throbber
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM
`Ericsson, Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Patent Owner
`
`IPR2014-01195
`U.S. Patent No. 7,787,431
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Before Jameson Lee, Justin Busch and J. John Lee,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`

`
`Grounds for Institution
`
` Ground #1: Claims 1 and 2 for
`obviousness over the combination of Li,
`Yamaura, Zhuang, and Beta/UTRA
`
` Ground #2: Claims 1 and 2 for
`obviousness over the combination of Li,
`Yamaura, Mody, Nobilet, Popovic, and
`Beta/UTRA
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`2
`
`(Institution Decision at 18)
`
`

`
`Independent Claim 1 of the ‘431 Patent
`
`In a variable bandwidth wireless communication system communicating under multiple different communication
`schemes that each have a different bandwidth, a process performed by a base station of generating an
`information bearing signal for wireless transmission, the process comprising:
`utilizing by the base station a number of subcarriers to construct a variable bandwidth wireless channel;
`utilizing by the base station groups of subcarriers, wherein each group includes a plurality of subcarriers;
`maintaining a fixed spacing between adjacent subcarriers;
`adding or subtracting, by the base station, groups of subcarriers to scale the variable bandwidth wireless
`channel and achieve an operating channel bandwidth; and
`wherein a core-band, including a plurality of subcarrier groups, substantially centered at an operating center
`frequency of the different communication schemes, is utilized by the base station as a broadcast channel
`carrying radio control and operation signalling, where the core-band is substantially not wider than a smallest
`possible operating channel bandwidth of the system; and
`wherein the information bearing signal has a primary preamble sufficient for basic radio operation and
`wherein: the primary preamble is a direct sequence in the time domain with a frequency content confined
`within the core-band, or is an orthogonal frequency-divisional multiplexing (OFDM) symbol corresponding to a
`particular frequency pattern within the core-band; and
`wherein properties of the primary preamble comprise:
`an autocorrelation having a large correlation peak with respect to sidelobes;
`a cross-correlation with other primary preambles having a small cross-correlation coefficient with respect to
`power of other primary preambles; and
`a small peak-to-average ratio; and
`wherein a large number of primary preamble sequences exhibit the properties.
`IPR2014-01195
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent
`
`3
`
`

`
`Dependent Claim 2 of the ‘431 Patent
`
`The process of claim 1, wherein the information bearing signal is:
`an orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) signal; and is
`utilized in a downlink with a duplexing technique that is either Time Division Duplexing (TDD) or Frequency
`Division Duplexing (FDD).
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent
`
`4
`
`

`
`Ground #1: Petitioner’s Prior Art Combination for Claim 1
`
`1.0
`
`1.1
`
`1.2
`
`1.3
`
`In a variable bandwidth wireless communication system communicating
`under multiple different communication schemes that each have a
`different bandwidth,
`
`a process performed by a base station of generating an information
`bearing signal for wireless transmission, the process comprising:
`
`utilizing by the base station a number of subcarriers to construct a variable
`bandwidth wireless channel;
`
`utilizing by the base station groups of subcarriers, wherein each group
`includes a plurality of subcarriers;
`
`1.4 maintaining a fixed spacing between adjacent subcarriers;
`
`1.5
`
`adding or subtracting, by the base station, groups of subcarriers to scale
`the variable bandwidth wireless channel and achieve an operating channel
`bandwidth; and
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`5
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 22-23
`
`

`
`Ground #1: Petitioner’s Prior Art Combination for Claim 1
`(cont.)
`
`1.6
`
`including a plurality of subcarrier groups,
`wherein a core-band,
`substantially centered at an operating center frequency of the
`different communication schemes, is utilized by the base station as a
`broadcast channel carrying radio control and operation signalling,
`
`1.7 where the core-band is substantially not wider than a smallest possible
`operating channel bandwidth of the system; and
`
`1.8 wherein the information bearing signal has a primary preamble
`sufficient for basic radio operation and
`
`1.9
`
`wherein: the primary preamble is a direct sequence in the time domain
`with a frequency content confined within the core-band, or is an
`orthogonal
`frequency-divisional multiplexing
`(OFDM)
`symbol
`corresponding to a particular frequency pattern within the core-band;
`and
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`6
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 23
`
`

`
`Ground #1: Petitioner’s Prior Art Combination for Claim 1
`(cont.)
`
`1.10
`
`1.11
`
`wherein properties of the primary preamble comprise:
`an autocorrelation having a large correlation peak with respect to
`sidelobes;
`
`a cross-correlation with other primary preambles having a small cross-
`correlation coefficient with respect
`to power of other primary
`preambles; and
`
`1.12
`
`a small peak-to-average ratio; and
`
`1.13
`
`wherein a large number of primary preamble sequences exhibit the
`properties.
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`7
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 23-24
`
`

`
`Ground #1: Petitioner’s Prior Art Combination for Claim 1
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`8
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 22
`
`

`
`Ground #1: Li, Yamaura, Zhuang & Beta
`Overview
`
` The Prior Art Combinations Do Not Disclose All of the
`Claim Elements of Independent Claim 1
`– “substantially centered at an operating center frequency of the
`different communications schemes”
`– “substantially not wider than a smallest possible operating
`channel bandwidth of the system”
`– “utilized by the base station as a broadcast channel carrying
`radio control and operation signaling”
`– “a primary preamble sufficient for basic radio operation”
` No Reason To Combine All Four References
`– No motivation to combine Li and Yamaura
`– Zhuang renders Li inoperable
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 24-25, 37, 48
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`9
`
`

`
`Missing Claim Elements
`
` “substantially centered at an operating center
`frequency of the different communications
`schemes”
` “substantially not wider than a smallest possible
`operating channel bandwidth of the system”
` “utilized by the base station as a broadcast
`channel carrying radio control and operation
`signaling”
` “a primary preamble sufficient for basic radio
`operation”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`10
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 24-25
`
`

`
`Claim Element 1.6: “substantially centered at an operating center frequency
`of the different communications schemes”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`11
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 22-23
`
`

`
`Dr. Zeger: the “different communication schemes” of claim 1
`“have substantially the same operating center frequency”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶111
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`12
`
`

`
`‘431 Patent, Figure 6
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`13
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent, Fig. 6
`
`

`
`“Yamaura Only Discloses
`One Communication Scheme”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶114
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`14
`
`

`
`Yamaura: “One Transmission Channel”
`
`Ex. 1003, Yamaura patent, 20:54-60
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`15
`
`

`
`Li: “A cluster can contain consecutive or disjoint subcarriers”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`16
`
`Ex. 1002, Li patent, 5:18-23
`
`

`
`Li: “not substantially centered at an
`operating center frequency”
`
`Ex. 1002, Li patent, Figures 1A and 6
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`17
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶113
`
`

`
`Petitioner’s Reply: “Yamaura, Fig. 17 (annotated)”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`18
`
`Ex. 1034, Haas’ Supplemental Declaration, at ¶¶ 24-25
`
`

`
`Claim Element 1.7: “substantially not wider than a smallest possible
`operating channel bandwidth of the system”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`19
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 22-23
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Core-Band”
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`“a frequency segment that is
`not greater than the smallest
`operating channel bandwidth
`among all the possible
`spectral bands with which
`the receiver is designed to
`operate”
`
`Petitioner’s
`Proposed Construction
`“a frequency segment that
`is not greater than the
`smallest operating channel
`bandwidth among all the
`possible spectral bands that
`a receiver is designed to
`operate with”
`
`PTAB’s
`Preliminary Construction
`“a frequency segment that
`is not greater than the
`smallest operating channel
`bandwidth among all the
`possible spectral bands
`with which the receiver is
`designed to operate”
`
`No meaningful dispute over the construction of “core-band.”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`20
`
`Patent Owner Response, p. 11
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Substantially Not Wider”
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`“significantly narrower”
`
`Petitioner’s
`Proposed Construction
`No construction necessary. Or “narrower
`than or equal to in width within a degree of
`accuracy that accounts for process and
`operational tolerances”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`21
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 18
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Substantially Not Wider”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶58
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`22
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Substantially Not Wider”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶59
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`23
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Substantially Not Wider”
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent at 4:37-45
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`24
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Substantially Not Wider”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`25
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent, Fig. 6
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Substantially Not Wider”
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent, 4:63-5:7
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`26
`
`

`
`Petitioner’s Expert, Dr. Haas, agrees that
`“substantially” means “significantly”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`27
`
`Ex. 2004, Haas Deposition at 121:3-122:4
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Substantially Not Wider”
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent at 4:63-5:7
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`28
`
`

`
`File History of the ‘431 Patent
`
`Ex. 1010, File History of the ‘431 patent, p. 160
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`29
`
`

`
`Dr. Zeger: “100 kHz is not ‘substantially not wider’ than 100 kHz”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶121-122
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`30
`
`

`
`Claim Element 1.6: “utilized by the base station as a broadcast
`channel carrying radio control and operation signaling”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`31
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 23
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Radio Control And Operation Signaling”
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`“radio control signals and radio operation
`signals”
`
`Petitioner’s
`Proposed Construction
`“control signaling that affects the operation
`of a receiver”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`32
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 16; Petitioner’s Reply at p. 8
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Radio Control and Operation Signaling”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶52
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`33
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Radio Control and Operation Signaling”
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent at 4:63-5:7
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`34
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Radio Control and Operation Signaling”
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent, 5:8-18
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`35
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Radio Control and Operation Signaling”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`36
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶54
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Radio Control and Operation Signaling”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶55
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`37
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Radio Control and Operation Signaling”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`38
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶56
`
`

`
`Yamaura Discloses Calling Signals
`
`Ex. 1003, Yamaura patent, 24:6-14
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`39
`
`

`
`Yamaura Discloses Control Signaling
`
`Ex. 1012, Haas Declaration at pp. 87, 89
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`40
`
`

`
`Yamaura Patent, Figure 17 (annotated by Petitioner)
`
`Ex. 1012, Haas Declaration at p. 59
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`41
`
`

`
`Claim Element 1.6: “utilized by the base station as a broadcast
`channel carrying radio control and operation signaling”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶128
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`42
`
`

`
`Claim Element 1.6: “utilized by the base station as a broadcast
`channel carrying radio control and operation signaling”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶129
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`43
`
`

`
`Claim Element 1.8: “a primary preamble sufficient for
`basic radio operation”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`44
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 23
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Sufficient for Basic Radio Operation”
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`“including radio control channels and data
`channels sufficient for the mobile station to
`operate at a primary state”
`
`Petitioner’s
`Proposed Construction
`“[a primary preamble] containing
`information to establish radio operation”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`45
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 20; Petitioner’s Reply at p. 11
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Sufficient for Basic Radio Operation”
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶64
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`46
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Sufficient for Basic Radio Operation”
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent at 5:8-18
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`47
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Sufficient for Basic Radio Operation”
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent at 5:8-18
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`48
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Sufficient for Basic Radio Operation”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`49
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent, 5:19-36
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Primary Preamble”
`
`Patent Owner’s Current
`Proposed Construction
`“a signal transmitted by the
`base station near the
`beginning of each frame and
`occupying only the core-
`band”
`
`Petitioner’s Proposed
`Construction
`“a signal transmitted near the
`beginning of a transmission,
`such as a frame of time slot,
`and occupying only the core-
`band”
`
`Board’s Preliminary
`Construction
`“a direct sequence in the time
`domain with its frequency
`response confined within the
`CB or an OFDM symbol
`corresponding to a particular
`pattern in the frequency
`domain within the CB, at or
`near the beginning of the
`transmission, which alone is
`sufficient for basic radio
`operation.”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`50
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 11
`
`

`
`Claim Construction: “Primary Preamble”
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`51
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘431 patent, Fig. 8
`
`

`
`No Motivation To Combine Li, Yamaura, Zhuang, and Beta
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`52
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 50
`
`

`
`No Motivation To Combine Li and Yamaura
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`53
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶138
`
`

`
`No Motivation To Combine Li and Yamaura
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`54
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶135
`
`

`
`Li Abstract
`
`Ex. 1002, Li patent, Abstract
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`55
`
`

`
`Li Discloses Control Signals
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`56
`
`Ex. 1002, Li patent, 3:54-64
`
`

`
`Li: Base Station Notifies Subscriber About Cluster
`Allocation Through Downlink Control Channel
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`57
`
`Ex. 1002, Li patent, 6:30-36
`
`

`
`No Motivation To Combine Li and Yamaura
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`58
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶139
`
`

`
`Li’s Pilot Signals
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`59
`
`Ex. 1002, Li patent, 12:44-56
`
`

`
`Zhuang’s Chirp Sequences
`
`Ex. 1012, Haas Declaration at p. 67
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`60
`
`

`
`No Motivation to Combine Li and Zhuang
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`61
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶154
`
`

`
`No Motivation to Combine Li and Zhuang
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`62
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶155
`
`

`
`Zhuang Destroys Li’s Functionality
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`63
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶156
`
`

`
`Zhuang Renders Li Inoperable
`
`Ex. 2001, Zeger Declaration at ¶157
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`64
`
`

`
`Ground #1: Li, Yamaura, Zhuang & Beta
`Conclusion: Petitioner Failed to Establish Unpatentability
`
` The Prior Art Combinations Do Not Disclose All of the
`Claim Elements of Independent Claim 1
` “substantially centered at an operating center frequency of the
`different communications schemes”
` “substantially not wider than a smallest possible operating
`channel bandwidth of the system”
` “utilized by the base station as a broadcast channel carrying
`radio control and operation signaling”
` “a primary preamble sufficient for basic radio operation”
` No Reason To Combine All Four References
` No motivation to combine Li and Yamaura
` Zhuang renders Li inoperable
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 24-25, 37, 48
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`65
`
`

`
`Ground #2: Petitioner’s Prior Art Combination for Claim 2
`
`1.0
`
`In a variable bandwidth wireless communication system communicating under
`multiple different communication schemes that each have a different
`bandwidth,
`
`1.1 a process performed by a base station of generating an information bearing
`signal for wireless transmission, the process comprising:
`
`1.2 utilizing by the base station a number of subcarriers to construct a variable
`bandwidth wireless channel;
`
`1.3 utilizing by the base station groups of subcarriers, wherein each group includes
`a plurality of subcarriers;
`
`1.4 maintaining a fixed spacing between adjacent subcarriers;
`
`1.5
`
`adding or subtracting, by the base station, groups of subcarriers to scale the
`variable bandwidth wireless channel and achieve an operating channel
`bandwidth; and
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`66
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 52
`
`

`
`Ground #2: Petitioner’s Prior Art Combination for Claim 2
`(cont.)
`
`1.6
`
`wherein a core-band, including a plurality of subcarrier groups, substantially
`centered at an operating center frequency of the different communication
`schemes, is utilized by the base station as a broadcast channel carrying radio
`control and operation signalling,
`
`1.7 where the core-band is substantially not wider than a smallest possible
`operating channel bandwidth of the system; and
`
`1.8 wherein the information bearing signal has a primary preamble sufficient for
`basic radio operation and
`
`1.9
`
`wherein: the primary preamble is a direct sequence in the time domain with a
`frequency content confined within the core-band, or is an orthogonal
`frequency-divisional multiplexing (OFDM) symbol corresponding to a
`particular frequency pattern within the core-band; and
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`67
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 52
`
`

`
`Ground #2: Petitioner’s Prior Art Combination for Claim 2
`(cont.)
`
`1.10
`
`wherein properties of the primary preamble comprise:
`an autocorrelation having a large correlation peak with respect to sidelobes;
`
`1.11 a cross-correlation with other primary preambles having a small cross-
`correlation coefficient with respect to power of other primary preambles; and
`
`1.12 a small peak-to-average ratio; and
`
`1.13 wherein a large number of primary preamble sequences exhibit the properties.
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`68
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 53
`
`

`
`Ground #2: Petitioner’s Prior Art Combination for Claim 2
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`69
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 51
`
`

`
`Ground #2: Li, Yamaura, Mody, Nobilet, Popovich & Beta
`Overview
`
` The Prior Art Combinations Do Not Disclose All of the
`Claim Elements of Independent Claim 1
`– “substantially centered at an operating center frequency of the
`different communications schemes”
`– “substantially not wider than a smallest possible operating
`channel bandwidth of the system”
`– “utilized by the base station as a broadcast channel carrying
`radio control and operation signaling”
`– “a primary preamble sufficient for basic radio operation”
` No Reason To Combine All Six References
`– No motivation to combine Li and Yamaura
`– Mody, Nobilet, and Popovic render Li inoperable
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 53-55
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`70
`
`

`
`Same Missing Claim Elements as Described Above
`
`Petitioner’s arguments about Challenge #4 are generally flawed
`for the same reason as those pertaining to Challenge #2 (except with
`respect to disclosure of properties of a preamble). Thus, for the same
`reasons articulated above in Section V.A.1, the Challenge #4 combination
`of prior art references fails to address at least three claim elements:
`
`(1) “a core-band… substantially centered at an operating
`center frequency of the different communication
`schemes” and “utilized by the base station as a broadcast
`channel carrying radio control and operation signaling”;
`“the core-band is substantially not wider than a smallest possible
`operating channel bandwidth of the system”; and
`“wherein the information bearing signal has a primary preamble
`sufficient for basic radio operation.”
`
`(3)
`
`(2)
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`71
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 53-54
`
`

`
`No Motivation To Combine Li, Yamaura, Mody, Nobilet,
`Popovic, and Beta
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`72
`
`Patent Owner Response at p. 59
`
`

`
`Ground #2: Li, Yamaura, Mody, Nobilet, Popovic & Beta
`Conclusion: Petitioner Failed to Establish Unpatentability
`
` The Prior Art Combinations Do Not Disclose All of the
`Claim Elements of Independent Claim 1
` “substantially centered at an operating center frequency of the
`different communications schemes”
` “substantially not wider than a smallest possible operating
`channel bandwidth of the system”
` “utilized by the base station as a broadcast channel carrying
`radio control and operation signaling”
` “a primary preamble sufficient for basic radio operation”
` No Reason To Combine All Six References
` No motivation to combine Li and Yamaura
` Mody, Nobilet, and Popovic render Li inoperable
`Patent Owner Response at pp. 53-55
`
`IPR2014-01195
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`73

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket