Attorney Docket No.
`
`IPR2014-01181
`110797-0004-655
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`______________
`
`Case IPR2014-01181*
`Patent 8,532,641 B2
`______________
`
`Before the Honorable KEVIN F. TURNER, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, and
`JON B. TORNQUIST, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REPLY TO
`PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE
`
`
`
`*Case Nos. IPR2014-01182 and IPR2014-01184 have been consolidated with the
`
`instant proceeding. See IPR2014-01181, Paper 15; IPR2014-01182, Paper 15; and
`
`IPR2014-01184, Paper 15. In view of this consolidation, Petitioners submit this
`
`single brief in reply to the Patent Owner’s Response filed in IPR2014-01181, Paper
`
`20.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`C. 
`
`D. 
`E. 
`
`II. 
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`
`IPR2014-01181
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS ............................................................................................... vii 
`GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................... xv 
`I. 
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................ 1 
`A. 
`“Wireless telephone device” (Claims 1, 5-7, 9, 12) .............................. 1 
`B. 
`“Stream a signal” (Claim 1) /“streaming audio signal” (Claim
`8) ............................................................................................................ 3 
`“A signal representing at least a portion of a song” (Claim 1)
`/“signal that represents a playing of the song” (Claim 8) ..................... 4 
`“Portable electronic device” (Claim 8) ................................................. 5 
`“Communication rate that provides for a CD quality listening
`experience” (Claim 11) ......................................................................... 6 
`“While” (Claim 13) ............................................................................... 9 
`F. 
`ABECASSIS IN VIEW OF CHENNAKESHU, HERROD, AND/OR
`GALENSKY RENDER OBVIOUS CLAIMS 1-3 AND 5-14 ..................... 10 
`A.  Abecassis in view of the knowledge of a POSA, or,
`Abecassis in view of Herrod, discloses a “rechargeable
`power supply” (Claims 1.D, 9.C) ........................................................ 10 
`Abecassis in view of the knowledge of a POSA, or,
`Abecassis in view of Herrod discloses a “physical interface”
`(Claims 1.E, 9.D) ................................................................................. 11 
`Abecassis discloses “a collection of instructions...” and “a
`selection of a selectable menu item…” (Claims 1.G, 8.C) ................. 13 
`D.  Abecassis in view of Chennakeshu, or, Abecassis in view of
`Chennakeshu and the knowledge of a POSA, discloses
`streaming an audio signal using an asynchronous channel
`(Claims 1.H, 8.E) ................................................................................. 16 
`Abecassis in view of Chennakeshu discloses Bluetooth
`(Claims 2, 8.D) .................................................................................... 17 
`Abecassis, or, Abecassis in view of Chennakeshu disclose
`operating in a hands-free mode (Claim 5) ........................................... 22 
`G.  Abecassis in view of Herrod discloses “a display that is more
`than half of the front surface” (Claim 6) ............................................. 23 
`i
`
`B. 
`
`C. 
`
`E. 
`
`F. 
`
`
`
`

`
`I. 
`
`J. 
`
`III. 
`
`B. 
`
`C. 
`
`D. 
`
`E. 
`
`F. 
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`
`IPR2014-01181
`110797-0004-655
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`H.  Abecassis discloses “a memory…configured to store a
`plurality of audio files” (Claim 8) ....................................................... 24 
`Abecassis, or, Abecassis in view of Chennakeshu discloses
`“provid[ing] a CD quality listening experience” (Claim 11) .............. 25 
`Abecassis in view of the knowledge of a POSA, or, Herrod
`discloses an internal battery and means for recharging (Claim
`14) ........................................................................................................ 28 
`ITO IN VIEW OF HAARTSEN, NOKIA, RYDBECK, AND/OR
`GALENSKY RENDER OBVIOUS CLAIMS 8 AND 11-14 ...................... 29 
`A. 
`Ito, Ito in view of Nokia, or Ito in view of Rydbeck discloses
`a “portable electronic device having a processor operable to
`play an audio file that represents a song” (Claim 8.A) ....................... 29 
`Ito discloses “a selection of a selectable menu item…”
`(Claim 8.C) .......................................................................................... 32 
`Ito in view of Haartsen discloses “a wireless communication
`module compliant with a Bluetooth standard” (Claim 8.D) ............... 32 
`Ito, or, Ito in view of Haartsen discloses “provid[ing] a CD
`quality listening experience” (Claim 11) ............................................ 35 
`Ito in view of Galensky discloses changing communication
`rates based upon an amount of data in a buffer memory
`(Claim 12.C) ........................................................................................ 38 
`Ito in view of knowledge of POSA, or Nokia discloses an
`internal battery and means for recharging (Claim 14) ........................ 39 
`IV.  OHMURA IN VIEW OF AHN AND/OR NOKIA RENDER
`OBVIOUS CLAIMS 8, 11, 13 AND 14 ........................................................ 41 
`A. 
`The priority date of the ‘641 patent is Nov. 9, 2012 ........................... 41 
`1. 
`The Examiner did not decide the priority date during
`prosecution of the ‘641 patent ................................................... 41 
`PO has failed to establish that the earlier applications
`disclose the subject matter of ‘641 claims 8, 11, 13 and
`14 ............................................................................................... 42 
`PTO decisions demonstrate that Applicants were not in
`possession of the claimed invention by March 28,
`2000 ........................................................................................... 44 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ii
`
`

`
`Attorney Docket No.
`
`IPR2014-01181
`110797-0004-655
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`B. 
`A POSA would have been motivated to combine Ohmura
`with Ahn .............................................................................................. 47 
`Ohmura, or, Ohmura in view of the knowledge of a POSA
`discloses “provid[ing] for a CD quality listening experience”
`(Claim 11) ............................................................................................ 49 
`D.  Ohmura, or, Ohmura in view of Ahn, discloses
`communicating a signal representing the media “while”
`receiving media (Claim 13) ................................................................. 51 
`Ohmura in view of the knowledge of a POSA, or, Ahn
`discloses an internal battery and means for recharging (Claim
`14) ........................................................................................................ 51 
`PO’S CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE SHOULD BE
`REJECTED .................................................................................................... 53 
`
`C. 
`
`E. 
`
`V. 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iii
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`
`CASES
`Ariad Pharms., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.,
`598 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2010) .......................................................................... 42
`
`Page(s)
`
`Comtech EF Data Corp. v. Radyne Corp.,
`No. CV-06-1132-PHXMHM, 2007 WL 5041159 (D. Ariz. Oct. 12,
`2007), adopted in relevant part, No. CV06-1132-PHX-MHM,
`2008 WL 906532 (D. Ariz. Mar. 31, 2008) ........................................................ 28
`
`Cooper v. Lee,
`1:14-cv-00672 (E. D. Va. Feb. 18, 2015) ........................................................... 53
`
`Ex Parte Almberg,
`No. 2010-005008, 2012 WL 1067617 (BPAI Mar. 23, 2012) ........................... 23
`
`Ex Parte Matsunaga,
`No. 2009-014954, 2012 WL 260128 (BPAI Jan. 25, 2012) ............................... 23
`
`Hyatt v. Boone,
`146 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 1998) .......................................................................... 45
`
`In re Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC,
`550 Fed. Appx. 884 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2014) .................................................. 5, 46
`
`In re Antor Media Corp.,
`689 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2012) ......................................................................... 24
`
`In re Baxter Int'l, Inc.,
`698 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2012) .......................................................................... 44
`
`In re Cuozzo,
`No. 2014-1301, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11714 (Fed. Cir. July 8, 2015) ............. 6
`
`In re Magna Elecs., Inc.,
`No. 2014-1798, 2015 WL 2110525 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2015) ................. 22, 40, 48
`
`In re NTP,
`654 F.3d 1268 (Fed. Cir. 2011) .................................................................... 41, 43
`
`iv
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`In re O’Farrell,
`853 F.2d 894 (Fed. Cir. 1988) ...................................................................... 20, 34
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`
`
`
`In re Oswald,
`83 F.2d 827 (C.C.P.A. 1936) .............................................................................. 46
`
`In re Thomas,
`151 Fed. Appx. 930 (Fed. Cir. 2005) .................................................................. 48
`
`Joy Techs., Inc. v. Manbeck,
`959 F.2d 226 (Fed. Cir. 1992) ............................................................................ 53
`
`KSR Intern. Co. v. Teleflex Inc.,
`550 U.S. 398 (2007) ............................................................................................ 19
`
`Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N.A.,
`790 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2015) .................................................................... 28, 29
`
`Lockwood v. Am. Airlines,
`107 F.3d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1997) .................................................................... 42, 43
`
`Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc.,
`789 F.3d 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2015) ............................................................................ 3
`
`Moleculon Res. Corp. v. CBS, Inc.,
`793 F.2d 1261 (Fed. Cir. 1986) .......................................................................... 42
`
`Patlex Corp. v. Mossinghoff,
`758 F.2d 594 (Fed. Cir. 1985) ............................................................................ 53
`
`Perfect Web Techs., Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.,
`587 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2009) .............................................................. 11, 40, 52
`
`Tempo Lighting, Inc. v. Tivoli, LLC,
`742 F.3d 973 (Fed. Cir. 2014) .............................................................................. 4
`
`
`
`
` v
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`STATUTES
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`35 U.S.C.
`§102 ..................................................................................................................... 41
`§103 ..................................................................................................................... 41
`§112 ......................................................................................................... 41, 42, 46
`§112¶6 ............................................................................................... 28, 29, 39, 52
`§112(f) ................................................................................................................. 28
`§120 ..................................................................................................................... 46
`§311(b) ................................................................................................................ 41
`
`OTHER AUTHORITIES
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.6(a)(3) ................................................................................................. 1
`
`
`
`
` vi
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`
`
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`Exhibit
`
`Description
`Exhibits filed in IPR2014-011812
`Ex. 1001 U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 (“the ‘641 patent”)
`Ex. 1002 U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 File History
`Ex. 1003 U.S. Patent No. 6,990,334 (“Ito”)
`Ex. 1004 Declaration of Harri Valio
`Ex. 1005 Declaration of Jari Toivanen
`Ex. 1005A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jari Toivanen - User’s Manual for the
`Nokia 9000 Communicator, dated 1995, published by Nokia Mobile
`Phones.
`Ex. 1005B Exhibit B to the Declaration of Jari Toivanen - Owner’s Manual for
`the Nokia 9000i Communicator (“Nokia”),
`dated 1995-1997, published by Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.
`Ex. 1006 U.S. Patent No. 6,973,067 (“Haartsen”)
`Ex. 1007 Declaration of Todd Michael Fenton
`Ex. 1007A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Todd Michael Fenton - “Bluetooth –
`the universal radio interface for ad hoc wireless connectivity”, J.
`Haartsen, Ericsson Review, The Telecommunications Technology
`Journal, No. 3, 1998 (“Haartsen Article” or “Ericsson Review 3”)
`Ex. 1008 U.S. Patent No. 7,123,936 (“Rydbeck”)
`Ex. 1009 U.S. Patent No. 6,845,398 (“Galensky”)
`Ex. 1010 U.S. Patent No. 6,728,531 (“Lee”)
`Ex. 1011 U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/155,500 (“Lee Provisional
`Application”)
`Ex. 1012 U.S. Patent No. 6,772,212 (“Lau”)
`Ex. 1013 Declaration of Paul E. Berg
`
`2 In view of the consolidation, where the same exhibit has been filed in both
`
`IPR2014-01181, IPR2014-01182 and/or IPR2014-01184, Petitioners reference the
`
`exhibit in the Reply Brief by its number in IPR2014-01181.
`
`
`
`
` vii
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`Description
`Exhibit
`Ex. 1013A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Paul E. Berg - Universal Serial Bus
`Specification, Revision 1.1, September 23, 1998, Compaq Computer
`Corporation, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, and NEC
`Corporation.
`Ex. 1014 U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390 File History
`Ex. 1015 May 20, 2014 Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review in
`IPR2014-00209 (Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390)
`Ex. 1016 May 20, 2014 Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review in
`IPR2014-00212 (Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390)
`June 12, 2014 Action Closing Prosecution in Reexamination Control
`Nos. 95/001,262 and 90/011,254 (Inter Partes and Ex Parte
`Reexaminations of U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947)
`June 30, 2014 Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision, Appeal No.
`2014-002024 in Reexamination Control No. 95/001,281 (Inter
`Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,634,228)
`Ex. 1019 Specification of the Bluetooth System v1.0 B, Vols. 1 & 2, 1999,
`Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, International Business Machines
`Corporation, Intel Corporation, Nokia Corporation, Toshiba
`Corporation.
`Ex. 1020 December 6, 2011 Right of Appeal Notice in Reexamination Control
`No. 95/001,263 (Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
`7,486,926)
`Ex. 1021 U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947 File History
`Ex. 1022
`IBM Dictionary of Computing, Edited by George McDaniel,
`McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994
`Ex. 1023 Declaration of Dr. Schuyler Quackenbush
`Ex. 1024 Declaration of Hayan Yoon in Support of Petition for Inter Partes
`Review of United States Patent No. 8,532,641
`Ex. 1025 Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Schuyler Quackenbush
`Ex. 1026 Microsoft Computer Dictionary 4th Ed., Microsoft Press, 1999
`Ex. 1027 European Patent Publication EP1675309 (“Gorman”)
`
`Ex. 1017
`
`Ex. 1018
`
`
`
`
` viii
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1030
`
`Ex. 1034
`
`Ex. 1035
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`Description
`Exhibit
`Ex. 1028 Webster’s II New College Dictionary, Houghton Mifflin Company,
`1995, definition of “portable”
`Ex. 1029 Dictionary of Computing, 4th Ed., Oxford University Press, 1997,
`definition of “portable”
`“Compatibility of FM Hybrid In-Band On-Channel (IBOC) System
`for Digital Audio Broadcasting,” Brian Kroeger and Paul Peyla,
`IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, December 1997
`Ex. 1031 Excerpted pages from “Audio Recording- Compact Disc Digital
`Audio System (ICE 60908:1999),” British Standard, 1999 (“Red
`Book”)
`Ex. 1032 Excerpted pages from “Principles of Digital Audio,” 4th Ed., Ken C.
`Pohlmann, 2000
`Ex. 1033 Definition of “CD-quality” from the Oxford English Dictionary
`(http://www.oed.com)
`“A DSP Powered Solid State Audio System,” Jason Kridner et al.,
`IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal
`Processing, 1999
`“Intellectual Property Protection Systems and Digital
`Watermarking,” Jack Lacy et al., Optics Express, 1998
`Ex. 1036 Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Ed., Merriam-
`Webster, Inc., 1997, definition of “while”
`Ex. 1037 U.S. Pat. No. 6,633,932 (“Bork”)
`Ex. 1038 Declaration of Michael Cohen
`Ex. 1038A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Michael Cohen – “New Technology
`Batteries Guide,” NIJ Guide 200-98, 1998
`Ex. 1039 Declaration of Walter Kester
`Ex. 1039A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Walter Kester – “Section 5 Battery
`Chargers,” Walt Kester, and Joe Buxton, Practical Design
`Techniques for Power and Thermal Management, Analog Devices,
`1998
`“BluetoothTM Whitepaper,” AU-System, January 2000
`Ex. 1040
`Ex. 1041 Declaration of Susan Rambo
`Ex. 1041A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Susan Rambo – “Philips shows
`central gateway for the home,” Electronic Engineering Times,
`December 20, 1999
`“Ericsson Demonstrates Bluetooth at CeBIT ’99,” available at
`http://www.mobic.com/oldnews/9903/ericsson_demonstrates_blueto
`
`ix
`
`Ex. 1042
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`Exhibit
`
`
`
`
`Description
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`Ex. 1044
`
`Ex. 1047
`
`oth_.htm, March 1999
`Ex. 1043 Certificate of Authenticity by Jett King and “Ericsson Received
`Innovations Award for Driving Bluetooth Development, Cebit
`2000,” Business Wire (February 29, 2000)
`“CTIA Wireless 2000 View From The Floor - Day 2,” Wireless
`Developer Network (available at
`http://www.wirelessdevnet.com/channels/wireless/features/ctia_2.ht
`ml)
`Ex. 1045 Letter from Maria Lampert and “Ericsson’s Bluetooth Modules,”
`Henrik Arfwedson and Rob Snedden, Ericsson Review No. 4, 1999
`Ex. 1046 Declaration of Christopher Butler
`Ex. 1046A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Christopher Butler – “White papers,”
`The Official Bluetooth Website (March 1, 2000 archive of
`http://web.archive.org)
`“Bluetooth Protocol Architecture Version 1.0,” Bluetooth SIG
`(1999)
`Ex. 1048 Declaration of Christopher Butler
`Ex. 1048A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Christopher Butler – “Casio
`Introduces New Cassiopeia Model E-10 A New Palm PC Powered
`by Windows® CE,” Press Release, Casio, January 8, 1998,
`(February 8, 1998 archive of http://web.archive.org)
`Ex. 1049 Declaration of Christopher Butler
`Ex. 1049A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Christopher Butler – “Shorten,”
`SoftSound (March 3, 2000 archive of http://web.archive.org)
`Ex. 1050 U.S. Patent No. 5,884,269 (“Cellier”)
`Ex. 1051 Comprehensive Dictionary of Electrical Engineering, CRC Press and
`IEEE Press, 1999
`“NTT DoCoMo To Offer Mobile Music Downloads,” William
`Auckerman, InternetNews.com (available at
`http://www.internetnews.com/ec-
`news/article.php/214471/NTT+DoCoMo+To+Offer+Mo) (October
`8, 1999)
`“Sony and Liquid Audio Integrate Internet Music Delivery Systems,”
`Press Release (available at
`http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press_Archive/200001/00-
`0111B/) (January 6, 2000)
`Ex. 1054 Declaration of Christopher Butler
` x
`
`Ex. 1052
`
`Ex. 1053
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`Description
`Exhibit
`Ex. 1054A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Christopher Butler – “Toshiba to
`Market ‘Genio,’ a Pocket Size Mobile Communicator with WWW
`and High-Speed PHS Communication Capabilities,” Toshiba
`Corporation (February 18, 1999 archive of http://web.archive.org)
`Ex. 1054B Exhibit B to the Declaration of Christopher Butler – “Genio PCV
`100,” Geoworks Corp. (February 10, 1999 archive of
`http://web.archive.org)
`Ex. 1055 Control No. 90/011,982 Reexamination History from February 14,
`2013 until June 10, 2014 (Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent
`No. 7,634,228)
`June 14, 2010 Non-Final Action in Reexamination Control Nos.
`90/010,333, 95/001,223 and 95/001,264 (Ex Parte and Inter Partes
`Reexaminations of U.S. Patent No. 7,324,833)
`Ex. 1057 Declaration of Christopher Butler
`Ex. 1057A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Christopher Butler –“Samsung builds
`TV function into cell phones,” CNN.com, December 2, 1999 (March
`1, 2000 archive of http://web.archive.org)
`Ex. 1058 U.S. Patent No. 6,928,468 (“Leermakers”)
`Ex. 1059 Exhibit 2008 in IPR2014-00209 – Universal Serial Bus
`Specification, Revision 2.0, April 27, 2000, Compaq, Hewlett-
`Packard, Intel, Lucent, Microsoft, NEC, Philips
`Ex. 1060 Declaration of Richard Moncrief
`Ex. 1061 Declaration of Hayan Yoon
`Exhibits filed in IPR2014-01182 (prior to consolidation)
`Ex. 1101 U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 (“the ‘641 patent”)
`Ex. 1102 U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 File History
`Ex. 1103 U.S. Patent No. 6,192,340 (“Abecassis”)
`Ex. 1104 U.S. Patent No. 6,772,212 (“Lau”)
`Ex. 1105 U.S. Patent No. 6,542,758 (“Chennakeshu”)
`Ex. 1106 U.S. Patent No. 6,405,049 (“Herrod”)
`Ex. 1107 U.S. Patent No. 6,845,398 (“Galensky”)
`Ex. 1108 Declaration of Todd Michael Fenton
`Ex. 1108A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Todd Michael Fenton - “Bluetooth-
`The universal radio interface for ad hoc, wireless connectivity”, J.
`Haartsen, Ericsson Review, The Telecommunications Technology
`
`Ex. 1056
`
`
`
`
` xi
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`Exhibit
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`Description
`Journal, No. 3, 1998 (“Haartsen Article” or “Ericsson Review 3”)
`Ex. 1109 U.S. Patent No. 6,526,335 (“Treyz”)
`Ex. 1110 U.S. Patent No. 6,879,865 (“Gladwin”)
`Ex. 1111 U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/151,714 (“Gladwin Provisional
`Application”)
`Ex. 1112 U.S. Patent No. 7,123,936 (“Rydbeck”)
`Ex. 1113 Declaration of Paul E. Berg
`Ex. 1113A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Paul E. Berg - Universal Serial Bus
`Specification, Revision 1.1, September 23, 1998, Compaq Computer
`Corporation, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, and NEC
`Corporation
`Ex. 1114 U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390 File History
`Ex. 1115 May 20, 2014 Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review in
`IPR2014-00209 (Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390)
`Ex. 1116 May 20, 2014 Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review in
`IPR2014-00212 (Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390)
`June 12, 2014 Action Closing Prosecution in Reexamination Control
`Nos. 95/001,262 and 90/011,254 (Inter Partes and Ex Parte
`Reexaminations of U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947)
`June 30, 2014 Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision, Appeal No.
`2014-002024 in Reexamination Control No. 95/001,281 (Inter
`Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,634,228)
`Ex. 1119 Specification of the Bluetooth System v1.0 B, Vols. 1 & 2, 1999,
`Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, International Business Machines
`Corporation, Intel Corporation, Nokia Corporation, Toshiba
`Corporation.
`Ex. 1120 December 6, 2011 Right of Appeal Notice in Reexamination Control
`No. 95/001,263 (Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
`7,486,926)
`Ex. 1121 U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947 File History
`Ex. 1122
`IBM Dictionary of Computing, Edited by George McDaniel,
`McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994
`Ex. 1123 Declaration of Dr. Schuyler Quackenbush
`Ex. 1124 Declaration of Hayan Yoon in Support of Petition for Inter Partes
`
`Ex. 1117
`
`Ex. 1118
`
`
`
`
` xii
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`Exhibit
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`
`
`
`Description
`Review of United States Patent No. 8,532,641
`Exhibits filed in IPR2014-01184 (prior to consolidation)
`Ex. 1201 U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 (“the ‘641 patent”)
`Ex. 1202 U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 File History
`Ex. 1203 U.S. Patent No. 6,937,732 (“Ohmura”)
`Ex. 1204 European Patent Application Publication No. 1146674 filed by
`Ohmura et al.
`Ex. 1205 U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0214525 (“Ahn”)
`International Publication No. WO 02/096137 filed by Ahn et al.
`Ex. 1206
`Ex. 1207 Declaration of Harri Valio
`Ex. 1208 Declaration of Jari Toivanen
`Ex. 1208A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jari Toivanen - User’s Manual for the
`Nokia 9000 Communicator, dated 1995, published by Nokia Mobile
`Phones.
`Ex. 1208B Exhibit B to the Declaration of Jari Toivanen - Owner’s Manual for
`the Nokia 9000i Communicator (“Nokia”),
`dated 1995-1997, published by Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.
`Ex. 1209 U.S. Patent No. 6,845,398 (“Galensky”)
`Ex. 1210 Declaration of Paul E. Berg
`Ex. 1210A Exhibit A to the Declaration of Paul E. Berg - Universal Serial Bus
`Specification, Revision 1.1, September 23, 1998, Compaq Computer
`Corporation, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, and NEC
`Corporation.
`Ex. 1211 U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390 File History
`Ex. 1212 May 20, 2014 Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review in
`IPR2014-00209 (Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390)
`Ex. 1213 May 20, 2014 Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review in
`IPR2014-00212 (Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390)
`June 12, 2014 Action Closing Prosecution in Reexamination Control
`Nos. 95/001,262 and 90/011,254 (Inter Partes and Ex Parte
`Reexaminations of U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947)
`June 30, 2014 Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision, Appeal No.
` xiii
`
`Ex. 1214
`
`Ex. 1215
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`Exhibit
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`Description
`2014-002024 and August 18, 2011 Action Closing Prosecution in
`Reexamination Control No. 95/001,281 (Inter Partes Reexamination
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,634,228)
`Ex. 1216 Specification of the Bluetooth System v1.0 B, Vols. 1 & 2, 1999,
`Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, International Business Machines
`Corporation, Intel Corporation, Nokia Corporation, Toshiba
`Corporation.
`Ex. 1217 February 12, 2013 Decision on Institution of Covered Business
`Method Review in CBM2012-00003
`Ex. 1218 U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947 File History
`Ex. 1219 U.S. Patent No. 7,324,833 File History
`Ex. 1220 U.S. Patent No. 7,778,595 File History
`Ex. 1221 Control No. 95/001,263 Reexamination History from December 6,
`2011 until April 11, 2014 (Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent
`No. 7,486,926)
`IBM Dictionary of Computing, Edited by George McDaniel,
`McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994
`Ex. 1223 Declaration of Dr. Schuyler Quackenbush
`Ex. 1224 Declaration of Hayan Yoon in Support of Petition for Inter Partes
`Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`
`Ex. 1222
`
`
`
`
` xiv
`
`

`
`
`IPR2014-01181
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`110797-0004-655
`
`Shorthand
`Claims
`IPR
`BRI
`P1
`
`P2
`
`P3
`
`ID1
`
`ID2
`
`ID3
`
`PO
`POSA
`R
`R##
`Pap.
`209 Pap.52
`
`407 Pap.48
`
`Description
`Claims 1-3 and 5-14 of U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`Inter Partes Review
`Broadest Reasonable Interpretation
`IPR2014-01181, Paper 4, Corrected Petition For Inter Partes
`Review of United States Patent No. 8,532,641
`IPR2014-01182, Paper 4, Corrected Petition For Inter Partes
`Review of United States Patent No. 8,532,641
`IPR2014-01184, Paper 4, Corrected Petition For Inter Partes
`Review of United States Patent No. 8,532,641
`IPR2014-01181, Paper 10, Decision Institution of Inter Partes
`Review
`IPR2014-01182, Paper 10, Decision Institution of Inter Partes
`Review
`IPR2014-01184, Paper 10, Decision Institution of Inter Partes
`Review
`Patent Owner
`Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art
`IPR2014-01181, Paper 20, Patent Owner’s Response
`IPR2014-01181, Paper 20, Patent Owner’s Response at p. ##
`Paper
`IPR2014-00209, Paper 52, Final Written Decision (Inter Partes
`Review of United States Patent No. 7,953,390
`IPR2014-00407, Paper 48, Final Written Decision (Inter Partes
`Review of United States Patent No. 8,359,007
`
`
`Note: All emphasis herein added unless otherwise stated.
`
`
`
`
`
` xv
`
`

`
`Attorney Docket No.
`
`IPR2014-01181
`110797-0004-655
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`PO makes numerous failed attempts to avoid the obviousness of its Claims:
`
`(1) PO fails to rebut Petitioners’ showing that the combinations of references teach
`
`every limitation of the Claims (2) PO fails to rebut Petitioners’ showing it would
`
`have been obvious to combine the cited references; (3) PO fails to rebut
`
`Petitioners’ showing a POSA would have had a reasonable expectation of success
`
`that the combinations would work; and (4) PO fails to demonstrate that it is
`
`entitled to a priority date earlier than November 9, 2012. PO simply failed to rebut
`
`Petitioners’ evidence, and its Claims are invalid.
`
`I.
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION1
`A. “Wireless telephone device” (Claims 1, 5-7, 9, 12)
`No construction of this term is necessary because PO does not tie
`
`construction of this term to any issue in this IPR. If, however, the Board construes
`
`“wireless telephone device,” the BRI is “telephone device that communicates
`
`wirelessly.” This construction is consistent with the ‘641 patent’s disclosure and a
`
`POSA’s understanding. Although the ‘641 patent does not explicitly define
`
`“wireless telephone device,” it describes a device that communicates wirelessly
`
`(e.g., over cellular, Bluetooth, or Digital Satellite). E.g., Ex. 1001 at 2:33-43, 3:62-
`
`64, 5:66-6:6, 9:5-7, 9:26-31, 13:56-59; Ex. 1025¶¶43-44. And, it discloses that the
`
`
`1 PO improperly “incorporates by reference” from its Preliminary Responses, but
`
`arguments not in its Response are waived. 37 C.F.R. §42.6(a)(3).
`
`
`
`
` 1
`
`

`
`Attorney Docket No.
`
`IPR2014-01181
`110797-0004-655
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`device may be an “Internet phone” or “cellular phone.” Ex. 1001 at 12:22, Fig. 4.
`
`PO’s proposed construction (R5-6) should be rejected because it improperly
`
`equates a “wireless telephone device” with a “cellular phone.” 2 A “wireless
`
`telephone device” is not synonymous with and is broader in meaning than a
`
`“cellular phone.” For example, an “Internet phone” that communicates via satellite
`
`is an example of a “wireless telephone device” that is not a “cellular phone.” Ex.
`
`1025¶45. Also, the ‘641 patent does not require communication over a cellular
`
`network. E.g., Ex. 1001 at 2:33-43, 5:66-6:6. In addition, PO improperly limits the
`
`wireless telephone device to one used “without a physical connection to
`
`a[n]…external power source.” R5. The ‘641 patent (including the passages PO
`
`cites—Ex. 1001 at 13:26-28, 18:37-39) does not require the “wireless telephone
`
`device” to “function without needing to be tethered to an external power source.”
`
`See generally Ex. 1001; see also 407 Pap.48 at 11-12. Rather, the ‘641 patent
`
`describes that a physical connection may be used “for powering” the electronic
`
`device. Ex. 1001 at 18:37-39. And, the ‘641 patent consistently uses the term
`
`“wireless” to describe a mode of communication, not how the device is powered.
`
`E.g., Ex. 1001 at 2:28-32, 3:62-64, 4:1-7, 5:18-21, 9:5-7, 9:26-31, 13:56-59; see
`
`also, e.g., Ex. 1026 at 484 (“wireless adj. Of, pertaining to, or characteristic of
`
`
`2 A “cellular phone” is a “telephone with access to a radio system so it can be used
`
`over a wide area, without a physical connection to a network.” See 407 Pap.48 at 6.
`
`
`
`
` 2
`
`

`
`Attorney Docket No.
`
`IPR2014-01181
`110797-0004-655
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`communications that take place without the use of interconnecting wires or cables,
`
`such as by radio, microwave, or infrared.”); Ex. 1025¶46; 407 Pap.48 at 11-12.
`
`Finally, PO incorrectly assumes that a wireless telephone device must be portable.
`
`R5. A “wireless telephone device” need not be “portable” and may be stationary, in
`
`a fixed location. E.g., Ex. 1025¶46; Ex. 1027 at Fig. 3 (item 55), [0023].
`
`B. “Stream a signal” (Claim 1) /“streaming audio signal” (Claim 8)
`The Board correctly construed “streaming audio signal” to mean “an audio
`
`signal that is transferred in a continuous stream.” ID1 at 7-8; ID2 at 7-8; ID3 at 6-7;
`
`see also Ex. 1015 at 7. The Board’s construction is consistent with the ‘641
`
`patent’s disclosure and the understanding of a POSA. E.g., Ex. 1001 at 8:31-35
`
`(“the method of FIG. 2 may be deployed in association with an Internet website
`
`operable to display selectable links for downloading information. The information
`
`may inclu