throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Capella Photonics, Inc.
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. RE42,368
`Filing Date: June 15, 2010
`Reissue Date: May 17, 2011
`
`Title: RECONFIGURABLE OPTICAL ADD-DROP MULTIPLEXERS WITH
`SERVO CONTROL AND DYNAMIC SPECTRAL POWER MANAGEMENT
`CAPABILITIES
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. 2014-01166
`
`Petitioner’s List of Proposed Motions
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`Case No. 2014-01166
`Atty. Docket No. CSCO-001/00US-[034855.2014] (RE42,368)
`Petitioner’s List of Proposed Motions
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756,
`
`
`
`48765-66 (August 14, 2012), Petitioner Cisco Systems, Inc., hereby submits the
`
`following list of proposed motions it is currently contemplating filing. Although
`
`motions to exclude evidence and motions for observations on cross-examination
`
`have been authorized by the Board, Cisco identifies such motions here to preserve
`
`its right to file them. This list is provided without prejudice to Petitioner’s right to
`
`seek authorization to file additional motions pursuant to the Board's authorization
`
`or to refrain from filing the motions listed herein.
`
`1. Motion to submit supplemental information pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.123
`
`(e.g., Patent Owner’s (“PO”)’s
`
`interrogatory responses and related
`
`discovery regarding alleged conception, diligence and reduction
`
`to
`
`practice).1
`
`2. Motion for additional discovery pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.51(b)(2) (e.g.,
`
`regarding (1) alleged conception, diligence and reduction to practice,
`
`
`1 Petitioner is concurrently filing a Request for Authorization to Move to Submit
`Supplemental Information. As explained in that Request, PO indicated in the
`associated District Court litigation that it will attempt to swear behind the prior art
`at issue in this IPR. PO also indicated it will may on alleged priority date evidence
`including documents that are solely in PO’s and in third parties’ possession. Thus,
`if PO pursues this argument, then in the interests of justice, Petitioner must be able
`to explore and test PO’s claims and the evidence behind them.
`1
`
`
`
`

`
`Case No. 2014-01166
`Atty. Docket No. CSCO-001/00US-[034855.2014] (RE42,368)
`Petitioner’s List of Proposed Motions
`
`
`including such evidence in PO’s or third parties’ control; and/or (2) lack of
`
`indicia of non-obviousness). Some of this discovery is likely to involve
`
`third-party subpoenas to, e.g., the named inventors of the RE42,368 patent
`
`at issue. Again, such motion(s) would be contingent on the arguments PO
`
`makes.
`
`3. Motion for extension of the hearing date and/or Petitioner’s Opposition.
`
`This may be necessary to accommodate the time to issue and achieve
`
`compliance with subpoenas that may be required depending on PO’s
`
`priority date arguments.
`
`4. Motion to Seal (and for Protective Orders).
`
`5. Motion to Compel Testimony and/or Motion for Live Testimony at oral
`
`argument (contingent again on PO’s arguments).
`
`6. Motion for observations on cross-examination as provided for in the
`
`Scheduling Order.
`
`7. Motion to exclude evidence pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.64(c).
`
`8. Motion to enlarge trial to include grounds denied as redundant.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case No. 2014-01166
`Atty. Docket No. CSCO-001/00US-[034855.2014] (RE42,368)
`Petitioner’s List of Proposed Motions
`
`
`9. Motion pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.222 to join a newly filed petition to this
`
`instituted IPR (Petition to be filed before February 28, 2015).
`
`These proposed motions have been timely filed within one month of the date
`
`the trial was instituted, and at least two business days before any expected
`
`conference call with the Board.
`
`
`Dated: February 26, 2015
`
`COOLEY LLP
`ATTN: Wayne O. Stacy
`1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 700
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 842-7800
`Fax: (202) 842-7899
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`COOLEY LLP
`
`/ Matthew J. Leary /
`Matthew J. Leary
`Reg. No. 58,593
`Back-up Counsel
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case No. 2014-01166
`Atty. Docket No. CSCO-001/00US-[034855.2014] (RE42,368)
`Petitioner’s List of Proposed Motions
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) and 42.105(b), the undersigned certifies that on
`
`February 26, 2015, a complete and entire electronic copy of this Petitioner’s List
`
`of Proposed Motions for Inter Partes Review No. 2014-01166, was served
`
`electronically via email in its entirety on the following counsel of record for Patent
`
`Robert Greene Sterne (Lead Counsel)
`Jon E. Wright (Backup Counsel)
`Jason D. Eisenberg (Backup Counsel)
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N. W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`E-mails:
`rsterne-PTAB@skgf.com
`jwright-PTAB@skgf.com
`jasone-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`By: / Matthew J. Leary /
`
`Matthew J. Leary
`
`Reg. No. 58,593
`
`Back-up Counsel
`
`
`1
`
`Owners:
`
`
`
`
`
`114253164 v5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket