`
`434821US
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`———————————
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`———————————
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC.
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________
`
`Case IPR2014-01252
`
`Patent No. 5,930,444
`
`_________________
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.123
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01252
`Motion for Supplemental Information
`
`
`
` Petitioner, Unified Patents Inc. (“Unified”), hereby requests permission to
`
`submit supplemental information in IPR2014-01252 pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.123(a). Petitioner’s authorization to file this unopposed motion was given by
`
`the Board via email on March 10, 2015.
`
`I.
`
`Unified’s Motion Complies With the Rules
`
`Unified submits that the present motion complies with the requirements of
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.123(a), which requires that (1) the “request for the authorization to
`
`file a motion to submit supplemental information is made within one month of the
`
`date the trial is instituted,” and (2) the “supplemental information must be relevant
`
`to a claim for which the trial has been instituted.”
`
`Here, the Board instituted the above-identified inter partes review (“IPR”)
`
`on February 12, 2015. Unified requested the Board’s authorization to file this
`
`motion on March 3, 2015, and this motion is being filed within one month of the
`
`date trial was instituted.
`
`In its institution decision, the Board found that Unified had demonstrated a
`
`reasonable likelihood that it would prevail on its challenge of claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10,
`
`13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,930,444 (“the ’444 patent”) as obvious in view of
`
`PCT Publication WO 89/12896 (“Ulmer,” Ex. 1002) and U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,241,428 (“Goldwasser,” Ex. 1003). As Unified now seeks to supplement Ex.
`
`1002, the supplemental information is relevant to claims for which trial has been
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01252
`Motion for Supplemental Information
`
`instituted.
`
`II. The Requested Supplemental Information
`
`The present IPR refers to and relies on Ex. 1002 for rendering unpatentable
`
`claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 13, and 14 of the ’444 patent. Exhibit 1002 contains the
`
`original French language version of Ulmer as well as an English translation of
`
`Ulmer. Page 11 of Exhibit 1002 also includes a certification of the translation of
`
`the French language version of Ulmer to English. Unified, however, recently
`
`noticed that this translation certification did not include some of the formalities of
`
`a declaration, as required under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68. Specifically, the certification did
`
`not contain a statement that the declarant was warned that “willful false statements
`
`and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both” under 18 U.S.C. §
`
`1001.
`
`To comply with the literal requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 1.68, Unified
`
`presents the attached Ex. 1018 with an updated translation certificate to
`
`supplement and replace Ex. 1002. No other changes to Ex. 1002 are made. In
`
`other words, Ex. 1018 does not change the translation provided in Exhibit 1002
`
`and does not affect the grounds of unpatentability authorized in this proceeding in
`
`any way. See Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co., Ltd. v. DSS Tec. Mgmt., Inc.,
`
`IPR2014-01030, Paper 11 at 3 (Feb. 3, 2015) (granting a motion to submit a
`
`supplemental affidavit for a translation because the supplemental information did
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01252
`Motion for Supplemental Information
`
`not change the grounds of unpatentability or the evidence initially presented in the
`
`petition).
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`This motion for supplemental information (1) was filed within one month of
`
`institution, (2) is relevant to claims for which trial has been instituted, (3) does not
`
`change the evidence presented by Unified in its Petition, and (4) does not change
`
`the grounds of unpatentability. Accordingly, Unified respectfully requests that this
`
`Board grant Unified’s motion to supplement and replace Exhibit 1002 with Exhibit
`
`1018.
`
`
`
`Dated: March 12, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`OBLON LLP
`
`/Michael L. Kiklis/
`Michael L. Kiklis
`Reg. No. 38,939
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a true copy of the foregoing UNOPPOSED
`
`MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 37
`
`C.F.R. §42.123 AND EXHIBIT 1018 were served on counsel for the Patent
`
`Owner, on this 12th
` day of March, by sending same via e-mail, to:
`
`Jason Angell
`FREITAS ANGELL & WEINBERG LLP
`350 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`DragonIPR@fawlaw.com
`jangell@fawlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Michael L. Kiklis/
`By:
`Michael L. Kiklis
`OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER &
`NEUSTADT, L.L.P.
`1940 Duke Street
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`703-413-3000
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 12, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`