throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`ACTAVIS, INC., ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC.,
`ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC,
`AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD., AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC.,
`BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., VENNOOT
`PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, SANDOZ INC., SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE,
`and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`RESEARCH CORPORATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case: IPR2014-01126
`Patent RE 38,551
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`JAMES F. HURST UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313–1450
`Submitted Electronically via the Patent Review Processing System
`
`

`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, and pursuant to the authorization provided by
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`(“Board”) in the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper Number 8, mailed July 23, 2014) (“the
`
`Notice”), Petitioners Actavis, Inc., Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. (f/k/a Watson
`
`Laboratories, Inc. – Florida), Actavis Pharma, Inc. (f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc.),
`
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC,
`
`Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Breckenridge
`
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., Vennoot Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Sandoz Inc., Sun Pharma
`
`Global FZE, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. submit this motion for James
`
`F. Hurst to appear pro hac vice. Petitioners respectfully request the Board to
`
`recognize Mr. Hurst as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding, and
`
`demonstrate good cause for doing so as shown below.
`
`I.
`
`TIME FOR FILING
`
`Pursuant to the authorization provided in the Notice, as well as the “Order –
`
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Unified Patents, Inc. v.
`
`Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (Oct. 15, 2013) (“the Order”), this
`
`motion for pro hac vice admission is being filed no sooner than twenty-one (21)
`
`days after service of the Petition.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Pursuant to the Order, the following statement of facts shows that good
`
`cause exists for the Board to recognize Mr. Hurst pro hac vice.
`
`Lead counsel for this proceeding, Samuel S. Park, is a registered practitioner
`
`(Reg. No. 59,656).
`
`Mr. Hurst is an experienced litigation attorney with 25 years of litigation
`
`experience. Ex. 1037 ¶ 8. He has been involved in numerous patent infringement
`
`cases in federal district courts across the country. Id. He has experience in various
`
`aspects of patent infringement matters, including jury and bench trials, Markman
`
`hearings, and summary judgment hearings. Id. He has argued multiple patent
`
`cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Id.
`
`Mr. Hurst is a member in good standing of the Illinois Bar and is admitted to
`
`practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth
`
`Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the United
`
`States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals
`
`for the District of Columbia Circuit, the United States District Court for the
`
`Eastern District of Texas, and the United States District Court for the Northern
`
`District of Illinois. Id. ¶ 1.
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`Mr. Hurst has not been suspended or disbarred from practice, has never had
`
`any application for admission to practice denied, and has never had any sanctions
`
`or contempt citations imposed against him. Id. ¶¶ 2-4.
`
`Mr. Hurst is lead trial counsel for Petitioners in patent litigation against
`
`Patent Owner concerning the patent challenged in the Petition (UCB, Inc., et al. v.
`
`Accord Healthcare, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 13-1206-LPS (D. Del.)). Id. ¶ 8. As a
`
`result of Mr. Hurst’s involvement as trial counsel for Petitioners in co-pending
`
`district court litigation over the involved patent, Mr. Hurst has obtained familiarity
`
`with the involved patent, the prior art, and the various issues raised in this
`
`proceeding. Moreover, Mr. Hurst has reviewed the involved patent, the Petition,
`
`the prior art, and all other cited materials. Id. Given his extensive patent litigation
`
`experience—including patent litigation on behalf of Petitioners—and his
`
`familiarity with the instant Petition, the cited materials, and the patented
`
`technology, Mr. Hurst has established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`this proceeding. Id.
`
`Mr. Hurst has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the
`
`C.F.R., and he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id. ¶¶ 5-6.
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`Mr. Hurst has not applied to appear pro hac vice in the last three years in any
`
`matter before the Board. Id. ¶ 7.
`
`Given that Mr. Hurst is a trusted advisor to Petitioners on matters involving
`
`the litigation of patent disputes—including patent litigation concerning the patent
`
`at issue here—and his familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding, Petitioners respectfully submit that they have shown good cause for
`
`the Board to recognize Mr. Hurst as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`III. AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION OF INDIVIDUAL SEEKING TO
`APPEAR
`
`This Motion is accompanied by a Declaration of Mr. Hurst as required by
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /Samuel S. Park/
`Samuel S. Park
`Reg. No. 59,656
`Lead Counsel for Petitioners Actavis,
`Inc., Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.,
`Actavis Pharma, Inc., Amneal
`Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Amneal
`Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC,
`Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Aurobindo
`Pharma USA, Inc., Breckenridge
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., Vennoot
`Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Sandoz Inc.,
`Sun Pharma Global FZE, and Sun
`Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
`
`4
`
`the Order.
`
`Dated: August 19, 2014
`
`
`
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 W. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Telephone: (312) 558-7931
`Fax: (312) 558-5700
`Email: spark@winston.com
`
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) and 42.105(a), I certify that, on August 19,
`
`2014, I caused to be served true and correct copies of the foregoing
`
`“PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JAMES F.
`
`HURST UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10” by electronic mail on the following attorneys:
`
`
`
`Andrea G. Reister (Reg. No. 36,253)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`areister@cov.com
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Enrique D. Longton (Reg. No. 47,304)
`Gregory S. Discher (Reg No. 42,488)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`rlongton@cov.com
`gidscher@cov.com
`
`Backup Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Samuel S. Park/
`Samuel S. Park
`Reg. No. 59,656
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 19, 2014
`
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 W. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Telephone: (312) 558-7931
`Fax: (312) 558-5700
`Email: spark@winston.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket