throbber
IPR2014-01166 Paper 39
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`IPR2014-01276 Paper 35
`
`571-272-7822
`
` Entered: October 21, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., CIENA CORPORATION,
`CORIANT OPERATIONS, INC., CORIANT (USA) INC., AND
`FUJITSU NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CAPELLA PHOTONICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2014-011661 and IPR2014-012762
`Patents RE42,368 and RE42,6783
`____________
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, and
`JAMES A. TARTAL, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TARTAL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 Case IPR2015-00816 has been joined with IPR2014-01166.
`2 Case IPR2015-00894 has been joined with IPR2014-01276.
`3 This order addresses issues that are the same in the identified cases. The
`parties are authorized to use this heading when filing a single paper in each
`proceeding, provided that such heading includes a footnote attesting that
`“the word-for-word identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in
`the heading.”
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01166 and IPR2014-01276
`Patent RE42,368 and RE42,678
`
`
`As authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to the Petition in
`IPR2014-01166 (Paper 3) and in IPR2014-01276 (Paper 4), Cisco Systems,
`Inc. , (“Cisco”) filed Motions for pro hac vice admission of Sarah J. Guske
`in IPR2014-01166 (Paper 35) and IPR2014-01276 (Paper 31).4 Patent
`Owner did not file an opposition to the Motions. Cisco’s Motions are
`granted. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); see also Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel
`Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission, Paper 7 (October 15, 2003) (setting forth requirements for pro
`hac vice admission).5
`It is
`ORDERED that Cisco’s Motion for pro hac vice admission is
`granted, and Ms. Guske is authorized to represent Cisco as back-up counsel
`in IPR2014-01166 and IPR2014-01276;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Cisco is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner as lead counsel in this inter partes review proceeding; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Guske is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that
`Ms. Guske is subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`4 Cisco’s Motions were accompanied by attachments identified as Exhibit A,
`“Ms. Guske’s Biography,” and an affidavit of Ms. Guske in support of the
`Motions. Cisco is cautioned that combined documents are not permitted. 37
`C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3). All evidence, including affidavits, must be separately
`filed in the form of an exhibit and properly labelled. 37 C.F.R. §42.63. For
`purposes of this Decision we will not require refiling of the attachments as
`exhibits, however, all future filings must comply with these requirements.
`5 Available at http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing-
`patent-decisions/decisions-and-opinions/representative-orders.
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01166 and IPR2014-01276
`Patent RE42,368 and RE42,678
`
` §
`
` 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01166 and IPR2014-01276
`Patent RE42,368 and RE42,678
`
`PETITIONER
`Wayne O. Stacy
`Matthew J. Leary
`COOLEY LLP
`wstacey@cooley.com
`capellacisco@cooley.com
`
`Christopher Chalsen
`Lawrence Kass
`Nathaniel Browand
`Suraj Balusu
`MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP
`cchalsen@milbank.com
`lkass@milbank.com
`nbrowand@milbank.com
`sbalusu@milbank.com
`
`Thomas Pratt
`J Pieter Van Es
`Jordan Bodner
`Michael Cuviello
`BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.
`TPratt@bannerwitcoff.com
`PVanEs@bannerwitcoff.com
`JBodner@bannerwitcoff.com
`MCuviello@bannerwitcoff.com
`
`4
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01166 and IPR2014-01276
`Patent RE42,368 and RE42,678
`
`PATENT OWNER
`Robert Sterne
`Jon E. Wright
`Jason D. Eisenberg
`Nicholas J. Nowak
`Jonathan Tuminaro
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`rsterne-PTAB@skgf.com
`jwright-PTAB@skgf.com
`jasone-PTAB@skgf.com
`nnowak-PTAB@skgf.com
`jtuminar-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket