`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CAPELLA PHOTONICS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`____________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF NICHOLAS J. NOWAK UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`
`Exhibit List
`
`
`Exhibit #
`2001
`2002
`
`2003
`
`Description
`Provisional Patent Application No. 60/267,285
`Transcript of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Teleconference in Case
`IPR2014-01166, Thursday, March 5, 2015
`Affidavit of Nicholas J. Nowak in Support of Pro Hac Vice
`Admission
`
`
`
`- i -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`
`I. RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to
`
`Petition (Paper 3), Patent Owner Capella Photonics, Inc. (“Patent Owner”)
`
`respectfully requests the pro hac vice admission of Nicholas J. Nowak in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`II. GOVERNING LAW, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`
`Section 42.10(c) states as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a
`proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner
`and to any other conditions as the Board may impose. For
`example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney
`and has an established familiarity with the subject matter
`at issue in the proceeding.
`
`The Board has stated that any motion for pro hac vice admission under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c) must be filed in accordance with the “Order – Authorizing Motion
`
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission” entered in Case IPR2013-00010 (MPT) (“Motorola
`
`Order”). (See Motorola Order, p. 2.)
`
`The Motorola Order requires that such motions (1) “[c]ontain a statement of
`
`facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`during the proceeding;” and (2) “[b]e accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of
`
`the individual seeking to appear attesting to the following”:
`
`ii.
`
`v.
`
`vi.
`
`i. Membership in good standing of the Bar of at least
`one State or the District of Columbia;
`No suspensions or disbarments from practice
`before any court or administrative body;
`iii. No application for admission to practice before any
`court or administrative body ever denied;
`iv. No sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any
`court or administrative body;
`The individual seeking to appear has read and will
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set
`forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.;
`The individual will be subject to the USPTO Code
`of Professional Responsibility set forth in 37
`C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and disciplinary
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`vii. All other proceedings before the Office for which
`the individual has applied to appear pro hac vice in
`the last three (3) years; and
`viii. Familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Based on the following facts, and supported by the Affidavit of Mr. Nowak,
`
`submitted herewith as Ex. 2003, Patent Owner requests the pro hac vice admission
`
`of Nicholas J. Nowak in this proceeding:
`
`1.
`
`Patent Owner’s lead counsel, Robert Greene Sterne, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Reg. No. 28,912). Patent Owner’s back-up counsel, Jason
`
`D. Eisenberg, is a registered practitioner (Reg. No. 43,447).
`
`2. Mr. Nowak is Of Counsel at the law firm of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein
`
`and Fox P.L.L.C. (Ex. 2003 at ¶ 3.)
`
`3. Mr. Nowak is an experienced patent litigation attorney. Mr. Nowak has
`
`been a patent litigation attorney for 13 years. (Id. at 4.) Mr. Nowak has
`
`been litigating patent cases during the entire time period, and has
`
`litigated numerous patent infringement actions involving a variety of
`
`technologies. He has significant experience in all aspects of patent
`
`litigation, including depositions, claim construction proceedings, and
`
`various stages of trial. (Id.)
`
`4. Mr. Nowak is a member of good standing of the Bars of:
`
`Massachusetts, New York, the District of Columbia, the United States
`
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the United States District
`
`Court for the Southern District of New York. (Id. at 5.)
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`5. Mr. Nowak has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before
`
`any court or administrative body. (Id.)
`
`6.
`
`No application of Mr. Nowak for admission to practice before any court
`
`or administrative body has ever been ultimately denied. (Id. at 6.)
`
`7.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations have ever been imposed against Mr.
`
`Nowak by any court or administrative body. (Id. at 7.)
`
`8. Mr. Nowak has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in
`
`part 42 of the C.F.R. (Id. at 8.)
`
`9. Mr. Nowak understands that he will be subject to the USPTO Code of
`
`Professional Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). (Id. at 9.)
`
`10. Mr. Nowak is concurrently seeking pro hac vice admission to appear in
`
`a co-pending, related matter against the Patent Owner, Case
`
`IPR2014-012761. Mr. Nowak has not applied to appear pro hac vice in
`
`any other proceedings before the Office in the last three (3) years.
`
`
`1 Case IPR2014-01276, also filed by the Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Petitioner”),
`
`challenges claims of related U.S. Patent No. RE42,678 (“the ’678 patent”).
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`IV. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`MR. NOWAK IN THIS PROCEEDING
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a
`
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered
`
`practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may impose. 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.10(c). Patent Owner’s lead counsel, Robert Greene Sterne, is a registered
`
`practitioner. Based on the facts contained herein, as supported by Mr. Nowak’s
`
`Affidavit, good cause exists to admit Mr. Nowak pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`As supported by his affidavit, Mr. Nowak is an experienced litigating attorney
`
`with over 13 years of patent litigation experience. Mr. Nowak also has an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. (Ex. 2003
`
`at ¶¶ 10-12.)
`
`Mr. Nowak has reviewed in detail the pleadings submitted by Petitioner and
`
`Patent Owner in this proceeding. (Id. at 11.) Mr. Nowak has reviewed in detail the
`
`patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. RE42,368 (“the ’368 patent”). (Id. at 10.) He has
`
`also reviewed in detail the relevant references asserted by Petitioner. (Id.) Mr.
`
`Nowak has engaged in many hours of strategic and substantive discussions
`
`regarding this proceeding with counsel for Patent Owner in this proceeding. (Id. at
`
`11.)
`
`Based on the facts contained herein, as supported by Mr. Nowak’s Affidavit,
`
`good cause exists to admit Mr. Nowak pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests that Mr. Nowak
`
`be admitted pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is hereby authorized to charge any fees
`
`associated with this filing to Deposit Account 19-0036 (Customer ID No. 45324).
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
` STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg
`Registration No. 43,447
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`Date: April 20, 2015
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01166
`Patent RE42,368
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`
`
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF NICHOLAS J. NOWAK
`
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and associated Exhibit 2003 were electronically
`
`served via e-mail on April 20, 2015, in their entireties on the following:
`
`Lead Counsel
`Wayne O. Stacy
`COOLEY LLP
`380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 900
`Broomfield, CO 80021
`wstacy@cooley.com
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Matthew J. Leary
`COOLEY LLP
`380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 900
`Broomfield, CO 80021
`CapellaCisco@cooley.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
` STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg
`Registration No. 43,447
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`Date: April 20, 2015
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`