throbber
IPR2014-01184
`U.S. Patent. No. 8,532,641
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD;
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Petitioners,
`V.
`
`AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2014-01181
`
`Patent No. 8,532,641 B2
`
`DECLARATION OF CINDY D. KUCHESKA IN SUPPORT OF PATENT
`OWNER'S RESPONSE TO INTER FAR TES REVIEW OFUNITED
`STATES PATENT NO. 8,532,641
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., v. AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
`IPR2014-01181 EXHIBIT 2004 – 1
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`I, Cindy D. Kucheska make the following Declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1746:
`
`1.
`
`I am currently the Word Processing Manager at the law firm of Robins
`
`Kaplan LLP.
`
`2.
`
`I provide this Declaration in connection with the above-identified inter
`
`partes review proceeding.
`
`3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2004A is a true and correct copy of the
`
`document containing a comparison of the specifications (not including the figures or
`
`claims) of U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947 to U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641. I created this
`
`document on April 30, 2015 using the Workshare Compare software. On May 12,
`
`2015, I formatted the content to fit on a full-size page. The text from '947 patent
`
`served as the original document. The text of the '641 patent served as new document.
`
`Changes from the text of the '947 patent to the text of the '641 patent are represented
`
`by the following markings: the blue underlined text indicates an insertion; the fed
`
`f,trikc through text indicates a deletion; the green strikethrough text indicates that text
`
`was moved from that location; the green underlined text indicates that text was
`
`moved to that location.
`
`4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2004B is a true and correct copy of the
`
`document containing a comparison of the specifications (not including the figures or
`
`claims) of U.S. Patent No. 7,778,595 to U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641. I created this
`
`document on May 12, 2015 using the Workshare Compare software. The text
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., v. AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
`IPR2014-01181 EXHIBIT 2004 – 2
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`from '595 patent served as the original document. The text of the '641 patent served
`
`as new document. Changes from the text of the '595 patent to the text of the '641
`
`patent are represented by the following markings: the blue underlined text indicates an
`
`insertion; the feel-strike-threugh text indicates a deletion; the grccn (cid:9) strikcthrough text
`
`indicates that text was moved from that location; the green underlined text indicates
`
`that text was moved to that location.
`
`5.
`
`I make these declarations on my own personal knowledge. If called to
`
`testify as to the truth of the matters stated herein, I could and would testify
`
`competently.
`
`6.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`21
`Executed this I (cid:9) day of May, 2015.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., v. AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
`IPR2014-01181 EXHIBIT 2004 – 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket