throbber
UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`414
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`0.2
`
`0.18
`
`0.16
`
`0.14
`
`0.12
`
`0.1
`
`0.02
`
`0.08
`
`0.06
`
`0.04
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`
`14
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`Figure 6. Histogram for needed transmissions per hybrid II ARQ packet. Both Q-O-QAM and B-0-
`QAM packet are included.
`
`7. 7.3.3 Macro cell
`
`7.7.3.3.1 Speech
`
`The simulated capacity is 55 kbps/MHz/cell. Then the blocking and dropping is less than 1 % and bad
`quality is less than 1 %. Thus quality requirements are fulfilled with that loading. An user uses in
`average 1.48 slots per frame when it is active. The average fractional cell loading was 72 % in the
`middle cells. The used power dynamics was 10 dB.
`
`With macro cell speech simulations the matrix was 16 time slots x 3 frequencies, which indicates reuse
`1/3. In reality the number of time slots would be 64. Only 16 time slots is used in order to reduce
`simulation time. Thus less diversity is obtained and more blocking happens which leads to that the
`simulated capacity becomes lower than with the full charmel matrix.
`
`7.7.3.3.2 LCD384
`
`The simulated capacity is 113 kbps/MHz/cell. In this simulation 98,1% of all users are satisfied, thus
`quality requirements are fulfilled with this loading. The used modulation is B-O-QAM and available
`link adaptation modes are 6/16, 8/16 and 12/16. With macro cell LCD3 84 simulations the matrix is 16
`time slots x 9 frequencies, which indicates reuse 1/ 1. The average fractional cell loading is ca. 28 % in
`the middle cells. During the simulation, the ratio link adaptation modes (6/ 16, 8/16 and 12/16) were
`11%, 36% and 52%, respectively.
`
`7.7.4 Discussion
`
`System simulation results for WB-TDMA are shown. The used RRM scheme is based on the
`interference averaging principle. In order to study the effects of fast algorithms such as ARQ and
`Frequency hopping, the interface between link and system level results is implemented according to [2].
`
`The results present a lower bound case due to several reasons: downlink results are presented, all the
`possible enhancements by the interference averaging radio resource management algorithms are not
`implemented and network parameter optimization is not completed.
`
`These simulations have been done with FDD assumption. To some extent these results can be
`generalized to show the trends also for the TDD mode. Detailed TDD simulations would be needed to
`evaluate the TDD specific features such as flexibility for resource allocation in up- and downlink and
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 414 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 414 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`415
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`utilization of asymmetric spectrum allocations. Also the link level results for TDD may be enhanced
`due to algorithms that make us of reciprocity of the charmel.
`
`The future improvements to be tested include several things. Among these are interference cancellation,
`antemra diversity, antenna diversity, the application of ARQ to LCD data, better coding schemes (e. g.
`increased constraint length, optimal puncturing and concatenated codes), optimized mapping of user
`data into packets, fast power control and channel allocation to cells.
`
`Future work will include the estimation of signaling overhead and degradation of the obtained capacity
`due to signaling. The estimated signaling load is less than 10 % of the capacity. This load has not been
`subtracted from the presented capacity figures.
`
`The obtained simulation results show high capacity for the WB-TDMA system especially for UDD
`services. Main conclusions are:
`
`0 WB-TDMA with interference averaging is very promising alternative especially for non delay
`sensitive packet services.
`
`0 High capacities can be provided without extensive frequency and network management
`
`0
`
`Since WB-TDMA has hardly any intra cell interference and reuse 1 can be applied, additional inter
`cell interference management and reduction techmques, such as adaptive antennas, joint detection
`and cell planmng can still increase the capacity.
`
`0 For RT services the possible gains of faster quality based power control should be investigated.
`
`7. 8 REFERENCES
`
`[1] UMTS 30.03 v3.0.0 “Selection procedure for the choice of radio technologies of UMTS”, Annex 2
`
`[2] ETSI SMG2 UMTS ad hoc #3 TDoc 73, Rennes, 1997.
`
`[3] ETSI SMG2 Gamma Concept Group, TDoc G18/97, Sollentuna, 1997.
`
`[4] ETSI SMG2 Gamma Concept Group, TDoc /97, Bad Salzderfurth, 1997 .
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 415 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 415 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`416
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`8. High Level Requirements
`This section describes how the W-TDMA concept meets the High Level Requirements for UTRA.
`Boxed text from ETR 04-01 has been included for reference.
`
`Some issues are identified for further study by Gamma Group. Others may be more appropriate for
`consideration by SMG2 during later stages of UMTS standardisation.
`
`8. 1 Bearer capabilities
`
`8.1.] Maximum user bit rate
`
`The UTRA should support a range of maximum user bit rates that depend upon a users current enviromnent as
`follows:
`
`It is desirable that the definition of UTRA should allow evolution to higher bit rates.
`
`Rural Outdoor: at least 144 kbit/s (goal to achieve 384 kbit/s), maximum speed: 500 km/h
`
`Suburban Outdoor: at least 384 kbps (goal to achieve 512 kbit/s), maximum speed: 120 km/h
`
`Indoor/Low range outdoor: at least 2Mbps, maximum speed: 10 km/h
`
`- Rural Outdoor: 144kbps will be available throughout the operator’s service area. The radio interface
`can tolerate the Doppler spread and rapidly changing charmel characteristics associated with high speed
`vehicles (up to at least l500kn1/h with 1/64 slot bursts). The maximum cell size depends on propagation
`conditions, but is comparable with GSM (assuming similar requirements for bearer capabilities and
`quality of service).
`
`- Suburban Outdoor: 384kbps rate will be available with complete coverage of a suburban or urban area
`
`- Indoor/Low range outdoor: 2Mbps will be available indoors and over localised coverage outdoors
`
`The maximum practical bit rate which can be provided depends on factors such as the operating
`environment, required quality of service, traffic loading and proximity of mobile to base station..
`However, the radio interface can support rates up to around lMbps for Rural and Suburban Outdoor,
`and 4Mbps over short ranges.
`
`8.1.1.1 Bearer Service Attributes
`
`i.e. different connection
`The W-TDMA concept can provide bearers with the necessary attributes.
`modes, symmetry, communication configuration, information transfer rate, delay variation, maximum
`transfer delay, maximum bit error rate, error characteristics.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 416 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 416 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`417
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`8.1.2 Flexibility
`
`Negotiation of bearer service attributes (bearer type, bit rate, delay, BER, up/down link symmetry, protection
`including none or unequal protection),
`
`parallel bearer services (service mix), real-time / non-real-time commumcation modes, adaptation of bearer
`service bit rate
`
`Circuit switched and packet oriented bearers
`
`Supports scheduling (and pre-emption) of bearers (including control bearers) according to priority
`
`Adaptivity of link to quality, traffic and network load, and radio conditions (in order to optimise the link in
`different enviromnents).
`
`Bearer services appropriate for speech shall be provided.
`
`Wide range of bit rates should be supported with sufficient granularity
`
`Variable bit rate real time capabilities should be provided.
`
`The W-TDMA concept provides flexibility of bearer service attributes by use of a number of different
`transmission bursts optimised for different bit rates in different radio enviromnents. The Link
`Adaptation mechanism can be used to dynamically maintain the quality of the connection under changes
`in propagation and interference conditions by adjusting transmission fonnat and number of slots
`allocated.
`
`Bit rate granularity is achieved primarily by allocating different numbers of transmission slots, but this
`can be suplemented if necessary by adjusting charmel coding rates.
`
`Parallel bearers can be transmitted independently, or where appropriate by multiplexing together into a
`single charmel.
`
`Circuit switched and packet oriented services are supported efficiently by Real-Time and Non-Real-
`Time bearer concepts.
`
`Variable rate data services are supported by dynamically changing the capacity allocation.
`
`Scheduling of bearers is allowed, but could be the subject of further study by SMG2.
`
`Bearers optimised for speech are available.
`
`The bearer service attributes can be configured as required on imtiation of a service, and changed
`dynamically if required.
`
`8.1.2.1 Minimum bearer capabilities
`
`The following table shows the potential combinations for the most important characterisation attributes
`(based on ETR-04-01).
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 417 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 417 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`418
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`Non Real Time/Variable Delay
`- Real Time/Constant Delay
`Operating
`Peak Bit Rate
`BER/ Max Transfer Peak Bit
`BER / Max Transfer
`environment
`(note 6)
`Delay (note 1)
`Rate
`Delay (note 2)
`
`Rural outdoor
`.
`(terrnlnal
`speed up to
`500 km/h)
`
`Urban/
`Suburban
`outdoor
`
`(Terminal
`speed up to
`120 km/h)
`
`Indoor/ Low
`range outdoor
`(Terminal
`speed up to 10
`km/h)
`
`at least 144
`kbit/s
`
`granlllarity
`l3kb/s (note 3)
`
`at least 384
`kbit/s
`.
`granularity
`74kb/s (note 4)
`
`delay 20 — 300 ms
`.3
`.7
`BER l0 - 10
`
`at least 144
`kbit/s
`
`BER = 10:5 to 10:8
`Max Transfer Delay 150
`ms or more
`
`delay 20 — 300 ms
`BER 10.3 _ 10.7
`
`at least 384
`kbit/s
`
`BER = 10:5 to 10:8
`Max Transfer Delay 150
`ms or more
`
`2 Mbit/s
`gmnulamy
`l50kb/s (note 5)
`
`delay 20 — 300 ms
`BER 10.3 _ 10.7
`
`BER = 10:5 to 10:8
`Max Transfer Delay 150
`ms °r mm
`
`Speech bearers are supported in all operating environments.
`
`Table 1.: Minimum bearer capabilities for UMTS
`
`Note 1:
`
`Note 2:
`
`Note 3:
`
`Note 4:
`
`Note 5:
`
`The rrlimmum achievable transmission delay is less than 20ms. For a given BER
`operation at lower C/I is possible by extending the interleaving depth. The detailed
`performance trade-offs between delay and BER (via choice of modulation, coding
`and interleaving) require further study.
`
`The delivery time for NRT/variable delay bearers depends on factors such as
`operating environment and traffic loading. Delivery times of the order of l50nls
`with BER in the stated range can be provided (using Type II soft combimng
`ARQ).
`
`The indicated granularity is based on BOQAM with a single l/64 slot allocation
`and 1/2 rate coding
`
`The indicated granularity is based on BOQAM with a single l/l6 slot allocation
`and 1/2 rate coding
`
`The indicated granularity is based on QOQAM with a single l/l6 slot allocation
`and 1/2 rate coding
`
`Note 6:
`
`Finer granularity can be provided by variation of charmel coding rate.
`
`8.1.2.2 Service trajfic parameters
`
`Since W-TDMA provides Link Adaptation as a fundamental feature it can support the use of UMTS in
`various enviromnents with a range of traffic densities range and a variety of traffic mixes in an
`economical way.
`
`8.1.2.3 Performance
`
`Details of performance are given elsewhere in this evaluation document:
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 418 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 418 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`419
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`8.1.3 Configuration management
`
`W-TDMA will allow the definition of configuration management features.
`
`8.1.4 Evolution and modularity
`
`The W-TDMA concept is service independent, and is defined so that UMTS can be implemented in
`phases with enhancements for increasing functionality (for example making use of different modulation
`and coding technology). The requirement for backwards compatibility can be met by provision of a
`negotiation mechanism to agree on supported capabilities between mobiles and infrastructure.
`
`The W-TDMA concept is consistent with the requirements of an open modular architecture and
`implementation of software downloading of radio interface features. However these aspects require
`further development within SMG2.
`
`8.1.5 Handover
`
`Provide seamless (to user) handover between cells of one operator.
`
`Efficient handover between UMTS and 2nd generation systems, e. g. GSM, should be possible.
`
`The UTRA should not prevent seamless HO between different operators or access networks.
`
`8. 1. 5. 1 Overall handover requirements
`
`Efficient seamless (mobile assisted) handovers can be provided in networks with synchronised base
`stations and between TDD and FDD systems. Seamless handover between unsynchronised systems, is
`for further study by Gamma Group.
`
`Signalling load from handovers is not expected to be significant but is dependent on scenario, and could
`be the subject of further study by Gamma Group.
`
`The level of security is not be affected by handovers. Security in general is ffor further study in SMG2.
`
`Handover to second generation systems can be supported by use of an idle frame allowing
`measurements of signal strengths from alternative base stations.
`
`The choice of frame structure allows synchronisation of UTRA with GSM sharing the same cell sites
`which simplifies handover in this case.
`
`8.1. 5.2 Handover requirements with respect to the radio operating environments
`The W-TDMA radio interface allows handovers within a network, between different environments and
`between networks run by different operators.
`
`8.2 Operational requirements
`
`8.2.1 Compatibility with services provided by present core networks
`
`ATM bearer services
`
`GSM services
`
`ISDN services
`
`IP (lntemet Protocol) based services
`
`Flexible RT and NRT bearers with a range of bit rates etc., allow current core network services to be
`supported.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 419 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 419 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`420
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`8.2.2 Operating environments
`
`W-TDMA does not restrict the operational scenario for UMTS, in, for example, international operation
`across various radio operating environments, across multiple operators and across different regulatory
`regimes. Further, a range of different MS types (e. g. speech only, high bit rate data), and a variety of
`services with a range of bit rates are possible.
`
`W-TDMA can support fixed wireless access, but performance in this application is for further study in
`SMG2.
`
`8.2.2.1 Support of multiple radio operating environments
`
`W-TDMA can support the requirements of all the specified radio operating environments.
`
`8.2.2.2 Support of multiple equipment vendors
`
`Minimum specification levels to ensure inter-operability are for further study.
`
`8.2.3 Radio Access network planning
`
`If radio resource planning is required automatic planning shall be supported
`
`The Interference Averaging feature means that network planning is not as sensitive as in GSM. Detailed
`planning procedures are for further study in SMG2.
`
`DCA can be used to re-configure the use of assigned frequency blocks in response to changing traffic.
`
`UMTS terminals using W-TDMA will almost certainly incorporate frequency agility capability to
`support frequency hopping. This could facilitate the use over non-overlapping allocations across
`regions or countries (unless other hardware restrictions apply).
`
`8.2.4 Public, Private and residential operators
`
`It shall be possible to guarantee pre-detennined levels of quality-of-service to public UMTS network operators in
`the presence of other authorised UMTS users.
`
`The radio access scheme should be suitable for low cost applications where range, mobility and user speed may be
`limited.
`
`Frequency planning should not be needed.
`
`Multiple unsynchromsed systems should be able to successfully coexist in the same enviromnent.
`
`It should be possible to install basestations without co-ordination.
`
`Low cost terminals with a restricted set of functionality can be implemented. For example, limited bit
`rate, power output or multipath equalisation capability could be appropriate for private cordless
`telephone applications.
`
`8.2.4.1 Public UMTS operators
`
`The ability to guarantee pre-deterinined levels of quality for public operators is likely to require
`separate frequency allocations for each operator. The possibility of public operators sharing part of the
`spectrum is for further study in Gamma Group/SMG2.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 420 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 420 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`421
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`8.2.4.2
`
`Private UMTS operators
`
`The Bunch concept is suitable for Private UMTS operators who may wish to operate clusters of base
`stations within a restricted area. A Bunch can installed without any cell planning or co-ordination with
`other Bunches (by using Interference Averaging), and it is co-ordination is automatically provided
`within a Bunch.
`
`8.2.4.3
`
`Residential UMTS operators
`
`Residential systems can be deployed in the same way as private systems, except that in the limiting case
`there may be only one base and one mobile in the system.
`
`8.3 Ejficient spectrum usage
`
`8.3.1 Spectral Efficiency
`
`High spectrum efficiency for typical mixtures of different bearer services
`
`Spectrum efficiency at least as good as GSM for low bit rate speech
`
`The spectral efficiency is considered in detail elsewhere in this report.
`
`Preliminary results indicate that speech and data services can be provided more efficiently than in
`GSM.
`
`8.3.2 Variable asymmetry of total band usage
`
`Variable division of radio resource between uplink and down link resources from a common pool (NB: This
`
`division could be in either frequency, time, or code domains)
`
`In an unpaired frequency allocation, TDD provides flexibility by adapting the uplink/downlink duty
`cycle. With paired frequency allocation, asymmetric traffic with pure FDD is likely lead to under
`utilisation of one or other of the band pairs. In this case TDD in the under used band would be an
`efficient solution. Detailed performance and consideration of other approaches is for further study in
`Ganuna Group.
`
`8.3.3 Spectrum utilisation
`
`Allow multiple operators to use the band allocated to UMTS without co-ordination.
`
`second generation system's bands
`
`It should be possible to operate the UTRA in any suitable frequency band that becomes available such as first &
`
`Spectrum sharing requires further study (as noted in ETR 04-01)
`
`W-TDMA can be deployed using for some applications using a single l.6MHz carrier (e. g. isolated
`cell). A small network could be deployed in as little as 5MHz (excluding guard bands). Therefore, since
`the concept is not critically sensitive to choice of carrier frequency this enhances the viability of
`deployment in any available band.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 421 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 421 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`422
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`8.3.4 Coverage/capacity
`
`The system should be flexible to support a variety of initial coverage/capacity configurations and facilitate
`coverage/capacity evolution
`
`Ability to support cost effective coverage in rural areas
`
`Flexible use of various cell types and relations between cells (e. g. indoor cells, hierarchical cells) within a
`geographical area without undue waste of radio resources.
`
`8.3.4.1
`
`Development and implementation risk
`
`The W-TDMA concept is a natural extension to proven technology so unknown factors in development
`and implementation risks are mimmised.
`
`8.3.4.2 Flexibility ofradio network design
`
`8.3.4.2.l Cell size flexibility
`
`The W-TDMA transmission bursts are designed to cover a wide range of charmel conditions. This
`allows operation in picocells, n1icrocells and macrocells. Hierarchical Cell Structures are supported.
`
`8.3.4.2.2 Cell location flexibility
`
`The Interference Averaging concept means that the system performance is not critically sensitive to
`base station location
`
`8.3.4.3 Synchronisation
`
`Time synchromsation between different UMTS networks is desirable to optimise spectrum efficiency
`For both FDD and TDD), but is not essential.
`
`8.3.4.4 Repeaters and relays
`
`Repeaters can be supported in principle, but the details are for further study in SMG2.
`
`8.3.4.4.l Vehicle with mobile BS operating environment
`
`A vehicle with mobile BS can be supported in principle, but the details are for further study in SMG2.
`
`8.3.4. 5 Very large cell sizes
`
`Very large cell sizes can be supported (for example by increasing the number of slots allocated to the
`bearer). Details of other techmques which could be employed, such as adaptive antennas, RF repeater
`stations or remote antennas are for further study.
`
`The implications of frequency conversion of the RF carrier within a RF repeater are for further study in
`Ganuna Group/SMG2.
`
`8.3. 4. 6 Evolution requirements
`
`8.3 .4.6.l Coverage evolution
`
`The W-TDMA concept supports:
`
`-
`
`-
`
`contiguous coverage (traditional cellular approach);
`
`island coverage (Bunch concept);
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 422 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 422 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`423
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`-
`
`spot coverage (isolated cell).
`
`Since performance is not sensitive to base station deployment, a minimum of planning is required in
`order to install new cells to extend system coverage. Initial calculations indicate that since maximum
`range (for voice) can be comparable to GSM, reusing cellsites is possible to achieve fast roll-out.
`
`8.3.4.6.2 Capacity evolution
`
`Similarly, a minimum of planning is needed in order to install new cells to increase system capacity in
`areas where coverage is already provided.
`
`W-TDMA supports techniques for capacity improvement, such as the use of adaptive antenna, but these
`are not essential.
`
`8.4 Complexity / cost
`
`8.4.1 Mobile Terminal viability
`
`Handportable and PCMCIA card sized UMTS terminals should be viable in terms of size, weight, operating time,
`
`range, effective radiated power and cost.
`
`W-TDMA is not inherently complex. Detailed complexity and other Implementation issues are for
`further study in Gamma Group.
`
`8.4.2 Network complexity and cost
`
`The development and equipment cost should be kept at a reasonable level, taking into account the cost of cell sites,
`
`the associated network connections , signalling load and traffic overhead (e. g. due to handovers).
`
`W-TDMA provides a single radio interface concept which can be adapted to all operating
`enviromnents.
`
`All the operating options within W-TDMA are based on a common approach, in order to minimise
`implementation complexity.
`
`A layered approaches is has been followed in the development of the radio interface.
`
`Detailed evaluation of various costs (e. g. migration from 2nd generation systems) is for further study in
`SMG2.
`
`8.4.3 Mobile station types
`
`It should be possible to provide a variety of mobile station types of varying complexity, cost and capabilities in
`
`order to satisfy the needs of different types of users.
`
`Mobile stations can easily be implemented with various complexity/cost/capability trade-offs. For
`example, low rate terminals may be not need to be capable of transmitting/receiving all possible multi-
`slot options. It should be possible to avoid the need for duplex filters if sufficient performance can be
`obtained without simultaneous transmission and reception.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 423 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 423 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`424
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`8.5 Requirements from bodies outside SMG
`
`8.5.1 Alignment with IMT 2000
`
`UTRA shall meet at least the technical requirements for submission as a candidate technology for IMT 2000
`
`(FPLMTS).
`
`These requirements are met.
`
`8.5.2 Minimum bandwidth allocation
`
`It should be possible to deploy and operate a network in a limited bandwidth
`
`See section 3.2 and Annex 2.
`
`8.5.3 Electromagnetic compatibility
`
`The peak and average power and envelope variations have to be such that the degree of interference caused to other
`
`equipment is not higher than in today's systems.
`
`The peak power and envelope variations can be constrained so that interference is expected to be less
`severe than (or at least comparable) with GSM
`
`8.5.4 RF Radiation effects
`
`UMTS shall be operative at RF emission power levels which are in line with the recommendations related to
`
`electromagnetic radiation.
`
`Details of emission levels are for further study.
`
`For ease of implementation, a maximum transmitter output power of around 1W peak is considered
`desirable for hand portable units.
`
`8.5.5 Security
`
`The UMTS radio interface should be able to accommodate at least the same level of protection as the GSM radio
`
`interface does.
`
`Security issues are for further study in SMG2.
`
`8.5.6 Co-existence with other systems
`
`The UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access should be capable to co-exist with other systems within the same or
`
`neighbouring band depending on systems and regulations
`
`W-TDMA is not inherently sensitive to co- or adjacent channel interference. It also does not produce
`high levels of adjacent charmel interference.
`
`Issues such as use of other systems in adjacent or the same band require further study in SMG2.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 424 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 424 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`425
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`8. 6 Multimode terminal capability
`
`It should be possible to implement dual mode UMTS/GSM terminals cost effectively.
`
`W-TDMA shares aspects of TDMA with GSM, including related frame structures. This is beneficial for
`implementation of dual mode terminals.
`
`8. 7 Services supported by the radio interface
`
`8.7.1 Location service
`
`The detailed mechamsm for support of user position location is for further study in SMG2. Since users
`are orthogonal in time domain in WB-TDMA, implementing position location with observed time
`difference can be done.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 425 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 425 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`426
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`9. Conclusions
`
`This draft evaluation document presents the Wideband TDMA concept and the evaluation work. The
`report has been prepared by the SMG2 Concept Group Gamma (WB-TDMA).
`
`The Radio Transmission Technology (RTT) building blocks for the WB-TDMA are described in
`chapters for Logical Charmels, Physical Channels, Layer 2 Radio Protocols and Radio Resource
`Management. Advanced TDMA features which can be used to enhance the performance of the WB-
`TDMA scheme are described. More detailed descriptions of the Layer 2 protocols and RM schemes
`can be found in Tdocs SMG2 Gamma l9 and 15 respectively.
`
`Evaluation for the services as described in Tdoc SMG2 258/97 has been done on link and system layer
`according to the table below.
`S
`
`Proaation model
`Outdoor to Indoor Microcell
`and Pedestrian A
`
`Link level
`completed
`completed
`completed
`completed
`com leted
`
`S stem level
`completed
`completed
`(not required)
`(not required)
`
`1.1
`
`3.1
`3.2
`3.3
`extra
`extra
`
`extra
`extra
`extra
`4
`extra
`extra
`
`Outdoor to
`Indoor and
`Pedestrian
`3 km/h
`
`LDD 384
`Speech
`LCD 144 kbit/s
`LDD 2048
`L DD 144
`
`LDD 2048
`Speech
`LCD 384 kbit/s
`50 % speech + 50 % UDD 384
`LDD 2048 with walls
`L DD 144
`L DD 3 84
`LDD 144
`Speech
`LCD 384 kbit/s
`L DD 3 84
`L DD 2048
`
`Speech
`L DD 144
`L DD 3 84
`Speech
`L DD 144
`L DD 3 84
`
`Vehicular
`120 km/h
`
`Vehicular
`120 km/h
`
`Vehicular
`250 km/h
`
`Indoor A
`
`Picocell
`
`Vehicular A
`
`Macrocell
`
`Vehicular B
`
`Vehicular B
`
`completed
`completed
`completed
`(not required)
`(not required)
`completed
`completed
`completed
`completed
`completed
`completed
`com leted
`
`completed
`completed
`completed
`completed
`completed
`com leted
`
`completed
`(not required)
`(not required)
`preliminary
`completed
`
`(not required)
`completed
`completed
`
`(not req)
`
`(not req)
`
`Considerations how the WB-TDMA concept fulfils the SMG2 high level requirements have also been
`included (see chapter 8).
`
`Specific aspects that have been considered during development of the WB-TDMA concept are:
`
`- Support of high bit rates with relatively simple terminal
`
`- Effective support of non-real-time traffic with fast variations in data rate and packet size
`
`- Support of TDD mode with data rates fulfilling the UMTS requirements
`
`- Possibility to implement simple terminals for low bit rate use
`
`- Narrow spectrum and low interference to adjacent carriers
`
`- Flexibility for introduction of enhancements
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 426 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 426 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`427
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`10. Annex 1 (ETR04.02)
`
`Technologies Description Template
`
`Al .1
`
`Test environment support
`
`ti Al . l .1
`
`In what test environments will the SRTT operate ?
`
`All test environments described in Section 1.1 ofannex 2.
`
`td A1. 1.2
`
`If the SRTT supports more than one test environment, what test environment does this
`technology description template address ?
`
`This template considers all the environments.
`
`Does the SRTT include any feature in support of FWA application ? Provide detail about
`impact of those features on the technical parameters provided in this template, stating
`whether the technical parameters provided apply for mobile as well as for FWA
`applications.
`
`No additional feature is required to support FWA.
`
`Technical parameters
`
`Note : Parameters for both forward link and reverse link should be described separately, if
`necessary.
`
`What is the minimum frequency band required to deploy the system (MHz) ?
`
`Minimum value depends on the application, the load of the network, the QoS and the user
`trafiic model. A 2Mbit/s is possible in an isolated cellfrom 1.6 MHZ in TDD mode and
`small cellular networks are possible flom 2x4.8MHz.
`
`t-F
`
`What is the duplex method : TDD or FDD
`
`Both FDD and TDD options are proposed. The TDD option allows to support asymetric
`trafiic.
`
`What is the minimum up/down frequency separation for FDD ?
`
`Based on DCS]800 assumptions, a sensible value seems to be the uplink or downlink
`bandwidth plus 10 MHZ to make the duplexer feasible.
`
`What is requirement of transmit/receive isolation ? Does the proposal require a duplexer in
`either the mobile or base station.
`
`In FDD mode low rate terminals can operate with non—overlapping transmission and
`reception time slots and in this case a duplexer is not required.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 427 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 427 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`428
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`ti
`
`ti
`
`Does the SRTT allow asymmetric transmission to use the available spectrum ?
`Characterize.
`
`Asymmetric service is possible both in the FDD and TDD modes.
`
`It can be done easily in FDD, especially by taking profit of the unpairedfiequency band, by
`allocating a low bit rate carrierfor the uplinkfiom the “paired” band and a high bit rate
`carrierfiom the « unpaired » band. The unused pair of the low bit rate carrier can be used
`for asymmetric services within the symmetric band. TDl\/[A makes this allocation scheme
`reasonable to implement.
`
`TDD asymmetry could be achieved by ‘traditional ’ means by allocation a fixed amount of
`slots through the whole operator ’s TDD spectrum for both directions.
`
`However, due to the uncertainty concerning trafiic profiles in different environments this
`approach does not seem to be very attractive. One idea in the usage of the TDD band is to
`allocate asymmetric capacity on an individual basis i.e. the fiequency band would not be
`divided into purely uplink and downlink channels in the time domain but rather in a
`dynamic manner enabling the usage ofall channels in fiequency and time domain for both
`directions. These scheme is possible both by using RNC controlled Channel Allocation
`which enables fast handovers in the fiequency and time domain or by Interference
`Averaging between different cells.
`
`The described scheme would lead to minimum fiequency planning. The operator does not
`have to putfixed percentage of the overall system capacity to up— or downlink trafifc.
`
`What is the RF channel spacing (kHz) ? In addition, does the SRTT use interleaved
`frequency allocation ?
`
`The channel spacing is 1. 6 MHZ, both in FDD and TDD modes. Interleavedfiequency
`allocation is not assumed.
`
`Note : Interleaved frequency allocation ; allocating the 2nd adjacent channel instead of
`adjacent channel at neighboring cluster cell is so called << interleaved frequency
`allocation ». If a proponent is going to employ this allocation type, proponent should be
`stated at A1 .2.4 and fill Al .2. 15 of protection ratio for both of adjacent and 2nd adjacent
`channel.
`
`What is the bandwidth per duplex RF channel (MHz) measured at the 3 dB down points ?
`
`It is given by (bandwidth per RF channel) X (l for TDD and 2 for FDD). Please provide
`detail.
`
`The 3 dB bandwidth of the duplex RF channel is around 1.1 MHZ in TDD mode (the exact
`value depending on the linearity requirements of the power amplifier which is not defined
`yet), while it is twice this valuefor the FDD mode.
`
`ERIC-1007 I Page 428 of 551
`
`ERIC-1007 / Page 428 of 551
`
`

`
`UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0
`
`429
`
`TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12)
`
`Does the proposal offer multiple or Variable RF channel bandwidth capability ? If so, are

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket