 18, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate
`Proceeding Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 (Paper 6) and a Joint Request to File
`Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317 (Paper 7). The Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding is accompanied
`by a copy of a settlement agreement styled “Term Sheet” and filed as Exhibit
`1010. The parties represent that the Term Sheet is a true and correct copy of
`their agreement. Paper 6, 2. The Board retroactively authorized the filing of
`these papers via e-mail on November 21, 2014.
`The Board authorized, via e-mail, the parties to file a license agreement,
`which the parties were contemplating executing, on November 28, 2014. On
`December 2, 2014, the parties filed a copy of their Confidential Settlement
`and License Agreement (Ex. 1011) and a Joint Request to File Settlement
`Agreement as Business Confidential Information under 35 U.S.C. § 317
`(Paper 8).
`The instant proceeding is still in the preliminary proceeding stage.
`Patent Owner has not yet filed a preliminary response, and we have not yet
`determined whether to institute an inter partes review. The parties indicate
`that they have settled their dispute and have reached agreement to terminate
`this inter partes review. Paper 6, 1–2. We have reviewed Exhibits 1010 and
`1011 and determine that, under the present circumstances, it is appropriate to
`enter judgment1 and terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written
`decision under 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`
`
`1 A judgment means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination of
`a proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.2.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01268
`Patent 7,612,843 B2
`
`
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate the proceeding is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated; and
`FURTHER ORDERED the joint requests that the Term Sheet (Ex.
`1010) and the Confidential Settlement and License Agreement (Ex. 1011) be
`treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the file
`of the involved patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c) are granted.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01268
`Patent 7,612,843 B2
`
`
`PETITIONERS:
`
`Lewis Popovski
`Paul Qualey
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`lpopovski@kenyon.com
`pqualey@kenyon.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Mark W. Handley
`HANDLEY LAW FIRM, PLLC
`docket@iplaw.pro
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket