throbber

`
`[Page 509]
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND
`
` TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Case No: IPR2014-01102
`
`U.S. Patent No: 5,228,077
`
`_________________________________
`
`Case No: IPR2014-01103
`
`U.S. Patent No: 5,552,917
`
`_________________________________
`
`Case No: IPR2014-01104
`
`U.S. Patent No: 5,414,761
`
`__________________________________
`
`Case No: IPR2014-01106
`
`U.S. Patent No: 5,255,313
`
`__________________________________
`
`Case No: IPR2014-01109
`
`U.S. Patent No: 7,831,930
`
`___________________________________
`
` Deposition of ALEX COOK, taken
`
`before LAURA MUKAHIRN, CSR, RPR, CRR, at
`
`One South Dearborn Street, in the City of
`
`Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, commencing
`
`at 9:00 o'clock a.m. on the 17th day of
`
`June, 2015.
`
` VOLUME III
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000001
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 510]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` OSTROLENK FABER LLP
`
` 1180 Avenue of the Americas
`
` New York, New York 10036
`
` (212)382-0700
`
` BY: MR. KEITH BARKAUS
`
` -AND-
`
` SIDLEY AUSTIN
`
` 1001 Page Mill Road
`
` Building 1
`
` Palo Alto, California 94304
`
` (650)565-7006
`
` BY: MR. PETER H. KANG
`
` MR. FERENC PAZMANDI
`
` Appeared on behalf of Universal
`
` Remote Control, Inc.;
`
` GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`
` 77 West Wacker Drive
`
`12
`
` Suite 2500
`
` Chicago, Illinois 60601
`
`13
`
` (312) 456-8451
`
` BY: MR. ERIC J. MAIERS
`
`14
`
` Appeared on behalf of Universal
`
` Electronics, Inc.
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000002
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 511]
`
` I N D E X
`
` Examinations Page
`
`Cross-Examination 512
`
`By Mr. Barkaus
`
` 727
`
`Direct Examination
`
`By Mr. Maiers
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
` No. Page
`
` Exhibit 1046 513
`
` (Universal Remote Control Exhibit
`
` 1046 Trial No. IPR 2014-1146)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
` Exhibit 2029 521
`
`10
`
` (Universal Electronics Exhibit 2029
`
` Trial No. IPR 2014-1146)
`
`11
`
` Exhibit 1003
`
`12
`
` (Universal Remote Control Exhibit 526
`
` No. 1003 Trial No. IPR 2014-1146)
`
`13
`
` Exhibit 1001 532
`
`14
`
` (Universal Remote Control Exhibit
`
` No. 1001 Trial No. IPR 2014-1146)
`
`15
`
` Exhibit 1047 542
`
`16
`
` (Universal Remote Control Exhibit
`
` 1047 Trial No. IPR 2014-1146)
`
`17
`
` Exhibit 1005 592
`
`18
`
` (Universal Remote Control Exhibit
`
` 1005 Trial No. IPR 2014-1146)
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` (Witness previously
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000003
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 512]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` sworn.)
`
` ALEX COOK
`
` called as a witness herein, having been
`
` first duly sworn, was examined and
`
` testified further as follows:
`
` Cross-Examination
`
` By Mr. Barkaus
`
` Q. Good morning, Mr. Cook.
`
` A. Good morning, Mr. Barkaus.
`
` Q. You recall that you're still
`
` under oath, sir?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` (Document marked as
`
` Exhibit No. 1046 for
`
` identification.)
`
` BY MR. BARKAUS:
`
` Q. Okay. I'm going to hand to you
`
` an exhibit which we've marked Universal
`
` Remote Control Exhibit 1046. And,
`
` actually, I just noticed -- Will you hand
`
` that back to me. This is currently marked
`
` Universal Remote Control Exhibit 1046,
`
` Trial No. IPR 2014-1109. And we're going
`
` to change that to be Universal Remote
`
` Control Exhibit 1046 Trial No. IPR
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000004
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 513]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 2014-1146.
`
` (Document remarked as
`
` Exhibit No. 1046 for
`
` identification.)
`
` BY MR. BARKAUS:
`
` Q. So do you have that document in
`
` front of you now, Mr. Cook?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. All right. And as you can see,
`
` it's -- on the top right-hand it says
`
` Amended Notice of Deposition of Alex Cook;
`
` is that correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. On the left-hand side it
`
` says -- Well, let's look at the case
`
` number. IPR 2014-1146 and U.S. Patent No.
`
` 8,243,207. Do you see that?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And if you turn to Page 2,
`
` there's a listing of the trial numbers or
`
` the case numbers that you're giving
`
` testimony in: Case Nos. IPR 2014-1102, IPR
`
` 2014-1103, IPR 2014-1104, IPR 2014-1106.
`
` And you gave testimony in those matters
`
` yesterday. Do you recall doing that?
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000005
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 514]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Okay. And, finally, IPR
`
` 2014-1109, and you gave testimony in that
`
` matter on Monday. Do you recall doing
`
` that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Okay. And you understand that
`
` today we're going to ask you to give some
`
` testimony on IPR 2014-1146. Do you
`
` understand that?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Okay. Great. And for -- To
`
` make things easier on both of us, when I
`
` refer to U.S. Patent No. 8,243,207, I'm
`
` going to use the term the '207 patent.
`
` Does that work for you?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. You'll understand what that
`
` means. And then when I refer to the IPR as
`
` a whole, can I refer to that as the 1146
`
` IPR? Do you understand that?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Okay. Good. I'd like to start
`
` off by talking a little bit about your time
`
` at Scientific Atlanta which was between
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000006
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 515]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1983 and 1996; is that correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And you previously mentioned
`
` that while you were working there, you
`
` worked on set-top boxes as well as remote
`
` controls, both single device remote
`
` controls and universal remote controls; is
`
` that correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. Okay. While you were at
`
` Scientific Atlanta, did you do any work on
`
` VCRs?
`
` MR. MAIERS: Objection. Form.
`
` THE WITNESS: When you say did I
`
` do any work on VCRs, are you saying did I
`
` design or develop VCRs? What's your
`
` question?
`
` BY MR. BARKAUS:
`
` Q. Let's go with that one. Did
`
` you design or develop VCRs at Scientific
`
` Atlanta?
`
` A. No, I did not.
`
` Q. Did you do any work related to
`
` VCRs at Scientific Atlanta?
`
` A. During that period of time VCRs
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000007
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 516]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` in home environment were common, and so I
`
` became very familiar with VCRs. And so
`
` from that sense in understanding the
`
` environment of a typical cable subscriber
`
` and the various pieces of equipment that
`
` they had, yes, I became very familiar with
`
` VCRs.
`
` Q. But Scientific Atlanta did not
`
` make any VCRs; is that correct?
`
` A. No. But definitely impacted
`
` the other products we did make.
`
` Q. Did -- Have you ever had any
`
` design and/or development experience in DVD
`
` players?
`
` A. Design or development
`
` experience in DVD players, no, not
`
` directly.
`
` Q. Did you have design or
`
` development experience in DVD players
`
` indirectly?
`
` A. In the effect, again, on the
`
` set-top box products and remote controls
`
` that Scientific Atlanta made we had to
`
` consider the entire entertainment
`
` environment in the home. And that included
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000008
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 517]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` DVD players.
`
` Q. Scientific Atlanta didn't make
`
` any DVD players, did they?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. After leaving Scientific
`
` Atlanta, did you have any experience in the
`
` design or development of VCRs?
`
` A. I don't recall ever having any
`
` design or development experience with VCRs.
`
` Q. So that would be -- So you say
`
` you don't recall ever having any design or
`
` development experience with VCRs. That's
`
` in your entire career?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. Okay. And do you recall ever
`
` having design or development experience
`
` with DVD players over the course of your
`
` career?
`
` A. I don't recall ever having any
`
` design or development experience with DVD
`
` players over the entire career.
`
` Q. Have you ever had any
`
` experience in design or development of
`
` digital video recording devices such as,
`
` for example, the TiVo device?
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000009
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 518]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I've had experience with
`
` digital video recording devices similar to
`
` a TiVo device.
`
` Q. And designing and developing
`
` those devices?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And where was that at?
`
` A. That -- I've had that
`
` experience in designing and developing
`
` those products in my current role at
`
` Comcast.
`
` Q. So presently working in the
`
` design and development -- slow down a
`
` little bit here.
`
` Are you presently working on
`
` the design and development of digital video
`
` recording devices at Comcast?
`
` A. Not today. The products I'm
`
` working on today do not have that feature.
`
` Q. Okay. So this was in the past?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Can you tell me approximately
`
` when you worked on those types of products?
`
` A. 2011 and '12, I think.
`
` Q. And prior to that work that you
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000010
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 519]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` did at Comcast, did you have any experience
`
` in the design and development of digital
`
` video recording devices?
`
` A. I don't think I had any design
`
` or development role prior to the work at
`
` Comcast.
`
` Q. And did any of your prior
`
` employers make a product -- make a digital
`
` video recording device?
`
` A. I did contract work for --
`
` consulting work for a company called Nagra
`
` Livewire from 2006. Let me get the dates
`
` right. Sorry. Through -- yeah, 20 -- let
`
` me say 2007 through -- through late 2010.
`
` Nagra made a software product that went
`
` with digital video recorders, and I was
`
` involved in the team that sourced the
`
` hardware that used that software product.
`
` So I had some role in that whole process
`
` from 2007 through late 2010.
`
` Q. And you said the name of the
`
` company was Nagra? Can you spell that,
`
` please?
`
` A. N-A-G-R-A. And I'm sorry. And
`
` the specific division at the time was a
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000011
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 520]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` company called Livewire, L-I-V-E-W-I-R-E,
`
` all one word, located in Atlanta.
`
` Q. And you said that this company
`
` developed a software application?
`
` A. Yeah. The application was
`
` actually called Livewire.
`
` Q. Okay. But this company,
`
` Livewire, did not make the hardware. They
`
` just wrote the software; is that correct?
`
` A. That's correct. We sourced the
`
` hardware, specified the hardware, and that
`
` was part of my work was to specify that.
`
` Q. So when you say you specified
`
` the hardware, you developed the
`
` specification requirements that you
`
` needed --
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. -- and then someone else made
`
` the device?
`
` A. That's right.
`
` Q. Okay. I'm a little embarrassed
`
` I didn't ask this on the first day, and I
`
` don't think Peter asked it yesterday. What
`
` is your current residence?
`
` A. Current residence is in the
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000012
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 521]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Atlanta area. It's 2290 Soaring, that's
`
` S-O-A-R-I-N-G, Soaring Lane, and the city
`
` is Lawrenceville,
`
` L-A-W-R-E-N-C-E-V-I-L-L-E, Georgia, 30044.
`
` Q. I'm going to give you now a
`
` copy of document Universal Electronics
`
` Exhibit 2029 in the 1146 IPR. Do you
`
` recognize this document?
`
` A. Yes. It's my declaration in
`
` this case.
`
` Q. Okay. And can you turn to
`
` Page -- okay. I'm going to stick with the
`
` rule today, otherwise Eric is going to
`
` throw stuff at me. We'll use the page
`
` numbers on this document after Universal
`
` Electronic Exhibit 2029. There's a page
`
` number. We're going to use that page
`
` number on the bottom right side of the
`
` page. Do you understand that?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. So please turn to Page 26 of
`
` Exhibit 2029.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And do you see your signature
`
` on that page?
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000013
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 522]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And is that your signature?
`
` A. It is.
`
` Q. Okay. Do you recall signing
`
` this document?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Okay. There's a date next to
`
` it says March 25, 2015. Is that the day
`
` that you signed this document?
`
` A. It is.
`
` Q. And is that the date that this
`
` document was finalized as far as you're
`
` concerned?
`
` A. Yes, it is. Yes.
`
` Q. And do you recall when you
`
` began working on this document?
`
` A. Same answer as on Monday. It
`
` was in that February time frame, but I do
`
` not recall the exact start of it.
`
` Q. And the process that you used
`
` to prepare this document is the same
`
` process that you used to prepare your
`
` declaration in the 1109 IPR; is that
`
` correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000014
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 523]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Okay. And just to quickly
`
` summarize, you prepared a first draft of
`
` the document; is that correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. And then you forwarded that on
`
` to some folks at Greenberg Traurig and they
`
` revised the formatting; is that correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. And do you recall if they made
`
` any changes to the substance of the
`
` document?
`
` A. I don't recall any changes to
`
` the substance of the document, no.
`
` Q. When I say "the document," I
`
` mean this specific document we're referring
`
` to right now.
`
` A. I don't recall any changes for
`
` this.
`
` Q. Do you recall if -- do you
`
` recall how many drafts, if any additional
`
` drafts, were exchanged between you and
`
` Greenberg Traurig?
`
` A. I don't recall any additional
`
` drafts on this document.
`
` Q. Okay. So just to summarize
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000015
`
`

`

`
`
` then, you do recall preparing a first draft
`
`[Page 524]
`
` of this document?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Okay. And then you sent it to
`
` Greenberg Traurig and they made whatever
`
` formatting changes they believed were
`
` necessary; is that correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` MR. MAIERS: Objection. Form.
`
` BY MR. BARKAUS:
`
` Q. And then they sent you back a
`
` revised draft; is that correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. And you don't recall making any
`
` additional changes to that revised draft?
`
` A. I don't recall making any
`
` additional changes on this one to that
`
` revised draft, no.
`
` Q. Okay. So do you believe that
`
` the revised draft you got back from
`
` Greenberg Traurig is the same as this
`
` document in final form?
`
` A. I believe that it is, yes.
`
` Q. Okay. Could you please turn to
`
` Page 6 of Exhibit 2029?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000016
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 525]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. And I'd like to direct your
`
` attention to Paragraph 20 which is at the
`
` bottom of that page. Do you see that
`
` paragraph?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And you see it says here, I
`
` agree with Mr. Geier that a person of
`
` ordinary skill in the art in the relevant
`
` time frame was aware of associating keys on
`
` a remote control with command values.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And then it says, I would also
`
` agree that it was well known to use a
`
` remote control to select inputs and outputs
`
` of devices. Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Okay. And then, finally, it
`
` says, I do not agree that such a person was
`
` aware of sending a command value to a
`
` device to actively switch inputs and
`
` outputs according to a user's activity.
`
` In that last sentence there,
`
` you use the term actively switch. Do you
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000017
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 526]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Did Mr. Geier use the term
`
` actively switch?
`
` A. No. That's a term --
`
` MR. MAIERS: Objection. Form.
`
` Foundation.
`
` THE WITNESS: No.
`
` BY MR. BARKAUS:
`
` Q. No?
`
` A. Actually, I don't have
`
` Mr. Geier's declaration in front of me.
`
` Can we take a look at that?
`
` Q. We certainly can. I'm going to
`
` go ahead and hand you what's been
`
` previously marked as Universal Remote
`
` Control Exhibit 1003, and this is in the
`
` 1146 IPR.
`
` So going back to my question,
`
` the term actively switch, which is on Page
`
` 6 of your declaration which is
`
` Exhibit 2029. Is the term actively switch
`
` a term that Mr. Geier used?
`
` A. No. It's not a term that he
`
` actively used -- or he used in his
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000018
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 527]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` description of what a person of ordinary
`
` skill in the art would be.
`
` Q. Did Mr. Geier use the term
`
` actively switch anywhere in his
`
` declaration? Actually, withdraw that.
`
` Let's go ahead and take a look
`
` at -- The statements that you make in
`
` Paragraph 20 here, are they with reference
`
` to your citation to Paragraph 22 of
`
` Mr. Geier's declaration in Paragraph 19
`
` above?
`
` A. They would be in reference to
`
` that and anywhere in Mr. Geier's
`
` declaration where he referred to someone of
`
` ordinary skill in the art.
`
` Q. Okay. So then based on your
`
` statements in Paragraph 20, you would agree
`
` that one of skill -- of ordinary skill in
`
` the art was aware of associating keys on a
`
` remote control with command values; is that
`
` correct?
`
` A. I would agree that associating
`
` keys on a remote control with a value that
`
` was transmitted, being the command value,
`
` people would be aware of that.
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000019
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 528]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Okay. So do you agree with the
`
` first sentence of Paragraph 20 in your
`
` declaration, Exhibit 2029? Is that an
`
` accurate statement of your belief?
`
` A. Yes, it is.
`
` Q. Okay. And would you also agree
`
` that one of ordinary skill in the art would
`
` have known to use a remote control to
`
` select inputs and outputs?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. But it is your position based
`
` again on your statements in Paragraph 20
`
` that a person of skill in the art would not
`
` be aware of sending a command value to a
`
` device to actively switch inputs and
`
` outputs; is that correct?
`
` MR. MAIERS: Objection. Form.
`
` BY MR. BARKAUS:
`
` Q. Actually, let me just change
`
` the question.
`
` Would a person of ordinary
`
` skill in the art in the relevant time
`
` period that you refer to here in
`
` Paragraph 20 be aware of sending a command
`
` value to a device to actively switch inputs
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000020
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 529]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` and outputs?
`
` A. Yeah. I believe that a person
`
` of ordinary skill in the art at that time
`
` would not have been aware of sending a
`
` single command value to actively switch
`
` inputs and outputs.
`
` Q. When you use the term actively
`
` switch, what is your understanding of what
`
` that term means?
`
` A. My understanding, I think I
`
` call out later in the document.
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` A. And I give examples from the --
`
` from the '207 patent, and my understanding
`
` comports with those examples given.
`
` Q. So is it your testimony that
`
` actively switch means what occurs in the
`
` examples you cite in your declaration?
`
` A. It means I stated to switch or
`
` route inputs to outputs in a device.
`
` Q. And is it your position --
`
` actually let me -- Withdrawn.
`
` Turning back to Paragraph 20 on
`
` Page 6 of Exhibit 2029. You refer to in
`
` the first sentence that the relevant time
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000021
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 530]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` frame. What is -- what relevant time frame
`
` were you referring to, Paragraph 20?
`
` A. To the time of the filing of
`
` the '207 patent which would have been
`
` September in 2009.
`
` Q. And, again, Mr. Geier did not
`
` use the term actively switch in his
`
` declaration, did he?
`
` A. I haven't looked again at the
`
` entire declaration, and I don't recall if
`
` that phrase is in, though, the declaration.
`
` I can review it now if you'd like.
`
` Q. Sure. Why don't you go ahead
`
` and review it, please.
`
` A. I believe you're right. I
`
` believe he does not discuss act switching
`
` in this document.
`
` Q. Okay. So he does not use the
`
` term actively switch in his declaration; is
`
` that correct?
`
` A. No. I don't see where he used
`
` actively switched or discussed that concept
`
` in any way that I could be referring to.
`
` Q. Okay. So then the statement
`
` that you made in the last sentence of
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000022
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 531]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Paragraph 20, Exhibit 2029, is an error?
`
` MR. MAIERS: Objection. Form.
`
` BY MR. BARKAUS:
`
` Q. Is that correct?
`
` A. I don't think I would call that
`
` an error. I would say that it's a matter
`
` of -- that I'm relating the person that he
`
` described to a person I think would need to
`
` be of ordinary skill in the art.
`
` Q. Okay. But the statement that
`
` you make in the last sentence of Paragraph
`
` 20, you're not actually disagreeing with
`
` anything that Mr. Geier expressed in his
`
` declaration?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` MR. MAIERS: Objection. Form.
`
` BY MR. BARKAUS:
`
` Q. Let's go down to Paragraph 22.
`
` And we're on Page 7 of Exhibit 2029 in the
`
` 1146 IPR. And you see there you say, I
`
` also disagree with Mr. Geier's opinion that
`
` the '207 patent also describes that
`
` technology was known in the art regarding
`
` controlling various components of a home
`
` entertainment center.
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000023
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 532]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Do you see that section?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Okay. Are you familiar with
`
` what a macro is?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Can you explain to me your
`
` understanding of what a macro is?
`
` A. A macro is when I take a number
`
` of individual commands on a remote control
`
` and assign those to a single key so that
`
` pressing that single key transmits those
`
` commands instead of a single command.
`
` Q. And can a macro include
`
` commands that relate to different
`
` components of a home entertainment system?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Let's take a look at -- I'm
`
` going to give you a copy of the '207 patent
`
` so we can talk about that. And this has
`
` been marked as Exhibit 1001 in the 1146
`
` IPR.
`
` Do you see the document that's
`
` marked as Universal Remote Control
`
` Exhibit 1001 -- I'm sorry. Universal
`
` Remote Control Exhibit 1001?
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000024
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 533]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Do you recognize this document?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Can you tell me what it is,
`
` please?
`
` A. I'm sorry?
`
` Q. Can you tell me what it is,
`
` please.
`
` A. It's a copy of U.S. Patent
`
` 8,243,207, the '207 patent.
`
` Q. Okay. And you have read this
`
` '207 patent; is that correct?
`
` A. That's correct. I have.
`
` Q. From cover to cover?
`
` A. Cover to cover.
`
` Q. Okay. Great. Can you please
`
` turn to Page 9 of that Exhibit 1001. I'll
`
` ask you to look at Column 1 starting around
`
` Line 20 where it says, various methods have
`
` been proposed for automating all or part of
`
` these configuration operations, for
`
` example, through use of controlling device
`
` based macro sequences such as described in
`
` U.S. Patent No. 5,959,751.
`
` A. Correct.
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000025
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 534]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Do you see that section?
`
` A. Mm-hmm.
`
` Q. So we just discussed what a
`
` macro is, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And we discussed that macros
`
` can be used to send commands to multiple
`
` components in an entertainment device?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And right here in Column 1 of
`
` the '207 patent, the idea of a macro
`
` sequence is described?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Is that correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. So wouldn't it be fair to say
`
` that the '207 patent does describe at least
`
` one way to control multiple components of
`
` the home entertainment system?
`
` A. No. I think the '207 patent
`
` references that to differentiate its
`
` content from macros.
`
` Q. Would one of skill in the art
`
` understand what a macro is?
`
` A. Yes.
`
`877-479-2484
`
`
`U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01146
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1054 Page 000026
`
`

`

`
`
`[Page 535]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Would one of skill in the art
`
` understand that a macro allows a user to
`
` control multiple components of a home
`
` entertainment system?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. So one of skill in the art,
`
` when they see the description of a patent
`
` that relates to macro sequences, would

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket