throbber
IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.
`Petitioners
`v.
`
`AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`______________
`
`Case IPR2014-011811
`Patent 8,532,641
`______________
`
`
`
`Before the Honorable KEVIN F. TURNER, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, and
`JON B. TORNQUIST, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`BRIAN P. BIDDINGER
`
`Pursuant to Rule 42.10(c), and as authorized in the Notice Of Filing Date
`
`Accorded To Petition And Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response
`
`(Paper 3), Petitioners Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics
`
`
`1 Case IPR2014-01182 and Case IPR2014-01184 have been consolidated with the
`
`instant proceeding. See IPR2014-01181 Paper 15.
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`
`America, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”) respectfully request pro hac vice admission of
`
`Brian P. Biddinger as counsel in this proceeding.
`
`I.
`
`Time for Filing
`
`This Motion is timely because it is being filed no sooner than twenty one (21)
`
`days after service of the Petition in this proceeding, which occurred on July 28, 2014.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`The following statement of facts demonstrates that there is good cause for the
`
`Board to recognize Brian P. Biddinger as counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Mr. Biddinger is an experienced litigation attorney and has an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Mr. Biddinger has been
`
`practicing law since 2003 and has extensive experience litigating patent infringement
`
`cases in many different District Courts across the country. Among his experience in
`
`patent litigation matters, Mr. Biddinger has been counsel in multiple trials, Markman
`
`hearings, patent summary judgment proceedings, and other patent-related hearings
`
`and pleadings concerning, inter alia, patent validity and infringement issues. Mr.
`
`Biddinger has also been recognized as a leading patent litigation attorney including as
`
`a New York Super Lawyer (2013) and a New York Super Lawyers Rising Star (2011-
`
`2012).
`
`Mr. Biddinger is familiar with U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 (“the ‘641 Patent”)
`
`and the issues involved in this case. Mr. Biddinger has been representing Petitioners
`
`Samsung against Patent Owner Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC (“Affinity”) as counsel in
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`
`the pending District Court litigation since 2013, and has been actively involved as
`
`counsel for Samsung since that time. As counsel in the District Court litigation, Mr.
`
`Biddinger has, among other things, been heavily involved with forming non-
`
`infringement and invalidity positions against Affinity’s patents. In addition, Mr.
`
`Biddinger is representing Samsung as backup counsel pro hac vice in the IPR
`
`proceedings of related U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390 (IPR2014-00209 and IPR2014-
`
`00212) and U.S. Patent No. 8,359,007 (IPR2014-00407 and IPR2014-00408), also
`
`involving Affinity and Samsung. Accordingly, Samsung prefers that Mr. Biddinger
`
`continue as counsel in this IPR proceeding as well; and, further, Affinity does not
`
`oppose Mr. Biddinger’s admission pro hac vice.
`
`III.
`
`Declaration of Brian P. Biddinger
`
`As directed by the Board, this Motion is also accompanied by the Declaration
`
`of Brian P. Biddinger in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission attesting to
`
`the requirements laid out in the Board’s Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission in Case IPR2013-00639 (Paper 7).
`
`For the foregoing reasons as well as the reasons contained in the attached
`
`declaration, Samsung respectfully requests admission of Brian P. Biddinger as counsel
`
`pro hac vice.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`March 24, 2015
`
`By: /J. Steven Baughman/
`J. Steven Baughman (Lead Counsel)
`Reg. No. 47,414
`
`
`
`
`Gabrielle E. Higgins (Backup Counsel)
`Reg. No. 38,916
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`One Metro Center, 700 12th St. – Ste. 900
`Washington, DC 20005-3948
`P: 202-508-4606 / F: 202-383-8371
`steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`
`Mailing address for all PTAB correspondence: ROPES & GRAY LLP
`IPRM – Floor 43, Prudential Tower, 800 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02199-3600
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1900 University Avenue – Suite 600
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303
`P: 650-617-4000 /F: 650-617-4090
`gabrielle.higgins@ropesgray.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD; and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioners
`v.
`
`AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`______________
`
`Case IPR2014-01181
`Patent 8,532,641
`______________
`
`
`
`Before the Honorable KEVIN F. TURNER, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, and
`JON B. TORNQUIST, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN P. BIDDINGER
`IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`I, Brian P. Biddinger, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest to the
`
`following:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bars of New York and California.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`
`3.
`
`I have never been denied an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has ever been imposed against me by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in 37 C.F.R Part 42.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`In the last three (3) years, I have applied to appear pro hac vice before the Office.
`
`On July 17, 2014, I applied to appear pro hac vice in IPR2014-00209 and IPR2014-
`
`00212, involving related U.S. Patent No. 7,953,390 and Samsung and Affinity, and on
`
`August 8, 2014, the Board granted the motions for pro hac vice admission (Paper 33 and
`
`Paper 31, respectively). On August 15, 2014, I applied to appear pro hac vice in
`
`IPR2014-00407 and IPR2014-00408, involving related U.S. Patent No. 8,359,007 and
`
`Samsung and Affinity, and on August 25, 2014, the Board granted the motions for pro
`
`hac vice admission (Paper 22 and Paper 21, respectively).
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney having familiarity with the subject
`
`matter at issue in this proceeding. I have been practicing law since 2003 and have
`
`extensive experience litigating patent infringement cases in many different District
`
`Courts across the country, including participation in multiple trials, Markman hearings,
`
`patent summary judgment proceedings, and other patent-related hearings and
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`IPR201-4«01181
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`
`pleadings concerning, inter aka, patent validity and/or infringement. I have received
`
`professional recognition in the field as a leading patent litigation attorney including as
`
`a New York Super Lawyer (2013) and a New York Super Lawyers Rising Star (2011-
`
`2012).
`
`I am familiar with U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641 (“the ‘641 Patent”) and the issues
`
`involved in this case.
`
`I have represented Samsung against Affinity as counsel in the
`
`pending District Court litigation since 2013 and have been actively involved as
`
`counsel for Samsung since that time. As counsel in the District Court litigation, 1
`
`have, among other things, been involved with forming non—infringement and
`
`invalidity positions against Affinity’s ‘641 patent and related patents.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed this7_2l_‘""‘day of March, 2015, in New York, NY.
`
`
`
`Brian P. Biddinger
`
`

`

`IPR2014-01181
`U.S. Patent No. 8,532,641
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO
`
`HAC VICE ADMISSION OF BRIAN P. BIDDINGER and DECLARATION OF
`
`BRIAN P. BIDDINGER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`
`ADMISSION has been served in its entirety by causing the aforementioned
`
`document to be electronically mailed, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, to the
`
`following attorneys of record for the Patent Owner listed below:
`
`Ryan M. Schultz
`ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
`rmschultz@rkmc.com
`
`Thomas DeSimone
`ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
`trdesimone@rkmc.com
`
`
`
`Dated: March 24, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Carolyn L. Redding/
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket