throbber

`
`434821US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`———————————
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`———————————
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC.
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________
`
`Case IPR2014-01252
`
`Patent No. 5,930,444
`
`_________________
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.123
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01252
`Motion for Supplemental Information
`
`
`
` Petitioner, Unified Patents Inc. (“Unified”), hereby requests permission to
`
`submit supplemental information in IPR2014-01252 pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.123(a). Petitioner’s authorization to file this unopposed motion was given by
`
`the Board via email on March 10, 2015.
`
`I.
`
`Unified’s Motion Complies With the Rules
`
`Unified submits that the present motion complies with the requirements of
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.123(a), which requires that (1) the “request for the authorization to
`
`file a motion to submit supplemental information is made within one month of the
`
`date the trial is instituted,” and (2) the “supplemental information must be relevant
`
`to a claim for which the trial has been instituted.”
`
`Here, the Board instituted the above-identified inter partes review (“IPR”)
`
`on February 12, 2015. Unified requested the Board’s authorization to file this
`
`motion on March 3, 2015, and this motion is being filed within one month of the
`
`date trial was instituted.
`
`In its institution decision, the Board found that Unified had demonstrated a
`
`reasonable likelihood that it would prevail on its challenge of claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10,
`
`13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,930,444 (“the ’444 patent”) as obvious in view of
`
`PCT Publication WO 89/12896 (“Ulmer,” Ex. 1002) and U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,241,428 (“Goldwasser,” Ex. 1003). As Unified now seeks to supplement Ex.
`
`1002, the supplemental information is relevant to claims for which trial has been
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01252
`Motion for Supplemental Information
`
`instituted.
`
`II. The Requested Supplemental Information
`
`The present IPR refers to and relies on Ex. 1002 for rendering unpatentable
`
`claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 13, and 14 of the ’444 patent. Exhibit 1002 contains the
`
`original French language version of Ulmer as well as an English translation of
`
`Ulmer. Page 11 of Exhibit 1002 also includes a certification of the translation of
`
`the French language version of Ulmer to English. Unified, however, recently
`
`noticed that this translation certification did not include some of the formalities of
`
`a declaration, as required under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68. Specifically, the certification did
`
`not contain a statement that the declarant was warned that “willful false statements
`
`and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both” under 18 U.S.C. §
`
`1001.
`
`To comply with the literal requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 1.68, Unified
`
`presents the attached Ex. 1018 with an updated translation certificate to
`
`supplement and replace Ex. 1002. No other changes to Ex. 1002 are made. In
`
`other words, Ex. 1018 does not change the translation provided in Exhibit 1002
`
`and does not affect the grounds of unpatentability authorized in this proceeding in
`
`any way. See Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co., Ltd. v. DSS Tec. Mgmt., Inc.,
`
`IPR2014-01030, Paper 11 at 3 (Feb. 3, 2015) (granting a motion to submit a
`
`supplemental affidavit for a translation because the supplemental information did
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01252
`Motion for Supplemental Information
`
`not change the grounds of unpatentability or the evidence initially presented in the
`
`petition).
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`This motion for supplemental information (1) was filed within one month of
`
`institution, (2) is relevant to claims for which trial has been instituted, (3) does not
`
`change the evidence presented by Unified in its Petition, and (4) does not change
`
`the grounds of unpatentability. Accordingly, Unified respectfully requests that this
`
`Board grant Unified’s motion to supplement and replace Exhibit 1002 with Exhibit
`
`1018.
`
`
`
`Dated: March 12, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`OBLON LLP
`
`/Michael L. Kiklis/
`Michael L. Kiklis
`Reg. No. 38,939
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a true copy of the foregoing UNOPPOSED
`
`MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 37
`
`C.F.R. §42.123 AND EXHIBIT 1018 were served on counsel for the Patent
`
`Owner, on this 12th
` day of March, by sending same via e-mail, to:
`
`Jason Angell
`FREITAS ANGELL & WEINBERG LLP
`350 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`DragonIPR@fawlaw.com
`jangell@fawlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Michael L. Kiklis/
`By:
`Michael L. Kiklis
`OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER &
`NEUSTADT, L.L.P.
`1940 Duke Street
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`703-413-3000
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 12, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket