`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, (TEXAS), INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`FILED
`OCT 11 2001
`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`B~ESTERN )1J/ICT OF TEXAS
`
`DEPU fY CLERK
`
`-vs-
`
`Case No. A-00-CA-217-SS
`
`CHAPARRAL NETWORK STORAGE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`BE IT REMEMBERED on the 4th day of September 2001, the Court called the above-
`
`captioned matter, and all parties appeared through their appropriate representatives and counsel of
`
`record and announced ready for trial, and a jury composed of seven legally qualified jurors having
`
`been empaneled and this case proceeded to trial on September 4, 2001, and on September 6, 2001,
`
`the plaintiff rested its case and the defendant filed a motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 50 of the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court overruled said motion with the exception of the issue
`
`of "contributory inducement," and the trial proceeded unti I September 11, 2001, when the defendant
`
`rested, and thereafter the plaintiff filed its motion for judgment as a matter of Jaw pursuant to Rule
`
`50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the defendant renewed its Rule 50 motion and the
`
`Court ovenuled all motions and the case proceeded with all parties closing on September 11, 2001,
`
`and all parties renewing their motions, and the Cou11 ove!Tuling all Rule 50 motions, and after the
`
`Court had instructed the jury and all counsel had made their final arguments, the case was submitted
`
` CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 2003
`Oracle Corp. et al v Crossroads Systems, Inc.
` IPR2014-01177
`
`(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 2 of 5
`
`to the jury on the 12th day of September 2001, and on that said day, the jury returned its verdict
`
`answering the questions as follows:
`
`Question No. 1:
`
`Yes
`
`1-14
`
`Question 2:
`
`Not answered
`
`Question 3:
`
`Yes
`
`July 14
`
`Question 4:
`
`Yes
`
`Question 5:
`
`Question 6:
`
`Question 7:
`
`Question 8:
`
`Question 9:
`
`July 14
`
`Router
`167,247
`5%
`8365.00
`
`Yes
`
`1-14
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`RAID
`1,371,693
`3%
`41,150.79
`
`49,515.79
`
`Said verdict was signed by the presiding juror who advised in open court it was a unanimous
`
`verdict and the verdict was accepted by the Court and filed by the Cleric Thereafter, the parties filed
`
`motions and on this date the Court has entered its orders disposing of all motions pending and, based
`
`upon the pleadings, trial record, and the law, enters this final judgment:
`
`IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the plaintiff Crossroads Systems
`
`(Texas), Inc., do have and recover judgment of and against the defendant Chapanal Network
`
`-2-
`
`(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 3 of 5
`
`Storage, Inc., for the total sum of$148,547.37 with interest as ofJuly 11,2001, in the amount
`
`of 2.40 percent per annum until paid, plus all costs of suit.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:
`
`1.
`
`ChapmTal Network Storage, Inc., has infringed claims 1-14 of the '972 patent
`
`in making, using, offering to sell, and selling certain routers and RAID controllers, including but not
`
`limited to the models listed in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and incorporated by reference and including
`
`any other products that provide access controls in a way that is substantially similar to any product
`
`listed in Exhibit l.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1-14 of the '972 patent are valid.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 154, Crossroads Systems (Texas), Inc., has the
`
`exclusive right in the United States to make, have made, use, sell, offer for sell, and impmt products
`
`covered by, or coming within the scope of any of claims 1-14 of the '972 patent.
`
`4.
`
`ChapatTal has infringed Crossroads' tights in making, offering to sell, and
`
`selling router and RAID controller products that use, embody, or perform the inventions of claims
`
`1-14 of the '972 patent.
`
`5.
`
`Chaparral has contributorily infringed and induced the infringement of claims
`
`14 of the '972 patent by providing third parties with the means of infringing claims 7-14 of the
`
`'972 patent and by instructing third parties to infringe claims 7-14 of the '972 patent.
`
`6.
`
`By reason ofthe infringement of the '972 patent, ChapatTal Network Storage,
`
`Inc., its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons acting in concert
`
`or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise,
`
`are enjoined as of this date from infringing any of claims 1-14 of Crossroads Systems (Texas), Inc.'s
`
`-3-
`
`(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 4 of 5
`
`'972 patent, including but not limited to the router and RAID controller models identified on Exhibit
`
`1 and including any other router or RAID controllers that are substantially similar to any product
`
`listed in Exhibit 1.
`
`7.
`
`ChapatTal Network Storage, Inc., its officers, directors, agents, servants,
`
`employees. attorneys, and all persons acting in concert or participation with them who receive actual
`
`notice of this order by personal service or otherwise are enjoined as of this date from contJibutorily
`
`infringing or inducing the infringement of any of claims 7-14 of Crossroads Systems (Texas), Inc.'s
`
`'972 patent.
`
`8.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Chapan·al Network Storage, Inc., will, no
`
`later than 30 business days from the date of the entry of this injunction obtain from any dealers,
`
`distributors. or sales agents within the United States and take into Chaparral's possession all products
`
`which are owned by Chapanal but which are now or will be in the possession or under control of
`
`such dealers, distributors, or sales agents and which infringe any of the claims 1-14 of the '972 patent
`
`(including but not limited to the products identified in Exhibit 1 and any other router or RAID
`
`controllers that are substantially similar to any product listed in Exhibit 1).
`
`9.
`
`The United States District Court for the Westem District of Texas, Austin
`
`Division, retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this injunction.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED this the 11th day of October 2001.
`
`-4-
`
`(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`
`
`Case 1:00-cv-00217-SS Document 169 Filed 10/11/01 Page 5 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, (TEXAS), INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-vs-
`
`Case No. A-00-CA-217-SS
`
`CHAPARRAL NETWORK STORAGE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`EXHIBIT 1 TO PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`ChapmTal Router Products that Infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,941.972
`
`FS 1220
`FS 2620
`
`Chapmnl RAID Controller Products that Infringe U.S. Patent No. 5.941,972
`
`07313
`07324
`08324
`K7313
`K7413
`A8526
`
`(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:24)